We have read many comments on this site ridiculing the possibility that Trump colluded with the Russians or that the Russians interfered in any way whatever in the 2016 election.
It’s only fair to hear the other side, this time from journalist Jonathan Chait of “New York” magazine.
He posits that Trump has been “a Russian asset” since 1987.
Meanwhile, the Washington Post reports, Trump in Montana was scarier than usual, appealing to racism, xenophobia, mocking McCain and George H.W. Bush.
“The nation remains appalled by Trump’s morally bankrupt “zero-tolerance” policy, which separated migrant children from their parents at the border and set up jails for babies. Now that his feckless administration is under court order to reunite the children with their parents, its sheer incompetence is plain for all to see. Just when you thought the callous disregard for these children couldn’t get any worse, the New York Times reported last week that “records linking children to their parents have disappeared, and in some cases have been destroyed.” And don’t forget that the Trump administration is going after naturalized U.S. citizens now, too….
“The continual race-tinged language on the stump and from the Oval Office, from a president of the United States who tends his base like a helicopter parent, is seemingly emboldening certain folks to act out. Thanks to social media, we know about “BBQ Becky” and “Permit Patty.” Last week, “ID Adam” joined their ranks when he called the cops on a fellow resident in Winston-Salem, N.C., after asking her to show identification to use their neighborhood pool….
“On the global stage, Trump continues to diminish America’s standing around the world by berating our allies and thinking Russian President Vladimir Putin is his friend. Remember the contentious Group of Seven meeting in Canada last month? The one that produced the iconic photo of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Trump staring each other down over his balking at signing the summit communique as other leaders watched? Well, Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer told “CBS This Morning” that after Trump agreed to sign, “He stood up, he put his hand in his suit jacket pocket and he took two Starburst candies out, threw them on the table, and said to Merkel, ‘Here, Angela, don’t say I never give you anything.’ ” And that was before Trump got into a spat with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over trade and withdrew the United States from the G-7 joint statement.
“Meanwhile, “troubling” doesn’t even begin to describe the Post story over the weekend about how Trump views Putin. According to U.S. officials, former national security adviser H.R. McMaster complained, “The president thinks he can be friends with Putin.” The report goes on to note this:
“Some White House officials worry that Putin, who has held several calls with Trump, plays on the president’s inexperience and lack of detailed knowledge about issues while stoking Trump’s grievances.
“The Russian president complains to Trump about “fake news” and laments that the U.S. foreign policy establishment — the “deep state,” in Putin’s words — is conspiring against them, the first senior U.S. official said. …
“With Putin, Trump takes a more conciliatory approach, often treating the Russian leader as a confidant.
“So what do you think I should do about North Korea?” he asked Putin in their November 2017 telephone call, according to U.S. officials. Some of those officials saw the request for advice as naive — a sign that Trump believes the two countries are partners in the effort to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula….
“All of this chaos swirling at home and abroad was the backdrop for the president’s Montana rally last week. That’s why Trump’s run-of-the-mill rhetorical dumpster fire is rightly viewed as an out-of-control inferno by everyone except those braying in the crowd in Great Falls or those averting their complicit eyes on Capitol Hill.”

So, what now we’re supposed to take Jonathan Chait seriously? Ay ay ay.
Anyway, few if any here have “ridiculed the possibility that Trump colluded with the Russians or that the Russians interfered in any way whatever in the 2016 election”. What we’ve said is (a) show us the evidence (hint, there still isn’t any yet: https://www.thenation.com/article/mueller-indictments-still-dont-add-collusion/ ) and (b) whatever collusion there may have been is basically irrelevant because Americans elected Trump and, unless things seriously change for the better, they will do so again in 2020. Whatever influence PUTIN! may have had pales in comparison to the flaws of Hillary herself as a candidate and the Democratic Party’s running of the election. As I said a couple threads down, there’s not much we can do about PUTIN! We could, however, potentially do something about the Democratic Party.
Anyway, again, feel free to yell at me if it makes you feel better – it still won’t change the facts. I don’t know that I’ll be back for a while. This place is becoming an echo chamber like I used to experience when I was naive enough to go on right-wing websites thinking Republicans could be argued with. Apparently Democrats can’t either.
LikeLike
Dienne, you have repeatedly asserted that there was no evidence of collusion despite the fact that his campaign manager Paul
Manafort worked for pro-Russian despots in Ukraine, despite the fact that his son and leaders of the campaign met with Russian operatives in June 2016 in hopes of getting dirt on HRC, despite the fact that Trump ridicules our allies and acts like Putin’s puppet. Why don’t you wait for the Mueller report, unless Trump manages to close it down. Basic rule of thumb:
Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.
What is Trump afraid of?
LikeLike
Dienne77: This thread should be named: “Smoking Guns Galore.”
I found the article informative.
But the first red flag that went up for me, and that was completely public (I never even thought of a Trump-campaign Russia link at the time) was when I read where, shortly after Manafort was hired, the Republicans removed their campaign “plank” that referred to their stance with regard to Russia. I didn’t even know at the time who Manafort was or his history of working with Russian oligarchs. Why, I asked, would they remove THAT plank? It’s been downhill from there.
The Russians are good at spreading so much smoke (from the smoking guns they leave around) that the evidence at the center becomes “clouded.” Half-truths and other logical fallacies abound (like equating Hillary’s negative issues with those of Trump as if they were morally equivalent). That’s Russia’s KNOWN methods of operations.
Applied here? It strains my credulity-gauge to continue to think: there is no connection. But I’m with you. Let’s wait and see what Mueller comes up with, not to mention a REAL reality show. Or do you think Mueller is a part of a “vast left wing conspiracy.”
BTW, you only have to watch the news (any of it) to realize that Trump is driving wedges between us and our long-term allies and is destroying the foundations of NATO, while kissing-up to the Russians–for whatever reason. For me, his actions have entered the “only two options” zone. (1) Stupidly destroying the foundations of democracy and democratic institutions OR (2) doing so intentionally–again for whatever reason (t-reason).
Whatever “make America great again” means, it’s delusional to think its some sort of “return” to authoritarianism. Since when were we ever a fascist state?
That the Russians are happy with Trump’s manifest activities is a known reality that, in my view, only self-imposed stupidity can refuse to recognize. CBK
LikeLike
Catherine,
I agree about that plank. And remember that change in the platform came after Trump’s top campaign staff and his son and son-in-law invited Russians offering dirt to Trump Tower for a meeting. And then Trump directed his son to lie about what the meeting was about (before he knew that Mueller had the e-mails proving this lie).
I agree with you that we should let Mueller do his job while acknowledging that there are plenty of smoking guns that certainly justify his taking his time and looking at all the evidence. Shouts that “there is no evidence” are what the right wing is screaming to shut down the investigation.
I really do not understand the double standard. Trump seems to blatantly flaunt the law — firing Comey after he wouldn’t follow his order (“suggestion”) to drop the Russia investigation — and people say “we don’t have any evidence of wrongdoing yet. But even the suggestion of impropriety by a Democrat (someone in an e-mail said they didn’t like Bernie) is considered proof that the entire primary was a sham.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent: But it’s true. And just now we see that bastion of single-standard politics–Mitch McConnell–speaking before Congress complaining about how many democrats say they will vote against ANY of the SCOTUS nominees.
What was the name of the Obama-pick who had Congressional doors shut in his face at the behest of (you guessed it) Mitch McConnell? Garland, or something like that? CBK
LikeLike
Saying there is no evidence of collusion (which there isn’t yet – read my link, Mate addresses Manafort) is not the same as ridiculing the possibility of collusion. I’ve said all along I’m willing to consider any evidence presented. I’m still waiting A bunch of intelligence agencies saying “trust us” is not evidence of collusion. A bunch of people being indicted for financial crimes is not evidence of collusion. A small troll farm looking to make money (and posting most of their ads after the election – in broken English no less) is not evidence of collusion.
LikeLike
Dienne,
I hope Mueller is allowed by Trump to conclude his investigation. When he was appointed, he was universally praised. Trump has demonized him for months. Go to google and read Mueller’s bio. He is an outstanding person with an unblemished history.
Trump works overtime to smear Mueller. Why? There is an old saying. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.
What is Trump afraid of?
As I recall, during the 2016 election, you were insistent that Clinton would be no better than Trump. Now that the arch-reactionaties will have five judges in SCOTUS, do you still believe there is no difference between Hillary and Trump? Do you care if Roe v Wade is overruled? Do you care if gay rights are restricted? Do you care if Obamacare is ruled unconstitutional? Just wondering.
