A regular reader who identifies himself as GregB has sound advice about how to advocate for your schools. His advice is similar to what is suggested by the Indivisibles. I would add that you can amplify your voice by joining the Network for Public Education. We exist to connect people to other activists in their community and state. Be informed. Participate. Work with allies.
GregB writes:
“For whatever its worth, I’ve worked as a legislative staffer, have organized and implemented grassroots advocacy campaigns in education, medical research, and health regulatory issues and Lloyd is far closer to the truth than Ed will ever be.
“First, phone calls are generally useless. Your call goes to young staffer–an intern or someone who has their first job–who literally take calls on every issue under the sun. They have no clue what people are calling about, take for/against tallies that few people pay attention to, and generally will answer you with something to the effect of: “I’ll be sure to pass your views on the senator/congressman.” The exception to the rule is when an issue becomes so big that it clogs up the phone lines, something like a Supreme Court nomination or a big issue that dominates the headlines and evening news. But it is aggregate numbers that matter, not individual messages. If you think your calls are being taken seriously, then you may as well agree with the argument that Hillary Clinton only won the popular vote because of widespread voter fraud.
“Second, emails are generally the same as phone calls, the only difference being that the computer algorithms generate pre-approved responses (if you are for the issue, you get one response, if you are against it, you get another). Occasionally when there are more than one issue addressed or nuances that don’t fit the algorithms, the message goes to a legislative correspondent who then patches together pre-approved language into “personal response.”
“Third, snail mail letters are effective if the stars line up such as: the arguments in the letter are personal with relevant examples and emotion and it reaches the eyes of a sympathetic staffer. While that is sometimes effective, more often than not, you will get an equivocal response that ends with “your views will be important to me should this issue ever be considered on the floor of the Senate/House.” In other words, nothing.
“If you do not know the names of: a local staffer who deals with constituents on the issue areas you care about, a DC legislative assistant and the legislative correspondent who supports him or her, and, if you are lucky, the local staff director and DC legislative director or chief of staff, then you are not doing effective citizen lobbying. You must contact one in the local and one in the DC staff a minimum of twice a year. You must be specific about your issue and remind them of what you contacted them about previously. And to be very effective, you should coordinate with other constituents who are like minded. You should share your correspondence to the boss with them.
“You should also know what committee/subcommittee memberships your senator/congressman has. If education is your issues and your senator/representative is not on the authorizing or appropriating committee on the issues you care about, then it is very unlikely that your views will ever reach the level of the boss. If it does, the best you can hope for is for that senator/representative to sign on to “Dear Colleague” letters about specific issue, i.e., they become lobbyists of a sort who try to influence the committees of jurisdiction. And if you are a real effective citizen lobbyist, you should find out about those “Dear Colleague” letters and make the staffers aware of them. If they are on the right committees, the tips below are even more important.
“If you can’t get to DC, you should try to schedule visits with local staffers (so that they become your lobbyists to their DC counterparts) once or twice a year and also request visits with their bosses during congressional recess periods. Town hall meetings used to be incredibly effective when only a dozen or so people showed up. That dynamic has changed dramatically since polarization has set in.
“Letters to the editor are more effective than phone calls or letters. They are more effective if you’ve done relationship building with staffers; you can make them aware of the letters. I have often received notes from my reps responding to letters I’ve written.
“One last tip. Should you get paper responses from your senators/representatives with signatures, know that signature machines are used. They have separate templates with full signatures and first names, the latter to make it more “personal.” But know that the boss has never touched that letter. When you get short, hand-written notes, then you know you’ve actually reached your senator/representative.
“But please don’t be deluded into thinking that your occasional call or email is actually accomplishing somethings. If you’re not willing to do your homework, build relationships, and keep it up since there is regular staff turnover (meaning you have to start the process all over again) you’re not engaging in effective advocacy.”

These are useful tips. Thanks for sharing, GregB.
For the time being, myself & a local group of public education activists are focusing our efforts at the state & local level. This week we are sponsoring an education town hall & have commitments from 2 state senators & 4 delegates (the latter group newly elected) to attend. One of the senators is on the education committee; not sure yet about the delegates & their committee assignments. Your tips are a great reminder this matters. Thank you!
LikeLike
The same rules, as you well know, apply for state and local reps. If fact it can be more effective, since they have far fewer staffers and are much more accessible. Sorry for the typos, it was a stream of consciousness thing when I wrote this.
LikeLike
Time is an enemy of some of the people who might other wise participate. This work is not for the faint hearted, certainly not for the pregnant server of coffee who has driven 15 miles to work at a job that begins at 6:30 am, ends at 3 pm if she is lucky, then drives to her home neighborhood, picks up her two school-age kids, and then prepares a sit-down evening meal.
LikeLike
Yes, Laura you are quite right! But in this age of social media and Facebook, if someone (or more) in a community takes the lead, groups can be set up so that the lead can rightly and honestly state they are representing others. It would be helpful to have the names and contact information included on any lobbying efforts, so that the recipients understand the reach. You can even request an individual reply for everyone represented. It’s another method of multiplying numbers. And people in the groups can and should mention the lead when they send their emails or make calls.
