The New York Times reported on the allegations against Mike Feinberg, co-founder of KIPP, and his termination.
“KIPP, one of the country’s largest and most successful charter school chains, dismissed its co-founder on Thursday after an investigation found credible a claim that he had sexually abused a student some two decades ago, according to a letter sent to the school community.
“The co-founder, Michael Feinberg, was accused last spring of sexually abusing a minor female student in Houston in the late 1990s, according to someone with close knowledge of the case, who was not authorized to speak publicly and asked not to be identified. An outside investigation found her claim credible after interviewing the student and her mother who both gave the same sequence of events.
“Mr. Feinberg denies the accusation, his lawyer, Christopher L. Tritico, said.
“Investigators also uncovered evidence that Mr. Feinberg had sexually harassed two KIPP employees. One case, in 2004, led to a financial settlement, the letter said; the other could not be corroborated because the woman involved would not cooperate, but the letter found it to be credible.
“We believe that Mr. Feinberg’s actions were incompatible with the leadership qualities that are central to our mission,” said the letter, which was sent Thursday afternoon to teachers, administrators and families of students.
“Mr. Feinberg was told of his dismissal at a meeting on Thursday in Houston.
“Mr. Tritico said an initial investigation last summer by outside counsel for KIPP’s Houston board had found the 1990s allegation to not be credible, before a second investigation by WilmerHale, a law firm specializing in sexual misconduct, reversed that finding.
“He said Mr. Feinberg had never been told of the precise allegations against him, and had not been given a chance to defend himself. “The investigation was conducted without even the most rudimentary form of due process,” Mr. Tritico said.
“KIPP said the first investigation found the claim inconclusive.
“The program, started in Texas in 1994 with 47 fifth-grade students, achieved extraordinary results with poor and minority schoolchildren and became a model that many others sought to replicate around the country. Today it has nearly 90,000 students and 209 schools in 20 states. The vision of Mr. Feinberg and the other co-founder, David Levin, Ivy League graduates who came together through Teach for America in the early 1990s, is largely credited with its success.
“In the early years, Mr. Feinberg was a teacher and administrator in Houston, but his current role had been mainly external — fund-raising, lobbying, political advocacy and college partnerships. In the year ended June 2016 — the latest period for which the organization’s tax filings were available — Mr. Feinberg received $231,885 in compensation and benefits while working for KIPP’s Houston schools, and $220,241 for work at the parent foundation in San Francisco, the filings show.”

Wonder what his net worth was before KIPP and what his net worth was just before he was terminated.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good question.
LikeLike
Some “successful school system,” when sexual abuse isn’t made public for 20 years.
LikeLike
Read closer – it happened in 90s but she just came forward in spring.
LikeLike
She must have been inspired by #metoo movement
LikeLike
So a half million for the “cash cow”. It happened in the 90’s but then it happened again and again. Twice in the 2,000’s and one incident which actually resulted in a pay-out to the victim. They kept a lid on it but not on him….for over 20 years.
Knowledge is Power, isn’t that their slogan?
LikeLike
The Chronicle — the Houston Chronicle’s on-line magazine — has filled in some of the missing pieces of this sad narrative:
https://www.chron.com/news/education/article/KIPP-co-founder-Mike-Feinberg-fired-following-3-12647658.php
Here’s some of what was in the Chronicle’s piece:
Feinberg’s alleged modus operandi was as follows:
1) mentor an attractive former KIPP student (female) from a low-income family, and who currently worked in some capacity for the KIPP organization — as a teacher aide (if she had yet to attain a Bachelor’s Degree), or as a teacher (who had yet to obtain a Master’s Degree);
2) allegedly offer this attractive female student a quid-pro-quo:
“I’ll use part of my $450,000 annual salary, or use KIPP organization funds, and pay for your schooling … ” — be that for a Bachelor’s Degree or Master’s Degree — “… and in exchange you’ll become one of my mistresses, or kept women, or to put it more bluntly:
“‘Put out and I’ll pay your tuition.’ ”
Here’s the sequence of what happened regarding the lawsuit over this alleged indecent proposal, and which was settled out of court:
1) One of these women spurned this disgusting (and let’s be fair — alleged) offer and blew the whistle on him to KIPP’s Board of Directors. Since Feinberg had so much clout in this organization — having basically appointing that board at the time with his partner Dave Levin — not a damn thing was done to Feinberg.
