The Trump administration released an ominous report on climate change in the middle of the Thanksgiving weekend, on a Friday at 2 pm. It hoped to bury the consensus of 17 federal agencies. But the facts won’t stay buried, no matter how much politicians try.
The Washington Post published an editorial, summarizing the report’s ominous warnings.
IF YOU did not hear about the major new federal climate change report, the Trump administration will be pleased. The report was released the day after Thanksgiving — when many people were distracted — probably because it contradicts practically everything President Trump has said and done on global warming. The Fourth National Climate Assessment is yet another reminder that reality will catch up to the United States, no matter how much the president tries to ignore and deny it.
The world is heating up, and there are no “credible natural explanations for this amount of warming.” U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions have decreased a bit lately. But they need to go down much further and faster to avoid dire consequences.
Already, the nation is seeing “intensifying droughts, increasing heavy downpours, reducing snowpack,” as well as “declines in surface water quality.” Without a course change, increasingly depleted groundwater, rising seas and other effects will make it more difficult to farm and provide enough water for large cities.
Foodborne and waterborne diseases will spread. Disease-carrying ticks and mosquitoes will be more common. Extreme heat will cause more deaths. Wildfires and insect infestations will overwhelm U.S. forests. Sea ice will melt and coral reef ecosystems will dissolve. Power outages and fuel shortages will be more frequent. Roads and bridges will swamp. Pipelines will become unsafe. Waterside property will be increasingly unusable. Fisheries will dwindle.
“Even if significant emissions reductions occur, many of the effects from sea level rise over this century — and particularly through mid-century — are already locked in due to historical emissions,” the report explains, underscoring the necessity for coastal communities to prepare. On the horizon is “the potential need for millions of people and billions of dollars of coastal infrastructure to be relocated.”
Critics of acting on climate change often cite the possible economic costs. But not acting has costs, too. The experts expect “substantial net damage to the U.S. economy throughout this century,” finding that “with continued growth in emissions at historic rates, annual losses in some economic sectors are projected to reach hundreds of billions of dollars by the end of the century — more than the current gross domestic product (GDP) of many U.S. states.”
And the damage will be long-lasting. “The climate change resulting from human-caused emissions of carbon dioxide will persist for decades to millennia. Self-reinforcing cycles within the climate system have the potential to accelerate human-induced change and even shift Earth’s climate system into new states that are very different from those experienced in the recent past,” the report notes.
The White House responded to the report by misrepresenting scientists’ work and promising “fuller information” in the next analysis. Cooking the next report will not change the facts. Mr. Trump and the Republican Party have been negligent stewards of the country’s irreplaceable resources. Future Americans will not forgive or forget what these “leaders” did to them. Playing games with report release schedules won’t change that.

Diane Trump’s gut says not to believe it, so it must not be true. CBK
LikeLike
That piece made sense until right near the End
Mr. Trump and the Republican Party have been negligent stewards of the country’s irreplaceable resources.
Whilectgat is certainly true, one could say the same about recent Democratic administrations as well
When it comes to irreplaceable resources and fossil fuels in particular, one could accurately sum up the position of both major parties as** Drill baby drill!**
And no, this isn’t NOT simply whataboutism
As long as Drill baby drill is the overarching policy (as it was under Obama and still is), little else will matter.
Drill baby drill!
Frack baby frack!
Spill baby spill!
Hack baby hack!
Blast baby blast!
Mine baby mine!
Fast baby fast!
All of the time!
LikeLike
Is NOT simply whataboutism
Not isn’t NOT (which, of course, means IS)
LikeLike
There are politicians who say that if we just drilled more, then gas prices would come down right away. What they don’t say is that we have been drilling more. Under my administration, America is producing more oil than at any time in the last eight years. We’ve opened up new areas for exploration. We’ve quadrupled the number of operating rigs to a record high. We’ve added enough new oil and gas pipeline to circle the Earth and then some
–President Obama, Rose Garden Speech, Tues, April 17, 2012
LikeLike
You’re not wrong, but even “Drill, Baby, Drill” is only a subset/symptom of the larger problem of neoliberalism. Margaret Thatcher famously told anyone with ears to hear that “There Is No Society”. I don’t think people really understood at the time (and most still don’t), but what that means is that the only value is financial/monetary. The only relationships are transactional/economic. There is no humanity. There is no love or friendship. There is no stewardship of the planet or its human, animal or plant inhabitants. Nothing can be allowed to stand in the way of economic/market development. Not even if it kills us all.
