This is what you must read to understand how the richest and most powerful charter advocacy group imploded. It pretended to be the voice of powerless black and Hispanic families. It was the Waltons, the Broads, and assorted financiers. The ostensible cause for its demise was the licentious behavior of its founder and CEO, who apparently had multiple hookups with staff members and then made lewd comments to a non-staff member at the education reform Philos meeting. That was the end for him, and the organization collapsed too.
- Chalkbeat reports. Key in this account is that other charter leaders were disgusted by Eva’s hardball tactics. It worked for her but embarrassed the others. What the Chalkbeat story leaves out is the importance of the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars that the financiers were giving to Cuomo’s re-election campaign. So, organizing the kids, their parents and teachers by the thousands, hiring buses, staging a march, and waging a political campaign using the children as props was a speciality of FES. No real public school could do that; it would be illegal. But the money to Cuomo was even more persuasive in building the appearance of a “movement.”
- Mercedes Schneider reports, A deep dive into data. Her specialty.

It’s so odd how these ed reform groups “for excellent schools” never do anything for public schools.
Nothing. Nada. Add no value whatsoever.
Why not just call them charter lobbying orgs? If ed reform is so awesome why all the careful marketing that appears to include public schools but actually deliberately and carefully excludes public schools and public school families?
Why can’t public school families have advocates like charters and vouchers do?
Why do we get the useless and ineffective “agnostics” and charters and vouchers get passionate pro-charter and pro-voucher lobbies?
I want AN ADVOCATE among the elected officials I and tens of millions of other public school families are paying. That’s not an outrageous request.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am likely pushing the optimism, but may the 2018/2020 would-be political candidates give us some hope: confused and overwhelmed citizens might well flock to someone voicing loud public school support.
LikeLike
I’m with you, Ciedie. We have to
make sure that candidates understand that supporting public schools is a winning issue
LikeLiked by 1 person
Boy, could these federal employees make it any clearer that public school families are NOT welcome in their transformation plans?
“DeVos’ public calendar for Feb. 5 said she had “no public events.” There were no press releases marking her trip to Indiana. Even the local school district did not know the U. S. Secretary of Education was coming.
But unbeknownst to most of the city, DeVos was visiting Cold Spring School, a public elementary school with an environmental science focus. As one of the first campuses in Indianapolis to voluntarily become an innovation school, Cold Spring is overseen by the district but has most of the flexibilities of charter schools. A staunch advocate of school choice, DeVos has highlighted innovation schools in the past, saying the schools are an “out-of-the-box” approach.
The Indianapolis Public Schools administration, however, was not involved with DeVos’ visit.”
Indianapolis public schools need not apply. They really go out of their way to make sure we know they don’t work for us.
It’s okay. Most public school families would probably prefer they stay out of our schools. Our kids don’t need another droning “public schools suck” lecture from DC political operatives.
We know the ed reform opinion on our schools and families. It’s been clear for years.
LikeLike
It really must suck to be a public school family in one of these privatized cities.
Can you imagine? The entire political apparatus goes out of their way to pretend your schools no longer exist. And you’re paying them for this!
There are only three sets of schools That Matter in Indianapolis- voucher schools, charter schools and the quasi-charter “innovation schools”.
I’d transfer to a charter or private school, too. It’s glaringly obvious that the Best and Brightest have deemed public schools unfashionable and unworthy of support.
WHILE tens of millions of families still attend them! One would think they could at least notify us that our schools are slated for elimination. Give us a head’s up.
LikeLike
It needs to be underscored: if FES was anything like what it said it was, it would still exist in some form because this supposed “voice of powerless black and Hispanic families” would continue to have [literally, not symbolically] grassroots supporters that would refuse to let it die from a swift and sudden from-the-top death sentence.
And something else: when it comes to the heavyweights of the “new civil rights movement of our time” they are anything but loyal to their putative causes and allies.
This is the simply the latest example of a very old phenomenon: “there is no honor among thieves.”
But then, since when has “honor” been, er, honored amongst those in the corporate education reform crowd? Except, of course, when “honor” is simply another way of celebrating $tudent $ucce$$ aka ROI.
