Although I often disagree with Rick Hess, I think he is the most insightful of the reformers and the nicest as well. He has a code of civility, and he never descends into mud-slinging or name-calling, unlike others in the reform camp.
In his latest article, I was surprised and delighted to see his acknowledgement that the pendulum is swinging away from the Bush-Obama reforms. He tacitly admits, as few other reformers do, that the era of No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top has failed, and (as John Merrow said in his latest post) “the air is humming,” and something great is coming. The current federal law (Every Student Succeeds Act) is a stripped-down version of NCLB, still insanely test-focused, in my view. Under ESSA, despite its grandiose name, there is no hope, none, that “every student will succeed.”
Rick looks at the wave of teachers’ strikes in West Virginia, Oklahoma, and Kentucky (with more likely to happen) and draws five lessons.
First, “Teachers are immensely sympathetic actors. For all the gibes, harsh rhetoric of the accountability era, and tsk-tsk’ing occasioned by polls in which people say they don’t want their kids to be teachers, the reality is that people really like teachers. In surveys, no matter how much talk there is about “failing” schools and problems with tenure, teachers are trusted and popular.” Although he doesn’t say it, I will: People trust teachers more than hedge fund managers or billionaires.
Second, “The Trump era has made it tougher for GOP officials to plead “fiscal restraint.” For years, GOP governors and legislators have said there is no more money, but the national GOP has just added billions to the defense budget, over a trillion dollars to the national deficit, and cut taxes for corporations by more billions.
Third, the reform movement must shoulder a significant part of the blame for demonizing teachers, demoralizing them, and building a reservoir of rage. “Along the way, teachers came to look and feel like targets, rather than beneficiaries, of “school reform,” which may be why bread-and-butter demands from teachers are ascending as the guts of Bush-Obama school reform are sinking to the bottom of the “discarded school reform” sea.”
Fourth, teachers’ strikes and walkouts are succeeding because they have broad appeal.
Fifth, he sees the current moment as a good time to rethink compensation, pensions, and staffing. In the minds of reformers, this could be converted into their usual mindset: merit pay, performance pay, replacing pensions with savings plans, etc. As the Kentucky walkout showed, teachers will not sit still while their retirement benefits are whittled away. Part of the appeal of teaching is the expectation that one will not retire to a life of penury after a career of low-paid service.
This is one of the most hopeful articles I have recently read about the pendulum swing that almost everyone knows is coming.
Fingers crossed in Denver.
Rick looks at the wave of teachers’ strikes in West Virginia, Oklahoma, and Kentucky (with more likely to happen) and draws five lessons.”
I think he should draw another lesson. Ed reformers were surprised by the teacher strikes.
These are people who supposedly work full time on education issues in these states. They didn’t know public school funding had reached a breaking point? They didn’t know teachers were fed up enough to walk off the job?
That indicates a certain cluelessness to me. How can you say you’re an “ed reformer” in Arizona and yet NOT KNOW public school systems are collapsing due to neglect?
The singular focus on charters and vouchers had consequences for public schools- they were neglected by lawmakers and others in power.
Now it’s starting to have consequences for ed reformers, too.
it offers emphatic transparency for those who have had to endure long, long years of HANDS-OFF top-down-disconnected “progressive” invasions
Here’s another example:
“On Wednesday afternoon, the Bush Center’s Forum on Leadership will host Priscilla Chan, co-founder of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, in a wide-ranging discussion about redefining student success to ensure a promising future for all children. The conversation will be moderated by Anne Wicks, the institute’s director of education reform.”
Facebook just got hauled before Congress to explain their irresponsibility and recklessness.
Ed reformers think it’s a good idea to have them run public schools?
They think public school parents won’t object to this?
They’re in for another “surprise” – just like they were “surprised” by the opposition to Common Core and standardized testing and privatization, they will now be “surprised” by the opposition to jamming these products into public schools. Because that’s coming.
The education reformers have achieved there goal which was either to create alternate school systems that are totally unequal or totally destroy public education. America scores lower in every education category because we would rather sell junk curriculum’s to our students. Students are graduating who can neither read nor write and we act surprised. As we move into the age of artificial intelligence what is going to happen to the next generation who are not in the group of elites who are getting the exposure that they need to be successful? Corporate Ed Reformers answer only to Wall Street, and the technology world for example Facebook,Google,and other social network platforms . There is no concern for students or for America by the policy makers. After all these years of suffering from the lies of Ed Reformers teachers have finally found their voices and just wont take the abuse anymore. When the politicians talk about education there is no real concern. Enough is enough.
