Steven Singer noticed a curious phenomenon: certain mainstream media outlets “The Atlantic” and “Education Week”) were intent on proving that the Teacher Revolt of Spring 2018 had fizzled out and that the cries of “We Will Remember in November” had fallen flat.

Since I’m writing a book that includes this topic, I noticed the same slant innlocal reporting: where were the teachers who ran for office? Why were so few elected?

What struck me was that teacher candidates ran as underfunded, unknown novices, often taking on experienced politicians. I was impressed that any of them won. The journalists seemed to think that if 2 or 3 won their races, that was a defeat. I didn’t see it that way. It was amazing that any was elected.

Steven lists a number of races where teachers’ votes made the difference. He could have added flipping the New Hampshire Legislature. Electing an educator, Kathy Hoffman, as State Superintendent in deep red Arizona, where she beat a former charter school operator. And the number of states where the anti-public school supermajority was broken (we are unlikely to hear much about vouchers in Texas for the next two years because of the blue wave in that state that broke the grip of righwingers in the legislator. The victory of Pro-public School Tony Thurmond over Charter School ally Marshall Tuck in the race for State Superintendent of Instruction in California, although Tuck’s campaign spent twice as much as Thurmond’s.

I wsxhoping that TIME would choose the Brave Teachers who fought for funding their schools as Person of the Year. But I was gratified to see that Time honored journalists who stood up for truth and facts.

A tough choice.

Thanks to Steven Singer for putting the victory of Brave Teachers in perspective.