No, for the chief beneficiaries and enforcers and enablers of rheephorm tis best to disruptively innovate what a very dead and very old and very Greek guy said by turning it upside down and inside out:
“Rather fail with honor than succeed with fraud.” [Sophocles]*
😎
P.S. *For those that have Kommon Kored themselves into insensibility, I am asserting that you are reading this to mean “Rather succeed with fraud than fail with honor.”
Because, if y’all were honest, another very dead and very old and very Greek guy said something much more to your liking: “Honesty is for the most part less profitable than dishonesty.” [Plato]
But, be honest, he didn’t necessarily mean it as an exhortation FOR but more as an admonition AGAINST…
LikeLike
THANK YOU! You ask what so many so-called education journalists at the NY Times and the NY Daily News and Chalkbeat NY do not because too many times they don’t realize how much they are being played for fools when they think they are doing hard-hitting reporting.
I did not see one question by a journalist questioning the board of FES and the billionaire who disbanded the organization about this hypocrisy. The sexual harasser was already leaving the organization and interviewing for a job directly with Eva Moskowitz with Success Academy paying his salary. That was pretty much a done deal until the reports of his inappropriate behavior went public. FES always knew he was leaving.
You don’t disband an organization that supposedly represents tens of thousands of parents if a leader who is already out the door gets caught doing wrong. That is, if the organization was anything but a front organization in which billionaires could hide the tens of millions they were using in a PR effort to make sure taxpayers footed the bill for their privatization efforts by pretending they represented “parents” and not the handful of billionaires who FES has always represented.
The mainstream media, including the NY Times, always portrayed FES as a real organization representing parents as opposed to a front organization of PR hacks that hires some charter school parents who apparently will all be unemployed now that they are no longer necessary. Every time there was an issue, those journalists would run to quote Jeremiah Kittredge and give his claim to represent tens of thousands of parents complete legitimacy instead of treating him like what he was — the spokesperson for a handful of anti-public school billionaires and the front organization that they generously funded to promote their views.
Perhaps most disgusting was when Mayor de Blasio was working on eliminating out of school suspensions of kindergarten, first and second graders. (Note: There were plenty of discipline methods that could be used — including removing them from the class — but telling 5 year old children that they were so “bad” that they could not come to school at all and must remain home was understandably not a punishment that seemed appropriate in kindergarten.)
Every media organization ran to get a quote from Jeremiah Kittredge as a representative of the Eva Moskowitz view that there are so many violent kindergarten children ready to do harm to their teachers and classmates if they are even allowed to be on school property that – according to Kittredge and Moskowitz — de Blasio’s non-suspension proposal of kindergarten children was simply a recipe for letting huge numbers of violent 5 year olds roam free doing harm all over elementary schools in NYC. (Note: Eva Moskowitz claimed that in some of her schools with virtually no white students, as many as 18% or 20% and once even 24% of the 5 year olds were acting out soviolently that suspending them from school was the only method to keep other children and teachers “safe”).
And the media treated this as if Kittredge represented lots of
African-American charter school parents who agreed with him and Eva Moskowitz that so many of their own kindergarten children were truly violent and needed to be suspended. Instead of what it was — only something the white billionaires who support his organization would believe is a “fact”, along with white journalists who don’t even realize how racist their not calling this out for what it was — racism — really is.
If the journalists were doing their job and treating FES as the ad agency for anti-public school billionaires instead of a FAKE organization representing parents, Kittredge would have never been quoted by any journalist doing a news story unless they were doing it about how the privatization movement employs PR fronts.
And now those journalists add insult to injury by failing to ask questions of the board. The board says they are disbanding because of Kittredge, reports the NY Times, and their journalist never questions what happens to all the parents and children the organization claimed to represent. It’s as if those journalists ALWAYS knew it was a front organization so they felt there was no question to be asked. Which speaks to how well they were manipulated into treating this organization IN THEIR NEWS STORIES as a legitimate one. They were all played for fools. They should have done a better job.
LikeLike
The corporate charter school reform movement to replace community-based democratic, transparent, non-profit, unionized public schools with autocratic, secretive, greed-based corporate charter schools that often bully teachers and children has been phony from the start because of the dark money coming from a few wealthy, power hunger, mentally and morally corrupt individuals that are using the power their wealth buys them to buy what they want and cut out the democratic process.
