Andrew Boryga writes in the New Yorker about the changes that made New York City’s specialized, elite high schools more segregated than they used to be. One reason was budget cuts imposed by former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani.
“The city’s specialized public high schools weren’t always so segregated. In the nineteen-eighties, the three oldest and most prestigious specialized schools had sizable black and Latino populations. (In 1989, Brooklyn Tech, Bronx Science, and Stuyvesant were sixty-seven, twenty-two, and sixteen per cent black and Latino, respectively; today, those numbers have fallen to fourteen per cent, nine per cent, and three per cent.) Samuel Adewumi, a Brooklyn Tech alumnus who is now a teacher at the school, recalls that when he was growing up in the Bronx, in the late seventies, the borough had well-funded gifted-and-talented programs that served as pipelines for exceptional students. By the sixth grade, Adewumi said, he and his friends had their sights set on getting into a specialized high school. Most of their preparation for the test took place in school. “My teachers already knew what needed to happen for me to be prepared and worked it into the curriculum,” he said.
“Things began to change in the early nineties, when New York City eliminated many of its honors programs as “tracking”(separating students based on their abilities) fell out of favor. Then, under Mayor Rudy Giuliani, two billion dollars were cut from the city’s education system. Awilda Ruiz, who helped found the middle-school honors program that I attended, within an underperforming school in the South Bronx, and taught math in the program for nearly thirty years, said that during this period funding for test-prep in the program dried up. By the time I first became aware of the SHSAT, at the beginning of eighth grade, the only resource provided by my school was a thin packet of practice problems. I remember very little about sitting for the test that October, apart from feeling overwhelmed by the material, but I know that I wasn’t surprised or upset to learn that I didn’t score high enough to get into any specialized schools, in part because they never seemed meant for kids like me in the first place.
“Pedro Noguera, one of the country’s leading scholars of urban education, believes that the dismal diversity statistics in New York’s specialized high schools prove that the SHSAT is a flawed metric, and that the criteria for admission should be expanded. “There is no college in the country that admits students strictly on the basis of a test,” he told me. “The idea of using a single test is crazy and hard to justify—especially because we know grades are often better predictors of future success than test scores.” (Studies have shown that college students who are accepted to standardized-test-optional schools without submitting S.A.T. or A.C.T. scores perform around as well as those who do.) Noguera, who is a distinguished professor of education at U.C.L.A., and the author of a dozen books on urban education, is an Afro-Latino native of Brooklyn. He attended public schools in the borough and on Long Island, where his family moved when he was in the third grade, and he went on to attend Brown University, even though, as he’s put it, “most students that I went to school with did not go to college.” A big part of the problem with a school like Bronx Science, he said, is that it is overwhelmingly made up of students who don’t even live in the Bronx. “Either you open up Bronx Science to more kids,” he said, “or you create more Bronx Sciences in the Bronx.””

A number of people have commented lately on what a dumpster fire Mayor Giuliani has become. New Yorkers understand he has always been one.
LikeLike
The answer isn’t to lower the standard, but rather increase the level of preparedness. Remember, private schools such as those accepting Prep for Prep candidates have found a way. Why not Prep for Prep approach in the system thus producing more qualified candidates to compete on the test. Why lower the standards and for God sakes why blame a mayor from 20 years ago. This school system via your very strong union has received everything they requested and they have often squandered those funds and assets.
LikeLike
The union has no control over funding. The mayor controls the Board of Education budget.
LikeLike
Like $500 million to help failing schools that still failed? Imagine what that could have done with a Prep for Prep approach to students who aspire to one of the eight high schools but need additional tutoring and attention.
LikeLike
My school district actively recruited promising minority students for advanced classes. Chosen students attended a summer boot camp to help students be prepared to take the Regents or AP plunge. The guidance department worked with parents so they would be able to understand what was required and what resources were available.
LikeLike
Are you, by any chance, shilling for Prep for Prep? And the UFT has no latitude over school funding. Insisting that it does makes you sound like you don’t know what you’re talking about, which definitely undermines your credibility.
Would you care to underwrite your claim about “squandered…funds and assets” with some evidence to prove it? If not, it is meaningless….
LikeLike
As I have said before, I attended a selective high school in Philadelphia in the ’60s. I didn’t take a test, but some others did. I don’t know if we were the “best and brightest.” What I do know is that the school was very competitive, and we had lots of homework. I can also say that I met students from all over the city, and the school was at least 14% black based on the pictures of students in the senior yearbook. These students were the survivors. In 9th grade there was a “culling of the herd.” I do not know how many minority students entered in 9th grade as a number of students, both black and white, opted to go back to their local high schools in 10th grade. It seemed to me that the school tried to create some semblance of balance in their selecting process. We did not have AP classes. I think there was some discussion about offering AP in some classes in 10th grade as I was graduating, but my class was beyond that grade when the decision was made.
LikeLike
Abolish all selective enrollment schools. They will always result in segregation by class and race. Instead, focus on equity-where no matter what school you go to, you receive the same level of educational opportunity.
LikeLike
Thank you! It’s amazing how this obvious solution is so overlooked.
LikeLike
Amen, Katie.
LikeLike
Does that include colleges?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Colleges are completely different than K-12. The government of each state is mandated to provide free and equitable K-12 education for every student. There is no mandate to go to college.
LikeLike
So private schools, K-12, are okay then?
And what about public universities? The CUNY system? They have different requirements for each of their schools. Plus, they have separate programs for advanced students as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In new york city, schools focused on playing an instruments are excluded from being inclusive. Should that not exist as well?
LikeLiked by 1 person
One more thing, so many schools are segregated within the school because of honor or superintendent classes. Should be abolish those classes, too?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Obviously, I disagree. I just think we to end poverty.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even a comprehensive high school tracks students by interests and sometimes ability. This also results in students being sorted by class and often race. To counter this tendency, the diverse district in which I taught worked very hard to encourage minority students to take advanced classes. We offered advanced classes, but we tried to be more inclusive.
LikeLike
A serious, smart, highly motivated student in a low performing school cannot get the same opportunities that they would at Stuy or BHSS because low performing schools are constrained by their demographics. In a perfect world your suggestion would have merit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a pipe dream.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Katie
So your grand plan is to prevent opportunity for children? So many other means to encourage kids ….
That type of thinking is why parents are flocking to charters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs – this has been tried, it did not work because the implementation was all wrong as it is often the case. In theory, considering how much wealth we as species have created so far, this can be done. But people are greedy. And lazy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Weasels are in charge.
LikeLike