The Sackler family owns Purdue Pharmaceuticals, which manufactures and markets (ed) OxyContin, a highly addictive opioid. More than 200,000 people have died of opioid addiction.
The Sackler family is listed by Forbes as one of the richest families in America with a net worth of $14 billion.
The Sackler name is engraved on museums, libraries, and universities. Some of those institutions have removed the Sackler name or said they do not welcome future donations.
The Sacklers are major supporters of charter schools. Jonathan Sackler funded ConnCAN and 50CAN. His daughter Madeline made a movie glorifying Eva Moskowitz’s charter chain, called “The Lottery.”
WASHINGTON, May 21 – Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) led a bicameral group of lawmakers in introducing the Opioid Crisis Accountability and Results Act, as Vermont Attorney General T. J. Donovan announced a lawsuit today against former Purdue Pharma CEO Richard Sackler and seven family members who served on Purdue’s Board of Directors for deliberately misrepresenting the risks of the drug OxyContin.
The Opioid Crisis Accountability and Results Act, introduced with Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Representatives Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), prohibits illegal marketing and distribution of opioids; creates criminal liability for top company executives; penalizes drug manufacturers who illegally advertise, market or distribute an opioid product; and requires drug makers to reimburse the country for the negative economic impact of their products.
The opioid epidemic is estimated to cost the United States over $78 billion per year. In 2016 alone, over 42,000 people died from opioid overdoses. From 1999 to 2016, the number of opioid overdose deaths more than tripled, and U.S. life expectancy as a whole fell for the third year in a row in 2017, due in part to the increase in opioid-related deaths.
“We know that pharmaceutical companies lied about the addictive impacts of opioids they manufactured. They knew how dangerous these products were, but refused to tell doctors and patients. While some of these companies have made billions each year in profits, not one of them has been held fully accountable for its role in an epidemic that is killing tens of thousands of Americans every year,” Sanders said. “At a time when local, state and federal governments are spending many billions of dollars a year dealing with the impact of the opioid epidemic, we must hold the pharmaceutical companies and executives that created the crisis accountable.”
“Communities across the country are being ripped apart by the opioid epidemic. Multi-billion-dollar pharmaceutical companies and their executives reaped large profits for years while their questionable marketing and distribution practices precipitated a devastating public health crisis,” Bennet said. “It is far past time for Congress to ensure opioid manufacturers, distributors, and executives fund our response to the crisis they created. Our bill will support programs that combat the opioid crisis and ensure we hold companies and their executives accountable for any future misconduct.”
“When I visit the communities that have been ravaged by the opioid epidemic, I see the victims of unscrupulous pharmaceutical companies that have put profits over the patients they were intended to serve,” said Khanna. “This bill holds opioid manufacturers and their executives accountable for decades of dishonest sales practices and malicious drug distribution. Over the past 20 years, more than 400,000 people have died of opioid overdoses, and millions more have been stricken by addiction. Their loved ones deserve justice.”
“Opioid companies have lied, cheated, and profited from the addiction and death left in the wake of the crisis they helped create. The criminal nature of these companies’ actions have destroyed families as well as strained the criminal justice and public health systems,” said Rep. Tulsi Gabbard. “This bill would create tools to hold companies and executives accountable for preying on patients using deceptive marketing tactics, as they proliferated these highly-addictive and destructive drugs on our streets.”
Any company found in violation of the Opioid Crisis Accountability and Results Act would be fined 25 percent of the profits from their opioid products. Drug manufacturers who illegally advertise, market or distribute an opioid product would also be stripped of any remaining period of market exclusivity for that opioid product, and would lose half of the remaining exclusivity period on other opioid products they have on the market. The legislation would also fine any company found liable for contributing to the opioid epidemic $7.8 billion—10 percent of the annual cost of the opioid crisis.
Organizations endorsing the legislation include Public Citizen, CREDO, American Medical Student Association (AMSA), National Collaborative for Health Equity and Prescription Justice.
Sanders contact: Keane_Bhatt@sanders.senate.gov
Bennet contact: Courtney_Gidner@bennet.senate.gov
Khanna contact: Heather.Purcell@mail.house.gov
Gabbard contact: Haig.Hovsepian@mail.house.gov

It’s a slap on the wrist (fined 25% of profits from opioids) but I guess it’s a start. Every single Sackler who participated in this disaster should have to dose themselves with their own medication (oxycontin) for 4 weeks and then self wean.
LikeLike
Agree! The Sackler need to take Their opioids and become totally constipated, too. Or maybe they are full of —— — — already because they are taking their own opioids.
LikeLike
“Any company found in violation of the Opioid Crisis Accountability and Results Act would be fined 25 percent of the profits from their opioid products.”
Why only fine 25%? This is ill-gotten money. Why not fine the company 98% and reimburse money to the families who most likely lost breadwinners?
