A charter school in Palmdale, California, raised nearly $30 million in bonds for its new building. But as matters stand, the school will never open. Charters are risky. They open, they close. Sometimes states close more charter schools than they open. That’s business. Where is Enron, Braniff Airlines, all sorts of brands that disappeared? Gone without a trace.
For the last year, construction on the corner of Avenue R and 40th Street East in Palmdale hummed along as a massive school campus took shape.
On its Facebook page, Guidance Charter School posted photos of students holding shovels adorned with yellow ribbons and contractors pouring the foundation for what would be an 87,000-square-foot campus with a swimming pool, library and playing fields — paid for with nearly $30 million in bonds.
Less visible was what was happening behind the scenes, as the local school system raised alarms that threatened Guidance’s existence.
The Palmdale School District’s board of trustees, which first authorized Guidance 17 years ago, voted in January to close the school, citing concerns about poor academic performance and questionable financial operations. As the new campus rose, charter officials launched a series of appeals, the latest of which came before the Los Angeles County Board of Education this week.
On Tuesday, the board rejected Guidance’s last-ditch effort to open for the 2018-19 school year. Unless a court overturns Palmdale’s decision, Guidance Charter School will not be able to enroll students — or receive the state funding that comes with them. But it still will be responsible for repaying the loan.
Supporters say the school is a victim of a process that puts decision-making power in the hands of the very districts that compete with charters for students and funding. Opponents see it as proof that charter schools, regardless of the quality of the education they offer or the extent of oversight they receive, are able to access bond money too easily.
The school’s executive director, Kamal Al-Khatib, blames its closure on the Palmdale School District, which he said purposely set the charter school up for failure in order to win students back. In the spring of 2017, less than a year before voting not to renew the school, the district had declared that Guidance was on solid ground, he said…
Guidance was founded in 2001 by Muslim leaders who promised to offer students a secular education and Arabic instruction.
The school leased space from a mosque owned by the American Islamic Institute of Antelope Valley, a religious organization run by the charter’s founder and its executive director, which would later prompt a host of conflict-of-interest concerns. Guidance’s ties to the mosque — and the thin partitions erected to separate its students from a prayer room — drew criticism from the American Civil Liberties Union and the Anti-Defamation League that there was not enough of a wall between church and state.
Regardless, the school grew. It had opened with 65 students but by last year had about 900 in grades K-12. And every five years, when its right to operate came up for renewal, the Palmdale school board voted to keep it open. Guidance also rented classroom space from the district…
When district officials voted not to renew the charter, they cited Guidance’s lagging academic performance as their primary concern.
Although its students’ scores on the state English exam in 2017 were roughly comparable to their peers in the district, according to Palmdale, math was a different story. In that subject, scores at Guidance were worse than those at most other schools in the area; none of the charter school’s 11th graders tested at grade level.
Many of Guidance’s students didn’t graduate, according to county officials, who said its drop-out rate was about 23% for the class of 2016. Palmdale officials found that even when students did graduate, many were not prepared to go to four-year colleges. According to the district, of 32 students who graduated from Guidance in 2014 and 2015, 24 had not completed the courses required for admission to the University of California or California State University systems.
The district also flagged Guidance’s fiscal operations and governance structure. It accused Al-Khatib of having financial interests in several of the school’s transactions, including its lease with the American Islamic Institute and a roughly $2-million loan from a related company called Guidance Charter School Services LLC.
Guidance’s lawyers disputed the claims and said Al-Khatib’s role at the mosque was voluntary and unpaid.

The LA County Board of Ed’s staff report is pretty damning. Clearly parents who sent their kids to this school either did it for religious reasons and didn’t care about academic quality because they trusted the leaders, or had no idea what they were signing their unfortunate students up for. It is pretty scandalous that a school that had violations pending for using dozens of teachers without proper credentials and in violation fo the Education Code could get $30 Million in bonds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
scandal after scandal and the game just goes on, something like a virus
LikeLike
Wonder WHAT COMPANY built those buildings? Payola?
LikeLike
Following the US Department of Ed in the ed reform era is fun.
Having completely given up on providing anything of practical value to any public school student, anywhere, they now exist solely to provide parenting tips:
US Dept of Education
Verified account
Heading #BackToSchool? Now is the perfect time to set up a special place at home to do school work/homework that is distraction free. 📓✏️💻 Show interest and praise your child’s work – it’s an easy way to show that education is a priority in your household.
Do ed reformers have a mission statement? Perhaps they should check it. I’m not clear on why we’re paying these people.
LikeLike
“Supporters say the school is a victim of a process that puts decision-making power in the hands of the very districts that compete with charters for students and funding.”
This is just an ideological sound-bite. The purse-strings need to be held by the locally-elected entity that collects the lion’s share of school tax revenue and is responsible for distributing it in a manner that benefits all children in the district. Under this charter system, the district can decide that its children would benefit from some charter alternatives [& has, in fact, two healthy charter schs], so it’s disingenuous to paint tradls & charters as adversaries.
In fact in CA it’s the state that undermines the structure & makes enemies of them, since we’ve seen that district decisions like this one are virtually always overturned, imposing charters where the local public doesn’t want and can’t support them, putting district budgets in disarray.
“Opponents see it as proof that charter schools, regardless of the quality of the education they offer or the extent of oversight they receive, are able to access bond money too easily.”
Obviously. But. The district gave the school a clean bill of health in 2/17 indicating green light for the bond issue. 11 months [& $30million in bonds & a nearly-done bldg] later, district thumbs-down the 3rd charter renewal? It’s not good enough to blame the 180 on a new supt showing that the old one shouldn’t have made the renewals: the new supt had already been there 4 yrs when the go-ahead was given. Taxpayers will end up holding the bag if the district pushes Guidance into bankruptcy.
Kudos to the new supt for showing the Guidance-emperor wears no clothes. But if bonds have to be eaten by taxpayers, fire him. Meanwhile, rack this one up as yet another example of how CA’s charter law is so weak that it turns charter decisions into political power struggles w/zero concern for taxpayer impact.
LikeLike
“Guidance Charter School will not be able to enroll students — or receive the state funding that comes with them. But it still will be responsible for repaying the loan.”
My guess is: NOT! I doubt they’ll end up having to repay a penny of that loan, especially not if they have friends in high places, loop-whole savvy accountants, use creative bookkeeping and/or money laundering schemes, etc.
White collar crime has been the easiest game for scheisters to win for years, hence all the banks and tycoons who tanked the economy BIG TIME, with impunity, and in the end made out like bandits with huge, taxpayer funded, too-big-to-fail bonuses.
Charter school carpet-bagging entrepreneurs, as well as unindicted co-conspirator Don-the-Con & his felonious motley crew, have been living high on the hog for decades, despite their unethical business practices, illegal behaviors and off the charts debts. They are typical of the fraudsters who’ve been over-looked by law-enforcement officials and corrupt politicians. I mean, if this stuff has been going on with Trump et al. for years, why didn’t it come out before the Russians and American nutters elected him in 2016?. I kept waiting to hear about it then but never did. How come only now has the proverbial feces started to hit the fan, when there were so many indicators in the past, including shady real estate deals?
LikeLike