Earlier today, President Trump tweeted a map showing that America has good air, and used a map from 2016.
The Washington Post responded:
President Trump boasted on Twitter Monday that the United States has the “Cleanest Air in the World – BY FAR!” He backed up that claim by tweeting out a map depicting little lung-choking soot hanging over the nation when compared to many areas of Africa, the Middle East and East Asia.
The president has made a habit out of pointing out America’s relatively clean air in interviews and in speeches. Just last week, Trump told the Associated Press, “I want the cleanest air on the planet and our air now is cleaner than it’s ever been.”
The United States indeed has far cleaner air than many other countries — especially developing ones with growing heavy-industry bases like India and China.
Even so, Trump’s Monday evening tweet is misleading in at least three different ways.
First, if the map shows a win for anyone, it’s former President Obama. The map Trump tweeted out came from an April report done by the World Health Organization, or WHO. But it shows air quality data worldwide for 2016. That is, of course, one year before Trump took office.
Obama, the president at that time, had pursued a plan to curb even more emissions of the sort of soot shown in the map from the nation’s power sector. That plan has been scrapped by the Trump administration for one that relaxes pollution limits on power plants despite an analysis from Trump’s own Environmental Protection Agency showing that Obama’s Clear Power Plan would have saved thousands of lives each year. Those particles are known to embed in the bloodstream and airways and are linked to deadly heart and lung diseases.
Even without that rule, concentrations of the tiny particulate matter have fallen through the United States since at least 2000. The cause is in part more economic than political: Many U.S. coal plants have shuttered as less carbon-intensive forms of electricity generation have grown, including natural gas, wind and solar power.
Second, the claim added to the map — that “none in [the] U.S.” are exposed to pollutions levels above WHO’s recommendations — is inaccurate.. While vast swaths of America have good air quality, there are pockets of pollution in the United States that are cause for concern.
In total, 45 U.S. cities, including Atlanta, Chicago, Houston and Los Angeles, have fine particulate concentrations above WHO’s recommended level, according to John Walke, a clean-air lawyer at the advocacy group Natural Resources Defense Council. That means tens of millions of Americans are exposed to that harmful fine particulate pollution — not none of them.
Finally, the United States does not have the world’s best air quality, as Trump claimed. According to WHO’s database of the annual average concentrations of fine particulate matter in urban areas, Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and New Zealand each were less polluted than the United States in 2016.
Still, by that metric the United States is ranked No. 9. That’s hardly an achievement to scoff at. The president is right to say the United States has clean air — it’s just not superlatively so.
But the bigger truth behind Trump’s tweet is perhaps how it highlights the diverging ways the two major political parties have reacted to the success of U.S. air pollution controls.
Republicans like Trump look at America’s relatively clean air and say there is no need for additional air regulations that would unduly burden businesses. In fact, a few of the existing rules could be safely rolled back, they argue.
Democrats look at the same data and say that success is because of the air-pollution rules put in place in the 1970s and built up by successive presidential administrations. They look at the clear air and see proof that the existing rules work.
The Republican approach is the one winning out at the moment. The EPA is rolling back not just rules meant to curb power-plant emissions, but ones designed to control smog-forming pollution from automobiles, too.
For proof, look no further than the Twitter account of acting EPA administration Andrew Wheeler. Shortly after Trump posted the map, Wheeler retweeted it.

The GOP/libertarians hate regulations, they want “limited” government, smaller government, midget government, mini-me government that they can drown in the toilet. They want the corporations to run wild with few or no restraints, the environment be damned. Please vote Democratic on Nov. 6, if you live in NJ, vote for Bob Menendez.
LikeLike
If you look up ‘putz’ in the dictionary, DT’s picture is right next to the word entry.
LikeLike
YUP
LikeLike
I think Trump has assigned someone to research every president and discover their accomplishments so he can claim credit for them all the way back to George Washington, who didn’t cross the Delaware River because Trump did.
I will not be surprised if Trump also claims he suffered horribly at Valley Forge one horrible winter in the late 18th century to keep the colonial army together. That’s where Trump got his bone spurs (that never existed).
LikeLike
Love your comments, Lloyd.
I read your other comment and agree re: FAKE Democrats.
LikeLike
Lloyd’s sentiment is correct. (Although research and Trump probably never met.)
Melania borrowed from Michelle’s talking points from the beginning of Trump’s figurative squatting at the WH.
Definition of squatting – settling on public land in order to get title to it.
LikeLike
In addition to the critical issue of climate change, there are so many ways that Trump has undermined the reputation of the United States. If, as the Intercept reports, Kushner gave the Saudis American intelligence about their enemies who were then tortured by Saudi Arabia, future foreign intelligence will be far more difficult for the U.S. to obtain.
LikeLike
IMHO, it is the best advantage to have government with both House Senators and House of Common which sustain the best representatives from Republican, Democratic, and Independent.
These representatives are truly working for America and Americans of all classes whether it is high, middle, or low classes = academic and working (both in white collars and blue collars). This means, certain states will strongly vote for Republican Party, and so does to Democratic party and to the Independent Party. The rest of other states (veterans in teaching career, academic professionals and conscientious voters) will decide who can represent for America and Americans due to the candidates’ background, intelligence, working experience, and personal attitude toward public education.
