Arizona’s State Auditor identified more than $700,000 in voucher money that was mis-spent for cosmetics, music, movies, clothing, sports apparel, and other personal items. Some even tried to withdraw cash with their state-issued debit cards. The state has not recovered any of the money. The legislature passed a bill to expand the voucher program, which gives parents a debit card for their e Peres, to every student in the state. Auditing will be even more difficult. Millions will be wasted. And many of the state’s children will go without an education.
On November 6, Arizonans will vote on whether to give a debit card to every parent in the state. If you don’t want universal vouchers, vote NO on Prop 305.
The Arizona Republic reports:
Arizona parents have made fraudulent purchases and misspent more than $700,000 in public money allocated by the state’s school-voucher style program, and state officials have recouped almost none of that money, a new Auditor General report has found.
The findings are the latest blow to a program that Republicans have touted as a model for school choice that has been replicated nationwide, but has faced serious questions about lax financial oversight.
The audit, released Oct. 25, found the state Department of Education, charged with administering and regulating the program, repeatedly failed to flag accounts at high risk for fraud.
That allowed parents whose children were enrolled in the Empowerment Scholarship Account program to make numerous improper purchases on state-issued debit cards, even after the accounts should have been frozen or closed.
The program began as a way to help parents of children with special needs find the educational services best suited to their kids. In 2017, Republicans in the Legislature expanded the program to make all of the state’s 1.1 million public-school students eligible to use tax money for private school tuition.
A grassroots group of parents and public education advocates who oppose the expansion collected tens of thousands of signatures to refer the law to the ballot as Proposition 305…
A “yes” vote on Proposition 305 keeps the newly expanded program in place. A “no” vote rolls back the 2017 expanded law….
The Auditor General found some parents used the ESA cards for transactions at beauty supply retailers, sports apparel shops and computer technical support providers. Auditors also found repeated attempts by some parents to withdraw cash from the cards, which is not allowed and can result in getting kicked off the program.
The audit also concluded education officials did not properly monitor parents’ spending, even after questionable purchases were denied, including on music albums deemed noneducational, Blu-ray movies, cosmetics and a transaction at a seasonal haunted house.

This just goes to show that lots of parents really do want a CHOICE in how their money is spent…..but it WON”T be for an education. These same parents will complain that their children can’t read, write, perform basic math functions. A vote for vouchers is a vote to dumb down the populace.
LikeLike
This is what we get when government fails to do its job. The state should be better stewards of public funds. The squandering of public funds is irresponsible. Voters in Arizona should rid themselves of irresponsible public officials.
LikeLike
My hunch: the AZ GOP cut the funding for the State DOE thereby making it impossible for them to oversee this misbegotten program… and now that some parents predictably abused the vouchers they can turn around and use this as evidence of “mismanagement” by “the government…”… it’s a win-win for the GOP….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seems strange that they would do this via a “debit card.” Why not just have payments come directly from the state? Wonder if that’s because it would make the “state nexus” too tight in cases where vouchers were spent on religious schools.
LikeLike
Seems like corruption of this kind was built into the program. Will Republicans in Arizona start railing against “voucher queens?”
LikeLike
The GOP is such a lying duplicitous party. The GOPers always claim to be the party of limited government, lower taxes and free market solutions and to be vehemently against anything that even hints of being socialism. This voucher program sounds like socialism for stupidity, profligacy, waste and fraud. Precious tax dollars down the drain and it further erodes true public education.
LikeLike
The credit card system was pioneered in Florida where its use has been limited to an “approved” list of various services and products with a maximum for the type of Voucher/Scholarship each student qualified for. Parents and authorized caregivers were the only persons who were supposed to be able to use the card.
Here is a still pending trademark application for the Florida debit card. https://www.trademarkia.com/myscholarshop-87676898.html
Florida has four voucher/scholarship/tax avoidance schemes. Here is a path the marketing toolkit https://www.stepupforstudents.org/marketing-toolkit/
Here is the oldest and most widely used payment scheme for vouchers. http://get.classwallet.com/schoolchoice/
Here is an example of the ripoff in Florida, caused by requiring teachers in Dade Couny (Miami) to use classwallet for supplies… a use totally unrelated to the voucher/scholarship program. No other districts had the same requirement. Apparently, the approved vendors were marking up the price of conventional supplies. Here is the tale of one Miami/Dade teacher https://kafkateach.wordpress.com/2018/05/12/why-teachers-hate-class-wallet/
LikeLike
I watched the video overview at ClassWallet. The program is similar to medical service payments/ reimbursement administered by health insurance companies. It would prevent the sort of abuses seen in AZ.