“America scores lower in every education category because we would rather sell junk curriculum’s to our students.” — the textbooks turned into junk at least a quarter century ago. I is a long haul for the reformers, but the pace is accelerating.
“The Twit and the Pendulum”
The pendulum is swinging
It’s swinging to and fro
Deformers it is flinging
It’s really quite a show
We’re the greatest…
When I was a little kid,
Way back in public school,
My mama told me, teachers are great.
Then when I was a teenager,
I knew they had got something going,
All my friends told me, teachers are great.
And now I’m a fan,
A teacher took me by the hand,
And you know what she told me, we are great.
We are in the greatest show on earth,
For what it was worth
Four is two plus two
And all we want to do, is teach you.
Hey!
We looked in the mirror,
We saw our life and kids,
And you know what they told us, we are great.
Hey, hey, hey, (hey, hey, hey) yeah!
(hey, hey, hey)
We are the greatest and you better believe it, baby!
Ho! Ho! Ho!
I wish I could simply upvote without posting a reply. This is a good one, sir!
Thanks Diane for bringing up these two (Hess & Merrow) very positive articles!
I hope Hess is right about the general public finding teachers to be popular and trusted. Definitely true, re: parents of school-aged children, & they are probably fairly active voters. But what % of the voting public are they? It seems there is a horde of older folks who know little of what goes on in schools today & just buy into agenda-based teacher-trashing based on nothing other than ages-old oldster attitudes [cf Socrates on ‘kids today’].
Agree w/Hess “teachers’ strikes and walkouts are succeeding because they have broad appeal”. I sense that middle/ working classes are finally turning a corner, e.g., instead of knee-jerk jealousy of public workers’ comparative job security, beginning to question why theirs is so fragile. Instead of resenting their every tax dollar spent, looking at why it isn’t buying them maintained public school facililities & infrastructure.
It was interesting that Hess compared the teachers’ strikes to the air traffic controllers’ strike during the Reagan years. Reagan fired all the air traffic controllers for their strike. The main difference is that the air traffic controller job was a high stress and high paying career. People lined up to be trained in this field. There is nothing to attract large numbers of teachers in most of the red states that offer low pay and minimal benefits. These states are lucky to get the people that sign on to work under those conditions, a high stress job for minimal pay and benefits.
Excellent point. Also, Hess blames teachers’ pensions for causing the current low salaries of current teachers, which is untrue. Trying to destroy pensions is what motivated Kentucky teachers to walk out, and Colorado teachers are doing the same, for similar reasons. Many teachers are drawn to the profession because, even though it is low paid relative to other positions requiring similar education levels, it allows them stability and the ability to live in their own communities. Attacking pensions will only further decrease the numbers of young people who want to go into education.
“In pursuing this agenda, would-be reformers emphasized the need to overhaul teacher evaluation and tenure, retool teacher preparation, and place a substantial weight on reading and math scores in judging teacher effectiveness. This was all sensible enough (aside from an increasingly unhinged fascination with reading and math scores). . .”
Sensible enough????
You’ve got to be kidding, Rick. All of those things mentioned served to undermine public education. There isn’t space here to go into all the details, but if you just search this blog for those things, you’ll find a vast array of articles that thoroughly debunk the “sensible enough” evaluation of those education malpractices.
“We have exceptionally expensive benefit systems that mean a big chunk of school funding is going to pay retirees rather than today’s teachers. Schools have added non-instructional staff at a pace that has massively outstripped student enrollment. In recent years, would-be reformers have goofed when imposing new teacher-evaluation systems while failing to identify or do right by all the teachers who play a critical role in their schools and classrooms. Now, we have another opportunity to tackle this challenge—to boost teacher pay and make substantial new investments in schooling while rethinking benefits systems, teacher compensation, and staffing.”
In Missouri teachers pay 13% of each paycheck into the retirement system. The districts also pay 13% and have for decades. 87% of personnel funding goes to today’s teachers and other staff. Somehow 13% doesn’t seem like “a big chunk of school funding” when one looks at it in a proper light.