LikeLike
Trump firing Comey after directing him to stop the Russia investigation. Trump ordering his top campaign officials to be in a meeting with Russians offering dirt and then directing his son to lie about the reason for the meeting and pretend it was about adoptions. Trump ordering a change in the RNC platform to favor Putin after that meeting in Trump Tower.
Where did anyone here mention a bunch of intelligence agencies saying “trust us”? They mentioned the actions that were in plain view to the American people.
LikeLike
Diane is much more forgiving than I would be in her position, given that Chait smeared her as a racist for believing in neighborhood schools and sexist for opposing Campbell Brown’s pedophile fear mongering campaign against teachers. Given his journalistic malpractice on Iraq, Libya, etc. it’s usually safe to take what he says and identify its opposite in order to find the truth.
LikeLike
I’m no fan of Chait on the subject of charters. Yes, he has insulted me. Unlike Trump (and even Chait), I try to be civil.
LikeLike
Well, flaws and all, Hillary did win the popular vote. To have not voted for her with Trump as the only other alternative was insane. Please spare me the nonsense about Jill Stein, she was no alternative, she couldn’t even beat out that libertarian nightmare, “what’s Aleppo” guy. People that I like on most issues, like Chris Hedges, Cornel West and Jimmy Dore are still frothing at the mouth about Hillary and how horrible she is and they pooh-pooh the whole Russian influence thing. I thought it was pretty much a fact that the Russians did interfere in the election. You can definitely question how effective that interference was.
LikeLike
“I thought it was pretty much a fact that the Russians did interfere in the election. You can definitely question how effective that interference was.”
That’s a good point. When Richard Nixon was aided and abetted illegally by his campaign staff arranging break-ins at Watergate and having a slush fund to pay for dirty tricks, the fact is that Nixon would have won that election anyway. He beat McGovern by a landslide. Even in the popular vote!
But fortunately, Americans back then understood that the point of the investigation is NOT whether or not Nixon would have won without the illegal help he received and then obstructed justice to cover-up.
The point is that democracy depends on making sure this kind of illegal behavior is not condoned or dismissed.
LikeLike
Joe
It was very effective some of that was by chance. You educators have done a terrible job of educating the American people. Had to throw that in there. It’s not the fault of teachers but we have to find someone to blame; so why not the teacher.
Now everyone knows I am no fan of Hillary or Barack. So I won’t let them off the hook for years of failed policy. Won’t let them off the hook for being Republican light or running a terrible campaign.
So here is my theory the Republicans since Richard Nixon have been a criminal enterprise involved in high treason against the United States. Forget Watergate that was small potatoes fraternity stuff breaking into your opponent’s headquarters with CIA types. Sounds like a good action adventure spoof. Conspiring with the South Vietnamese in 68 to scuttle the peace talks; arguably cost the lives of 30 thousand American boys. Then we have Iran Contra which also may have involved the sabotaging of the Iran Hostage release. Of course, we will never know because daddy Bush pardoned everybody.
Then we can move on to Shrub and Cheney and the outing of Valerie Plame. An effort that was aimed at intimidating her husband who was throwing cold water on the idea that Niger was selling Yellow cake uranium to Saddam. So it is apparent that there are very few guard rails that Republicans are not willing to break through in order to seize power or achieve policy goals. We have to look no further than the tax bill. Or the blocking of Merrick Garland.
Since the election of Bill Clinton the nerve of him to end Republican rule before its time. The Republicans have used the investigative powers of Congress to smear and entangle Democrats in trumped-up scandals. From Vince Foster and White Water to Benghazi the IRS Ur-anus one (Uranium). Benghazi mutated into an investigation into the Clinton use of an email server. The investigation lingered for years with questions about what happened to the 30 thousand missing emails on Clinton’s server. The shopping list for the cocktail parties and bills Limo rides may never be found. But Comey under pressure from Republicans felt the need to publicly indict Clinton but criminally absolve her. Unlike the Republican scandals no need for Pardons. Because nobody ever gets indicted no less convicted or pleads guilty in these scandals. They are like Pizza Gate the products of deranged minds.
Enter the Russians with the 30 thousand missing emails. Oh, you say that the DNC hack had nothing to do with the server. Try telling that the to the American people who are clueless. Weeks of the DNC convention being tied up in headlines that causes chaos at the convention and certainly was responsible for some Bernie supporters abandoning the Democratic ticket. But Hillary recovers from that and with the general public as ignorant as they are; manages not to lose much support. But Emails being synonymous with Hillary was now ingrained in the American psyche. Enter the night of the” Pussy Grabber ” Perfect night for it to be John Podestas time in the barrel. Hillary and more of those 30 thousand emails we have been looking for. You say they had little to do with Hillary who cares nobody ever read any of them. But they were in the headlines for weeks again.