Lord Acton said (17th-18th centuries), Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Money buys power and most if not all of these autocratic billionaires are totally corrupt.
LikeLike
These astroturf groups are insidious. There was a booth for Powerful Schools (charters) at the last Women’s March here in Los Angeles.
LikeLike
Check out Jeremiah Kittredge at the 2:30 mark of this video. He is asked whether charter schools cherrypick to avoid high need students.
LikeLike
Eva Moskowitz is asked at 00:17
“Is there a difference between the parents who decide to go into a lottery…..are the parents of those 18,000 kids somehow radically different than the parents who either don’t care or don’t know about lottery schools?”.
Moskowitz: “This is sort of an unknowable question…..I have met very few parents who do not deeply, deeply love and care for their children…”
From the NY Times:
“Greeting parents coming to pick up their children. Ms. Moskowitz asks a lot of participation from parents, as a condition of admitting their children. She told one group, “If you know you cannot commit to all that we ask of you this year, this is not the place for you.”
THIS IS NOT THE PLACE FOR YOU.
Eva Moskowitz’ answer to the journalist in the video above explains why I find that she is so frighteningly like Donald Trump. She cannot deal with any criticism, period. Like Trump, she is perfect and always right. It doesn’t matter if what she says has any relationship to the truth. What matters is that if anyone challenges her she immediately goes to her “I’ll say anything because the press never challenges me with the facts and I know I can get away with it.”
I do not understand how there is a single journalist at the NY Times or elsewhere who still treats anything that comes out of this woman’s mouth as any more truthful than what comes out of Trump’s mouth. Sometimes she may tell the truth and sometimes she may decide to say whatever will promote her the most.
Why can’t she just admit that the students in her charters are not the same as in the public schools where she is co-located? It’s as if admitting to anything that lessened her claims of tremendous success — the biggest success in the country! — she cannot tolerate. And if that means she has to lie, it doesn’t matter because it is all about her.
I really think she is exactly like Donald Trump on the inside. I think she feels like a nothing — maybe her time at Stuy made her feel incredibly insecure about herself as a good person — and that is why she has to prop up her fragile ego by boasts and lies.
I mean, how little regard for the truth did it take for her to so strongly endorse and praise Betsy DeVos? Most of the other chatter leaders shut up and a few honorable ones spoke up about what a terrible choice she was. But the billionaires who wanted DeVos to be approved KNEW they could count on Eva Moskowitz to do their bidding. When it came to finding a person willing to say anything that would help her ego, Eva Moskowitz was it.
Again, the parallels to Trump are spooky. With Trump, it is the whole Putin thing. No matter what, he won’t criticize Putin — it’s getting really obvious with Mueller’s latest report in which Trump had far more criticism for the FBI then he did about the Russia revelations.
With Moskowitz, it is similar. She has yet to criticize Betsy DeVos or retract her strong endorsement and over the top praise she made earlier. And, it was only after the chairman of her board got caught making racist remarks on Facebook coincided with the Trump praise of the “good people” who marched in Virginia that she gave the least criticism of Trump. And she STILL hasn’t criticized DeVos once.
I think it’s spooky to see a woman in charge of so many children’s education who has the same regard for honesty and truthfulness as Donald Trump.
And the video above shows you exactly why she gets away with it the same way Trump did all through the campaign. She is allowed to answer any criticism with whatever will mislead the public into believing something she absolutely knows is untrue. Without ever being questioned by a reporter with the facts. (Except once by John Merrow, and watching her sputtering and stuttering because she had no idea how to handle follow up questions when she lies was astonishing.)
LikeLike
^^My apologies as I didn’t think that entire link would post that way.
But the slide I am referring to is #11 of 12, so if you look at the above, you have to tap through 11 photos. This may be more direct:
LikeLike
jake jacobs,
Thank you for posting this. I should have added above that Jeremiah Kittredge was absolutely lying — if you define lie as the intent to deceive the public by using statements that you know will mislead them into believing something that you know is untrue..
Kittredge is very good at this. That’s very likely why Eva Moskowitz seemed to be about to hire him to work directly for her (as he told many people). It’s a shame for him that his harassment went public and he became just as expendable to Moskowitz as any child who couldn’t score high enough on state exams. I’m sure he would have been the ideal addition to Moskowitz’ staff of lackeys and yes-men.