Mechanics can be handled relatively cheaply by computer. But the process requires hefty admin support to establish/ maintain/ update approved services/ goods, investigate/ approve/ maintain/ update lists of qualified providers, and deal with customer service issues. So essentially, you have to set up a new bureaucratic unit within the state’s dept of ed [procurement].
Taxpayers will inevitably pay a mark-up from every provider to cover their paperwk expense as a govt vendor. And… higher-priced vendors will find ways to buy influence with the govt, squeezing lower-priced competition off the approved list [see the Miami-Dade example].
This illustrates, at the brass-tacks level, some of the expenses involved in running yet another tier of schools with public money.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that growing “management” model of modern days: tiers and then more tiers between the consumer/client and the overwhelmingly wealthy 1% — the phenomenally rich forever looking to establish yet another management tier to help them eke out and suck up every penny
LikeLike
Add this latest to the many reasons why vouchers (like tax credits) are just a scam. Let us hope that AZ voters next week will follow the example of the voters in 28 state referenda from coast to coast from 1966 through 2014 and sink this awful waste of public funds by 2 to 1.
LikeLike
ESA recipients need to be policed more carefully. Each ESA participant should be required to submit an annual “return”, on the items/services purchased through the ESA program.
In a program like this, there will be fraud and abuse. But, that is no reason to “throw the baby out with the bath water”. Close accountability, and swift prosecution of abusers, will certainly keep the wide majority honest.
Food stamp/SNAP recipients sometimes use their food stamps to buy cheetos and soda pop. No one is suggesting cancelling the food stamp program!
LikeLike
The ESA program allows massive fraud. Parents get a debit card. Their children don’t get an education.
LikeLike
“Each ESA participant should be required to submit an annual “return”, on the items/services purchased through the ESA program.”
Oh for the love of pizza, Charles, what century are you typing from? Have you ever seen a credit card statement? Why pretend the the powers that be don’t already know what ESA recipients are spending their money on? They clearly don’t care, which is the problem.
LikeLike
I have seen a credit card statement. The AZ program is clearly not being policed properly. The debit card program could be set so that the card can only be used at approved sites. (Keep in mind, that I am an IT professional).
The recipients should be required to use the ESA program properly, or else have their participation cancelled, and face prosecution.
No one doubts, that there is fraud and improper use of funds in the program. But that is no reason to cancel the program.
LikeLike
Younare right, Charles. Cases of individual fraud are not a reason to cancel the whole program. The whole program is a fraud that should be canceled because it diverts money from public schools, which is why citizens pay taxes.
LikeLike
I believe that the entire purpose of the Arizona ESA program is precisely to “divert” financial resources from the publicly-operated school system, and into the educational enterprises (tuition, tutoring, etc), that has been selected by the families.
When money ceases to flow to the public schools, that the students are not attending, and does go to the schools/tutoring, that the students are attending, that is the reason why the program was brought in, in the first place.
Everyone agrees that vouchers/ESAs divert resources from the public school systems. But voucher opponents seem reluctant to face up to the other side of the equation. These programs divert the students as well.
LikeLike
In other words, as you admit, the purpose of vouchers is to destroy the public schools that the overwhelming majority of students choose.
LikeLike
From the article: The State Supt said that $5.7million intended for program oversight is sitting in a fund which legislators have refused to release. A Rep legislator said that tho his caucus wouldn’t agree, he finds them so enthusiastic about vouchers that they are loath to do anything, including releasing oversight funds, that might make the vouchers ‘difficult to use’.
LikeLike
Also, my girl did not do Volleyball only because of short short or underwear pants. She hates that she can’t do Volleyball at all and will graduate next year. When is there going to be reason and have regular basketball shorts in schools for girls Volleyball.
LikeLike
Comparing the ability to purchase Cheetos with SNAP, to defrauding the taxpayers by purchasing non-educational personal items like beauty supplies, is not a valid comparison by any stretch. Cheetos, soda, steak, etc. are all eligible food items allowed under SNAP.
