Minnesota passed the nation’s first charter school law in 1991 and opened the first charter school in 1992.
Seven years ago, Bloomberg News reporter John Hechinger (son of the eminent education writer Fred Hechinger, for whom The Hechinger Institute at Teachers College is named) went to see what had happened in Minneapolis 20 years later. What he discovered stunned him. Since charter cheerleaders care about test scores, but not racial segregation, it is not likely that much has changed.
“At Dugsi Academy, a public school in St. Paul, Minnesota, girls wearing traditional Muslim headscarves and flowing ankle-length skirts study Arabic and Somali. The charter school educates “East African children in the Twin Cities,” its website says. Every student is black.
“At Twin Cities German Immersion School, another St. Paul charter, children gather under a map of “Deutschland,” study with interns from Germany, Austria and Switzerland and learn to dance the waltz. Ninety percent of its students are white.
“Six decades after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down “separate but equal” schools for blacks and whites, segregation is growing because of charter schools, privately run public schools that educate 1.8 million U.S. children. While charter-school leaders say programs targeting ethnic groups enrich education, they are isolating low-achievers and damaging diversity, said Myron Orfield, a lawyer and demographer.
“It feels like the Deep South in the days of Jim Crow segregation,” said Orfield, who directs the University of Minnesota Law School’s Institute on Race & Poverty. “When you see an all-white school and an all-black school in the same neighborhood in this day and age, it’s shocking.”
“Charter schools are more segregated than traditional public schools, according to a 2010 report by the Civil Rights Project at the University of California, Los Angeles. Researchers studied 40 states, the District of Columbia, and 39 metropolitan areas. In particular, higher percentages of charter-school students attend what the report called “racially isolated” schools, where 90 percent or more students are from disadvantaged minority groups.
“Charter-School Birthplace
“In Minnesota, the birthplace of the U.S. charter-school movement, the divide is more than black and white.
St. Paul’s Hmong College Prep Academy, 99 percent Asian-American in the past school year, immerses students “in the rich heritage that defines Hmong culture.” Its Academia Cesar Chavez School — 93 percent Hispanic — promises bilingual education “by advocating Latino cultural values in an environment of familia and community.” Minneapolis’s Four Directions Charter School, 94 percent Native American, black and Hispanic, promotes “lifelong learning for American Indian students.”
“Charter schools, which select children through lotteries, are open to all who apply, said Abdulkadir Osman, Dugsi’s executive director.
“Some people call it segregation,” Osman said. “This is the parent’s choice. They can go anywhere they want. We are offering families something unique.”
“Nobody ‘Forced’
That’s a “significant difference” between Minnesota charters and segregated schools in the 1950s South, said Joe Nathan, director of the Center for School Change at Macalester College in St. Paul.
“Nobody is being forced to go to these schools,” said Nathan, who helped write Minnesota’s 1991 charter-school law.”
That’s the way segregation and choice work together. This is why Southern governors were champions of school choice in the decades after the Brown decision.

There is nothing wrong with students’ celebrating their language and culture, and my district had an annual multicultural festival to celebrate the cultures of our diverse students, and students did this through school clubs. However, our school district was integrated. We were also very conscious of our goal of making ELLs be a part of the mainstream from the start. Our ELL beginners spent an half of a day in ESL, but attended art, music and PE with their mainstream peers. As students’ language skills improved, we reduced their ESL time and increased their mainstream time. We knew that ESL was a means to an end and not an isolation tank. Unfortunately, some maintenance bilingual programs have suffered from the low expectations you mention in the post. In my district students knew that the goal was for them to no longer need ESL. They had to make it in the mainstream, and we pushed them to get there.
LikeLike
Multicultural celebrations are great. Unicultural celebrations are not. Integration is good for all. Segregation is harmful to all.
LikeLike
This type of CHOICE schooling is fragmenting the United States into many factions that are Balkanizing the United States making it ripe for not one Civil War, but many, and the result will be genocide on an industrial scale.
LikeLike
A far from outlandish possibility at this point in time. We live in interesting times, the old curse.
