Writing at Anthony Cody’s Blog “Living in Dialogue,” Paul Horton succinctly explains what’s wrong with using public dollars to subsidize school choice.
He begins:
“Because I have been asked to comment on problems facing public schools in the United States, I would like to begin by saying that there are a great many things right with public education. Two friends, Ellen Allensworth, Director of the UChicago Consortium on School Research, and Chris Lubienski, professor of education policy at Indiana University, tell me that public sector innovation in the classroom in Chicago and beyond surpasses much, if not most, of the innovation that we see in the charter and independent sectors in the United States. The problem is that willingness to innovate and implementation of innovation in public schools is largely unreported in corporate media.
“With this in mind, I would say that the single largest factor facing public education today is inadequate funding in rural areas, inner cities and inner-ring suburbs. We still face a situation in this country with what Jonathan Kozol once called Savage Inequalities that are made worse by increasing income inequality, structural unemployment, and persistent segregation. Black, brown, and white families are facing what Thomas Shapiro calls “toxic Inequality” that makes it almost impossible for poor families to gain any measure of financial stability.
“Richard Rothstein of the Institute for Policy Studies has recently written a book, The Color of Law, that argues that public policy created segregation and that segregation is most responsible for underfunded schools and the “hyper-poverty” that education reformers are attempting to target.
“I part ways with many policy makers when they advocate for charters, vouchers, and an end to neighborhood schools. Like John Dewey, I believe that schools should serve as community centers and that public schools have an important in role in the construction of strong community institutions beyond buildings….
”Every statistical study done about test scores in the United States for the last fifty years points to one fact: the biggest gains in test scores in the United States were achieved in the mid 1970s when schools reached their zenith of integration. We have gone back toward racial and class segregation since, and the charter and voucher movements are merely accelerating the pace of segregation in the opinion of a wide consensus of policy experts.
“Our current problem is that these simple facts are rejected by the billionaires like Bill Gates, Eli Broad, Ken Griffin, the Kochs, and the Waltons who push charters and vouchers to gain market share in a thirteen billion dollar a year industry. Philanthropy is a tool to open markets. The Gates, Broad, and Walton Foundations are filled with market zealots who seek to disrupt public education to sell product, gentrify inner-city neighborhoods, and make their bosses look better.
“These same billionaires contribute heavily to university education departments that rubber stamp their ideas. The Gates foundation heavily subsidizes education research at Harvard University and the Walton Foundation has deep pockets for education research at the University of Arkansas…
“This is precisely how the free market education reform movement operates: forget an ocean of peer-viewed research, funnel large sums of money into big name universities, and billionaires can give voice to their own half-baked ideas with the stamp of approval from major academic brands.
“Multiply this by control of major editorial boards, the noise created by Foundation created PR firms, and the AstroTurf funding of such groups and Democrats for Education Reform, and the echo chamber drowns out most of the peer reviewed research.
“It does not hurt that these same billionaires can hate on our Education Secretary in public, but cheer her every move in private.
“Billionaires are practicing a bait and switch. Their narrative about the decline of public education is repeated in most major newspaper and network outlets on cue. But public schools are out innovating them in the trenches and this innovation is seldom reported….”

“Only policies that decrease segregation will create a more equitable school system; public policies must target de jure segregation . . . “
Why doesn’t Horton identify even a single, you know, policy here, just one that stands better than a snowball’s chance of actually being implemented? Why does he ignore that white Americans are deeply opposed to school integration, even in the most liberal parts of the most liberal cities, and that in reality it takes court orders to get the job done?
Horton wants to stop charters because he believes that they are an obstacle to integration. I propose a different sequence from his: traditional public schools must FIRST enact meaningful, actionable, widespread policies that actually do something, ANYTHING, to address appallingly bad neighborhood school segregation, and THEN we can have the conversation about the position of charters in a new, substantially integrated public school landscape. That way well-regulated, open-to-all charters like the ones in New York can continue on their merry way of doing a great job for the families who opt-in to them while the traditional public district school system figures out the solutions that have mysteriously eluded it for 65 years and that it wasn’t concerned about until a free alternative to traditional public schools came along.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Tim,
I address your concerns in the original piece. Regarding de jure segregation: as Rothstein makes clear, public schools can not do anything about segregation because remedies must proceed from violations of Civil Rights committed by city, state, and federal governments. The courts must order remedies. I address the issue of white opposition with a very telling quote, click on the link.