The Slackers are getting off way too easy. They don’t deserve any of this money. Criminal liability should throw the book at them.
LikeLike
Even you don’t go far enough. If you or I were caught with ill-gotten gains, we’d have to pay back 100% of it plus penalties, fees and interest.
However, what’s most likely to actually happen is what happened with Big Tobacco. The government levied a “big” fine, supposedly to go to help people addicted to tobacco and suffering tobacco-related diseases (most of which got laundered through “non-profits” back into the hands of Big Tobacco, with kick-backs to the Congresscritters). But the fine was paltry in comparison to what they would have had to pay out in lawsuits and in exchange for the fine, the government indemnified them against private lawsuits.
LikeLike
If you or I did what the execs of companies like Perdue did ,– effectively murdered hundreds of thousands of people – we would either get the death penalty or life in prison without the possibility of parole.
LikeLike
Well, yes, SDP, there is that….
LikeLike
CONGRESSCRITTERS!!!! My chuckle for today.
LikeLike
“On Thursday five more states filed lawsuits accusing Purdue Pharma of illegally marketing and selling opioids. Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, West Virginia and Wisconsin joined 39 other states to file lawsuits targeting the company and the Sackler family.”
The family is up the creek and heading into a swamp of lawsuits. Bankruptcy seems to the path to a bailout. I agree with LisaM about the penalty and hope many more groups connected to medical care sign on as endorsers.
https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/sackler-family-divided-on-how-to-face-oxycontin-lawsuits-1.7254167
LikeLike
Yay!
LikeLike
Thank you for sharing this – these companies also produce vaccines – not so sure why everyone seems to trust what they say about vaccines. There was legislation in the past created so that no one is allowed to sue pharmaceutical companies for any damages brought on by these injections. There has been no double blind placebo tests done on these products but the sheep still believe whole heartedly that these companies would only lie about opioids???? This impacts public schools!
>
LikeLike
Yes, the pharma companies have a bad reputation. That doesn’t mean, however, that vaccines are unsafe. There is not one shred of evidence that vaccines are dangerous. They are, in fact, one of the greatest medical advances in history and have saved millions of lives and nearly eradicated deadly diseases. It’s really unfortunate the confluence of events that’s convincing people not to vaccinate because now easily controlled diseases like measles and polio are making come-backs. Please get yourself and your family vaccinated. Herd immunity only works if the herd is, in fact, immunized.
LikeLike
Just to sound a note of caution… I hope the legislation is precise and accurate in its definition of illegal marketing and distribution. Already the reverberations of this scandal have done as much if not more damage to the many sufferers of chronic pain as the periodic clamp-downs of DEA on pain mgt clinics.
There is a huge host out there of autoimmune-disease patients using modest amounts of opioids to manage chronic pain who periodically, for political reasons, get cut off/ forceably weaned/ suddenly told to “try” NSAIDS or auto-feedback or accupuncture [as if they hadn’t already lol]. Autoimmune disease has risen sharply, occurring nearly 3 times as often as a few decades ago, and many of these diseases cause lifelong debilitating pain. Opioids, when properly prescribed & managed, free many of these people to lead productive lives, & allow even the worst off to get around a bit & not have to depend on 24/7 health aides.
We need to keep in mind that the opioid epidemic was created not just by one bad-guy company, but by a virtually privatized healthcare system that leaves medical research, product devpt, sales & marketing in the hands of for-profit corporations, providing weak, midget counterbalance by govt-funded research & FDA.
This scene has been going on for generations. The least-understood medical issues are the most vulnerable to govtl neglect/ underfunding/ public shaming. In recent years repeated harm has been done (tho on a smaller scale so not as visible) by other drugs in fields we do not care to give weight to, like substance-abuse & mental health. Chronic pain is currently one of those fields, dominated by brain/ neurology, where medical science has a long way to go. Let’s not forget that cancer was once one of them—just 50 yrs ago, cancer patients were allowed to writhe in pain until death w/o the benefit of palliative opioids due to ignorance and prejudice.
Nothing will change if we keep just spanking one company every decade w/o systemic reform.
LikeLike
“We need to keep in mind that the opioid epidemic was created not just by one bad-guy company, but by a virtually privatized healthcare system”
Yes, doctors and pharmacies played a huge role in this.
And it was not just a few bad apples.
Ask yourself this. Why were so many doctors and dentists so easily swayed from the position that opioids were highly addictive and should only be given to a restricted group of people (eg, chronic pain sufferers) who really needed them to the position that opioids were not addictive and could therefore be given to pretty much anyone with minor pain, including children?
Are doctors in the US really that gullible? Or were the financial incentives just too enticing?
Make no mistake. This is an indictment of the entire medical profession.
I’d say the doctors are at least as responsible for what happened but no one is suing the American Medical Association or other similar groups.
