Tony Thurmond tweeted that Marshall Tuck called to congratulate him on his victory in the race to become State Superintendent of Instruction in California.
At last count, Thurmond was leading Tuck by 4,632,425 (50.8%) to 4,480,240 (49.2%).
There were not enough votes outstanding to change the outcome.
First of all, congratulations to Tony Thurmond for winning and fighting clean.
Second, condolences to Marshall Tuck.
Above all, a Bronx cheer for the billionaires who thought that they could buy this office by heaping millions on the Tuck campaign, twice as much as Tony Thurmond was able to raise.
It is no secret that most of the money for Tony Thurmond was contributed by the teachers’ unions. Their money was not inherited, nor did it come from speculation on Wall Street. Their money came from the dues paid by teachers and other members of the union, as well as other unions.
This race was not between two men, but between two competing ideologies.
On one side, behind Thurmond, were the hardworking women and men who teach every day, most of them in the classrooms of California.
On the other were billionaires, who want to impose their DeVosian ideas about the free market on the public schools. They make no bones about their desire to encourage more privatization of public schools.
Tuck’s leading contributor, who gave more than $6 million, was billionaire Bill Bloomfield, a venture capitalist and a Republican. Close behind him were the Walton family (who don’t believe in paying their 1 million workers at minimum wage), Eli Broad, Doris Fischer, Arthur Rock, and Richard Riordan. It is likely that none of these people have entered a public school since they were children, if then.
In time, the full list of contributors will be published, and it is sure to include other billionaires who have taken it upon themselves to inflict their wrongheaded ideas on America’s children.
My wish is that their loss in this election humbles them, but in reality, I know that those who are billionaires never learn humility.
My wish is that they learn that the voters and parents don’t like what they are offering.
My wish is that they would find a new hobby and make a pact to pay higher taxes so that teachers might have a good salary, not only in California but in every state.
Here are some suggestion for what they might do instead of pushing charter schools: build health clinics in every poor community; support school nurses for every school; establish well-supplied libraries in every school; give schools money dedicated to buying musical instruments and hiring someone to teach music, band, and orchestra; build playgrounds where they don’t exist and pay schools to set aside time for recess and play. The best idea of all: Insist on paying higher taxes to support education! You can’t take it with you, and your children don’t need to inherit billions of dollars. It will make them lazy and ruin their lives.
There are so many useful ways that these very rich people could spend their money, ways that would help children and communities.
If they care about our national future, they would invest in good ideas instead of spending hundreds of millions to privatize public schools.
They would be revered instead of wasting their money trying to gain control of something they do not understand.
And, yes, one more thing!
Congratulations, Tony Thurmond for a race well run!

Awesome! Love your input about this!
LikeLike
This is great news!
Bill Bloomfield is also a big contributor to CA State Senator Ben Allen, who is a registered Democrat (as is Tuck). Bloomfield paid for an oversized election mailer for Marshall Tuck with a giant picture of a smiling Ben Allen endorsing Tuck. Ben Allen is Chair of the CA State Education Committee.
LikeLike
Some of us were fooled by Zimmer’s buddy, Ben Allen, He and Bob Hertzberg and Henry Stern have shown us where their hearts, minds, and purses are by endorsing Tuck. NEVER AGAIN will I work to elect these three phony liberals. They have sold out to the Billionaire Vultures.
elubic@aol.com
LikeLike
Is Allen the reason the public schools are still operating on a shoe string? Is there any hope for more money?
LikeLike
Public School Privatizers’ “Marshall Plan” …. THWARTED!
Twp and a half years ago, the California Charter Schools Association claimed that they will keep running Marshall Tuck for State Supe until Tuck wins.
In his keynote at the California Charter Schools’ Association’s annual 2016 soiree, CCSA’s President Jed Wallace called this strategy their … wait for it…
” … our ‘Marshall Plan.’ ”
Yeah, I know. Pretty lame. Harry Truman and George Marshall are twirling in their respective graves.
Here’s that quote in context.
JED WALLACE:
( 25:05 – 25:38 )
( 25:05 – 25:38 )
“… a plan for our entire state.
“We refer to it as our ‘Marshall Plan,’
— (laughs creepily at his lame joke)
“Because we hope to heck that CCSA advocates, not so long from now, can convince Marshall (Tuck) to run again, and can take this broad base of charter school supporters that we have, and help him become a transformational S.P.I. (Superintendent of Public Instruction)
” … in 2018, just like CCSA advocates will be working together with our broad base to elect a governor who is as supportive of charter schools as our current governor is.”
The governor’s race didn’t work out so well for Jed, either. Privatization stooge Tony Villaraigosa went down in flames like the Hindenburg, not even making the run-off / general election.
I kept watching Jed’s speech and shortly after this, Wallace brags about campaigning for Ref Rodriguez in L.A. Unified’s Board District 5 during the 2015 election.
*And how’s that working out for you NOW, Jed? Not so good, I imagine, Your guy Ref resigned in disgrace and is now a convicted felon.”
Back before Ref’s plea deal, the stress of a trial on dozens of felony counts — earlier handed down by the grand jury — must have been getting to the Ref-ster, as he was arrested for public drunken-ness during school hours (i.e. at a restaurant during his lunch break. Could you imagine if someone on the pro-public ed side, say tje UTLA President or the CTA President, or I dunno … Dr. Ravitch had been arrested like this? Could you imagine what they would have done with this, during the school / work hours?)
From the L.A. Times (after Ref spent 5 1/2 hours in the clink):
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-edu-ref-rodriguez-public-intoxication-arrest-20180404-story.html
You might think that including this is gratuitous, but I did so because Ref’s opponent Bennett Kayser was and is one of the most moral, upright, and decent people one will ever get to know. The campaign against Bemmett was a classic example of Freudian projection — all the scummy attributes of which Ref was and is guilty, were then smeared onto Bennett, who possesses none of these.
The L.A. Times knew back then how much of a crook that Ref was before he was elected, but endorsed him anyway. For example, Ref approved a multi-million-dollar food contract — to provide food the the PUC charter schools — to a company owned by the spouse (husband) of one of the higher-up exec’s (Jacqueline Something-or-other) at the PUC Charter Chain that Ref was leading. When this was discovered in the middle of the 2016 campaign, she quickly resigned and exited the PUC orgt Ref then made the strange claim that her resignation did not mean that either she or he did anything wrong.
Oh yeah? Then why did she resign when it was discovered?
LikeLike
Excellent post.
LikeLike
I’m so glad that we Californians rejected Tuck’s ethnocentrism and “english only” policies. Our state’s diverse students deserved, and got much better than those politics of exclusion and marginalizing. This has been an excellent weekend so far with Tony Thurmond’s victory, and my passing the California Bar Exam on my first attempt. Two more things the lucrative charter school industry needs to worry about.
LikeLike
Mr. Skeels,
Congratulations on your Bar results! I have no doubt that you will continue the fight to save public education, and hope that you hit the CCSA square in the pocketbook.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great news, congrats CA!
LikeLike
It is very satisfying to see that the billionaires dropped at least $30 million and lost anyway.
If they thought it was necessary, they would have spent $60 million, $90 million, but that might have been embarrassing and might have led to an even bigger defeat.
LikeLike