All best,
LikeLike
Yeah, no, I clicked and read the piece, as you should have ascertained by my quoting a segment not included in Diane’s excerpt.
The NHJ quote doesn’t gainsay my argument. Color of Law has made it fashionable to refer to de jure segregation, but this glosses over a very important point that represents the flaw in Rothstein’s thesis: racism and segregation weren’t imposed on us by Bill Gates or the capitalist villain du jour. Everything was built from the ground up—the laws, the systems, the institutions—on the collective racism of ordinary whites who stood and stand to benefit from it. That’s why it’s here; that’s why so little is done about it. The current occupant of the White House was elected as an immune response to a threat to the system.
So we agree that it isn’t happening organically or voluntarily—then where are the lawsuits? In my state there are lawsuits in various stages of percolation over funding ($25,000 or more per student isn’t enough to provide a sound, adequate, basic education, they say) and charter schools, but for the failure to address the nation’s worst school segregation? Bupkis. Even if the lawsuits are filed, thanks to whites and the politicians they elect and the judges those politicians choose, there is no guarantee of getting the court order you want.
Charter schools or “reform” generally had nothing to do with creating this mess. There is no moral, educational, political, or financial justification for keeping families out of charters as the American-as-apple-pie traditional public zoned neighborhood school system takes another few decades or centuries to heal itself.
LikeLike
Tim,
Segregation is very bad. Bad for kids, bad for society. Charter schools didn’t cause it. They make it worse. And you don’t care. Our kid population is only 13% black. Why concentrate them them in all black schools? Why not strive for what’s right instead of giving up?
LikeLike
Corporate billionaires care little about our extreme income inequality and segregation. It is the “little people” that have to deal with the fallout that privatization engenders. Our country has never been totally fair; however, as least we aspired to equity and opportunity for all. The billionaire reboot of our country aspires to suppress democracy and thrives on propaganda and the best fake research money can buy so that our billionaires can loot our democratic public schools to take hold of the thirteen billion dollars spent educating our young people. The wealthy have installed a network of puppets in key positions in the federal and state governments to assist in this hostile takeover. Aided by the corporate media, propaganda goons, institutions and foundations that churn out fake research and look the other way, free market America is for sale to the highest bidder.
LikeLike
retired teacher,
YES! And THANKS. Love your comments.
LikeLike
Thanks for this.
“The billionaires can easily buy academic credibility and the broader public has difficulty determining who more accurately represents the reality of schools and schooling. ”
A perfect case of this is the Gates-funded Measures of Effective Teaching project (MET), in excess of $65 million cobbled together by Harvard economists who thought they could actually get principals in multiple school districts to randomly assign teachers to classrooms, thereby allowing for a perfect demonstration of VAM in sorting out “effective teachers.”
That did not work.
The MET researchers also wanted some proof of the reliability of the Danielson Observation protocol. That did not work. They had to settle for something other than actual observations. They asked teachers to create and edited video segments of their teaching for use in the study, and the teachers got to keep the video equipment.
There is more, but this deeply flawed study was accompanied by a great publicity scheme including Congressional testimony from the lead researcher, economist Thomas Kane.
The MET study has left behind a long trail of secondary studies, peer-reviewed, (as the original study was not) in addition to keeping alive the use of VAM and Danielson rubrics for evaluating teachers and a flawed student evaluation survey for teachers created by economist Ron Ferguson.
This is a clear case the billionaire Bill Gates paying for research by Harvard economists who were clueless about the ground truths to be found in public schools.
LikeLike
Thanks for your diligent efforts to track the assorted efforts to undermine public education.
LikeLike
Laura,
Click on the article and you will find another example very close to home!
LikeLike