So long as both parties subscribe to this philosophy (and they do), neither is going to offer any salvation, even if the Democrats are better on some issues.
LikeLike
Kill baby kill?
LikeLike
Pretty much.
LikeLike
Reminds me of Arlo Guthrie singing Alice’s Restaurant, which I heard over the weekend.
LikeLike
The central problem is that mainstream economics treats the earth (air, water, netals, fossil fuels) as an outside input to the economic system rather than treating the economic system as just a small part of the much larger earth eco system, which is the reality.
It’s the difference between an ecologic and economic perspective. The two are almost diametrically opposite, despite sharing the same eco prefix
And as physicist Richard Feynman noted, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.” …
He said over public relations, but he might just as well have said over economics.
LikeLike
“…reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.”
This strain of neoliberalism is the ultimate in human hubris – that nature itself is subject to market forces. Unfortunately, I think Mother Nature is getting ready to disabuse us of that notion….
LikeLike
Nature can’t be fooled and always gets the last laugh.
LikeLike
Combine ignorance
With arrogance, and — Voila!
“President” D. Trump.
Trump’s climate change denial threatens our entire planet, but he knows that he will not be around long enough to see the world cursing him
LikeLike
I also just read that the Trump Hotel in D.C. has five million dollars in liens against it for unpaid bills. This guy is a disgusting deadbeat. https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-hotel-paid-millions-in-fines-for-unpaid-work
LikeLike
These climate reports were commissioned by Congress — not by Trump or his corrupt, traitorous, and lying administration.
“The report, the second of four such annual studies commissioned by Congress, concludes not only that the world’s temperature is rising and but also that the preponderance of evidence suggests human actions play a role in it.” …
“President Donald Trump on Monday dismissed a study produced by his own administration, involving 13 federal agencies and more than 300 leading climate scientists, warning of the potentially catastrophic impact of climate change.”
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/26/politics/donald-trump-climate-change/index.html
My question is: If Congress commissioned these studies and put control (was their language from the Congressional commission that put limits on Trump’s power over the results of the studies) into the hands of Trump’s White House, why didn’t Trump’s loyalist and traitorous minions censor the studies and strip them of any language that didn’t agree with Fox News that is arguably Trump’s brain?
I think Trump has no brain. Fox News is Trump’s brain.
LikeLike
There was a plump old frump named Trump
Whose brain was in his rump.
With his numbers in a slump
He should go down to the dump
And take a big jump.
LikeLike
LOL – so DT’s brain is a turd.
LikeLike
Donald’s ‘very high levels of intelligence’ is pure narcissism. He is an ignorant fool with power. He is dangerous.
…………………
President Trump Says He’s Too Intelligent To Believe In Climate Change
By Nick Visser
President Donald Trump asserted that he had “very high levels of intelligence,” and as such, did not believe in the scientific consensus surrounding climate change in a sweeping interview with The Washington Post published Tuesday.
“One of the problems that a lot of people like myself, we have very high levels of intelligence but we’re not necessarily such believers,” said Trump, speaking to the Post’s Josh Dawsey and Philip Rucker. “You look at our air and our water and it’s right now at a record clean. … As to whether or not it’s man-made and whether or not the effects that you’re talking about are there, I don’t see it — not nearly like it is.”
Trump’s statements, his latest in a long history of climate change denial, go against the vast majority of scientists who say the planet has rapidly warmed since the Industrial Revolution and will continue to do so unless humanity is able to dramatically scale back greenhouse gas emissions…
Article: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-climate-change-denial_us_5bfde067e4b0d23c21379349
LikeLike
Too intelligent to care what scientists conclude
LikeLike
Inglorious leader said: “You look at our air and our water and it’s right now at a record clean.” What does that even mean? Record clean? It’s a jumbled tossed word salad lacking in any coherence or meaning. Typical Trump bombast and baloney word sandwich.
LikeLike
Joe: Here is a report on our record clean air and water. IQ45 is showing off his extreme intelligence. I guess I’m supposed to be impressed that NW Indiana went from 16th most polluted in 2013 to 22nd in 2018.
….
American Lung Association 2018 ‘State of the Air’ Report
POSTED BY REGION NEWS TEAM ON APRIL 18, 2018 IN LOCAL NEWS, REGION NEWS
More than four in ten Americans live with unhealthy air according to the American Lung Association’s 2018 “State of the Air” report released today. The report found ozone pollution worsened significantly due to warmer temperatures, while particle pollution generally continued to improve in 2014-2016. The 19th annual national air quality “report card” found that 133.9 million Americans –over 41 percent—lived in counties with unhealthful levels of either ozone or particle pollution in 2014-2016, placing them at risk for premature death and other serious health effects such as lung cancer, asthma attacks, cardiovascular damage, and developmental and reproductive harm.
The Chicago metro area which includes the northern half of northwest Indiana was 22nd on the list for most polluted cities by ozone, Indianapolis-Carmel-Muncie ranked 13th most polluted for year-round particle pollution, and the South Bend-Mishawaka-Elkhart area was 17th for short-term particle pollution. Here is a link for more information –
http://www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy-air/sota/city-rankings/most-polluted-cities.html
LikeLike
Trump says that the cold spell and amount of snow that fell recently proves there is no climate change. HIs ‘high level of intelligence’ is showing. Several years ago the National Institutes of Health started doing research on how the changes and increase in illnesses would affect infants and older people.
………………………….
Climate change: Last four years are ‘world’s hottest’ By Matt McGrath Environment correspondent…BBC
The year 2018 is on course to be the fourth warmest on record, according to the World Meteorological Organization.
It says that the global average temperature for the first 10 months of the year was nearly 1C above the levels between 1850-1900.
The State of the Climate report says that the 20 warmest years on record have been in the past 22 years, with the 2015-2018 making up the top four…
“It is worth repeating once again that we are the first generation to fully understand climate change and the last generation to be able to do something about it,” said Mr Taalas…
The WMO report highlights some of the significant events of 2018. In the Indian state of Kerala more than five million people were affected by floods. Similarly in Japan, hundreds of people were killed by flooding.
There were also heat waves in large parts of Europe including the UK leading to wildfires in some places including Scandinavia.
In July and August there were numerous record high temperatures north of the Arctic Circle. Helsinki saw 25 consecutive days with temperatures above 25C.
There were major wildfires in the US with the Camp Fire in November claiming the most lives of any fire in over a century in the US.
Greece also had fatalities from fires, while British Columbia broke its record for the most land burned in a fire season.
Scientists involved in preparing the report say that the fingerprint of climate change can now be more clearly seen.
“The warming caused by these greenhouse gas emissions is already clear at the global scale,” said Prof Tim Osborn from the University of East Anglia, who provided some of the data used in the WMO analysis…
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46374141
LikeLike
Climate change and global health go hand in hand
May – June, 2008 | Volume 7, Issue 3
Marriage between climatology and biology has the potential to improve global health by predicting disease outbreaks and lessening the effects of pollution-driven chronic illness, say researchers advocating a systems approach to global warming preparedness.
Characterizing the model for collaboration as a microscope linked to a satellite, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrator Conrad C. Lautenbacher said, “Everything is connected in our earth system… It’s science without borders” and requires integration of data from basic researchers, health providers, weather forecasters and environmentalists looking at the very long term effects of human-caused climate change.
“The health community – NIH and CDC – already are engaged in a substantial amount of research and training that aids preparedness for climate change,” Dr. Joshua Rosenthal, deputy director of Fogarty’s international training and research division and director of its environment programs, told the forum on “Changing Climate: Changing Health Patterns.”
“The overarching goal is to think about strengthening basic health research, surveillance and reporting, with an eye on the most vulnerable populations,” Rosenthal said. That eye is often a space satellite measuring ocean temperature, vegetation and weather patterns like El Nino/La Nina – collecting data that in the hands of public health experts could be tailored to preventing disease, or at least treating it faster.
Lautenbacher said, for example, when satellites measure the temperature of water in the Bay or Bengal, the data track with later outbreaks of cholera in the region.
Predicting the arrival of flooding should be more than just protecting property, Rosenthal said. It should also warn people in developing nations about the potential spread of diseases such as schistosomiasis (snail fever) and other hazards such as toxic pollutants.
Satellite images …, captured last month in Africa, show where vegetation density is higher. In these areas, the risk of malaria may also be higher. Where areas are brown, the risk is lower.
