This from Politico this morning:
Open the post for the links. DeVos is having lunch with Trump and Pence today. Apparently that is the only event on Trump’s not-busy calendar. He will spend the rest of the day watching TV.
By Kimberly Hefling | 02/12/2018 10:00 AM EDT
With help from Caitlin Emma, Mel Leonor, Michael Stratford and Benjamin Wermund
BUDGET DAY TO SHOWCASE EDUCATION WISH LIST: The release of the administration’s first full-fledged budget proposal later this morning will spotlight President Donald Trump and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos’ priorities for 2018 and 2019. On the higher education front, we already know the White House will suggest broadening eligibility for Pell grants, tweaking requirements for trade licensing and growing apprenticeships in its $1.5 trillion infrastructure plan in an effort to boost workforce training.
– Last year, the Trump administration called for a $9.2 billion, or 13 percent, cut to department spending – cuts congressional appropriators largely ignored. Administration officials indicate they will propose drastic reductions to nondefense programs in today’s blueprint, meaning education programs are likely to see proposed cuts yet again.
– A big caveat: Congress raised the strict caps on how much the government can spend in the next two years when it passed its fiscal package, H.R. 1892 (115), early Friday amid the overnight government shutdown. As POLITICO’s Sarah Ferris has reported, Congress is even less likely to pay attention to the president’s funding request because it was written before the budget deal was reached. That’s important to keep in mind – especially in light of the inclusion of a $2 billion boost to higher education each of the next two years that congressional leaders agreed last week to spend.
– The White House said it would release an “addendum” to its proposal reflecting the raised spending caps because it was too late to rewrite the document. We’ll be watching closely to see how that affects education spending.
– The budget request will land at 11:30 a.m. and the Education Department has a 2 p.m. conference call to discuss it.
– Here are some things to watch for:
– School choice: Last year, support for school choice in Trump’s proposed budget came at a cost. The president proposed big and unpopular cuts across the K-12 spectrum, on everything from teacher training to after-school programs. But he also proposed about $1 billion to encourage public school choice, $250 million for private school choice and a 50 percent boost for charter schools. Education policy watchers are watching to see whether similar priorities – and cuts – are pitched for K-12 programs. House and Senate GOP appropriators largely rejected the school choice proposals, although they did vote to give a small boost to charter schools – just not at the level the administration wanted.
– STEM: Trump last year issued an executive order directing DeVos to spend at least $200 million in existing grant funds per year on the promotion of high-quality STEM education and, in particular, on computer science education. Education Innovation and Research grants could be one place where the Trump administration signals that priority.
– Career and technical education funding. Trump called for more vocational schools in his State of the Union address, and has repeatedly touted career and technical education since taking office. That didn’t stop his administration from proposing a more than $1 billion cut last year to the programs that support the type of vocational education he says he wants to bolster and expand.
– Education Department workforce reductions: The Trump administration has taken steps to streamline government agencies, including efforts to cut personnel. In recent months, 69 Education Department employees accepted buyout offers. The budget blueprint may spell out proposals for additional workforce cuts.
– School infrastructure funding: There have been no indications that the administration will include funds for crumbling school buildings in its infrastructure push, but many public school advocates have been pushing hard for a share and will be watching to see if any of the funds are targeted for K-12 upgrades.
– Student aid programs. Higher ed watchers are looking to see if the administration will again call for deep cuts , including cutting $3.9 billion from the Pell grant surplus and eliminating entirely the $733 million Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant program, which provides grants to help low-income students attend college. Last year, it also called for cuts the TRIO and Gear Up programs, which help low-income students prepare for college. House and Senate appropriators mostly ignored these recommendations, although appropriations committees in both chambers did agree to cut billions from the Pell grant surplus.
– Early education: The Trump administration cited insufficient Head Start Funding for its decision last month to waive an Obama-era rule requiring Head Start centers to offer full-day preschool year-round to at least half of their students by next summer. Preschool supporters are watching to see if the administration will again propose no funding increases for Head Start. Last year, the administration also proposed axing the Preschool Development Grants program, which Congress created in the Every Student Succeeds Act to target 4-year-olds from low- and moderate-income families – a recommendation rejected by congressional appropriators.

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
I have my comments, but they aren’t pretty or nice.
LikeLike
Why don’t public school families have any effective representation in DC?
Why are public schools, specifically, always targeted for cuts?
One would think that with 90% of US familiesusing public schools we could get one or two halfway competent advocates out of the thousands of federal employees we’re paying.
LikeLike
The reason there aren’t more complaints is that the public has been brainwashed with all the disinformation that’s out there. Just like Alec used propaganda to justify For Profit Prisons, they are using the same techniques to justify Privitized education.
As long as they focused on schools in the urban areas with high rates of poverty and parents who accepted what they got without any questions – they were home free.
Now that they are targeting suburban parents who are actively involved with their local schools and don’t like what they see due to CCSS and their related policies – the very people who through their taxes are vested in the success of the local public schools – there is more and more pushback.
There are traditions which must be upheld and that doesn’t include fly by night Charter Schools which result in reduced services for their own children.
LikeLike
DC can put forth a budget that cuts public schools and increases charter and voucher funding and no one says anything?
Wow. I know very few of these people attended public schools but they must be aware that the vast majority of Americans attend public schools, right?
500-some members of Congress, tens of thousands of federal employees and we have education policy and practice that utterly ignores 90% of families simply because public schools are unfashionable?
Someone should tell public school families their representatives are lousy advocates.
LikeLike
New Jersey has the worst pay in and receive ratio of any state. Jersey and other blue states underwrite the red states.
