Samuel Abrams, Director of the Centerfor the Study of Privatization at Teachers College, Columbia University, reports here about the introduction of charter schools and vouchers on the Island after the hurricane Maria.
Abrams explains why the charter industry will not be able to turn Puerto Rico into New Orleans.
Unlike Hurricane Katina, many schools in PR were not destroyed. Unlike Nola, there remains an intact teachers’ union to fight against complete privatization. In New Orleans, all the teachers were fired and the Union was crushed.
He writes:
“The island’s Education Reform Act, approved in March 2018 in the wake of Hurricane María, which wrought havoc the previous September, introduced charter schools as well as vouchers, with the stipulation that no more than 10 percent of schools could be charter schools and no more than 3 percent of students could attend private or non-district public schools with the use of vouchers.
“In the first year following the Education Reform Act, one charter school opened: Vimenti, an elementary school in San Juan operated by the Boys and Girls Club of Puerto Rico.
“According to an article published by Noticel,Vimenti started in August 2018 with a kindergarten and first grade, enrolling 58 students in total–31 of whom come from the neighborhood, 27 of whom come from nearby, and 13 of whom are classified for special education. The plan is to add one grade per year as students progress through school.
“Supplementary funding for Vimenti, reported Noticel, comes from the Colibri Foundation, which donated $1 million, and the singer Marc Anthony, who gave $500,000.
“In the hearings last week, the Department of Education considered proposals for four more charter schools in San Juan, five in Humacao, one in Bayamón, three in Caguas, six in Ponce, two in Arecibo, and nine in Mayaguez.
“In contrast to Vimenti, these schools would not be new schools built one grade at a time but, rather, conversions from traditional schools to charter schools.
“According to a school administrator with direct knowledge of the hearing process, it is expected that at least 13 of the proposed conversions will be approved for the 2019-2020 year while the remaining 17 will be approved for the 2020-2021 year.
“For charter schools, the baseline for determining the 10 percent was the number of schools as of August 15, 2018, which means that if additional public schools across the island are closed, the proportion of charter schools could in time exceed 10 percent. The government of Puerto Rico closed nearly 25 percent of the island’s schools following Hurricane María. Before the storm, there were 1,110 schools. A year later, according to a report by Education Week, there were 847.
“Whether 14 schools or 31 in 2019-2020, the number of charter schools in Puerto Rico would mark striking growth. By comparison, Minnesota, the state that introduced charter schools with legislation in 1991, opened one charter school in 1992 and six more in 1993. By 2017, there were 164 charter schools across the state, enrolling 6.5 percent of the state’s public school students.”
Ironically, Abrams points out, Puerto Rico already has a choice sector within the public system.
“Although charter schools and vouchers are new to Puerto Rico, the concept of alternative forms of public school management is not new. The island’s Instituto Nueva Escuela (INE), in fact, sets the international standard for running neighborhood public Montessori schools.
“INE, celebrated in a recent story published by El Nuevo Dia, comprises 44 schools across the island enrolling 14,600 students. Like conventional neighborhood public schools, schools in the INE network require no application. Unlike conventional neighborhood public schools, the schools in this network all employ the Montessori child-centered curriculum and get significant supplementary funding from foundations.
“According to Ana María García, the founder and director of INE, the network spends 10 percent more per pupil–or $6,600 compared to $6,000.
“García was pressured by the Department of Education, she said in an interview in San Juan last week, to transform INE into a charter network, but she refused, contending that fundamental to INE was the idea that the network’s schools be open to all students in the neighborhood, without any application process. García prevailed.
“In recognition of García’s work, as El Nuevo Dia reported in a separate story, the American Montessori Society will be presenting García with its highest honor, its Living Legacy Award, at its annual meeting in March. “
There’s a Charlie Brown bit I’m sure you all know …
Puerto Rico is a target of privatization like so many poor communities. The privatizers are eager to shift public resources into private pockets before the public realizes their public assets have been appropriated. Privatizers want to act quickly before resistance sets in and countermands their smash and grab. At least Puerto Rico will not be another New Orleans, but it continues the takeover school legacy of the poorest students.
Are these so called Montessori schools part of the pay for “success” scheme? Will these schools really be child centered or will they be some on-line version of Montessori? Will it look like the Wildflower School which is the “brainchild” of Chan Zuckerberg. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2018-11-20-kid-tracking-sensors-may-not-be-the-wildest-thing-about-this-montessori-model
If you read the link, it describes a rather creepy surveillance system that collects data. The only link I can see between Montessori and “reform” is that Montessori promotes individual interaction with various hands-on materials. Perhaps the surveillance is geared to identify those most likely to accept the tedium and monotony of personalized learning.
find the drones
According to the article, & its linked article in PR’s main newspaper, PR’s Montessori’s are neighborhood public schools. They are existing publicschs which have applied & been authorized to adopt Montessori curriculum (44 did so, mostly in 2015-16). The effort was made official in 2015 w/the establishment of the Asst Ministry of Montessori Education (part of PR’s Ed Dept). School transition is supported by the Instituto Nueva Escuela (INE), a non-profit formed around longtime American Montessori Society (AMS) teacher-training in PR. From the linked article’s interviews, it appears that the Montessori movement in PR [at least 20 yrs old] has been along traditional roots, i.e., bringing foundation-supported free ed to disadvantaged children. These folks can be thanked for organizing the local pushback against the govt’s efforts to convert Montessori’s to charters.
As near as I can figure, Wildflower schools, tho they call themselves Montessori, are not associated with the AMS– therefore almost certainly not part of PR’s Montessori pubschs.They are a tiny, 5-y.o. network of tech-oriented schools whose CEO is a 10-yr vet of TFA. They have 3 PreK’s & 1 SrHisch-level academy in PR.
Sickening … the vultures are busy at work.
They’ll see the same thing happen that we’ve seen all over the US though- the entire policy focus will become supporting and promoting charter and private schools.
It isn’t that public schools will disappear. They’ll be deliberately neglected and ignored in favor of the privatized schools and systems ed reform prefers.
That’s happened in every single state they dominate and at the federal level.
This may happen if the public fails to block the efforts to privatize by voting out complicit representatives. People intent on preserving authentic public education can and must make a difference.
Go now to any ed reform echo chamber site and look for mention of Puerto Rico’s PUBLIC schools. How are THOSE schools are doing post-disaster?
All you’ll see if charter and voucher promotion because all the echo chamber care about are charter and voucher promotion.
It’s as if the public schools don’t exist. That’s deliberate.
I’m confused. Why aren’t we investing our public tax dollars into established public schools in Puerto Rico? There is room for change and monies from these kind investors could make that change without starting additional private/charter schools. We all know that people invest in charter schools–BECAUSE IT IS AN INVESTMENT. They get a return on their money at taxpayer expense. Shhhh…we are not suppose to know that.
Why wouldn’t Montesori, et al, invest in the public good first? Are they able to make money on privatization?
First, identify weaknesses and make our public schools better–if that is what is needed.
Use the money of these kind investors to bolster public school education–afterall, it is all about the children’s welfare first? Right?
I Googled Ana Maria Garcia and found two women by that name. I think the complete name for the correct advocate for children and their education is Ana Maria Garcia Blanco.
Here’s a piece she co-wrote: “A Community-Based Approach to Education Reform in Puerto Rico”
https://books.google.com/books?id=nlY2Kmf9b0sC&pg=PA157&lpg=PA157&dq=Ana+Mar%C3%ADa+Garc%C3%ADa+Puerto+Rico+education&source=bl&ots=82Eb87Ocg2&sig=ACfU3U0vipIYVKc3_zLrZK5xYpZL0eQaBQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjY_5PJt8jgAhUlHDQIHflCDPAQ6AEwDXoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=Ana%20Mar%C3%ADa%20Garc%C3%ADa%20Puerto%20Rico%20education&f=false
Puerto Rican public education should view the self-appointed role of the Center for American Progress in the island’s recovery, with suspicion. CAP is Gates-Funded. CAP advocates for school privatization and, the person heading CAP’s plan in P.R. is a former Kaplan executive.