We have long known that some charters pay exorbitant salaries to their “CEOs.” Eve Moskowitz gets $600,000 or $700,000 a year, or more, with bonuses. Others get close to half a million.
Now Rachel Cohen reports in the Washington City Paper that some charter leaders there are raking in big salaries.
Their teachers, not so much.
Cohen explains that teachers’s salaries are lower in the DC charter sector than in the DC public schools. Actually, no one knows what they are because the information is not collected or reported. Not even teachers in a charter know if there is a salary schedule. It’s a secret.
But there is information about the salaries of charter leaders.
She writes:
Though charter teachers earn much less than their DCPS counterparts, administrative pay in the charter sector has been rising at a fast clip, according to public records.
According to salary information posted each year on the DC Public Charter School Board’s website, between 2016 and 2018, staff working at the DC Public Charter School Board received raises averaging 12 percent annually. And in 2017, according to nonprofit tax filings, the average annual salary for the top leader at each D.C. charter was $146,000. Only three charter heads earned less than $100,000, and eight earned more than $200,000.
Summary statistics aside, the sector is replete with examples of steep salaries and quick raises. Allison Kokkoros, the head of Carlos Rosario International Public Charter School and the highest-paid charter official in D.C., received a 24 percent salary increase between 2015 and 2016, from $248,000 to $307,000. Then, in 2017, she received another 76 percent increase, bumping her compensation to $541,000. Patricia Brantley, head of Friendship Public Charter School, received a 33 percent raise between 2016 and 2017, increasing her pay from $231,000 to $308,000.
Outside of school heads, other high-ranking charter administrators also claimed significant salaries. In 2017, KIPP DC had four administrators making approximately $200,000 annually, and its president earned $257,000. The chair of Friendship, Donald Hense, earned over $355,000 annually between 2015 and 2017, and its CFO earned between $171,000 and $197,000 in each of those years. DC Prep’s Chief Academic Officer earned $203,000 in 2015, and $223,000 one year later. The board chair of AppleTree Early Learning earned over $231,000 annually each year since 2015, reaching $245,000 in 2017. 990 tax forms list another 110 charter administrators earning between $100,000 and $200,000 annually, although this list is likely not comprehensive, as schools are only required to disclose their top five highest-paid employees. 2018 figures are not yet available.
In one remarkable instance, Sonia Gutierrez, the founder and former CEO of Carlos Rosario, who now sits on the school’s board, earned $1,890,000 between 2015 and 2017. Board chair Patricia Sosa, when contacted about this large sum, says much of that had been awarded as deferred compensation from Gutierrez’s time working between July 2010 and December 2015. However, according to tax records, she was also paid an average of $326,000 annually during that period.
It’s all about “saving the children.”

The top-heavy structure is an issue in the Chicago charter teachers strike, too:
“Chicago International, a nonprofit group, receives funding for students enrolled in all of its schools and distributes that money to the schools, taking a cut for its own management costs. The individual operators — a mix of nonprofit and for-profit groups — also assess fees.
Teachers and the union argue that the fees leave little for the classroom and even less to pay teacher salaries. Teachers at the schools are paid significantly less than Chicago Public Schools teachers.”
This is a LOT of layers:
“Unlike charter networks that run schools directly, Chicago International operates more like a contractor: It hires other organizations to run schools. The network oversees 14 schools run by five different charter management organizations, some of which subcontract management to a third operator.”
There could be three layers of managing contractors before a penny reaches the students. They’re all taking a cut.
I remember the Obama Administration holding forums to “empower” teachers. It was all very progressive and heart-warming and, well, just rhetoric and really patronizing rhetoric at that.
I guess “empower” in ed reform means “pay them less than public school teachers”.
https://chalkbeat.org/posts/chicago/2019/02/08/in-charter-schools-on-strike-a-complicated-and-unusual-structure-divides-responsibility/
LikeLike
If you want to see what how the corporate ed. reform industry responds to exposes such as this, look no further to Peter Cunningham, who is paid handsomely to run the propaganda org EDUCATION POST.
When a similar article was done in Boston, exposing those charter leaders’ outrageous salaries, Cunningham dutifully called the article and its writer “silly,” claiming that charter leaders deserve this kind of money because of … you guessed it .. high student test scores.
In other words, they deserve to pocket all that public taxpayer money.
Here’s the article:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/08/01/some-boston-charter-school-leaders-paid-hefty-salaries/fbHDOC33WKmzcvvZaNNkLN/story.html
Re-reading this article on the insane pay that Boston charter school leaders pull down is so infuriating that I had to stop three times while reading it — each time to pace back and forth while taking deep breaths as a I calm myself back down before sitting back down and continuing:
The ridiculous, duplicative salaries …
The lame justifications for the salaries … we deserve it because we’re so wonderful, and if the charter industry wants to stay competitive with the private sector, and to hire people of our high caliber, YOU SIMPLY HAVE TO PAY US THIS MUCH.
They also offer the bogus defense for the simultaneous low pay of their teachers. On that score, the article shrewdly includes the fact that …
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
BOSTON GLOBE:
“The average earnings for charter-school teachers, guidance counselors, and other educators who work directly with students were roughly $55,000, according to the Globe review.
“Average pay for teachers in the Boston school system is about $90,000.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
If the “average” charter teacher pay is $55K, that means the low end teachers might be getting $30K or so … which is 6 to 8 times less than the a charter school “Executive Director” at $180K – 240K is pulling down.