LikeLike
And unfortunately, it has already become more difficult for the people who really need opioids to get them.
The decisions about these drugs are not based on science, but on money.
In many cases, the companies that produce the drugs are actually allowed to do the “safety” studies, which is simply idiotic on the part of the government agency regulating the drug companies.
It’s a sure invitation to fraud.
LikeLike
Like Boeing having the authority to decide whether its planes are fit to fly.
LikeLike
A completely independent (independent of Boeing and independent of the FAA) team of knowledgeable scientists and engineers should be tasked with assessing the safety of the Boeing 737max. They could be drawn from universities.
Neither Boeing nor FAA should/can be relied upon to provide an unbiased assessment.
No one should trust either organization at this point.
LikeLike
It would certainly appear that the American medical system is as corrupt as the financial system.
LikeLike
SDP: Yes, the medical profession in corrupt. I’ve already said that I was thrown out of a natural history study at the National Institutes of Health because it was officially declared that in the future I might become a threat to myself or others if I didn’t get psychiatric help. I had used alternative healing practices to shrink a brain tumor, which showed up on an NIH MRI, and my hearing had improved. This awful occurrence is not acceptable.
The Western medical establishment doesn’t want people to heal. Diseased people are walking ATM’s for the medical establishment. That is why cures for diseases are rarely developed. Dr. Royal Rife created a cure for cancer in the 1930’s and he died penniless. His process was working with other doctors but they were told that if they continued to use that equipment they would loose their medical licenses.
Qigong healing is being studied by the alternative medicine section of NIH and it receives really bad funding.
LikeLike
Yes, and the medical establishment is currently going after doctors who recognize and treat the reality of chronic Lyme disease.
I many cases, the doctors are being essentially labelled as quacks just because they listen to their patients when those patients tell them that they still experience the symptoms of Lyme disease after they have been treated with the standard two week regimen of antibiotics.
I know for a fact that two weeks is not always sufficient because I contracted Lymd disease, got treated for two weeks and then had the symptoms cone back with a vengeance.
It took me 7 months, going to 3 different hospitals and seeing about ten different doctors before I found a doctor who would give me a longer term of antibiotics which cleared up the problem completely.
Who are the quacks? The ones who stick their heads in the sand and deny the reality of what their patients are telling them.
LikeLike
By the way, I knew with certainty that all my symptoms were due to Lyme disease because ALl my symptoms started shortly after I was bit by a tick and developed the definitive rash.
But because I had been treated (briefly) with antibiotics and my Lyme test kept coming back negative ( I later learned the test was so unreliable as to be essentially useless) it took me 7 months (and several thousand dollars worth of tests for stuff I knew I did not have) to simply get what I requested: more antibiotics. The doctors I saw were so closed minded that they would not believe what I was telling them. Either that, or they simply wanted to make a lot of money for the hospitals they worked for by giving unnecessary tests.
Ironically, one of the doctors who denies the reality of chronic Lyme disease is someone at Yale university who originally identified the bacteria that cause Lyme disease.
LikeLike
Just to be clear.
I did not have chronic Lyme, but if it had gone untreated much longer, I may very well have ended up with it.
LikeLike
SDP so sorry for your troubles, & glad you recovered, no thanks to asinine protocols apparently still in place. Lyme has been a horror show for people I know well in NJ. One nbr 3 blocks away kept getting neg results & was refused treatment. Fortunately his wife is a nurse: when he got Bell’s Palsy she fought & got results thro connections. My next-door nbr (biking team buddy of the 1st guy) went for yrs w/o appropriate treatment (neg tests again) & was swiftly becoming debilitated—told it was ‘arthritis.’ Again lucky w/spouse: a Merck scientist, she got a friend w/inside track who put him on hep-line antibiotics for 8 mos—but it all had to be hush-hush. He came back nearly 100% w/some residual arthritis. And another friend one block down got it well before the other 2 when even less was done treatment-wise, & way too late. She is still frail & semi-invalid 20 yrs later.
LikeLike
Carol, I think that your accurate observation [diseased people are walking ATM’s for the med establishment] is a function of the way we deliver healthcare. If we had nationalized, single-payer healthcare, the focus would be on what healthcare costs the country—as opposed to viewing it as a thriving private industry.
My eldest (now deceased) had a rare autoimmune disease lifelong. I found very few rheumatologists with experience in treating it in the metro-NY area. My best source of info was UK blogs & research. Over there, rare diseases of this type—chronic & life-long—are not just ignored because of too few “consumers.” People go to the dr & keep seeking better treatment, because cost is not an issue—so the medical establishment is more aware of these diseases in the first place. But there’s also a better grasp of the cost issues involved: sufferers of rare life-long debilitating disease—who are actually being treated & not just shrugged off—cost the healthcare system a lot more per capita than the average citizen, so more attention gets paid.