One example of a current Fogarty-sponsored study is how parasitic diseases in Kenya change during the transition from drought conditions to flooding, Rosenthal explained. Another area of analysis for the NIH, he said, is natural disaster and the community reaction to it, such as studying post-traumatic stress syndrome and drug abuse in survivors of Hurricane Katrina or our ability to contain the spread of health effects of hazardous materials after a major fire.
Panelists also stressed the importance of systems thinking that includes agriculture and urbanization patterns, energy, economics and health care.
“It’s important…that we build climate into these other types of long-term analyses rather than trying to separate it out,” Rosenthal said.
When there is a natural disaster or outbreak of disease, “What we do know is it’s probably going to hit the most vulnerable populations the hardest: the poor, children, the elderly, those in low- and middle-income countries with weak infrastructure, degraded ecological environments, poor health-delivery systems,” he said.
“Sound science needs to drive sound policy,” Lautenbacher said, calling for the study of climate change “in a more rational and less emotional fashion for decision makers and for the people.”
The forum was sponsored by the World Federation of Public Health Associations, the American Public Health Association and the U.S. Group on Earth Observations and held at the National Press Club in Washington.
LikeLike
Notice that NIH started researching global warming problems years ago. They want to have information when problems hit.
………………………
Climate Change, Human Health, and Biomedical Research: Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Research Portfolio
Christine M. Jessup , John M. Balbus , Carole Christian , Ehsanul Haque , Sally E. Howe , Sheila A. Newton , Britt C. Reid , Luci Roberts , Erin Wilhelm , and Joshua P. Rosenthal
Published:18 January 2013
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104518Cited by:7
Abstract
Background: According to a wide variety of analyses and projections, the potential effects of global climate change on human health are large and diverse. The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), through its basic, clinical, and population research portfolio of grants, has been increasing efforts to understand how the complex interrelationships among humans, ecosystems, climate, climate variability, and climate change affect domestic and global health.
Objectives: In this commentary we present a systematic review and categorization of the fiscal year (FY) 2008 NIH climate and health research portfolio.
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.1104518
LikeLike
Trump put together a word salad view of climate issues in a rambling tweet. He made an A+ on absolute and complete ignorance.
LikeLike
DT has clearly let the world know that he thinks he is the most intelligent human on the planet, so why should he believe a bunch of scientists when in his own mind, DT is smarter than all of them combined? To DT, heknows everything that everyone else doesn’t know.
LikeLike
It doesn’t really matter what we “believe” about climate change. The earth will have it’s way with us no matter what we do. If you don’t believe spewing tons of toxic material into the earth and air makes any difference at all, invite the large energy companies to come and dump their waste in your house and yard.
LikeLike
Why not have them dump all their toxic waste on Trump’s golf courses?
LikeLike
. . . or ask someone in Flint, Michigan. CBK
LikeLike
Excuse me as I get up on my soapbox once again: WE DO NOT BELIEVE IN CLIMATE CHANGE. WE ACCEPT THE FINDINGS OF OVERWHELMING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS, WHICH REQUIRES AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. IT IS NOT A MATTER OF FAITH OR BELIEF. SO LET’S QUIT SAYING WE “BELIEVE” IN CLIMATE CHANGE. DOING SO CREATES A SELF-INFLICTED WOUND THAT GIVES ANTI-SCIENCE BIGOTS ROOM TO “ARGUE” THE INARGUABLE. Stepping off my soapbox now.
LikeLike
Al Gore Claims Trump Is the ‘Face of Climate Denial’
Former Vice President Al Gore called President Donald Trump the “global face of climate denial” in an interview on Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show” on Wednesday night.
“It’s really significant, Trevor, that Donald J. Trump is now the face of climate denial. His voice is the voice of climate denial,” Gore told host Trevor Noah.
Gore was responding to Trump’s statement that U.S. air and water quality were at “record” levels of cleanliness…
https://www.westernjournal.com/al-gore-claims-trump-face-climate-denial/
LikeLike
Subject: The National Climate Assessment – a call for climate action from Union of Concerned Scientists
Dear friend,
The White House recently released the Fourth National Climate Assessment. This report, which is mandated by Congress, provides the US public with the best available science on climate change and its impacts on the United States.
The findings prove, yet again, why we need climate action: The United States is already suffering economic and public health damages from climate change-fueled wild fires, heat waves, and floods, and these damages will get worse if we don’t take bold action to address it. We need our federal elected officials to take these findings seriously and enter the new year ready to roll up their sleeves and advocate for national action on climate change.