LikeLike
Any comment on this latest educational reformer?
https://www.opednews.com/articles/How-To-Reform-School-A-Ra-by-Joan-Brunwasser-Activism_Bottom-up-Technology_Citizen-Activists_Education-K-12-180604-735.html
>
LikeLike
In other words the Balkanization of education.
To each his own little island. . . “I am a rock, I am an island”.
I CHOOSE to be with my own kind, it’s my CHOICE!
LikeLike
Some of our foreign students attended Saturday school, particularly our Russians. Some Filipino and Indian students attended dance classes outside of school to learn some of the dances from their homeland. This is fine and healthy, Students should be proud of their families and heritage, and they should want to learn as much as they can about their background and culture. If they are in this country, the language of access is English. It is the road to opportunity here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Concur completely!
LikeLike
Ditto.
LikeLike
I had a number of 6th Grade girls on my LD caseload who were also ELL students. They would come to my room for an English class pull-out 3x/week and, invariably, 2 of those days were Fridays & Mondays.
So, on Fridays, they’d like to talk about what they were going to do on the weekend. In Spanish. Every Monday, they’d talk about what they did on the weekend. In Spanish. At one point, I told them, “Ladies, this is ENGLISH class; therefore, we are not only writing & learning English, we are also SPEAKING English…and ONLY English.”
Of course, the girls huffed & puffed, and, of course, called me a racist
(!), etc. I said, “I think that you are very lucky to be fluent in your own language, and I admire (& am jealous!) that you are learning another language, & now will be fluent in TWO languages, whereas I am only fluent in one.* This means you are also very smart. And–I think it’s great that when you’re home or out, you speak Spanish with your parents & friends: this is YOUR language, & you’ll always use it, & someday, you’ll be able to choose from many jobs, because bi-lingual people are in demand in every vocation. But–when you’re here–well, it’s ENGLISH class, so we’re writing, reading & speaking…” “English!”
the girls giggled.
This was 16 years ago, & I’m betting the majority of our ELL students have soared in the world. They were pretty serious about learning English…and keeping their Spanish.
*Despite taking French in middle school & 3 years of high school (& I was in honors), numerous Spanish classes as an adult & taking a Hebrew course, I’m still fluent only in…English. Also, rather than teach us Yiddish at home (how I wish they would have!), my parents & grandparents kept it as their “secret language” when they wanted to talk about things they didn’t want the kids in the family to understand. Sad…& meshugeh!
LikeLike
My first wife was Chinese, and my current wife is Russian. Both were gung-ho about learning English. I tutored an Arab man, in colloquial English, when I lived in Saudi Arabia. I speak French (technical translator at the US Embassy in Paris) I speak German (official interpreter for my Air Force Squadron in Germany), and Russian. I am also a qualified sign-language interpreter.
I am strongly for increased language instruction in publicly-operated schools. Foreign students need ESL training, early-on. And foreign languages should be taught to American children, beginning in elementary school, similar to what you see in Europe. In Holland, it is not unusual to see a ten-year old, who can speak three languages.
One thing that people can do much better than computers (for now) is translate. A foreign language background will enhance almost any career. (Especially in most STEM fields).
Foreign language training, also increases English writing skills. I learned about infinitives, and things like active voice and passive voice, and the subjunctive mood in foreign language classes, long before I was taught these topics in an English class.
LikeLike
According to this website, the Four Directions Charter School for American Indians, grades 8-12) was closed in 2013.
It had 87 students and 8 teachers.
I found an old website for the school. When it was still active the curriculum offered courses with conventional content and some electives, most of these connected with the Ojibwe language and culture.
A few highlights from the history of the school can be found in this post–a last ditch appeal for a charter authorizer in 2012. http://fdcshome.blogspot.com
This link is still active if you would like to see the courses offered. http://fdcscurriculum.blogspot.com
LikeLike
So, the Wall Street Democrats In Name Only abandoned labor, and with charters they abandoned multiculturalism. Who haven’t they abandoned beside one another?
LikeLike
Charter schools are boutique schools. The aim is not to provide a wide swath of education to all, but rather to market to a group which will self select. This kind of environment is damaging to our democratic norms.