LikeLike
I have a different take than Flo. I gather fed aid to public schools averages 10% nationally, which isn’t enough to garner much DC lobbying. (In my district it amounts to only 1/2 of 1%!)
We also only get only 4% budget revenue from state aid – NJ redistributes state tax income from wealthier areas to poorer ones. There has been growing pushback on that score from mid & upper-mid communities since the recession flattened or decreased state ed aid starting in 2009-10, while a 2% cap was established on prop tax increases [the main source of ed revenue in all but poor areas) in 2011. So there’s some kind of lobbying/ political activity at the state level.
The main actors in slashing funding for publschs are at the state level – & so are the promoters of charters & vouchers. DC’s bully pulpit on privatization doesn’t help matters, but their $10’s of millions here & there are just drops in the bucket. I am far more concerned w/fed legislation like NCLB/ RTTT/ ESSA: their stds/ assessments/ accountability regime has & continues to do serious harm to publschs everywhere.
LikeLike
I’m really getting tired of the constant barrage of garbage that continues to flow from politics these days. Every day is more and more nonsense, and most of it is meant to hurt average people. When will it stop? When will Congress start thinking about more than enriching the wealthy? When will we have a decent healthcare system? When will there be money for our crumbling infrastructure? When will people in power start telling the truth? [I believe this one is too much to expect. Politicians speak out of both sides of their mouths and say nothing.] When will people in power finally realize that they have a responsibility to average and poor people since we are the majority?
When will Trump supporters realize they’ve been royally screwed…except for the selfish wealthy ones who voted for him to get tax breaks. How can they continue to support a person with no compassion nor any caring about anyone or anything except for enriching himself. Shame on him for wanting to be worshiped like a king. Shame on America for having voted this con man into power.
LikeLike
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillbilly_Elegy
LikeLike
What a shame that no one in the Trump Administration supports the public schools that 90% of families use.
Our schools (and our kids) are invisible in DC. Unfashionable.
It’s like public school students don’t exist.
LikeLike
Why would you expect Trump (the Hill School) or DeVos (Christian evangelical schools) to know or care about public schools?
LikeLike
Donald Trump and Betsy DeVos are wrong. Lots of public school kids are doing great stuff and they deserve the support of the adults who supposedly represent their interests at the federal level.
The adults who show this ideological favoritism should be ashamed.
Let’s start hiring people who support our kids, instead of punishing students for attending the unfashionable public schools that these ridiculous, out of touch snobs disdain.
LikeLike
“The White House said it would release an “addendum” to its proposal reflecting the raised spending caps because it was too late to rewrite the document. We’ll be watching closely to see how that affects education spending.”
Given the total unreliability of anything from the White House, I refuse to get worked up about this, at least for now. In any case, the proposals are not really from the White House or Trump approved.
LikeLike
The federal government is proposing spending an additional billion dollars on private and charter schools- the money will come directly from cuts to public school funding.
Wow. This ed reform thing is going great for public school kids and families!
They got screwed. Again.
They could really use an adult advocate in DC. None of these public employees seem to be working on their behalf. Was there a single advocate for the 50 million public school families at the table when these private school graduates put this thing together?
LikeLike
Fortunately so far, as the article points out, congress has turned a mostly deaf ear on school choice spending proposals. That is perhaps the only bright side to their proclaimed intentions to cut non-defense spending…
LikeLike
The only thing the Trump Administration is offering public school families is 43 million dollars for an anti-opiate campaign.
They can keep it if they promise to stay out of our schools. We’ll pay them to stay away.
LikeLike
We have a “brain” crisis in congress and in the wh.
LikeLike
DeVos is using public money to film a tv special on “innovation” and to celebrate her year in office:
“On Monday, DeVos’ spokesperson Liz Hill emailed an explanation for the visit.
“She was there filming for an upcoming TV special on innovation in education and her one-year anniversary in office,” Hill wrote. “It was closed press and not noticed to the public for that reason.”
Gold almighty- now we have official federal ed reform propaganda.
Of course, consistent with ed reform practice, the unfashionable public schools were excluded from this marketing event:
“The Indianapolis Public Schools administration, however, was not involved with DeVos’ visit.
“The board and administration were not aware of the visit until after it had occurred,” said Mary Ann Sullivan, a member of the Indianapolis Public Schools board. “No one at the district or the board knew she was coming.”
It’s ludicrous that we have a federal government that is opposed to our schools. We’re paying for this garbage.
https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/in/2018/02/12/betsy-devos-made-a-covert-visit-to-indianapolis-last-week-heres-why/
LikeLike
It does not take a policy wonk or expert on governmental and political processes to understand the ulterior motives of the people here or the underlying end game to these actions. Where will the cost be made up for the money being extended to choice, private education, religious schooling, and charter schools and districts? Simple: in the public sector. It will be us working in public schools every day who will be left without the resources we need and who see the effects of this type of policy on those it hurts it most. And I am not surprised that they do not care. Trump and the general GOP at large that have sycophantically taken up his banner do not care about the people they are leaving behind. They think public schools are inner-city slums overpopulated with the shiftless offspring of welfare queens or that they are isolated rural dumps wasting money on a handful of bumpkins – they do not see the great things being done in real public schools across the country. They do not see the work produced by the brilliant children therein or the hard work done by teachers to change students’ lives. They do not see how crucial the institution of public school is to so many communities and individual children across the country. It is no wonder they do not value it nor see the need to fund it. They are detached, elitist, dismissive, and as such, cannot be trusted to secure the future of something so important to our nation’s progress.
LikeLike