2) Appalled at this inaction, the alleged victim of this alleged quid-pro-quo harassment then lawyered up, and with credible evidence apparently, sued Feinberg and the entire KIPP organization;
3) Against Feinberg’s wishes, the Board, KIPP’s legal team including Nolan Highbaugh, and the KIPP organization’s insurance carrier opted to pay an out-of-court settlement to the alleged victim, one which included a Harvey-Weinstein-ish NDA, or non-disclosure agreemen, where the all the parties involved — the alleged victim, Feinberg, the KIPP Board of Directors, the KIPP legal team, Nolan Highbaugh, and presumably Dave Levin, Feinberg’s close friend with whom Feinberg co-founded KIPP — would all take this to their graves, and no one else outside KIPP, or in the public would ever be the wiser.
Well, that obviously didn’t last, as the current KIPP board, — which had no part in this prior settlement — was apprised of this prior out-of-court settlement when the investigation of Feinberg’s alleged molestation of the teenager in the late 1990’s was underway.
The current Board — also appointed by Feinberg and Levin, by the way — opted out of the earlier KIPP Board’s “let’s-all-take-this-to-our-graves” strategy, and commenced an investigation. In no uncertain terms, they told Feinberg that — regardless of the fact the Feinberg and Levin appointed them — if the investigation proves Feinberg guilty of anything regarding either the alleged teen molestation case, or the alleged quid pro quo “put-out-and-I’ll-pay-your-tuition” case— even if he was merely guilty of the appearance of impropriety — then Feinberg’s toast. He would be immediately canned.
During this investigation, a second alleged victim of the “put-out-and-I’ll-pay-your-tuition” harassment came to light. Unlike the first, however, she clammed up and refused to speak ill of Feinberg, or say ANYTHING, for that matter, about the alleged “put-out-and-I’ll-pay-your-tuition” scam. However, witnesses confirmed that they witnessed indications that, and believed that Feinberg and alleged victim No. 2 were indeed involved in in an intimate relationship.
I’m just guessing here, but the Board must have or may have discovered a paper trail, or an electronic paper trail that shows that Feinberg paid both of these alleged victims’ tuition — either through his personal funds, or using KIPP organization funds, with again, Feinberg orchestrating this payment. Since those payments were proven beyond doubt with electronic or paper records, that, at the very least, constitutes the “appearance of impropriety” referenced in KIPP’s letter released to the public.
Two things to note:
1) Feinberg did not want this settlement of quid-pro-quo alleged victim No. 1. He wanted to fight this accusation in court — even if that meant bad PR for him and KIPP — but he was over-ruled by the Board and presumably Dave Levin.
2) Assuming Dave Levin was in the loop on all this from Day One — I find it hard to believe that he was not, as Feinberg and Levin ruled this whole show with an iron fist — this makes a mockery of Levin’s claims to the New York Times that all of this is news to Dave Levin…
“Oh my word! I’m shocked, I tell you. Just shocked! I can’t believe and never knew ANY of this. I’m comin’ down with the vapors.”
LikeLike
The lawyer is upset about lack of due process. That’s rich. When employees, and even students, raise that complaint, the answer is always that ‘we don’t have any obligation to do so as a privately managed enterprise’. Now the shoe’s on another foot…
On Feb 22, 2018 10:14 PM, “Diane Ravitch’s blog” wrote:
> dianeravitch posted: ” The New York Times reported on the allegations > against Mike Feinberg, co-founder of KIPP, and his termination. “KIPP, one > of the country’s largest and most successful charter school chains, > dismissed its co-founder on Thursday after an inves” >
LikeLiked by 1 person
An important note for anyone looking for work inside charter chains: “…The lawyer is upset about lack of due process. That’s rich. When employees, and even students, raise that complaint, the answer is always that ‘we don’t have any obligation to do so as a privately managed enterprise’…”
LikeLike
Call me petty, but the schadenfruede is delicious, especially when someone so richly deserving of public exposure and humiliation gets what’s coming to them…
LikeLike
The usual automatic blather about the greatness of KIPP spooned out byt the NYT writer, I suppose as a license to write about this.
It remains disturbingly dishonest….because it is supposed to be taken for granted.
LikeLike
As the old saying goes …
Karma’s a b–ch!
… or at least it sure is in this case.
I mentioned the KIPP AMP unionization controversy on another thread. Here’s some more detail.
(By the way, “AMP” is one of the stupidest acronyms for a school I’ve ever heard. It stands for “Always Mentally Prepared.” So what? Teachers and students at non-charter schools are usually not “mentally prepared?” Sheesh!)
In 2009, despite extreme pressure not to do so from the current KIPP principal at the time (presumably on orders from Dave & Mike), those KIPP AMP teachers voted to form a union.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/brooklyn/teachers-brooklyn-charter-school-seek-city-union-membership-article-1.421176
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
N.Y. DAILY NEWS:
“Teachers at a Brooklyn charter school want to join the powerful city teachers union – the latest in an effort to organize educators at the 78 taxpayer-funded, privately run schools.