LikeLike
“Charter schools are boutique schools.”
Good way to put it. Then they can still claim to being open to all comers, but I’m guessing that a school aimed at the hmong culture is not going to be drawing a wide swath from the broader society.
LikeLike
I do not see this as a problem. “Boutique” schools are a desirable and good thing (for K-12). We can have schools which emphasize athletics, dramatics, military schools, etc. Parents/children will be able to select the specific type of school, that is most appropriate. We can even have schools for the deaf, blind, handicapped, learning-disabled, even gifted/talented.
Instead of a “one school for all” regardless of taste, talents, special-needs. or giftedness, we can have a whole “rainbow” of schools to serve each student to the best of their ability and needs.
This will not damage “democratic norms”, but will, enhance democracy through choice.
LikeLike
Charles,
I assume you are saying that racial and religious segregation is good.
LikeLike
You are assuming incorrectly. I am not promoting segregation of any kind. I strongly support religiously-operated education. Notre Dame is one of our finest universities. So is Georgetown. Many families who are not Catholic, send their children to Catholic-operated K-12 schools, to obtain a superior education.
Not all people who support school choice are racist bigots.
see
https://www.catholicherald.com/News/Local_News/Why_non-Catholics_select_Catholic_schools/
LikeLike
All of the activities you mentioned as a reason for a boutique school are already offered by public schools, unless they have been stripped of resources to pay for charters and vouchers.
LikeLike
Charles, the k-12 traditional, unionized public schools I am aware of in the United States often offer extracurricular activities and elective classes that provide most if not all of those choices you mentioned in a comment that displays a deep ignorance of those same public schools.
Those choices have been around for as long as I remember but I’m sure that all the budget cutting of public schools taking place across the United States were designed to get rid of those choices.
In fact, even children and teens that are interested in military experiences have ROTC and Boy Scouts and Eagle Scouts as choices that offer a preparatory experience that leads toward the military.
LikeLike
We don’t need charters to achieve that goal; these schools already exist in public schools. They are often called magnet schools, designed to attract students who are drawn to certain areas of study. Within large schools offering several differing areas, these are sometimes referred to as pathways. Students are not however balkanized into limited interactions with other students. Outside of their pathway classes they share other classes, a building, lunch, gym, extra-curricular activities and a shared sense of identity and belonging to a larger group with kids who aren’t just like themselves.
LikeLike
Q All of the activities you mentioned as a reason for a boutique school are already offered by public schools, unless they have been stripped of resources to pay for charters and vouchers. END Q
I believe you are mistaken. The activities I mentioned: Athletics, dramatics, military education, etc. are NOT available at all of the public schools in this republic. I am certain that there are some schools operated by governments, which offer some or all of these. But if you think that all public schools are offering these kinds of specialties, you are wrong.
The state of Virginia operates Virginia Military Institute, a military college. It is entirely possible that a state could operate a 4-year residence preparatory military school. If not, then a private entity could operate such a school, and families could elect to receive a voucher to meet the costs.
The state of Kentucky operates the Kentucky School for the Deaf. My sign-language instructor was a graduate of this school. Deaf and hearing-impaired children attend this school and live in the dormitories. It is much more cost-effective, to locate all of the deaf/hearing impaired children in one residence school, than to have programs operating in schools, statewide.
I foresee, that states (and/or private entities) could operate specialty schools, both residence and non-residence, which could work to meet the needs of students, cost-effectively.
LikeLike
Here is an example of a boutique school. see
http://www.mytesa.org/
LikeLike
Illinois has the Illinois Math and Science Academy. It is a residence preparatory school, run by the state. Entrance is difficult, they do not accept all applicants. see
http://www.imsa.edu
I would like to see more of these residence preparatory academies. The IMSA is a government-run, publicly-operated school.
In this school, gifted/talented students are given more personalized attention, and are able to achieve full potential.
I would love to see more of these residence preparatory academies, I do not care if they are publicly-operated or privately run.