And that cost incentive spurs the healthcare establishment to research every possible source of treatment incl complementary med, Eastern med, ayurvedic, you name it. (Another bonus: in everyday health issues there’s much more investment in prevention).
LikeLike
This article comes from the alternative medicine section in the National Institutes of Health. They are concerned about the opioid problem.
…….
From the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, one of the National Institutes of Health:
Perspectives on Pain Research
Director’s Page
Helene Langevin, M.D.
May 14, 2019
…It’s important to note that NCCIH’s ability to be responsive to the public health crisis is a byproduct of longstanding work by the Center to establish and refine rigorous methods for exploring mind and body approaches and natural products—modalities that can present unique research challenges. Bravo to the Center for yielding the research infrastructure that’s urgently needed now to explore pressing research questions on pain!
The opportunity for NCCIH’s research to improve people’s lives is clear. A better understanding of the mechanisms of action of nondrug pain management and how to effectively integrate nonpharmacologic approaches into care will help support the self-management that is increasingly being recognized as an important part of the overall treatment strategy for chronic pain. NCCIH’s work to discover the underlying mechanisms of pain will help researchers design better treatments and predict which people are most likely to respond. And our continued investment in translational research that transfers knowledge from the bench to the clinic is critical, especially for NCCIH-supported researchers testing the safety and efficacy of pain management interventions.
With the commitment and focus of multiple NIH institutes and centers, other Federal agencies, and research institutions to deepen our understanding of pain, including the complex array of connections between the brain and the body, I am confident that, together, we can reshape how we think about pain and generate much-needed solutions.
http://nccih.nih.gov/about/offices/od/perspectives-on-pain-research?nav=govd
LikeLike
I am relieved to read this, Carol. I didn’t know that there was such a branch of NIH. Perhaps it takes a slow-motion tragedy like the opiod epidemic to get these tradl & non-tradl institutes working together. But I worry that NIH is a small skiff compared to the medical/ pharmaceutical cruise ship, especially in this era ofoverweening corporate influence.
Another issue I have is that looking over their website I see little or no research including psychiatric/ psychological research. “Mind and body” is the right approach but not if limited to yoga & meditation. Neurology is great but it’s just the body component of mind-body. This was a serious pbm for us because my son also suffered from bipolar. On the one hand this limited meds he could take, & worse, the 2 diseases worked against each other. Flare-ups of one caused flare-ups of the other, in a spiral. We learned the hard way that phys & mental medicine here in the US are ships passing in the night. Psychiatry/ psychology are considered so separate as to be irrelevant by the phys med establishment.
What I found particularly frustrating in trying to help my son: there is ample research showing that neural pathways for pain are the same pathways used for transmitting the key neurotransmitters involved in psychiatric illness (dopamine & serotonin). And those neurotransmitters are significantly affected by the way the body processes various food elements— a role seems obvious there for complementary medicine. Yet there’s little that proceeds from that research to clinical application. We found (too late) exactly 2 places in the US that feed this kind of mind-body research directly into clinical practice: Howard Hughes Institute, & the Mind-Body Institute at Johns Hopkins [sadly the latter has lost funding & been rolled back into the psychiatric dept.]
LikeLike
bethree5: There are a lot of different branches at the National Institute of Health. I was in NINDS, a neurological section.
Created by the U.S. Congress in 1950, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) has occupied a central position in the world of neuroscience for nearly 60 years. The mission of NINDS is to reduce the burden of neurological disease—a burden borne by every age group, every …
The psychiatrist at NIH who diagnosed me with severe mental illness came from the NIMH [National Institute of Mental Health] section. Obviously there are some psychiatrists there who have no morals or ethics. I’m sure I’m not the only person who was brutally dismissed from a research program.
Google or DuckDuckGo to get more information. Hope this helps.
…………………..
Research Conducted at NIMH (Intramural Research Program)
The Division of Intramural Research Programs (IRP) at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) is the internal research division of the NIMH. The division plans and conducts basic, clinical, and translational research to advance understanding of the diagnosis, causes, treatment, and prevention of psychiatric disorders. NIMH IRP conducts state-of-the-art research that utilizes the unique resources of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), provides an environment conducive to the training and development of clinical and basic scientists, and in part, complements extramural research activities.
Investigators Home
NIMH Intramural Research Program (IRP) investigators — which include scientists, physicians, and clinicians — conduct research ranging from studies into mechanisms of normal brain function at the behavioral, systems, cellular, and molecular levels, to clinical investigations into the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of mental illness.
Gree Blue Neurons
Intramural Research Groups
Over 40 groups conduct research from basic neuroscience to clinical trials of mental illness, brain function and behavior at the NIH main campus in Bethesda, Maryland. Learn more about their research projects, staff, publications, and resources.
LikeLike