The United Teachers of Los Angeles went out on strike on January 14. The strike will end if the membership approves a new two-year contract. The union won almost everything it sought. The teachers will get a wage increase; the district will limit class sizes and eliminate a waiver that allowed class size limits to be voided for economic reasons; there will be full-time nurses in every school, a librarian, more counselors. And more.
Here is the union’s press release with the tentative agreement included.
Here is the New York Times summary:
Los Angeles public school teachers reached a tentative deal with school officials on Tuesday to end a weeklong strike that had upended learning for more than half a million students in the nation’s second largest public school system.
The teachers won a 6 percent pay raise and caps on class sizes, which had become one of the most contentious issues between the union and district officials. The deal also includes hiring full-time nurses for every school, as well as enough librarians for every middle and high school in the district by the fall of 2020.
The city and county will also expand programs into public schools, providing more support services for the neediest students.
The settlement came after tens of thousands of teachers marched in downtown Los Angeles and picketed outside schools for six school days, and after a round of marathon negotiating sessions over the holiday weekend.
In addition to winning resources that were badly needed, the union won on other fronts, first, by injecting charter schools into their demands; and second, by putting Democratic politicians on the spot.
The victory for the teachers’ union goes far beyond the new two-year contract. In recent years, teachers in Los Angeles and all over the country have often found themselves on the defensive, as politicians and educational leaders have demanded that more be done to weed out ineffective teachers.
The Los Angeles strike was the eighth major teacher walkout over the past year, as a movement that calls itself Red For Ed spread like wildfire from West Virginia to Oklahoma, Arizona, Chicago and beyond. But the strike in Los Angeles was a union-led one against Democratic leaders who are usually on their side. It also was one of the first to highlight one of the most controversial questions in education: whether charter schools, which are publicly funded but privately managed, hurt traditional schools.
The charter issue was explained like this: The board will be asked to endorse a resolution calling for a cap on charter schools, which this billionaire-bought board is unlikely to do. But the union put out there the fact that charter schools harm public schools, and politicians had to choose. As “widely popular” as charter schools are, only 10% of the kids in the state attend them, and only 20% in Los Angeles.
In a summary released by the union, the agreement also includes a pledge that the elected school board for the district will vote on a resolution asking the state to “establish a charter school cap” and create a governor’s committee on charter schools.
That would be a major shift in California, where charter schools have been widely embraced by political leaders and have proved popular among parents.
This agreement is a major victory for UTLA and promises better working conditions in the schools and better services for students.

Once they saw Diane marching with the teachers, it was only a matter of time. There is, after all, a limit to venal stupidity (at least that’s what I have to believe to keep my sanity). Now let’s see if the journalists will have the intelligence and ability to see to that these strikes in different states are not isolated incidents but part of a national/international response to the criminality of privatization.
LikeLike
It is gratifying to see the gains made by the Los Angeles teachers. This means much for teachers all over the nation. Teachers have for a long time been patiently accepting what they have been handed out, hoping that good sense and reason would prevail. They need to remember this lesson, that they have to fight for what they need for some of the people on the other side ( their adversaries) are driven purely by greed and are not concerned with the ordinary person and his fulfillment.
And one word here, teachers must stay vigilant.
LikeLike
Exactly. I’d say public ed adversaries are driven by greed, power & contempt for the teaching profession. Politicians have used austerity as a weapon against public ed for years- whining about how teacher salaries & pensions are “unsustainable”; as if teachers did no work to earn their salaries & benefits.
I also think these strikes are bringing awareness to the often secret contracts &TIFS that funnel billions in public subsidies to corporations like Amazon, Walmart & the oil/gas industries. Walker’s FOXCON and Amazon’s billion dollar deals infuriated citizens in these states.Politicians alwaysfind the money for what they want. The teachers strikes illuminate the emptiness of their austerity rhetoric.
LikeLike
Sounds like teachers got what they wanted. Congrats, now get back to work truants!
LikeLike
Hate to be a nay-sayer, but the only winners in this were the very few people who are able to stand up on a stage and literally say that they cut a deal. That is, both our union leaders and Beutner. The union leaders become power brokers within Los Angeles, and Beutner can say that he averted a crisis.
To whit:
The tentative agreement does next to nothing for special education students and teachers, and is actually worse than the 2014 contract in many respects. Some Spec Ed class sizes are actually going to go up!