Maybe Kittredge can find a job in the Trump administration instead. Or working directly for Betsy DeVos/
LikeLike
NYC Parent makes an excellent point about the speed that FES folded up after the CEO was caught. Where is the rank and file of the group? Now is the time to point out that this was always a money-funnelling shell organization, not a grassroots advocacy group.
Even to the extent that they had visible rallies with strong turnout, it was because stipends were handed out and parents were allowed to log required “school volunteering” hours on a long bus ride to Albany.
And it’s also true the media fails time and again to nail these astroturfers down, but that’s a little more involved. The media knows the same PACs funding these groups spend millions on ad campaigns, whether issues based, like a race-baiting pitch for charters, or candidate based, like an stirring yet vague spot about Cuomo.
The lowly reporters are often bound by NDAs never to reveal what gets cut from stories and why. But there are also “scholarships” for ed reporters as inducements, paid by wealthy “philanthropies” as well as exclusive “fellowships” where the bosses and CEOs hobnob with the elites.
Then there is the revolving door, and if all that fails, the billionaires can just purchase the entire media outlet or create a competing one.
The fast talking Moskowitz and Kittredge do in the above video is only half the game – the rest is putting the entire media on notice, which they do by announcing what their projected advertising budgets will be…
LikeLike
Sent from my mobile.
NYC Parent makes an excellent point about the speed that FES folded up after the CEO was caught. Where is the rank and file of the group? Now is the time to point out that this was always a money-funnelling shell organization, not a grassroots advocacy group.
Even to the extent that they had visible rallies with strong turnout, it was because stipends were handed out and parents were allowed to log required “school volunteering” hours on a long bus ride to Albany.
And it’s also true the media fails time and again to nail these astroturfers down, but that’s a little more involved. The media knows the same PACs funding these groups spend millions on ad campaigns, whether issues based, like a race-baiting pitch for charters, or candidate based, like an stirring yet vague spot about Cuomo.
The lowly reporters are often bound by NDAs never to reveal what gets cut from stories and why. But there are also “scholarships” for ed reporters as inducements, paid by wealthy “philanthropies” as well as exclusive “fellowships” where the bosses and CEOs hobnob with the elites.
Then there is the revolving door, and if all that fails, the billionaires can just purchase the entire media outlet or create a competing one.
The fast talking Moskowitz and Kittredge do in the above video is only half the game – the rest is putting the entire media on notice, which they do by announcing what their projected advertising budgets will be…
LikeLike
NYC Parent makes an excellent point about the speed that FES folded up after the CEO was caught. Where is the rank and file of the group? Now is the time to point out that this was always a money-funnelling shell organization, not a grassroots advocacy group.
Even to the extent that they had visible rallies with strong turnout, it was because stipends were handed out and parents were allowed to log required “school volunteering” hours on a long bus ride to Albany.
And it’s also true the media fails time and again to nail these astroturfers down, but that’s a little more involved. The media knows the same PACs funding these groups spend millions on ad campaigns, whether issues based, like a race-baiting pitch for charters, or candidate based, like an stirring yet vague spot about Cuomo.
LikeLike
Families for excellent Schools was a shell. The only families were the founders. There were never any grassroots.
LikeLike
The lowly reporters are often bound by NDAs never to reveal what gets cut from stories and why. But there are also “scholarships” for ed reporters as inducements, paid by wealthy “philanthropies” as well as exclusive “fellowships” where the bosses and CEOs hobnob with the elites.
Then there is the revolving door, and if all that fails, the billionaires can just purchase the entire media outlet or create a competing one.
The fast talking Moskowitz and Kittredge do in the above video is only half the game – the rest is putting the entire media on notice, which they do by announcing what their projected advertising budgets will be…
LikeLike
You can’t grow crops on astroturf no matter how much manure you put on it….
LikeLike
I like your analogy … but if you put twelve to eighteen inches of soil/manure on top of astroturf, then you have created a new base of topsoil to grow plants again. What you did is bury the astroturf so it can’t so what it was designed to do.
LikeLike
Moskowitz is so insufferably arrogant and evil that even the other charter touts and monsters can’t stand her.
That’s really saying something.
LikeLike