Join me in writing to our members of Congress and tell your personal story of why climate action is important to you and your community, and why you demand climate leadership from your legislators in the new Congress:
https://secure.ucsusa.org/onlineactions/epKiipydtkmwqZrIHE5Hhg2.
LikeLike
Life is looking up. Get the Orange Hair Monster!!! ‘Political and legal peril’ sounds like music to my ears.
……………………….
The Washington Post
Democracy Dies in Darkness
News Alert Nov 29, 8:21 PM
Trump emerges as a central subject of special counsel’s investigation in documents revealed this week
New evidence from two fronts of Robert S. Mueller III’s inquiry casts fresh doubts on President Trump’s version of key events involving Russia, signaling potential political and legal peril for the president. Investigators have now publicly cast Trump as a central figure of their probe into whether Trump’s campaign conspired with the Russian government during the 2016 election.
Together, the documents show that investigators have evidence that Trump was in close contact with his lieutenants as they were in touch with both Russia and WikiLeaks — and that they tried to conceal the extent of their activities.
LikeLike
This is unbelievable. How can we get rid of this horrid creature in the WH? There is NO excuse for killing marine life nor antagonizing governors for opposing the expansion of federal oil and gas leases to the Atlantic. Trump has NO respect for the environment.
…………….
The Washington Post
Democracy Dies in Darkness
News Alert Nov 30, 11:46 AM
Trump administration to let companies run deafening seismic tests that can kill marine life, a step toward oil drilling in Atlantic
The planned Friday announcement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, a division of the Commerce Department, that it will issue the permits to five companies is likely to further antagonize a dozen governors in states on the Eastern Seaboard who strongly oppose the administration’s proposal to expand federal oil and gas leases to the Atlantic. Federal leases could lead to exploratory drilling for the first time in more than half a century.
LikeLike
It may be sooner than you think, Carol.
Many Republicans in the Senate voted to stop US arms aid to Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen.
And now this:
https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-legal-perils-that-michael-cohens-guilty-plea-pose-for-donald-trump
LikeLike
Carol,
This is from today’s Boston Globe:
Is your head hurting as much as mine from this constant barrage of Trump covfefe? It’s stunning how easily Trump and the people around him lie. So casual, so interwoven into daily conversation. Trump pursued a deal in Russia to build a Trump Tower in Moscow — and give Vladimir Putin a $50 million penthouse in the building — while he was running for president. It was just the latest of many attempts Trump had made over the course of 30 years to do real estate deals there. The tower pursuit sped up in the fall of 2015 when Trump signed a letter of intent authorizing negotiations to proceed — negotiations that ended in June 2016. But Trump repeatedly shaded the truth to voters, saying he knew nothing about Russia, had no ties to Russia, had no deals in Russia. Not sure why he couldn’t have just said, “I really wanted to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, but the deal fell through.” Maybe because it had been revealed that Russia tried to interfere in the 2016 election on Trump’s behalf.
His former attorney, Michael Cohen, outright lied to Congress, saying the deal ended in January 2016, that he hadn’t talked to Trump or his children about the project, that he didn’t consider going to Russia, and that there was no Russian government involvement — all lies.
The question is how much Trump’s potential post-presidency deals are influencing his inexplicable embrace of a despot like Putin. And another question today is whether his decision to not meet with Putin at the G-20 really was about Russia’s attack on Ukrainian ships, or was actually because it looks bad in the context of Cohen’s admissions. Are Trump’s personal business dealings influencing his decisions and policies as president?
LikeLike
The Orange IDIOT is showing his extremely high intelligence again.
……………………..
EPA Plans to Roll Back Water Protections Despite Climate Change Warnings
Sharon Lerner
November 27 2018,
…The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to release a rule replacing water protections for many waterways across the U.S. The new rule, based on an executive order Donald Trump issued in February 2017, will likely take federal protections away from these tributary rivers, streams, and wetlands that are seasonal and rain-dependent.
Though a growing number of waterways may run only a few months a year, such streams and rivers impact 58 percent of the drinking water in the continental United States, supplying more than 117 million people, according to EPA calculations.
The deregulation of seasonal waterways could also worsen flooding…
https://interc.pt/2P3ynUf
LikeLike