The tentative agreement lowers class sizes by one student per class each of the next two years, then two students per class on the third year…but these are simply the numbers that they should have already been, per the 2014 contract [the District has been increasing class sizes by 4 students across the board by declaring a “fiscal emergency” for each of the last five years; that via a clause that was instituted back in 2007, during the recession.]
The tentative agreement hires 141 nurses for each of the next two years, to be placed in elementary schools. This will not affect the budgets of secondary schools positively, as the money that they have been allocating to have full-time nurses will just be taken out of their discretionary budgets. Likewise, it is questionable whether or not the DIstrict will be able to hire 281 new nurses on average teacher salaries [sorry, but RNs are paid more.]
The “6% raise” is both a misnomer and a non-issue. The District had already budgeted for 2% retroactive, 2% current and 2% future pay increases and was using that as leverage.
The tentative agreement adds a whopping 17 counselors over each of the next two years. Whooopie, 34 new counselors spread over 600,000+ students! What a gain!
Theres a bunch of baloney about Pre-K and Adult Ed that the vast majority of teahers don’t really pay attention to.
The real winners are ROP teachers, who get 10 more hours of pay each month! That’s sweet, but only affects a couple hundred people.
Seriously, the strike resulted only in the elimination of Article XVIII, section 1.5 – on class sizes. But that should never have been an issue to begin with. That should have simply resulted in an immediate work stoppage as soon as it was discovered that the District was cooking the books.
So, I feel used, abused and cheated, all around. If the union leadership and members do not turn around and get Jackie Goldberg elected this really was for naught.
LikeLike
The only real leverage in Los Angeles is to win a majority of the board seats for people who will fight for the students and teachers.
Electing Jackie Goldberg is a great first start. Even though the Reformers would have 4 of 7 seats, she is smarter than all of them put together.
LikeLike
So she can vote with two hands, not one.
LikeLike
NAH, SHE CAN OUTTALK THEM, OUTTHINK THEM, OUTSMART THEM.
LikeLike
I wish I could “like” messages without replying. +1 to what Steve said.
LikeLike
Agreed on all points here.
I’d add that there was probably a sense of urgency, as a strike takes much needed money out of the hands of the protesters with every day they’re on the picket line.
I’m glad it’s a short term contract. They’ll be able to revisit it sooner than later. Hopefully with more teeth the next time.
But yes: it’s sad to see the backpatting when so much of what’s needed was addressed minimally if at all.
LikeLike
Do they lower the limit on class sizes one student per year, or just lower the class size by one even if there are 50 students in it?
LikeLike
Class size reductions are only going to affect academic courses in secondary schools and regular classes in primary schools.
LikeLike
My question was about setting an upper limit on class sizes, or they just want to lower the size of each existing class by, say, 1 each year?
In the first case, if the new limit is 25 instead of 26, then a class of (already illegal) size 50 would have to be broken up into two 25-student classes within one year, in the second case, the class can still have 49 students by the end of the year.
LikeLike
Our 2014 contract (the one they have been ignoring) stipulated that K-2 classes be capped at about 22-to-1, grades 3-5 be capped at about 32-to-1 and secondary academic classes be capped at 39-to-1. Non academic classes are upwards of 50-to-1 (say, in an art class.) Those are rough numbers, off by a single digit here and there.
The lowering will only be in academic secondary classes and in all primary classes. The 50-to-1 art classes, PE classes, etc., are not going to change at all.
I’m a skeptic with respect to the nation waking up to charter nonsense. I wish that were the case…
LikeLike
These numbers sound very high.
LikeLike
On the other hand, the effect of these strikes cannot be just measured by what agreement they come up with. Now the whole Nation knows, there is a problem with charter schools and billionaires’ bs about saving poor children.
LikeLike
Brave and disrespected teachers deserve more than this. I want to study the details for sure, but Steve M’s remarks above confirm my sense that UTLA settled too soon for too little which does give the Dem powers in LA good press while also shining a happy light on the UTLA leaders like Caputo. After so many teachers walked out with so much community support and national support, all they could get is a pointless promise to bring an charter cap resolution to the pro-charter Board?? Very disappointing. UTLA should have specificed an exact limit by the numbers on charters that restricts their looting of public schools and their dispossession of public teachers and students from their taxpayer funded school spaces. Reduction in class size also sounds cosmetic and minimal when the UTLA should have explicitly demanded the max number for each class. What is going on here? Isn’t it already clear from this strike and from the 6 wildcat walkouts before that teachers already have enormous power in their hands if they leave the classroom? Enough power to stop the looting and the bleeding from privatization? It takes so much to organize a statewide or citywide walkout, so hard to organize with community support–it has to pay off big time or else it will breed cynicism among the rank and file that there’s not much to gain in putting up a fight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
With this feeble agreement, and with the tenor of this morning’s last rally, I’m beginning to suspect that the union leadership’s aim was primarily to shift the union, and themselves, into a position where they are a major broker within Southern California’s Latino political sphere.