The frustrating part of this level of advocacy is that it often runs into roadblocks. You just have to keep chipping away. I’ve just been introduced to another platform of building communities. Once I understand it better, and if it works, I’ll be sure to report the results.
LikeLike
Wow! So short of flying to DC and meeting with Congress nothing else I do matters?
Would someone clarify for me?
And does this mean that a teeny donor like me has no voice?
LikeLike
Yvonne, I understand your frustration. I’ll try to clarify. My point is that effective advocacy, like everything else worth doing in life, takes effort, commitment, and sincerity. And even then you might not achieve what you are trying to accomplish. If you want to make a great meal, you have to learn how to cook. You’ll still mess up, burn, and wrongly spice things along the way. If you want to run a marathon, you have to train. And you’ll still have many setbacks along the way, maybe even never run that marathon. You get the point.
My intent in writing this was to try to explain that simple online pitches that make it easy to contact members of Congress with pre-written, pre-addressed emails will rarely—not always—be as lasting as the time you put into them. The exceptions also do not always lead to success. For example, the opposition to Betsy DeVos’s nomination lit up Capitol Hill and clogged the lines, but she was still approved.
So that doesn’t mean you have no voice. It means you have to pick your battles. If it’s Congress, you can work at the state level office for your senators and district offices for your representative. As Virginia Parent reminds us above, you can choose the state level. In my case, I’m focusing on my school board and local politics and trying to convince them to act locally and be my surrogate voices to state and federal reps. But if it takes you less than 20 seconds to act and then forget until the next action alert to do the same, you’ll likely get back what you put in.
LikeLike
I think that is why we join organizations like NPE.
I can’t but feel that the overwhelming response to DeVos’ nomination and her tenure has had an effect. Yes, she won confirmation but only because the Vice President voted. She has never been and never will be a popular Secretary of Education. We see the mess she is making, but how much worse could she be if we had not let our views be known en mass? Spokespeople are important but they need someone to speak for (as you indicated). Diane is so incredibly effective not only because she is extremely knowledgeable but because she has a huge backing. If I write as an individual, you are right, I will probably have no impact, but when I write as a member of NPE or some other organization…
It’s the same reason I support unions and why certain autocrats don’t. As part of a collective, the little guy has a voice that otherwise would be ignored. Years ago a group of parents in my district managed to beat back an attempt of the administration to consolidate the three neighborhood schools into two centralized campuses. The administration claimed it would allow them to get to know all the students well before they entered the junior high together. We were at a nadir in our enrollment after interest rates went sky high, but the parents of the two schools set for demolition (and the teachers,too, although not overtly) got to work presenting all the data that supported the smaller classes that would be lost to a consolidation that could never be reversed.
I don’t think that there is anything here that Greg would not agree with. I am just saying the same thing, I think, from a different perspective.
LikeLike
Dearest Dr. Chapman:
I really love your wisdom. You truly touch the essential core of life to commoners or to the population whose survival and happiness is barely fulfilled within 24 hours daily time frame for the rest of their working lives.
I am the one who has lived through capitalism, communism, rich, poor, immigrant, excellent in my own language, and beginner in language barrier. I was born in the environment where I can achieve everything with ease, but I have grew up for the past 40 years in Canada and have fulfilled my goals efficiently with my own strategy in time management and money management.
IMHO, the best educator is the one who is also content with his/her own living/working life to set example to students and their parents.
In short, the best and successful advocacy for public education must be from the collective point of view from teachers, parents and students within the essential time frame.
Respectfully yours,
May
LikeLike
Great stuff, Greg.
LikeLike
Thanks!
LikeLike
Second that!
LikeLike
“But please don’t be deluded into thinking that your occasional call or email is actually accomplishing somethings. If you’re not willing to do your homework, build relationships, and keep it up since there is regular staff turnover (meaning you have to start the process all over again) you’re not engaging in effective advocacy.”
With all due respect, this is a little bit like saying “please don’t be deluded into thinking a daily walk is going to make you lose 20 pounds.” Well, correct, a daily walk alone is probably not going to go that far. But it’s better than doing nothing. If you do a number of smaller somethings, that eventually adds up to a bigger something, and is certainly going to get further than sitting on your backside. Just because you don’t have time to train for two hours a day doesn’t mean you shouldn’t get any exercise. Just because you might not have time to work at advocacy hours a week doesn’t mean you shouldn’t write the occasional letter or make the occasional phone call when you have the time and ability to do so.
LikeLike
I don’t disagree with a word you wrote.
LikeLike
And it doesn’t take hours a week. A good friend of mine ends his emails with a quote from the late Michigan politician Neil Staebler: “The price of democracy is one hour a week—from everyone.” I interpret that as three hours a month of educating myself (I’m sure I spend that time reading this blog alone) and engaging in conversations with my neighbors, and one hour of activism, which, in my case, is mostly local. Imagine if we all spent one hour a week on democracy.
LikeLike
Just got home after a very busy day. But well worth reading. Thanks.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike