Richard Brodsky, a former Democratic legislator in New York, warns that Trump Tax Plan will be a disaster for New York.
Of course, Republicans have boasted about the devastation that their tax law will cause to New York, New Jersey, and California, the big blue states. It is a partisan hit job, unlike the 1986 tax reform, where the parties worked together.
He writes:
“That loud rumbling sound New Yorkers are hearing is the ground shifting beneath their feet.
“The recently enacted federal package of tax cuts and increases does much more than increase the state’s outsized contribution to the federal treasury. It will fundamentally transform New York’s government and politics by undermining support for current school funding arrangements.
“To provide a quality education to a population with many high-needs students, New York spends more per pupil than any other state – an average of more than $22,000 a year. This figure varies throughout the state and there is a lot of attention paid to disparities in school spending. Many school districts don’t have sufficient local resources and need state funds to pay for teachers, physical space and supplies.
“Most education money comes from two separate taxes. The local share is usually paid mostly by property taxes, a particularly regressive tax that does not consider the taxpayers’ income or ability to pay. In most of the state outside New York City – which has low property taxes and an income tax – school property taxes are an enormous social and political problem.
“The state steps in with its own funding on top of the local share, getting its money from the income tax, and distributing it through a formula that sends most of the money to poorer districts. A wealthier suburban district can get as little as 5-7 percent of its budget from the state. Poorer districts, most of them upstate, get 70-75 percent of their budgets from the state. New York City gets 40-50 percent of its budget from the state, largely because it is a wealthy district when compared to the statewide average.
“It’s not as complicated as it seems. The state redistributes income tax revenue to make up for disparities in wealth. Schools across the state function under the system. Taxpayers everywhere complain, but it has been a stable system. The regional impacts are clear. Generally speaking, New York City gets back in state dollars a little less than it sends to Albany in tax payments. Upstate gets an enormous subsidy provided by suburban taxpayers.
“President Donald Trump has blown up that delicate balance. Measured across all state programs – not just education – New York City and the suburbs send billions of dollars to upstate communities. That system has been tolerated partially because it’s fair: State dollars are directed at communities that need the money for basic services, including schools, and partially because political leaders bargained their way into a sustainable compromise.
“Enter Donald Trump. His tax reform legislation unravels a central economic premise of New York’s school funding system. Suburban taxpayers pay both high property taxes and high state income taxes, but they could deduct from their federal income taxes what they paid in state and local taxes. That deduction is now capped at $10,000, far less than the state and local taxes paid by many middle-class and affluent homeowners in New York City and its suburbs. So now many of those New Yorkers will see their total tax liability increase by thousands of dollars a year. New York, already the largest net donor among the states, will be sending an additional $14 billion per year to Washington.
“This will undo the political bargain that has kept the current system afloat. Suburban taxpayers might be willing to absorb an additional burden if those dollars flowed to their home districts. Instead, slowly but surely, they will learn that their money is heading out of town and they won’t like it. That will inevitably erode public support for regional subsidies. A taxpayer revolt is coming.”
Read on. It is ironic that the president from New York is wreaking maximum damage on his home state.

Could this be one reason why? Wouldn’t surprise me.
LikeLike
It’s not ironic. Trump has a reputation for getting even with anyone that doesn’t do what he wants and New York voted heavily against him in the presidential election.
Hillary took 58.8-percent of the vote (4,143,874 votes) to Trump’s 37.5-percent (2,640,579 votes).
Trump loves, is even thrilled, to punish those that don’t cooperate with him when he is cheating them.
“Richard Branson: Donald Trump told me he wanted ‘to spend the rest of his life’ getting revenge”
http://www.businessinsider.com/richard-branson-on-meeting-donald-trump-2016-10
LikeLike
It will likely cause more backlash against teachers. However, in order for teachers to work in down state New York, they are shouldering their share of those hefty tax bills. It costs a lot to live in metropolitan New York City for teachers and other public employees. One trend has changed over the years. When I first started teaching in the suburban NYC area, most of the teachers lived within twenty minutes of the area in which they taught. Today, many more teachers are commuting from further distances of over a hour from where they live. Beginning teachers in New York are not starting out with a salary that can help them buy a home in the area in which they teach. In an attempt to lower the cost of living, some New York teachers are commuting more than fifty miles each way to be able to teach in suburban NYC schools. Also, more of the younger teachers are remaining renters longer, and some of them are changing jobs when they buy a home in a more affordable area. They accept a job paying less in another part of the state if the move permits them to buy a home there.
LikeLike
Wait – – The article is only part 1. Go deeper into those high wealth yet diverse districts and towns (this will affect police, roads, other public services).
Weathy folks were already revolting when annual tax increases were 5, 6, 7%. They blamed teacher salaries AND in many towns blamed immigration, increasing ESOL programs, and preschools.
And – in NY school budgets voted by public annually.
Enter the “2%” tax cap which essentaill forced public entities to limit increases. Budgets passed with ease. Cuts were significant. Override proposals feared.