LikeLike
And no one using SNAP ever figured out how to purchase alcohol through the system.
Nevertheless, fraud is fraud, and the Arizona debit card approach needs to be improved or voted down.
I wonder what the percentage was of fraud. Any larger than with SNAP?
LikeLike
Do they really have a program that needs to be monitored on an individual level? Coming from the GOP, which has railed against big government for years by yelling about welfare fraud, this is laughable but not humorous. The superstructure of a government to over see a program designed this way is so large and expensive that programs designed to combat the depression during the New Deal pale by comparison. The cost of monitoring each and every person as you try to control their behavior is the argument against tyranny. The failure of the Soviet Union can be laid largely to the massive cost of the police state. As soon as Gorbachev realized that he had to create glasnost to survive, the house of cards came crashing down. Even the old KGBer Putin realizes that modern tyranny must save money with natural compliance inducements.
LikeLike
These schoolteachers dressed up as ‘Mexicans’ and a MAGA wall for Halloween. It didn’t go well.
A school district in Idaho apologized after its staff dressed up as Mexicans and the border wall for Halloween. (Globalstock/iStock) (Gobalstock/iStock)
By Eli Rosenberg
November 2 at 10:36 PM
An Idaho superintendent has issued a public apology to students and their parents after staff at a public elementary school dressed up as Mexicans and the border wall for Halloween.
The images began circulating on social media this week, and they depict more than a dozen adults dressed up in two groups at Middleton Heights Elementary School, in a town of about 7,500 located 30 miles west of Boise. One group is dressed up as stereotypes of Mexicans, replete with maracas, ponchos, sombreros and fake mustaches. The other group is dressed as wall segments plastered with the slogan “Make America Great Again.”
“I want to say we are better than this,” Superintendent Josh Middleton said in a Facebook video Friday. “We embrace all students. We have a responsibility to teach and reach all students. Period. Do I think that there was a malicious intent in this poor decision? No, I don’t. Was there a poor judgment involved? Absolutely. And we now have to own those decisions.”
The story quickly took off on Friday evening, drawing coverage in national news media outlets. Angry reactions flooded the school’s Facebook page. And social media responses were harsh.
“The fact that these elementary school teachers thought this would be okay demonstrates how much more cultural competence training is needed in education,” Kevin Nadal, a psychology professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, wrote on Twitter.
Middleton said that he had been alerted to the issue by a parent who expressed concern over the costumes and that he has since opened a district investigation into the matter.
“I was shown those photos and deeply troubled by the decision by our staff members to wear those costumes that are clearly insensitive and inappropriate,” he said. “Right now our time is going to be devoted to investigating those events and those poor decisions that were made.”
According to the Idaho Statesman, the photos were originally posted on the Middleton School District’s Facebook page with a caption reading, “It was a great day to be a Heights Hawk! We celebrated our RESPECT character winners, single and double marathon runners.”
The Halloween incident is another data entry in the long list of controversial, racially insensitive or historically ignorant costumes that inevitably get trotted out every year. But this incident also struck at the heart of an emotional political debate over immigration that has only grown more bitter in recent days in the lead-up to Tuesday’s elections, as President Trump has warned of an immigrant “invasion” and released a misleading ad about immigrants that was widely criticized as racist.
Twelve advocacy organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union’s chapter in the state, sent a letter to the district expressing concern about the costumes, the Statesman reported.
“Regardless of the intent of a teacher’s actions in the classroom, we must focus on and give weight to the impact of such actions on the students who rely on teachers and other school officials for guidance and support throughout their educational experience,” the ACLU of Idaho said in a statement. “School districts, their staff and other agents have obligations under federal law, state law, and district policies to prevent and protect students, staff, and others from discrimination, bullying, intimidation, and harassment.”
The Idaho Human Rights Commission, a state governing body, also weighed in on Friday night.
“Discrimination under these acts can occur when an employer or school allows a hostile environment to exist against persons because of their race, sex and national origin,” the commission said in a statement, according to the Idaho Press. “Simply because conduct takes place as a so-called joke does not excuse otherwise unlawful conduct.”
The school did not identify the staff members who wore the costumes.
About 13 percent of the students at the elementary school are Latino, according to data from Idaho Ed Trends.
MAKE IT A GREAT DAY!
LikeLike