Hess, hints at, but doesn’t actually come out and say that that “rethinking benefits systems, teacher compensation and staffing” means no secure retirement for teachers with the benefits of those monies being siphoned off by banksters and hedge funders. Nor does he say that rethinking teacher compensation actually means in his mind “performance based pay” that is based on student test scores. We’ve seen the results of that already and they ain’t pretty. And while I agree that staffing needs need to be analyzed with the thought in mind of providing better, more adults in the classroom with fewer students per class, he would more likely than not have more “computer based learning” with fewer adults and larger class size.
You can’t say those things can you, eh Rick!?!
I read this the same way you did, Duane. He so desperately wants to grade teachers by test scores. Whatever ground he grudgingly gives up is to an exchange for even higher-stakes testing. Ed Reformers like Hess can afford to concede on the fuzzy points of trust and teachers feeling demonized (btw, did you notice that he doesn’t say that teachers were ACTUALLY a target….it just looked and felt like it). Diane, Mr. Hess is pretty insidious, imo.
The Hessians never come right out and say what they mean. They beat around the bush (and sometimes Bush).
By saying “We have exceptionally expensive benefit systems that mean a big chunk of school funding is going to pay retirees rather than today’s teachers” he might imply that the benefits for current teachers should be reduced or that the benefits for retired teachers should be reduced or possibly both.
One thing he does not imply: it’s ok to pay pay retired teachers so that they can lead a comfortable dignified existence.
I totally agree. I just tried to post a comment about this, but it’s “awaiting moderation.” The bogus reformers’ lack of clarity is a form of dishonesty.
It is telling that none of these five bullet points is about students, teaching, pedagogy, school hours, anything like that. Despite that the talking are supposedly about “the reform”, all they talk about is the fight of righteous teachers against the greedy capitalists. This is understandable: when the fight grows, no one remembers the original reasons for the conflict and the original goals, noble or otherwise. It becomes just a fight for survival.
Good point, Gruff!
I SURE HOPE SO. The Deformers are so WRONG about so much.
Could this have been accomplished without Public Schools and Public School Teachers?
http://www.spacex.com/webcast
And of course wealthy and supportive philanthropists will never send their own kids to these schools. They are mostly intended for the “underclass.”
Segregation doesn’t work in the end. Segregation damages everyone. and living in silos doesn’t help.
I will agree with Diane that Rick is quite a nice person. Had a chance to talk with him during the lunch break of last May’s “Failures to Fixes” edudeformer conference in Kansas City. Very cordial, articulate, and he is smart, no doubt. And very misquided in his thinking, no doubt also. It would be nice if we could win him over to “our side” but then he wouldn’t have his AEI job for very long.
That’s the key right there. He’s paid to advocate for things that would hurt school children and teachers while reducing costs for corporations and the wealthy.
“Pearsonalized learning” is a backdoor method for introducing all the Deformers’ favored programs (national standards, national curriculum, regular testing, increased class sizes, fewer, deprofessionalized, lower paid teachers , data collection, etc) with very little resistance. For example, because the testing is built in to a students custom program, its basically impossible for the student to opt out.
It’s like slipping students and parents a Mickey. By the time they notice, it will be too late.
Supposed to go under tutucker’s comment below
Good term, SDP, but make that “Pear$onalized” –don’t forget the $
sign, $$$ attached to everything Pear$on doe$.
I fear that the next wave of reform will not be in our favor as technology takes over the classrooms. We should be very very concerned.
I do not see the move towards positive results. I see the wave towards personalized learning in which computers will be replacing teachers.
I think you’re right. Wouldn’t be surprised if Mr. Hess would be in favor of that.
Of course he is in favor of it.
It includes all his pet policies rolled into one tidy “stealth Deform” package.
Pearsonalized learning is Deform flying under the radar in the guise of “personalization”.
“personalized learning” is undoubtedly the most inaacurate and dishonest terminology that any Deformer ever came up with.
I’d really like to know who coined it.
We won’t let that happens.
Education works best with human relationships, not relations with computers.
And yet it’s happening all over the country. I spent the morning with first graders who spent the whole time staring at a HUGE screen doing direct instruction the whole time.
I see kids online all the time in school doing drill and skill via game apps. It’s an addiction. Yesterday I had to convince a child to eat lunch instead of playing a game on his chrome book.
I fear we are close to an epidemic.
I agree with the comments that question the reformers’ honesty. When they make big statements about their favorite topics, they tend not to be clear about what they specifically mean, or what they really believe (which may be hidden behind their mild rhetoric). In this case, Hess couches his commentary in positive terms but withholds the grisly details of what “rethinking compensation” really means. Among other possibilities, it could mean getting rid of defined benefit retirement plans for teachers (or severely cutting those benefits, or even diminishing the benefits of current retirees).