So in towns like Ms. Clinton’s wealthy (ot so diverse) hometown (president probably has a dartboard with that town and NY, CA.. on the bulls eye) and dozens more that are diverse with 2% cap already squeezing schools – the wealthy, and middle class voters will be more reluctant to increase their taxes they can’t deduct.
Mix in conservative voters who would love a T-wall in New York and cuts to Title 1 and federal programs – – – watch for more attacks on teachers, unions, and immigration – – and another nail in the coffin of the American Dream for low income, immigrant, and stuggling overtaxed middle class families.
LikeLike
WE teachers ALWAYS get BLAMED. I am so sick and tired of the BLAMING of teachers, especially public school teachers, for the ills of this society created by the already wealthy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
and what these people don’t stop to think about – whether their kids go to public or most likely private schools – is their taxes on are their very expensive yet always increasing in value homes – – and why are those areas so attractive? Wait for it…. the public schools with the remarkable teachers whose salaries the homeowners complain about.
LikeLike
We shouldn’t think of this as Trump’s tax plan. This is the Republicans’ tax law.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point.
LikeLike
How about ALEC pulls the strings to its GOP puppets? And behind ALEC, the Tea Party and probably that so-called Freedom Caucus are David and Charles Koch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
YES. Trump would have signed anything put on his desk: he was, and is, being used for his very lack of logic and order.
LikeLike
You had an opportunity to work with Republicans but chose not too. Did you not care? No ideas?
Why no attempts at bipartisanship? Hatred of a single man is not helping this country.. I live in a no state tax state, yet we are hit by other taxes and don’t see a break given on our federal returns. We have heavy debt in this state and school taxes are climbing by huge amounts for the average homeowner and it is alarming in Seattle area. The time limit on the citizen rates is because the Dems would not participate in the vote. Reps wanted the cuts to be permanent. Our economy and employment numbers are improving across the state.
Can’t we ever work together? Emotional appeals, threats, marches and riots will get us nowhere except more anger and division.
LikeLike
It takes two to work together. The GOP refuses to cooperate no matter what they say or claim. Most if not all elected Republicans have demonstrated that working together means, to them, that they get their way 100-percent of the time.
LikeLike
The only thing I want to do with Republicans Tumpanzees is relagate them to the dust bin of history as the vile disgusting creatures that they are. And my only fear is that Democrats see it as illiberal among other things and will fail to do so when the Trumpanzees are swept from office .
This is not the Republican Party of Dwight Eisenhower or even Ford , Rockefeller, George Romney . This is a party willing to tolerate authoritarian fascists . And to quote Rex a ——- moron .
LikeLike
Wait, WHAT? Are you serious?
Cite ONE example of GOP contributing to anything PRESIDENT Obama proposed in 8 years?
How many times did they vote to repeal ACA?
Where was the bipartisan willingness to debate a Supreme Court nominee?
For years the Dems said the health care plan was not perfect – They asked Where’s your suggesitons to improve it? Zilch from the GOP
Dems allowed months of debate. GOP behind closed doors not only without democrats but only selected republicans who got a few days to read it.
Bipartisan willigness of gop? If PRESIDENT Obama and dems did any one of the hundreds of lies (yes, based on quotes – not pres declarations of fake news), snafus, bullying, baiting the enemy, blaming FBI, CIA, GOP, DEMS, JUSTICE DEPT.
Hatred of a single man – your elected GOPers who you claim want bipartisanship seem to love this “single man” – not one willing to call him out for anything.
This is an education blog so let’s go there:
Your bipartisan eager Congress who defends this president – – –
Doesn’t accept science –
Sees an ice storm and claims there’s no global warming
Thinks being intellectual is a bad thing
Slashes programs for first in college
Makes every kid with immigrant parents afraid they’ll go home and parents will be gone
Accepts behavior of a president who if he were a student in any school in the country would have been booted out daily violations of conduct…
Ignores white supremecist marches and kkk leader support, cuts civil rights protections,
never mind… you probably stopped reading after seeing a mention of President Obama
LikeLike
In February 1974, Nixon proposed more comprehensive health insurance reform—an employer mandate to offer private health insurance if employees volunteered to pay 25 percent of premiums, replacement of Medicaid by state-run health insurance plans available to all with income-based premiums and cost sharing, and …
Nixon failed.
Because Mitt Romney was the governor of Massachusetts at the time, the law has colloquially been called Romneycare, a reference to the nicknaming of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as “Obamacare”. … As such it is one of the models of the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance exchanges.
“Mitt Romney Finally Takes Credit For Obamacare”
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/10/23/451200436/mitt-romney-finally-takes-credit-for-obamacare
Under Romney, healthcare reform would have been a GOP plan but under Obama, the GOP went to war to destroy the same health care program Romney implemented in Massachusetts when he was governor and the same plan he proposed for the nation when he was running for president.
Romney failed to implement a national health care plan. Obama did not fail with the same plan and because Obama looked like an African-American and was a Democrat, the racist GOP declared an endless war on Obama and his health care plan that wasn’t originally his idea.