Seriously, that seems to be the most liekly explanation for everything that has transpired.
The tentative agreement couldn’t be much weaker.
LikeLike
SADLY STILL LOOKING FOR “….Enough power to stop the looting and the bleeding from privatization.”
LikeLike
Newsome’s new healthcare initiative will require that preventive care be offered to anyone and everyone. Supposed to be state-wide by 2021…
What better way to ensure that school-age kids are in health than to have nurses in schools, checking up on kids? They can even collect data on the youngsters, so that the childrens’ medical information can then be sold to insurance carriers [one of the regular posters put links to that scam up a couple days ago.]
On top of that, the State is likely to subsidize most/all of the costs. So, the District will be relieved of that obligation!
Yea for preventive health care (assuming that kids’ medical data is not stolen), but it is very likely that talks have been going on behind our backs regarding placing nurses in schools anyway, particularly in high-needs schools.
Although the Capital & Main article alluded to the District squirreling away money in textbook funds, keeping it from prying eyes and allowing the reserves to build that way, we still don’t have an accounting of the District’s true finances (other than knowing it has $1.7+ billion hidden away).
We even partially gave in to Beutner’s 20 “Community Schools” initiative. How do you think that one is going to go?
I voted “no” on the tentative agreement, but I’m sure it will pass through with 70% of the vote.
LikeLike
Steve M, can you tell us what’s up with evaluating teachers by tests?
LikeLike
Hi OA2T,
We shot that one down several years ago, when it started to come out that VAM scores are pretty meaningless. That was being pushed by John Deasy, along with his i-Pad initiative, and it essentially died when the FBI started to look at the whole i-Pad deal.
It is/was suspected that Deasy was making deals with Apple and software developers…a conflict of interest. The VAM rating proposal resulted in a vote of no confidence by teachers which, along with the FBI inquiries, was enough to get Deasy to quit.
But we’ve been so occupied by issues such as that (and Tuck, and Villaraigosa-Beutner, and Melvoin…) that we have not been questioning the DIstrict’s line on budgeting/expenditures.
Time for new union leadership that includes a number of forensic accountants, IMO.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes; forensic accountants needed ACROSS THE NATION.
LikeLike
Thank you for your reply, Steve. Very appreciative of you.
LikeLike
A deal is easier to make when the mayor wants this whole incident over so he can run for President.
Keep pushing. The public needs to know which side our leaders choose – public or charter – that’s 80-90% of the public vs 10-20%.
LikeLike
I’m sorry that the UTLA teachers didn’t get as much as is advertised in the media. Hope Denver teachers hold out. Denver pay must be really bad since Indiana is no shining star.
…………….
Denver teachers vote to strike for first time in 25 years
By Madeline Holcombe, CNN
Updated 3:58 AM ET, Wed January 23, 2019
…Following two days of voting, the Denver Classroom Teachers Association (DCTA) announced that 93% of its members approved a strike after negotiations failed….
DCTA hopes to alleviate the high turnover with changes to Denver teachers’ pay, which the union says prohibits some teachers from paying for housing in the area and forces some to take on second jobs. As an example of the hardships Denver teachers face, the union cited a teacher who taught in Indianapolis and Chicago before moving to Colorado. The teacher makes $10,000 less in Denver than he did in Indianapolis and $15,000 less than he did in Chicago, the union said in its statement…
Check out this story on CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/23/us/denver-teachers-vote-strike/index.html
LikeLike
Here is what is happening in Indianapolis. I wonder how many teachers got “ineffective’ or ‘needs improvement’. That is a way to save money. Test scores do matter.
……..
Indianapolis Public Schools teachers win big raises — and more pay bumps could be on the way
…All six board members present voted for the contract, which was ratified by union members last week. Board member Venita Moore was not present.