I am proud of Ontario, Canada where the major party is normally Democratic, until Conservative Party with the corrupted businessmen + women invade in politic area, academic area and public policy, then a big messy danger happens. For instance,
1) dangerous Marijuana is legalized;
2) leasing public highway HW407 to be “toll pay” for foreigners at dirty cheap price ( 100 million) BUT Ontarians must pay VERY HIGH PRICE (100 billion) from tax payers funds;
3) workers suffer lack of protection from insurance;
4) women suffer lack of protection from hospital, from abortion, from rapists, from sexual harassment at work place, at universities.
The more gangsters from “NEW” and bad old Europeans, Asians, White, Mixed and Colour people, the less peace and fairness happens in all daily aspects of living life from working, police force, army force, education force…
Who creates these or brings to people all disastrous weathers like tsunami, hurricanes, wild fires, volcanoes, drought, flood? Who will reap the profit? Who will suffer? And who will be sick and dead?
Will those living beyond average be suffering? or will the next younger generation be suffering? Or only those poor and rich BUT ignorant people in global-wide on Earth will be in the tough luck situation!!! Back2basic
LikeLike
Meanwhile, a new report of a long-term study shows a 75-85 percent decline in flying insects, and another shows a 58 percent decline in wild vertebrates since 1970. The canaries in the coal mine are dying.
LikeLike
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185809
LikeLike
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37775622
LikeLike
Another outrage of the day from the Trumpty Dumpty misadministration:
“One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.” –Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex
Ideas matter. They matter a lot. That’s why reading (something Trumpty Dumpty evidently can’t or won’t do) is so important. His administration has just announced that it intends to redefine “gender” based on presence or absence of a Y-chromosome, which will have horrific consequences for trans people.
In 1949, the breathtakingly brilliant novelist and philosopher Simone de Beauvoir, from whom Jean-Paul Sartre stole his best ideas, published The Second Sex. In this ground-breaking book, she drew clearly, for the first time, an extremely important distinction between sex and gender and described the social construction of the latter.
Sex, she says, is a biological phenomenon. It has to do with physical traits that you are born with, like male or female genitals and internal organs. Sex is actually a LOT more complicated than even Beauvoir recognized, for we now know that we all start out female in the womb. Then, if the fetus carries the Y-chromosome, a testosterone flood occurs, and the developing clitoris extends and becomes a penis, and the developing labia majora fuse and become a scrotum, and this testosterone flood is greater or lesser in different Y-cromosome babies, who then have more or less pronounced male physical characteristics. Some people are born intersex, with ambiguous sexual genitalia and/or internal organs, and after birth, people are on a continuum with regard to many sexual characteristics, such as sex hormone levels, and all people produce, to a greater or lesser extent, both male and female hormones.)
Gender, on the other hand, is a sociocultural phenomenon. It is something you acquire via what we would today call microconditioning. It’s the whole set of cultural acquisitions related to being a woman or a man—dress, manner of walking and speech, roles within the society, and so on. Gender is CONSTRUCTED and thus open to deconstruction and reconstruction. In other words, it is potentially fluid, or malleable, and can and does take a wonderful variety of forms. To give a specific example, in the Masai culture, some gender characteristics of males are wearing bright clothing, doing small handicrafts, and sitting together and gossiping, all of which would seem unusual, to the Masai, if done by women–exactly the opposite of what was traditional among Europeans.
Of course, people who are extremely cognitively challenged, like our President, don’t understand distinctions. To use the word ironically, Trumpty and his ilk are incapable of DISCRIMINATING between sex and gender, and now they want to make the identity of the two into law, with horrific consequences for trans people in our country.
Help stop this evil. Let your voice be heard. The future is NOT binary.
http://time.com/5432091/gender-identity-transgender-hhs-memo/
LikeLike
Hi Dr. Bob Shepherd:
In general, according to my observation for the past 50 years that whenever a man really loves a woman, the result of a conceiving will be a baby girl after their making love. Similarly, whenever a woman really loves a man, the result of a conceiving will be a baby boy after their making love.
Ha ha ha, now, to think about LGBT (?), I must say that it is in history, man-will or man-made from abusive power-control, lust-control, OR animal-instinct-mimic-curiosity-half-baked cases…I can read all of weird cases from those in rich families and royal families in History.
Yes, we can explain sex nature by X and Y- chromosomes. But there is always special case that is beyond explanation. Life can be very simple BUT life also can truly be very complicated. This gives us three choices: Heaven – Earth – Hell. But I do not doubt about the four dimension – the invisible world where there is no gender, no strict, no discipline, no good and no bad = ???. I can not know for sure about this idea, ha ha ha. Have a great day. Respectfully yours, May King
LikeLike
Well then
LikeLike
Rump is despicable and so are his people. Impeach.
LikeLike
Trump playing games as usual.
I really do get knee-jerk reactions against EPA regs. Far away from the urbs, small businessfolk can be adversely [& sometimes illogically/ unfairly] affected by over-reaching bureaucracy from their own state epa’s– orgs which are geared up to deal w/their states’ big cities. The frustration and sense of powerlessness can bleed over into that anti-govt-reg/ pro-“small-govt” sentiment common in rural areas.
State epa hold-ups/ interference were regular events in my parents’ tiny RE-devpt biz, when epa’s gathered steam in ’70’s-’90’s. The most flagrant example: they had to pay a big fine for diverting a stream (on their property) so that a 30-y.o. pond made by the previous owner would stop flooding the adjacent county road… Because it decreased the wetlands for migrant birds 😀
LikeLike