Enter Rudy Guiliani and the NY office of the FBI and retired agents from that office. A report that they found the missing 30 thousand emails on Anthony Weiners laptop Rudy is so excited by the news that he can barely avoid pissing in is pants on Fox News as he tells about a big October surprise. The Surprise; Comey is again being pressured to reopen the investigation and announce it to the public or risk the results of an election being called into question. Coming just weeks before the election; we see Clinton’s poll numbers plummet. With no time left to recover when it turned out to be horse manure.
So how do we know that Rudy and Trumplandia were in on it, after all, that section of the inspector generals report has not been released yet even though Comey claims to have asked for the investigation when he was still the director. Because Trumps Bucket of crap Deven Nunes a wormy little weasel tells us he had the information about the laptop before the Comey memo to Congress. Now how would he have gotten it without being given it by agents from the NY FBI?
Yes, the Inspector General is still investigating FBI leaks. I wonder if that report will come with indictments from Mueller.
As for dienne’s nonsense never has so much Alzheimers been detected in one small group of people. And if the back channels and secret meetings about adoption had been about Hillary she would be calling for a firing squad. And not for nothing if you are innocent you say who me worry take your best shot. You do not obstruct justice you do not makeup stories about adoption. And you certainly do not plead guilty to lesser crimes unless you are guilty of the underlying charge.
As for motive a bankrupt billionaire and a 500billion dollar oil deal with Putin for starters.
LikeLike
Joel Herman: I especially like the “pissing in his pants” comment about Rudy. (There’s no better way to say what we see when he puts his wannabe face on the news.) Er . . . but then there is the comment about never has “so much Alzheimers . . . .” Nailed it. When these people are around (and I have some in my family) I get this image in my head of myself trying to carry on a conversation with a brick. CBK
LikeLike
Joel,
Wow! Thank you for this post that sums it all up.
I agree with everything you posted here (even about the years of failed policies under the Democrats).
LikeLike
Joel,
That was an excellent comment you made at The Nation website in response to the article clearing Trump of all collusion charges.
LikeLike
Joel, I read and reread your comments to joe. Bingo! What you wrote is right on. Thank you.
Dump needs Putin’s money and who knows what else … drugs, sex, fraud, and ???? else. The list is long.
But just focus on two:
Has dump paid any taxes. Why does he need Putin’s $$$$$$, and Deutche Bank? Why does he surround himself with thieves. Why did he appoint those evil and incompetent people in his cabinet.
And WHERE are those babies and children separated from their families and having to appear in Court? Why that dump “ain’t” in court being prosecuted for treason and then IMPEACHED is beyond me.
I am not a fan of the DFERS. In fact, the DFERS make me wrench. They sold out public education and got dearly rewarded in many ways.
LikeLike
I rarely read Chris Hedges anymore. I have a lot of respect for his earlier work but his position on Hillary Clinton appears to me to be almost unhinged.
I am willing to wait to see what Mueller’s investigation uncovers.
LikeLike
Hello Diane: Of course, Trump is right that so many in the government are conspiring against him.
. . . just like the Justice Department and the government has “conspired” against crime and criminals for centuries (with a few damnable exceptions). CBK
LikeLike
Horrifying. If only more Americans knew more about Putin’s wickedness. They don’t understand why we should consider Russia an enemy.
LikeLike
Trump may not be a secret Russian agent, but it’s clear that there was a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign. That’s simply obvious. Even the late Charles Krauthammer admitted it in a column lat summer referencing the Trump Tower meeting between Trump campaign officials and Russians:
“The evidence is now shown. This is not hearsay, not fake news, not unsourced leaks…even if nothing else is found, the evidence is damning…you don’t need a lawyer to see that the Trump defense — collusion as a desperate Democratic fiction designed to explain away a lost election — is now officially dead.”
The Post reported this just a few says ago:
“the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence found that Russia did indeed intervene in the election with the express purpose of hurting Hillary Clinton’s candidacy or potential presidency and of helping Donald Trump win. It found that the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that was released in January 2017 was based on solid information and defensible analytical assumptions. It found that Russia did in fact penetrate multiple state and local electoral boards and they reported that their subsequent investigation had unearthed further evidence of this…It agreed that all of this was personally ordered by Vladimir Putin.”
