Laura Chapman writes:
“I think that charters, along with public schools are becoming captives of the tech industry with online education misrepresented as personalized. There is an effort to deschool education altogether by making everything a matter of choice from a menu of options leaving brick and mortar schools at the margins. Among other tools for moving in this direction are per-pupil cost analyses that include proportionate costs of buildings, maintenance, transportation and so on for specific grades, subjects, and levels of staffing. One conclusion: outsourcing music education is cheaper than offering it in school, so too for foreign languages, and AP courses.
“Charter schools, except for those operating as online schools, are too much like public schools insofar as they require investments in brick and mortar schools and land. That is one reason why so many charter operators are actually more attracted to land deals than education. Even with evidence of massive frauds, online education is marketable as the best way to do education reform with the advantage of being a big cost saver and “personalized.”
“Now add to the opportunities of deschooling education the proliferation of education dollars packaged as scholarships, vouchers, tax deductions or education savings accounts. Amazon is serving as a prototype for thinking about the parent/caregiver/student payments for educational products and services a la carte. Authorized providers would be listed in menus so purchasers see options and prices for “approved” products and service providers. Customers might view recommended interventions for specific students based on big data, prior purchases, and the (dubious) mindset of an artificial intelligence system.
“Of course, no one is talking about who approves the online catalog and the surveillance systems required to conjure recommendations. No one is talking about ways of rigging the whole system as is the case in Ohio’s ECOT online scam, or as Facebook and Amazon are known to do for a fee. No one is talking about the convergence of marketing spaces and platforms into one authorized site for spending the money in education savings accounts. Among those websites just shy of fitting the emerging view of Click it education is Great Schools (leases data to Zillow and others), and TeachThought (pays users of “Affiliate” tech products a fee).
“Florida is rolling out an online payment system for education savings accounts this year. The platform, called MyScholarShop™, will resemble Amazon, complete with parent/caregiver reviews of the authorized fare. The press release says parents: “will simply go online to the pre-approved catalog and ‘Pick It, Click It, Ship It.” The cost will be taken directly from their education savings account. Supplies, if ordered, will be delivered to customer-provided address.
“This project has been in the works with Step Up For Students, the Florida agency that distributes state money earmarked for Gardiner Scholarships for special education—nearly 10,000 students (autism spectrum disorder, muscular dystrophy, cerebral palsy and spina bifida) who, on average, are allocated $10,000 each per year. These approved services include private school tuition and fees, private tutoring, occupational therapy, instructional materials and other services.
“Step Up For Students also manages the income-based Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program. Students qualify if they participate in the national free or reduced-price lunch program or if they are homeless, in foster or out-of-home care. These scholarships can offset the transportation cost to an out-of-district public school or for help pay for private school tuition. In 2017-2018, the MyScholarShop™ direct-pay platform will serve about 115,000 students
”The system will include a product and service-provider rating system “ so families can assist each other in making appropriate selections for their children.”
“The MyScholarShop™ platform is described as a Partnership with SAP Ariba and Premikati. SAP Ariba is a cloud-based system of business management, with analytics that track inventory (supplier information), performance (sales), and create digital invoices. Features of SAP Arib are available in four pricing tiers. All tiers have transaction fees, based on the volume of annual financial transactions with customers. All tiers also have a subscription fee, based on the number of documents in annual transactions with customers, and use of the technology. SAP Arib is designed to help “suppliers connect with profitable customers’ among other business services (provided in 190 countries, with three million companies).
“Premikati, Inc. provides services that cut red tape for users of the SAP Arib platform (e.g., planning, financial, contract management, legal). According to the website, Premikati has a new line of business, a national Group Purchasing Organization (GPO) for K-12 education and for non-profits.
“A GPO is designed to secure discounts with select vendors by leveraging the collective purchasing power of its members.
“Betsy Devos, Jeb Bush, and self-proclaimed gurus of disruptive innovation who love edtech are darlings of an industry estimated to be worth $365 billion dollars. Eliminating brick and mortar schools as a social, educational, and a communal asset is part of the new GERM–Global Education Reform Movement. The movement is aided by much talk about the emerging gig ( or jobless) economy where a major function of brick and mortar schools is not needed–child and adolescent care during a typical work day. That function, say entrepreneurs, will be diminished or vanish as child-care is seamlessly integrated into family friendly work facilities. WeWork in NYC is one example, and being planned for a world wide scale up by (you guessed it) an entrepreneurial billionaire.”

“No one is talking about….”