That seems to be one of the key features of privatized education — be it charters, or voucher-funded private schools. It’s that, compared to the public school system,
…the bosses make way more cash,
… while …
… the workers get paid way less.
You could say the same thing for privatization in general. They offer the canard that they “can do the same job for less,” or “can do it better for less.”
Lie, lie, lie.
That’s also why they want no unions. In Los Angeles, the “Alliance for College-Ready Charter Schools” leaders have spend millions of dollars of dark money donated to them for suppressing unionization at their schools.
The article includes a master list — from least to greatest — of the 80 Boston charter schools’ executive pay.
Here’s one quote from a ludicrously over-compensated charter school
operator attempting to justify this disparity:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
“Everyone I know wants to hire great teachers and pay them as much as possible,” said Shannah Varon, executive director of Boston Collegiate Charter School, who also leads the Boston Charter School Alliance. “I don’t know of any executive director who is trying to pad their paychecks and, in doing so, is hiring teachers who are green or paying them less.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Oh, no, not at all, Shannah. It’s just pure coincidence that THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT’S HAPPENING AT YOUR SCHOOL AND AKK THE OTHER BOSTON CHARTER SCHOOLS.
The fact that this information was hidden from view and, that, over the course of months of digging and filing FOI requests, that this salary information had to be pried out of these organizations with public records filings is another thing.
That which one hides is that of which one is ashamed.
If you’ve got nothing to hide, you hide nothing.
This is a post-Question-2 article, written after the initiative to expand Massachusetts charter schools went down in flames. I’m guessing that any voters who had been on the fence regarding Question 2 and then reads this will be either
— even happier than before that they voted “NO”
OR
— kicking themselves for voting “YES.
While the article was great overall, it failed in its characterization of charter schools when it said:
“The Globe review offers a rare examination of payroll records at the city’s 16 independently run charter schools — public institutions that are overseen by state education officials and operate as separate government entities from the city.”
NO, NO, NO!
They are most certainly not, not NOT “public institutions” … they are “private” entities in every sense of that word.
They are most certainly not “separate government entities from the city.”
The are NOT “government entities” at all, not in any sense of that phrase, any more than the private outfits that are now in charge of parking and transit in Chicago — thanks to Richie Daley, a Cunningham bud, by the way, — are “government entities”. That’s a deal that ultimately is costing Chicagoans billions over the years.
Finally, here’s Peter Cunningham, earning his $380,000 year, Eli-Broad-funded salary, chiming in and calling the article “silly.” He thinks it’s right to correlate test scores with huge six-figure salaries.
https://twitter.com/PCunningham57/status/892916897334927360
Also, here’s the article that Cunningham re-tweets. It’s from the corporate ed. reform propaganda machine, and it derides the Globe expose — meticulously researched and months in the making — as a phony “hit piece” of “gotcha journalism.”
Going full Swift Boat, the writer then claims that those charter leaders, such a John Clark, actually are underpaid, and deserve a raise.(???!!!)
“Give Jon Clark a Raise”
https://www.edumom.org/single-post/2017/08/02/Give-Jon-Clark-a-Raise/
LikeLiked by 1 person
ignore/hide the cherry picking of students along with the kicking out any who may not score well….now that’s actually why those high salaries are paid
LikeLike
I don’t know if this is true nationally, but in Ohio it’s common practice for teachers to work at a charter or Catholic school for a couple of years when they’re brand new, and then switch to the public schools where they’re paid, on average, about 15% more.
So public schools ultimately benefit from the lower charter and religious school pay scale. We have less turn over too and since I still hold to the old fashioned idea that people actually learn things in the course of their work over years and experience matters, I prefer not to have new teachers at my son’s school every year. I think kids value consistency too. Mine always did.
The only people who cheerlead “disruption” in schools are adult ed reform consultants and they’re not even sincere fans of “disruption” judging by how long they stay in THEIR jobs.
LikeLike
I’ve been trying to find info on Corey Booker’s campaign to see whether ed reform Democrats have managed to come up with anything to say on PUBLIC schools.
This is Booker in Iowa:
Second Q to Booker is about charter schools. “I know there’s a lot of charter debates, but that’s 3 percent of our schools,” he says. Wants “great public education for all of our children.”
So there you go. Ed reformers want “great public education for all children”.
Still nothing for students and families in public schools, although they themselves admit, as Booker does here, that the vast, vast majority of families use public schools. They just aren’t going to speak to us at all. They offer nothing.
LikeLike
It happens in the regular public schools, as well. Oakland Unified has 29 administrators making $200,000 or more, including benefits. That’s after they got rid of some of the $20M excess fat that Antwan Wilson larded on during his tenure here. Created layers of admin with lofty titles like Deputy Chief of This and Executive Director of That. Part of the reason we are in this financial mess now and why the teachers may go on strike…
LikeLike
There isn’t much on Glass Door, but I did find this:
Charter School Teacher Salaries in Washington, DC Area
1 SalaryUpdated Jun 8, 2015
How much does a Charter school teacher make in Washington, DC ?
Salaries for Charter school teacher vary by company. Salary estimates are based on salaries submitted to Glassdoor by Charter school teacher employees.
One charter school teacher reported earning $46-$50k at Scholars Academies.
https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/washington-dc-charter-school-teacher-salary-SRCH_IL.0,13_IM911_KO14,36.htm
LikeLike