The agreement offers wage increases for 95 percent of the district’s 1,889 educators, and it rewards both early-career and experienced teachers. The base pay rose to $42,587, about $2,600 above the previous floor.
The deal significantly increased the top pay a teacher can receive — $74,920, or about $15,500 more than the last contract — by adding several new levels of pay near the top of the scale.
“Teachers a week ago could not look at the salary schedule and feel comfortable and confident that they had a future in this district,” said teacher Tina Ahlgren, bargaining chair for the Indianapolis Education Association, the teachers union. With the increased ceiling of almost $75,000, “we hope that that will truly allow teachers who want to serve IPS students for the entirety of their careers to see that future as a possibility.”
Teachers who received evaluations of “ineffective” or “needs improvement” in 2017-18 are not eligible for raises…
https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/in/2018/12/20/indianapolis-public-schools-teachers-win-big-raises-and-more-pay-bumps-could-be-on-the-way/?utm_source=email_button
LikeLike
I sense from comments that the tentative agreement is not universally seen as an unequivocal victory. But there is no guarantee that a protracted strike would yield a better outcome and some evidence that a longer strike might erode the good will the teachers now have. The big issue facing CA is the referendum to change Proposition 13 and as Diane notes the local school board elections are critical as well. Any voter antipathy toward teachers would undercut both of those crucial votes and any sense of good will toward teachers will help. From afar, it seems that the teachers are getting as much as they can without compromising their standing in the community.
It took decades for the GOP to undercut the public’s confidence in public education. It may take decades to win it back. The LA strike and the wildcat strikes across the country are bringing the negative consequences of the privatization movement to the public’s attention without adding to the resentment toward “government schools” that the right wing of the GOP promotes. Finally, on the heels of the Kansas and Wisconsin gubernatorial elections the LA strike will add another nail into the coffin of Reaganomics… https://medium.com/@GreinerOU/reaganomics-is-on-the-ropes-d559ffa9ed7a
LikeLike
Of course, but we had just received the support of the IAFF, and the SEIU finally started to show. I believe that one more week would have worked in our favor. The glad handing that took place immediately after negotitions ended seems rather premeditated and self-serving.
We’ll see the truth in it in one month: whether our union’s leaders immediately jump on Goldberg’s campaign with full gusto, and if a vote of no confidence is put up for Beutner. The proof will be there.
LikeLike
Also, the school administrators union had sent out a notice that their situation was untenable. All fingers were being pointed at District leaders, as of Tuesday.
LikeLike
Fantastic. Hopefully this will resonate all over the country!
LikeLike
Beutner settled because he knows the U.S. is a powder keg near the blow point.
Media reported that federal workers who have been forced off of the job will be in the classrooms when the Colorado teachers strike. Pitting workers against workers is a desperation strategy that reeks of the richest 0.1%’s manipulation and disrespect for the 99%.
The Today program on NBC is going to air a Savannah Guthrie interview with the MAGA-hat wearing, Catholic high school student. The network used lighting,
camera positioning and too big clothes to portray the 18-year-old as smaller, younger and more angelic. (Huffpo) Letters to NBC?
The student’s PR is the real story. The PR firm is Scott Jennings’, a man who was made notorious for his part in the firing of US Attorney David Iglesias. Jennings taught Tribalism in American Politics to McConnell at the right wing Kennedy School of Government. (Wikipedia)
LikeLike
I just saw this bunch of BS on the Idaho Statesman, Boise, ID. Shall we all rejoice in choice between Jan. 20-26? Unfortunately, this paper doesn’t have a comment section. Have you ever heard of a position known as president of the National School Choice Week? Sounds like he should be sitting next to DeVos.
……
During National School Choice Week, be thankful we have education options
BY ANDREW CAMPANELLA
…It means we shouldn’t ask them [schools] to be everything for everyone. With focused budgets and resources, not every school can provide everything. But even with unlimited budgets and a full staff of excellent teachers, no school can meet the unique needs of every single family.
That’s why school choice is so important. It empowers parents to find schools that work for them and their families. In environments where school choice is flourishing, parents are even empowered to found their own schools and help other families, too.
Here in Idaho, there are plenty of educational options, including open enrollment, charter schools, public magnet schools, private schools, online learning and home schooling.
From the beginning, America has been a richly diverse country, weaving together the similarities and differences of many different cultures into a beautiful fabric. There are as many ways to be American as there are Americans, and even those born in the same country — or same city — have different ways of living. Our desire for variety in education reflects that…
What better way to promote that diversity than to celebrate National School Choice Week (Jan. 20-26) — and the diversity of education it inspires?