LikeLike
No, April, that is incorrect. Republicans chose to put healthcare first up on the legislative agenda; their bill would have slashed Medicaid, which got huge public pushback, & failed to address spiralling healthcare costs, which lost them some conservative votes, & was written/amended ‘out of order’, which lost them McCain’s vote. All that took from Jan-MidSeptember. So in order to ‘get something done’ by the end of 2017, they fast-tracked tax-reform via reconciliation rules – meaning no Democratic votes needed. Reconciliation rules dictate that either the corporate or the individual income tax cuts had to be temporary, in order to limit the projected debt to reconciliation reqts. Meanwhile, Democrats’ proposals [Ways & Means, Senate Finance Committees focused mainly on closing loopholes, maintaining the high- & low-end brackets’ & estate tax rates as-is– but they were shut out of the tax-reform talks. ‘Bipartisanship’ was neither solicited nor required.
LikeLike
April, wait a minute. Our economy is not improving. Americans are poorer than they’ve been in decades and the reasons are not what you think. Republican trickle-down economic policies that cut taxes for the uber wealthy have dominated for 40 years. Billionaires pay lower taxes so the rest of us subsidize their businesses and lifestyles. https://www.thebalance.com/income-inequality-in-america-3306190
We are near full employment but the jobs available are low wage, part time, unpredictable, & put employees into dire working conditions. Income inequality is at historically high levels & the Republican tax bill just made it worse for all of us.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/americans-havent-been-this-poor-and-indebted-in-decades.html?utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s3&utm_campaign=sharebutton-t
LikeLike
I have said for months that the tax bill will have this effect , That it is as Stephen Moore said “Death to Democrats ” The Trojan horse of tax cuts that will go to most Americans skewed to the top, disguises a massive attempt at Social re engineering with the goal of turning the Nation back to the 1920s .
You can see the assault starting already on the editorial and news pages . Within days of passage there have been calls to weaken unions related to the Public sector and infrastructure spending in NYC . One from the NY Times and the other the daily News . So it is not just Public Schools . It is construction workers in NYC and through out the Nation who will pay a price . I wish I could take some joy in the justice, the suffering they are about to endure after they voted for a ——— moron in huuuuge ! numbers . . Unfortunately it hits too close to home .
Now the news is not all bad. The one thing that Republicans and Corporate America have taught us is that tax laws were written to be gamed . As soon as loop holes were closed a slew of corporate tax Accountants and Lawyers went to work to open a new one.
Weeks ago Dean Baker propose changing state income taxes to Employer based payroll taxes . Fully deductible by the employer . A complex project that may require adjustments downward to wages . Cuomo mentioned it as something to work on . An even sweater Idea being floated is Charitable deduction to Public school districts school districts that would be fully deductible on federal taxes . Followed by a credit on State taxes dollar for dollar ; All is fair in love and war.
http://prospect.org/article/rubbing-salt-wounds-republicans
LikeLike
Whatever the blue states do to counter the unfair manipulations of the tax code, they should do. As you have said, all is fair…… The Republicans and ALEC have no intentions of being fair at all. The blue states carry the majority of the tax burden which then is sent to the red states to make up for their poverty.
LikeLike
Trump’s tax plan will blow up school funding in NY & the Senate HELP Committee will blow up the teaching profession. I received this legislative update from my SPED professional organization (CEC). Let’s hope there is no bipartisan agreement on this hot mess.
The PROSPER Act raised many concerns for educators relating to the teaching profession – including:
· Elimination of Title II, the teacher preparation title, including the Teacher Quality Partnership Grants
· Elimination of the TEACH grants which support teacher candidates in high need schools and fields
· Elimination of three loan forgiveness programs for teachers, including the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program
Meanwhile, Senate HELP Committee chairman Lamar Alexander (R-TN), has said that he will work with Democrats – most notably Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), the ranking Democrat on the Committee – to draft a bipartisan reauthorization bill. He hopes to mark it up this spring and hearings as early as this month are anticipated. Since this appears to be Sen. Alexander’s final year as chair of the Committee (because of chairmanship term limits in the Senate), he is likely to be highly motivated to get a result before he steps down. Sen. Alexander has been talking about fixes to the Higher Ed Act for years – particularly simplifying the FAFSA (student aid application) and cutting down on regulations. Undoubtedly this stems back to his days as President of the University of Tennessee and US Secretary of Education. Having seen his success wit h a rewrite of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, he seems well poised and highly motivated for another legislative outcome.
The House bill is a non-starter in the Senate if that is to be a bi-partisan process. A number of targeted bi-partisan bills have been introduced in the Senate addressing issues such as FAFSA simplification, risk-sharing and access and accountability. These bills may be where the Senate rewrite starts – with bi-partisan measures already on the playing field.
LikeLike
“Sen. Alexander has been talking about fixes to the Higher Ed Act for years – particularly simplifying the FAFSA (student aid application) and cutting down on regulations. ”
Seriously, who, other than the student loan industry, thinks it’s a good idea to make student loans easier to get?
LikeLike