“(KIPP) Administrators were mum Tuesday on whether they’ll oppose the bid at the KIPP AMP Academy in Crown Heights.
” … ”
“KIPP has said for years that they wanted to work with us and are not anti-union, so we hope they will recognize the union,” she said.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Dave & Mike had been saying for years. “We’re not anti-union. We’ll respect the teachers’ choice on that regard, whether or not to form a union.”
Were they sincere?
Indeed, and unfortunately, this union lasted only the 2009 school year, as according to UFT Vice-President Leo Casey, Levin and Feinberg hired a union-busting tiger team to pressure as many teachers to vote to decertify the union, which they did in 2010.
https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/ny/2010/04/23/after-opting-in-kipp-staff-vote-themselves-out-of-teachers-union/
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
CHALKBEAT:
“The United Federation of Teachers plans to fight the decision when the teachers have a hearing before the state’s Public Employee Relations Board, arguing that KIPP improperly intimidated teachers, vice president Leo Casey told me today.
“ ‘It really feels like class warfare in a way that is not the case in the public sector,’ Casey said.
“Casey said that an ‘active group’ of teachers remains committed to working with the teachers union, but he would not describe the size of the group on the record, citing concern for them. The union had previously filed complaints with the state and put out fliers accusing KIPP of intimidating teachers.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Now, what do you think happened to that “active group” of KIPP teachers still desiring a union?
And why am I bringing this up?
Well, this is relevant to Feinberg’s lawyer fulsome whining about how Feinberg was not “afforded due process” when the KIPP Board of Directors canned him.
Well, here’s how much “due process” Feinberg and Levin afforded those pro-union KIPP AMP teachers. Mind you, this is even after some of them had capitulated to pressure and later voted to decertify the union.
How much “due process”?
Try NONE.
Levin and Feinberg waited a comfortable time — till the end of the 2010-2011 school year — then fired without cause all those KIPP AMP teachers who voted to sign on to unionization in 2009, including even some of those who voted a second time in 2010 against unionization:
https://ny.chalkbeat.org/posts/ny/2011/04/04/a-struggling-kipp-school-plans-to-overhaul-teaching-staff/
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
CHALKBEAT: “The concerns were the driving force behind (KIPP AMP) teachers’ decision to join the teachers union against the will of the school’s board. A year later teachers opted out of union membership, kicking off a prolonged fight in which the United Federation of Teachers accused KIPP of intimidating teachers who wanted to unionize.
“Now, the school could experience what teachers initially feared: turnover and instability. It’s unclear how many teachers will lose their jobs.
“A teacher at the school said today that the school’s leadership has informed most of its teachers that they will not have jobs next year.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
This was pure, vicious retaliation on the part of those two $450,000/year douchebags Dave Levin and Mike Feinberg, sending a message not just to the KIPP AMP teachers, but to all teachers in the KIPP organizaiton to not even think of forming a union, or we, Dave & Mike, are gonna crush you.
If any of you ever try this union sh–, or even THINK of trying it, we WILL crush you, and we’ll use our power to not give you any due process to do so.
Thus, I’m hard pressed to shed any tears for Feinberg now that he’s getting the same sh–ty treatment that he and his partner Dave Levin cruelly dished out to the teachers at their KIPP AMP school.
It’s the ultimate poetic justice.
LikeLike
It seems to me that Jay Mathews of The Post — who has slobbered all over KIPP — now needs to change the name of his KIPP book to “Work Hard. Be Nice. And Get Some.”
It will be interesting to see if Mathews addresses this KIPP problem in a column, or two.
LikeLike
The news keeps getting worse, as this local TV news segment details:
http://abc13.com/terminated-kipp-co-founder-denies-misconduct-/3126241/
Apparently, the previously hidden, and still-sealed 2004 civil settlement with one of Feinberg’s alleged victims included a 2-week suspension for Feinberg. Feinberg also kept his seat on KIPP’s Board of Directors, but was instructed that he can no longer be around children!
Parents are furious that not only was Feinberg not simply let go, but also that this settlement, Feinberg’s suspension and Feinberg’s ban from interacting with students was all kept quiet, with parents kept totally in the dark until now.
Indeed, no parent was ever told that “Feinberg was reportedly instructed he couldn’t be around students or at the school unsupervised.”
Why weren’t we told of this?! furious parents complained.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
KTRK TV News:
“Parents wonder why Feinberg wasn’t let go back then.
“If somebody at the top can get away with two allegations with a slap on the wrist, what makes us think, as parents, they’re going to take anything else seriously,” said Marcos Alvarez, a KIPP Explore Academy parent. “If the leader is doing this, what makes you think others aren’t doing this? And that’s the bad part.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
LikeLike