Andrew Campanella is president of National School Choice Week.
Read more here: https://www.idahostatesman.com/opinion/readers-opinion/article224936310.html#storylink=cpy
LikeLike
I feel good,
Like I knew that I would.
LikeLike
You indicated a few days ago that you would be happy with if the strike only eliminated Article XVII, Section 1.5. That is exactly what we achieved (perhaps gained nurses in elementary schools…we’ll see.)
Very little else was achieved, and some things have been worsened (e.g., Spec Ed class sizes).
Oh, grades 3-5 are still going to be 33-1, even after three years…
LikeLike
Actually, a lot more was gained than eliminating 1.5 (although everything revolved around eliminating 1.5), including some things we weren’t even asking for. There are even some additional, wonderful things agreed upon that are not part of the published agreement. I don’t want to divulge them publicly at this time. But I do want to say that regarding charters, collocations, class size, salary and the protection of benefits, democratizing school leadership and spending, and a host of other important issues, tremendous gains were made. Most importantly of all, we gained a strong union. When we fight, we win.
LikeLike
NPR today claimed, the school district is not authorized to put a moratorium on charters.
LikeLike
The district agreed to stop authorizing charters. That pushes authorization to the county and then the state. (Hopefully without divulging too much) I can just say that that puts appropriate pressure on the state to move toward a moratorium, and that it’s in the works among the power players.
LikeLike
Sorry LCT, that doesn’t seem to make any sense at all. If it is not put into a contract then it is not enforceable. And, as we have seen, even when something has been enshrined in a contract it is not enforceable.
Likewise, if the things that you allude to are to be placed in the contract via a temporary agreement, the union would have had to legally divulge to its members what has been proposed.
Items such as the first presented in the temporary agreement [where the Board must vote on whether or not to ask the State for a moratorium on charters] are facile pandering. They mean nothing.
What I read regarding co-locations, etc. seemed to boil down to providing adequate notice to chapter chairs. There were a few consultation clauses with respect to site issues, but that does not equate to granting chairs veto power.
Benefits are going to be revisited within two years, just postponing the inevitable s—storm that is going to happen when we are forced to universally go with Kaiser and actually address retiree bennies.
I’m still not seeing where any true gains were made for the more substantive issues (i.e., SpecEd, Counselors.) The SpecEd situation was actually made worse, from what I’m seeing in the tentative agreement and it is likely that the District will have its new nurses paid for by Newsome’s healthcare initiative [assuming they can even hire the nurses at the $82,000 rate.]
Membership voting was rushed, and it seems more and more likely that the love fest that followed had been planned from the start…very self-serving on the part of the union leadership.
Color me highly skeptical.
LikeLike
Cool.
LikeLike
Thank you so much Diane, for coming out here and supporting our teachers. Some are disappointed, but I think they won much more than just the contract issues. I can’t tell you how many people came up to me and said “I had NO IDEA this was going on”. The people of this city are paying attention, and they don’t like what has happened to the schools. They don’t like the school board majority. They don’t like Beutner. The fight has just started.
LikeLike
Melissa,
You are right. The public did not understand how large class sizes are or that many schools lack a full time nurse or librarian.
LAUSD has been systematically starving public schools and showering favors on charters.
LikeLike
I agree, Melissa. The public awakening is the ultimate gain. Seriously. Los Angeles voter turnout is abysmal, and the awareness of privatization began with this union leadership. I had parents on the strike line tell me that they never realized that school board elections were important. I had people on their morning dog walks ask me about the special election (Goldberg!!). The city of Los Angeles is no longer asleep. I will be forever grateful for this leadership team for that. Is the contract perfect? Nope. But I had a fourth grade with 40 students this year. With 1.5 gone, that won’t happen again. I hope.
Yes, there were political power plays and things we may never know about (unless Left Coast Teacher spills the beans). Yes, we have yet to see if secondary will get nurses AND the money they usually spend on them. Yes, this was rushed and should have been handled better at the end. Yes, special education needs much more attention. Yes, yes, yes, y’all.
But the people of the city now understand what is at play. Beutner’s “reimagining” might disappear, but have no doubt these privateers have a back up plan. Let’s stay alert and bring the public along with us. Let’s keep it together because it’s our only chance.
LikeLike