I’m reading The Year of Lear, a riveting book on Shakespeare and his times by James Shapiro. In it he shows how the word “equivocation” came to take on its current meaning (in the aftermath of the Gunpowder Plot of 1605). What Hess is doing in this article might not be outright equivocation, but I find it disingenuous at best.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_reservation
Give Rick Hess a break. He is a reformer. How far can he go in admitting failure?
I expect he needs to say it’s failed so they can start promoting their new message.
It’s tough to give him a break when it sounds like he’s lying. All the hedging raises red flags.
I don’t understand why people like Hess should “get a break”.
He has not only been supporting policies that have wreaked havoc on the lives of millions of school children and teachers, but he was actually PAID to do it.
And now he is trying desperately to “rehabilitate” his reputation because it has become blatantly obvious to anyone who has paid any attention that his policies were not just an abject failure, but were actually very destructive.
I have no sympathy for people like Hess. He has had his “break” (far more than most people ever get) and he blew it.
If he had any shame at all, he would just crawl under a rock and disappear.
Let me put all the Rick Hess gibberish into plain words;
Teachers are generally trustworthy because they are not greedy, they are ot out to get rich, and their “business” is not to screw people;
Republicans have NEVER been FOR fiscal restraint. It’s all been a calculated lie to cut social programs, including educaion.
He education “reform”movement has – too – also been built on a pack of lies, about education in “crisis,” about “economic competitiveness,” about test scores – including the ACT and SAT – and about the dire need for Advanced Placement and STEM courses.
Teachers are on the right side of the walkouts and the demands for better pay and resources.
It’s about time that teachers get the recognition and the compensation they deserve, and its WAY past time that public schools began focusing on educating for democratic citizenship.
Quite frankly, the last 18 months or so have made all of these points abundantly, crystalline clear.
Are you saying he agrees that it was all lies and he’s actually changing his tune? Or are you saying that we should be able to figure that that’s the way things really are?
If he actually believes that all teachers should get the compensation they deserve, he could say that clearly and directly. But even if he were to do that, it wouldn’t be saying what he thinks they actually do deserve. Do they deserve a good pension to make up for low to mediocre pay? Do they deserve what others with the same education earn? Do they deserve what think tank blowhards earn? I don’t hear him saying any of that.
As far as I can tell, the fake reformers want well paid teachers to be paid LESS and to receive a greatly diminished pension. The suburban school districts that pay the best tend to be located in states that have strong teacher unions and decent pension plans. This partly explains the wholesale attacks on ALL teachers and teacher unions. But those well paid districts also tend to have the best offerings and the best “outcomes.” Besides, the fake reformers DON’T WANT good pay and benefits for teachers in the areas that don’t already have them. That would defeat one of their main purposes.
To imply that teachers in severely low paying states should get a raise is not to say they should be paid what they deserve, especially when he’s implying that teacher pension schemes in general should be rethought (read, “dismantled”).
I think there’s good reason to be suspicious.
“if only we knew”
If only we knew
What Hessians think
We’d know we were through
A whirl in the sink
I’m basically saying that Hess is a fairly articulate bozo.
Rick makes the same mistake reformers made in the past…. trying to “think” for teachers. Telling them they do not want pensions. They do.
With the deformers, it’s more of a strategy than a “mistake”
They do it because they have gotten away with it in the past.
Up until very recently, there has been very little organized push back from teachers against all the garbage that has been forced down their throats by deformers.
The Deformers have gotten away with saying things that are patently false with impunity, knowing full well that teachers who challenge the lies can face disciplinary action for doing so.
“Trying to ‘think’ for teachers”
Exactly, Carol! It’s one of the main problems with the edudeformer camp, they have no clue how to include teachers’ voices. Actually, they actively downgrade, demean those teachers and their thoughts.
This is where we are headed and it’s not pretty. Look at the players. We are letting computers take over our profession.
https://wrenchinthegears.com/2018/04/19/theyve-got-trouble-up-there-in-north-dakota/
I hope that all of the attention will include how we can better support our teachers.
I hope that we help support staff be able to identify and counsel students who need assistance before they hurt themselves and/or others.
I hope that we now see education as vital to the American infrastructure as highways and power grids.
#ALLIn4Teachers #SoTeachersCanTeach