Grant Frost writes here about the plans of the new Conservative premier of Alberta to fix the schools by introducing charters and market competition. Grant attended the last NPE conference in Indianapolis. He makes clear here what has been muddy in the U.S. Privatization of public schools is a conservative goal.
Frost writes:
There is a very famous anecdote about McDonald’s founder Ray Kroc and his take on business. According to legend, after speaking with an MBA class at the University of Texas in 1974, Kroc accepted an invitation to join some of the students for few few beers. During that rather laid-back social event, Kroc asked the MBA students, “What business am I in?” — to which all the students replied, quite obviously: “The hamburger business.” Kroc paused (presumably for dramatic effect) and told them they were wrong. He was not in the hamburger business. He was in the real-estate business.
Every McDonald’s restaurant that I have ever seen sits on a prime piece of real estate in whichever town it’s implanted itself. By some accounts, McDonald’s is the largest owner of real estate in the world — most of it, of course, purchased using the proceeds from the sales of the aforementioned hamburgers. But, in the end, the burgers are just the means to the end.
Now, take that same business model and apply it to local public schools. Once Kenney allows charter school operators to own property, the same premise will come into play.
Charter schools, it should be remembered, are set up to operate outside the public system. They are offered up as alternatives to traditional schools, usually after a fairly long and substantive campaign has been undertaken to convince the general population that traditional schools are failing….
The beauty in this for the edu-preneurs is that once the public buys in, parents will line up around the block to get their kids into the charter school, even in the face of evidence that the public system is actually doing well. After all, parents want what is best for their kids, and using another business strategy called FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) charter school proponents find it relatively easy to exploit parental unease.
And, of course, every single student comes to the door of the new charter school with a backpack full of taxpayer dollars in the form of per-student funding, a percentage of which can now be used by the charter school backers to buy a piece of what is undoubtedly prime real estate.
So, among all the rhetoric coming from Kenney about pipelines, the environment and student GSAs, this is one little nugget that — should it be acted upon — will open up the Canadian education system in ways that we could never have imagined possible a generation ago. Canadian schools will be open for business, with the ground they sit upon being the ultimate prize.
Welcome, Alberta, to the era of McEducation. It probably will not be long before the rest of us follow your lead.

Word!
LikeLike
Diane . . . to “fix the schools . . . .” That statement is like asking someone: How many times did you beat your wife?” It assumes a level of need (for fixing) that they’d rather assume than accounted for. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
exposing an essential truth: schools are not broken, kids are not failures, teachers are not BAD
LikeLike
I don’t know if it will fly. I’m Canadian but have lived in Los Angeles since 1976. I taught in LAUSD and my sons attended LAUSD schools. I don’t hear from relatives and friends that they want alternatives to their local schools. Teachers are very well paid and class sizes are very decent with lots of resources to help students when needed. We’ll have to see how far this goes, but I have my doubts that parents will want to mess with an already top education system.
LikeLike
I hope Canadians reject all the lies that will be told about their system to try to move this agenda forward. I hope they value what they have and refuse to throw caution to the wind as we have done in the US.
LikeLike
Convincing a government to privatize public education takes a great deal of bribery, I mean lobbying and campaign donating money. I could be wrong, but I’m not sure the billionaires have it in them at this point. They’re losing the prized U.S. Also, it seems to me that Canada has a pretty strong immune system to fight GERMs.
LikeLike
Exactly right.
Privatization depends on bribery.
Bribing politicians of both parties to sell out their public schools.
Funny thing, Republicans send their kids to public schools too.
Nearly 90% of US kids in public schools.
LikeLike
Race to the Top was all just a big VAM bribe too.
LikeLike
It is not surprising that another free market fool is trying to inflict bad ideas on Canadian schools. The free market approach may make money for a few individuals, but it does nothing to improve education. Every country that has gone on the free market bird walk regrets the decision. Canada should look at Chile, Sweden and the US before jumping on the sinking ship of privatization.
One of the big motives underlying privatization in the US is also real estate. Land in western Canada is pricey so the scheming Kroc sees the same plan that many developers in the US have exploited. Many states have actually turned public school real estate over to privatizers, a gigantic loss for the public. I do not know if the laws in Canada will permit this. Beyond this scheme they also set up crooked EMOs from which they can lease property at an exorbitant rate. The public get continuously burned with this arrangement. Some charter school owners are also developers, and they develop the property around the charter school. Unless there are laws that prohibit this egregious profiteering at public expense, we will see more of it anywhere there is money to be made, even Canada.
LikeLike
It’s consistent in ed reform to never see public schools or public school students mentioned – they never have any positive plans or ideas for public schools.
Instead, our kids are the claimed indirect beneficiaries of them promoting the schools they prefer.
Public school students deserve people in government who value them and their schools, and intend to work on their behalf. No public school family should accept this second class status, where our kids and schools are relegated to the default- the schools and students ed reformers include only as an afterthought and only as indirect beneficiaries of their “choice” ideology.
We’re paying all these people. They’re supposed to return ACTUAL VALUE, not to the set of students they prefer with some trickle down proposed benefit to the students they don’t prefer, but directly.
That is not an unreasonable demand. It is the minimum we should expect from public employees. I don’t really care if they have ideological objections to “government schools” and labor unions. If they refuse to return any value they should be replaced by people who will. It is not fair that public school students don’t have real advocates. That has to change.
LikeLike
Betsy DeVos dismisses every single public school student with a wave of her hand as “buildings”. There are students in those buildings, just like their are students in the “buildings” she funds and promotes and supports- charter and private school “buildings”.
We don’t have to accept our students being relegated to this lesser category. We can hire people who are committed to our students and passionate advocates for them. Those people exist. Not within ed reform they don’t, but there’s no rule that says we have to hire exclusively within their echo chamber.
They have not benefited 90% of the students in this country, and in many cases they have HARMED public school students. They should be replaced with people who offer some positive plan or idea or proposal.
LikeLike
After spending the last 6 months promoting private school vouchers the huge group of public employees at the US Department of Education turned this week to the other set of students they work for- charter school students:
“U.S. Department of Education
🚨 POP QUIZ 🚨
When was the first law passed allowing the establishment of public charter schools?”
Nothing, nada, zip for or any behalf of any public school student anywhere. They’re almost completely excluded from any mention in the huge public agency that supposedly serves them, other than as potential drug addicts and school shooters.
This is an inaccurate depiction of our schools and students and it is not fair to them. They are being sacrificed for this ideological goal, and you’re all paying for it. Millions and millions of dollars. We’re publicly funding an anti-public school and anti-public school STUDENT marketing campaign.
LikeLike
Why should we be surprised. All human history has been about real estate. The more people, the bigger the fight. Why did the neoconservative voices of the second Bush administration scream for the sale of TVA? Why does the hostility toward federal lands in the west exist? Real estate. The ultimate reason for Hitler’s rise to power? He claimed the German people were hemmed in by inferior races. They needed leibenstraum, elbow room, so that their greatness could be made manifest. Real estate. The warlords of Japan pushed out the democrats with the solution to the Great Depression: expansion into Manchuria. Real estate is power.
LikeLike
Just heard this on the ABC World News w/David Muir–the S.A.T. is going to be building in an “adversity” factor into scoring S.A.T.s (i.e., taking factors such as poverty, violence,
etc., being taken into account for students who experience the aforementioned taking the tests).
Hmmm…why am I skeptical…???
LikeLike
It’s a business
It’s always about the market share and bottom line
LikeLike
Yes. & I wonder just how this “adversity” score will be obtained.
I will be delving into this as soon as I can…
LikeLike