LikeLike
Yes, some students need to be in an all-gifted school–specifically, when their own school district does not offer ANY gifted education; I know, first-hand, that some of those students can really suffer.
That having been said, living in IL, there are a number of excellent day schools for gifted & talented students &, while IMSA is a terrific school, & I know the students do well there, I think (having been a charter member of a group of parents in ACE {Advocates for a Challenging Education} & having been a teacher of twice exceptional children (Gifted L.D. kids), most parents don’t want their elementary & high school students living away from home. And, for many kids, going away to summer camp is quite enough.
LikeLike
It is unusual to find anyone who agrees that gifted/talented children would benefit from getting out of the “mainstream” public schools, and receiving more personalized instruction. I salute you.
Sadly, most publicly-operated schools do not have the staff, resources, or funding to properly meet the unusual needs of gifted/talented children.
For some (NOT ALL) g/t children, a residence preparatory academy might just be the ticket. There is an “economy of scale”, in locating g/t children in one place.
The Supreme Court recently ruled in Endrew F. v. Douglas County (2017) see
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2016/15-827
That if a school district cannot provide adequate educational services to a disabled child, then the school district must pay for an alternate, appropriate education at a private facility. The ruling was unanimous.
Since a “mirror” situation occurs when a publicly-operated school district cannot provide an adequate education to a g/t child, it is just a matter of time, before a similar case comes before the court.
LikeLike
Charles, most if not all public schools, if they are properly funded and supported, have Honors and Advanced Placement classes for alleged “gifted/talented” children. In addition, there are electives for students that want them so choice is involved by the children and/or their parents instead of being labeled “gifted/talented”.
And to stay in those classes, those alleged “gifted/talented” children have to demonstrate they are making an effort to learn or they are sent back to the college prep classes for the rest of the students to make room in the honors and advanced placement classes for motivated children that might not be labeled “gifted/talented” children.
What is used to decide who the gifted/talented children are, an IQ test and/or their parents?
In addition, studies have revealed that being labeled “gifted/talented” as a child does not guarantee success later in life. It seems that EQ and motivation is more important than being labeled “gifted/talented”.
How is being labeled “gifted/talented” any different than being labeled a difficult student to teach? A label is a label and a label is worth as much as the sticky note it is written on.
LikeLike
Q most if not all public schools, if they are properly funded and supported, have Honors and Advanced Placement classes for alleged “gifted/talented” children. END Q
What are you smoking? Please give me a toke. “Most” publicly-operated schools in this republic are NOT providing adequate services to our g/t students. No way. I find it ironic, that our society can find many millions of dollars to spend on the mentally retarded, learning disabled, blind, deaf, autistic, neurologically-damaged, stutterers, etc. But our brightest kids have to “suck runt’s udder”.
Q What is used to decide who the gifted/talented children are, an IQ test and/or their parents? END Q
There are many ways to identify g/t children. (I am not an expert). IQ tests are very rough and inexact measure of intelligence. Teachers have a knack at recognizing the brightest kids in their class. Often, g/t students are “bored” with the level of material being presented.
Q studies have revealed that being labeled “gifted/talented” as a child does not guarantee success later in life. It seems that EQ (sic)and motivation is more important than being labeled “gifted/talented”. END Q
I find myself 1000% in agreement. Intelligence alone is no guarantor of success. My favorite president, Calvin Coolidge also agrees.
“Nothing in the world can take the place of Persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘Press On’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.”
Q How is being labeled “gifted/talented” any different than being labeled a difficult student to teach? END Q
I prefer the term “identified” over “labelled”. We can agree that g/t students as well as learning-disabled students both present unique challenges to our educational system. G/t students are “difficult” to teach, and learning-disabled students are “difficult” to teach. All of these categories present challenges to our society.
We can and we should provide the proper educational setting and challenges to all students, all across the spectrum.
The Supreme Court agreed, unanimously, that when a public school system cannot provide for the needs of an autistic child, then the parents have the right to withdraw the child, and transfer him to a private school, and the public school district must pay the costs. Even the most ardent supporters of public schools, support this decision. Hurrah!
LikeLike