Importantly, the attorneys for Paul Manafort have already conceded in court filings that the Russian election meddling took place and Manafort was involved. Manafort’s lawyers want the conspiracy evidence disallowed in court, saying that
“Even if evidence or arguments concerning Mr. Manafort’s role in the Trump campaign or the allegations of collusion under investigation by the Special Counsel were relevant and admissible, they should nevertheless be precluded by Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“Rule 403”). Under Rule 403, relevant evidence may be excluded at trial “if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of,” inter alia, “unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, [or] misleading the jury[.]” Fed. R. Evid. 403. “[U]nfair prejudice can arise where the offered evidence presents a ‘genuine risk that the emotions of the jury will be excited to irrational behavior, and that this risk is disproportionate to the probative value of the offered evidence.’”
The lawyers added this:
“As the Court (not to mention the potential jurors in this case and the American public atlarge) is aware, the appointment of the Special Counsel to investigate possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government has been on the front page of most newspapers for over a year and is mentioned each day in hundreds of media outlets, from major network television news broadcasts to political blogs, and has engendered fierce debate around the country. There can be no doubt that the scant probative value of evidence concerning Mr. Manafort’s tenure as then-candidate Trump’s campaign chairman, or concerning allegations that the campaign colluded with Russian officials, is undoubtedly and substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. Specifically, there is a very real risk that the jurors in this case—most of whom likely have strong views about President Trump, or have likely formed strong opinions as to the wellCase 1:18-cr-00083-TSE Document 93 Filed 06/22/18 Page 3 of 8 PageID# 1740 4 publicized allegations that the campaign colluded with Russian officials—will be unable to separate their opinions and beliefs about those matters from the tax and bank fraud matters to be tried before them in this case. For these reasons, the Special Counsel should be precluded from offering evidence or advancing arguments concerning Mr. Manafort’s role with the Trump campaign or the Special Counsel’s investigation into alleged collusion between the campaign and the Russian government.”
So, where is the evidence of conspiracy?
It’s all over, including in the legal filings by Manafort’s own attorneys.
LikeLike
democracy: The problem is that, in Trumptopia, “the emotions of the jury will be excited to irrational behavior” isindistinguishable from the fact that the jury might be excited to rational behavior having understood the truth. CBK
LikeLike
The truth is that there was a conspiracy between Trump and Russia.
The truth also is that Republicans are trying to help cover it up.
The truth also is that Article III, Section 3, of the U.S. Constitution defines this behavior.
LikeLike
It’s truly frightening, isn’t it. Trump went to the NATO meeting and opened his remarks by blasting Germany as “a captive of Russia.” Projecting much? The Senate passed a resolution by 97-2 reaffirming the US commitment to NATO. Trump is undermining the UK government by declaring his friendship with the pro-Brexit Boris Johnson, who just resigned from the Cabinet. Wonder what will happen when he has a 1:1 meeting with his good friend Putin? Will he give him a thumbs up on Crimea and Ukraine? No note-takers in the meeting. Strange.
LikeLike
There’s also this, by Marcy Wheeler, on the Trump Tower meeting:
” 52 U.S.C. §§ 30121 makes it a crime to solicit or offer support from a foreign national, which is one of the crimes that NSD has already said might be charged in this case. Arguably, that’s what the meeting did. All the more so if the emails that got dumped a 6 days later were tied to Don Jr’s agreement to revisit sanctions…it doesn’t so much matter whether the conspiracy was successful (and there’s abundant evidence showing both sides continued to try to deliver on this detail). It matters whether two or more people made an agreement to conspire to violate US regulatory functions.
(1) two or more persons formed an agreement to defraud the United States;
(2) [each] defendant knowingly participated in the conspiracy with the intent to defraud the United States; and
(3) at least one overt act was committed in furtherance of the common scheme.”
By virtually all accounts, the Trump Tower meeting constituted a conspiracy.
But guess what? The Trump Tower meeting is not all there is.
There’s more to come.
LikeLike
The thing about the Trump Tower meeting is that it is a fact that cannot be denied. And it is also a fact that Trump dictated a knowing false statement for his son that pretended the meeting was about “adoptions”. Trump had no idea that his son’s e-mails that showed that this had nothing to do with adoptions but was all about a foreign government offering dirt to help Trump that the Trump campaign received.