Au contraire. Lots of people are talking about all of these issues. Just no one important enough to get listened to, because the powers that be have already made their decisions and they don’t care what people are talking about.
LikeLike
Exactly! And the student and taxpayer both get the shaft!
LikeLike
Once hijacked by the Overclass (which basically happened immediately after their emergence), charter schools were never anything but a hoped-forprelude to full and total voucher-type privatization. Charters were the camel’s nose under the tent, the exploratory foray into seeing if privatization could work.
Sure, there were the Eva Moskowitz-type empire builders, and real estate players, and straight out looters. There were even a few schools run by people who cared about kids. But they were given advantage only for the purpose of weakening the public schools enougt for Final Offensive, after which everything was given over to Google, Microsoft, the evangelicals and everyone else who wanted to make money off kids without those pesky teachers and their unions getting in the way.
It’s ironic to think that even someone as evil and vicious, and strategic, as Moskowitz is still just a pawn in this game, but it’s a big chessboard, and our Overclass Lords have the 360 degree view. It’s just a criminal shame that despite that vantage point, they’re still blind.
LikeLike
Well said.
LikeLike
The ed tech promoters are misleading people:
“I want to give you a quick and conceptual look at why I think the pivot to ‘personalized digital learning’ is a really big deal, like one of the three or four of the most important things happening in the world,” said Tom Vander Ark, an author, speaker and investor in more than 70 technology companies. “Secondly, I’m going to talk about how that’s going to happen in most of your schools,” he said.
“You ought to be piloting special services online. Speech therapies have had big developments in the last year and can deliver better and cheaper and faster speech therapy online,” he said.
Vander Ark, who mentioned the cost savings of using technology in place of teachers several times during his presentation, also said he started the first kindergarten to 12th grade online school in the country, but that “this stuff has not made enough of a difference as it should.”
Vander Ark told the audience of education leaders that the reduction in teachers would “improve productivity.” “It means a different staffing model which costs less and works better,” he said. “It means a tough set of conversations…”
This is about providing cheap technology to replace teachers.
It won’t be jammed into wealthy schools. It will be jammed into low and middle income schools.
When public school parents figure out that they were sold “personalized learning” which was actually cheap garbage intended to save on staffing costs there will be a backlash.
The US Department of Education should be ashamed of themselves for peddling this crap to kids.
http://missourieducationwatchdog.com/2011-video-personalized-learnings-plan-to-replace-teachers/
LikeLike
Parents and community groups need to sound the alarm. Tech giants want to turn students into widgets. Parents and concerned citizens are going to have to have a showdown with representatives that billionaires will buy to pull this “sleight of hand” off.
LikeLike
You have to love “Altschool”
Wealthy private school parents rejected the Altschool model, so they all got together and said “let’s sell this to public school families! They’ll buy anything!”
The people who run public schools and are buying into this snake oil should all be replaced.
LikeLike
They’re eagerly moving into the “rural market”, too, the ed tech salesforce:
“Blended Learning: Districts can also better prepare students by providing chances to learn via different modalities (direct instruction, small groups, peer-to-peer, blended, virtual). Blended learning and digital coursework allow rural schools to offer lessons, enrichment opportunities, even whole courses that they could otherwise not provide, which can expand the number of Advanced Placement classes students can take and broaden horizons by exposing students to concepts that might otherwise be unavailable in some of our more remote corners. Rural districts can also address teacher-shortage areas this way without compromising the number of course offerings. Finally, farm life often requires rural students to be home during daylight hours — especially in harvest season — so the anytime/anywhere nature of digital coursework accommodates their need”
Yes, because that’s what low income rural students really need. Fewer adults who care about them and more cheap online garbage.
“Whole courses!” Whoopee! Apparently my generation are too cheap to provide public schools with actual teachers.
This is a rip off. We’re selling this to these kids as if it’s comparable to a human teacher and it’s not. It’s a cheap replacement.
At least have the decency to admit that. They’ll get a cheaper, lower quality experience in school because the adults no longer feel like paying taxes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
EXPOSING THE BIG MONEY TECH-INVESTOR TRUTH, sarcasm be damned (and taking out the word RURAL doesn’t change the nature of the game): “…what low income rural students really need. Fewer adults who care about them and more cheap online garbage…”
LikeLike
I wasn’t aware of TeachThought. Thank you, Laura, for your comprehensive research.
LikeLike
…or MyScholarShop. Ridiculous.
LikeLike
Outsourcing arts instruction is a direct attack on the profession. This is part of the small schools tactic, to make sure no school has enough students for bands or orchestras, even though the building has enough.
LikeLike