Posted by Carol Burris.
During School Choice Week it is important to note that most of the attempts to steer public dollars to private schools and homeschoolers happen not at the federal level, but at the state level. Across the nation, bills are being introduced that are all very similar.
One of those bills was recently introduced in Iowa by Senator Chelgren who claimed he had a business degree from Forbco Management school which the press dubbed “Sizzler University.”
Senator Chelgren had a certificate from a course he took when he worked for the Sizzler Steakhouse when he was a teenager. Forbco Management trains Sizzler employees.
Chelgren’s bill would give public money to parents to use at their discretion for “competent private instruction.” Perhaps he wants other Iowans to take courses at the Sizzler Steakhouse, paid for by taxpayers. Perhaps other youngsters could attend Hamburger University at McDonalds on the taxpayer dime.
But it is no laughing matter. It is serious business.
Here is what our friends from Iowans for Public Education had to say:
“Senate File 2091 was introduced by Senator Mark Chelgren (R-Ottumwa) on January 23 and assigned to the Ways and Means Committee. The bill is a wide-ranging assault on the foundation of public education in the state of Iowa. If made law, it would divert hundreds of millions of dollars out of public coffers and give it to the parents of private school and homeschool students for them to use at their discretion for “competent private instruction,” according to the wording of the bill.
“This bill would directly divert taxpayer dollars dedicated to public education funding and basically hand it to private religious schools and completely unregulated homeschools,” said Claire Celsi, the Central Iowa organizer for the grassroots group that stands up against efforts to erode public education in Iowa.
Iowa is in the midst of a fiscal crisis because of sagging revenues. Corporate tax cuts over the past ten years have severely restricted the amount of revenue flowing into state coffers. This misguided voucher plan will make things even worse. The legislature is currently mulling how to plug another funding gap caused by Governor Kim Reynolds’ reckless budgeting practices.
“We are waiting for a fiscal note to be prepared to accompany the bill. There will definitely be a huge cost to the taxpayer on legislation like this,” said Randy Richardson, the group’s volunteer legislative monitor.
Karen Nichols, the founder of Iowans for Public Education said, “Our group is comprised of thousands of Iowa parents, students, administrators and average everyday Iowans who are fighting to hang on to our most prized institution – public education.”
“Every other policy or plan that we have as a state, including economic development, workforce development and public health – depends on having an educated and engaged population. Iowa’s public education system has been underfunded for eight years and we cannot afford to fund two parallel systems. The Legislature should fully fund our excellent public schools. Taxpayer money is for public schools. We are completely against this voucher plan,” said Nichols.

From what I’ve read, ALEC starts at the bottom and work up toward the national level and ALEC has been behind hundreds if not more than a thousand successful elections at the state level the past decade or more.
LikeLike
Sizzler University is a safety school for those who don’t get into Hamburger University. He must have graduated Fulla cum Lardy.
LikeLike
Good one!
LikeLike
“He must have graduated Fulla cum Lardy.”
Does that mean he has a brain full of rancid lard – after all the brain is 70-percent fat?
LikeLike
A colleague enrolled in McDonald’s University as part of a post graduate research project. He is a scholar with an interest in popular culture. The “university” is for training the manager of a franchise…a version of Relay Graduate School of Education where no one is permitted to have a graduate degree.
LikeLike
crosposted at Oped:
with this comment:
Carol Burris, the amazing and talented executive director of the Network for Public Education, wrote this stunning investigative report on charter fraud in California. It is titled “Charters and Consequences.”The report details the fraud and financial scams permitted by California’s weak charter law. So weak is that law that it not only tolerates fraud, it encourages it. As you read the report, you will ask yourself why taxpayers are not outraged. They should be.
https://networkforpubliceducation.org/2017/11/npe-releases-charters-consequences-investigative-report/
And, it is just just one state. There are 15,880 school systems in 50 states, and the fraud would make you head swim if it weren’t already filled with trumpdacca trumpshutdowntrumpshitholetrumpborderwalltrumptweet etcetc… ad nauseam.
LikeLike
Sorry…her sis the link! at Oped: https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Voucher-legislation-introd-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Declaration-Of-Crisis_Education-Vouchers_Fraud_Network-For-Public-Education-180124-768.html
LikeLike
The lack of oversight is stunningly stupid. If our country truly cared about its young people, our so called representatives would protect them from clowns, frauds and grifters. We need to limit the money in politics.
LikeLike
That’s the problem, our representatives? are all ALEC graduates who think that they know what is best for the country, which means that the people should die and leave everything to them. All they are interested in is power and money! Paul Ryan is at the top of the list of traitors!
LikeLike
He’s the same person who sponsored a bill a couple of years ago that would have mandated firing some percentage of tenured state university faculty every year based on their student evaluations. Another example of somebody who knows or cares nothing at all about how education gets done trying to legislate terrible ideas because their rich friends tell them to.
LikeLike
The voucher bills being proposed all over the country are an example of how the two political lobbies in ed reform – pro-charter and pro-voucher- have basically merged.
They’ll be completely indistinguishable by the end of Trump’s term- unless ed reformers start losing some elections in states like Iowa and Kansas, which they might since public schools have fared so poorly under ed reform in those states. I think they’re almost definitely going to lose some in Ohio, not for promoting charters and vouchers but instead because they harmed existing public schools.
What’s funny to watch is there were VEHEMENT denials among ed reformers that this was about going to an all-voucher funding scheme and now that’s mainstream in the “movement”. No public explanation, no public discussion, instead we just see the results of the shift.
All of the critics of privatization who warned this would end up with vouchers were right- that’s exactly what happened. What WAS the far Right position in the movement- eradicate public schools completely and replace current funding systems with vouchers- is now mainstream.
The end goal of ed reform cannot be reached without K-12 education funding being converted into a voucher system. They can’t get to where they want to go without it.
LikeLike
I’ve been following “school choice week” in DC. That’s the week where all the paid ed reformers join hands and bash public schools in order to promote charters and private schools. It’s basically a huge “public schools suck!” rally.
DeVos is lead cheerleader this season. She says over and over (and over) that the voucher funding system ed reform envisions would allow every child to attend any school.
That is of course not true- the defining characteristic of private schools is that they are PRIVATE and can and do exclude students they don’t want, but it doesn’t matter- they all cheer when she says it.
LikeLike
This is what happens when morons are elected to public office….
LikeLike
Maybe ed reformers can answer the question if we pose it the other way.
What is the definition of “public education” in this movement? It has to be limited to “publicly funded” because they’ve stripped the phrase of any additional meaning when they all embraced vouchers.
They don’t support “public education”. They support (some) public funding of K-12 education. I wonder what would happen if they ran on that? I suspect a lot of them would lose.
LikeLike