Now we know for a fact that Trump’s highest level campaign officials were at this meeting right at Trump Tower, including his son and son-in-law.
We know for a fact that the meeting was set after Trump Jr. received and responded to an e-mail offering dirt.
We know for a fact that Trump Jr. doesn’t order high level campaign officials around – Trump senior does. And that meeting was in Trump Tower and soon after the meeting the plank at the RNC was specifically changed to favor Russia for the sole reason that the Trump team demanded it.
And we know for a fact that when there were stories in 2016 of Russian meddling, that Trump himself denied any knowledge whatsoever of this, despite his knowing full well that he had ordered his top campaign staff and son and son-in-law to invite Russians offering dirt to Trump Tower for a meeting.
Case closed. I don’t know how anyone thinks this is not the most clear evidence of wrongdoing ever. A confession would not provide more evidence.
And it is a sign that the media is so fearful of the truth being “biased” that they have not called for impeachment long ago.
LikeLike
Part of the meeting was about “adoptions.” After the murder of Magnitsky by the Russian regime, the US imposed economic sanctions on Russia. Russia retaliated by halting the adoption of Russian children by Americans. Russia wants the sanctions lifted. “Adoptions” is a code word for “lift the sanctions.”
LikeLike
Thanks for the correction. But the e-mails to Trump Jr. to set up the meeting talked about offering dirt on Hillary.
It was illegal for the Trump campaign to even attend that meeting offering foreign help to win the election. And then Trump himself added to the problem when he stated publicly that he knew absolutely nothing about Russian involvement when his campaign had set up a meeting with Russians offering dirt right in Trump Tower and the very top campaign officials had attended.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent Another kink in the works is this: That meeting may well have had adoption on the agenda. Let me explain:
On Democracy Now last night, the suggestion was raised that undocumented children “disappeared” even from their parents in a new country who speak a different language, is a great source of “child workers” and even “child sex workers.” (God forbid.)
In the corrupt climate that we are becoming accustomed to, it’s not a stretch to at least WONDER about “adoptions” occurring in corrupt countries, like for the oligarchs in Russia who are long into sex trafficking.
The Democracy Now speaker did NOT connect with the Russians, but did cover the early-planning and contracting-out (by the U.S.) of “black site child-holding areas” (e.g., a vacant office building in Arizona) here in the United States. These sites are unconnected with any State license authority, and apparently even without State knowledge. In this one case, a neighbor video-taped through her window the otherwise-innocuous arrival of several ages of children with a couple of adults; and, worried about what was going on, reported it to authorities and those non-state agencies who are presently and thankfully diligent about this issue.
He’s their boy, however and, if so, through him, they can bend an entire nation to their will. NO–this is not over yet.
ALSO, I would ask some others here who are still ‘looking for evidence of collusion’: How many people do you know, who are morally sound and who are NOT corrupt in the way, say, the mob or Putin is corrupt, who also consistently surround themselves with corrupt and unprincipled people? . . . and not only that, who go around dissing everyone who disagrees with them or who don’t bow down, on principle? CBK
LikeLike
Trump landed in Brussels. He criticized the British leader Teresa May, praised her critic Boris Johnson (pro-Brexit) as “a good friend,” and praised his good friend Putin.
Is he the Manchurian candidate? Or the Siberian candidate?
LikeLike
dianeravitch About the child trafficking thing, a few minutes ago in an interview with someone on CNN, Mike Pence was asked about the “missing children.” In his response (I’m paraphrasing), he said how awful this situation was and of course no one wanted to see children “trafficked.” I almost fell on the floor. It was as if it was a commonly known idea–maybe it IS in some circles? CBK
LikeLike
The Trump Tower meeting is damning. But that’s only a part of the whole sordid mess.
The fact that more people are not outraged by what he and Republicans did and are doing is not a good sign for the health of the republic.
LikeLike
“Donald Trump is the subject of two federal criminal investigations.”
Go Mueller.
And that dump is jealous. Notice his loser gang of unmentionables. They are all sick and have dirt in each other. Thus, the club of horrors.
LikeLike
FILE- In this Aug. 3, 1993, file photo, then-Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg poses in her robe in her office at U.S. District Court in Washington. Earlier, the Senate voted 96-3 to confirm Bader as the 107th justice and the second woman to serve on the Supreme Court
https://ofwreplay.su
LikeLike