Robert S. McIlvaine is a scholar of The Great Depression. He warns that Republicans are endorsing the same flawed ideology that produced that devastating economic collapse.
““There are two ideas of government,” William Jennings Bryan declared in his 1896 “Cross of Gold” speech. “There are those who believe that if you will only legislate to make the well-to-do prosperous their prosperity will leak through on those below. The Democratic idea, however, has been that if you legislate to make the masses prosperous their prosperity will find its way up through every class which rests upon them.”
“That was more than three decades before the collapse of the economy in 1929. The crash followed a decade of Republican control of the federal government during which trickle-down policies, including massive tax cuts for the rich, produced the greatest concentration of income in the accounts of the richest 0.01 percent at any time between World War I and 2007 (when trickle-down economics, tax cuts for the hyper-rich, and deregulation again resulted in another economic collapse).
“Yet the plain fact that the trickle-down approach has never worked leaves Republicans unfazed. The GOP has been singing from the Market-is-God hymnal for well over a century, telling us that deregulation, tax cuts for the rich, and the concentration of ever more wealth in the bloated accounts of the richest people will result in prosperity for the rest of us. The party is now trying to pass a scam that throws a few crumbs to the middle class (temporarily — millions of middle-class Americans will soon see a tax hike if the bill is enacted) while heaping benefits on the super-rich, multiplying the national debt and endangering the American economy.”

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education and commented:
This is scary.
LikeLike
This is why I support Bernie Sanders & Elizabeth Warren despite their backing of charter schools. It is the extraordinary concentration of wealth & income and the political power that flows from it that is the most pressing problem facing our society. The attacks on public education by the wealthy is pocket change to them. The best examples are Bill Gates and Eli Broad. They would rather spend money to privatize public education rather than risk society demand higher taxation on the wealthy to adequately fund public schools. (As Mayor de Blasio proposed)
LikeLike
The courageous Jeff Flake is a yes vote. It’s over.
LikeLike
Let me guess? Did Susan Collins come out as a no vote?
She is always a profile in courage whenever her vote isn’t needed.
LikeLike
She’s got her $10,000 deduction in the bill now, so she’s probably a yes, too.
LikeLike
All the Republican senators will fall into line. Sell outs. Every one.
McCain is voting for a bill that takes away medical care for people with cancer like him. Not his problem. He has great medical care, paid for by us.
LikeLike
FLERP!,
If it’s a done deal, I suspect Collins will vote no. That is exactly what she did with DeVos so she could pretend that she opposed the nomination even though she was the person who insured that DeVos would be approved.
LikeLike
Collins and Murkowski voted YES on DeVos in Committee, then NO on Senate floor, so Pence could provide the winning vote
LikeLike
No, she’s a yes.
LikeLike
Those that support Republicans with a zombie like stealth should reconsider the errors of their ways. This bill causes so much harm to working families, the poor, the elderly, and those with chronic health conditions that any crumbs tossed to these groups will be far offset by the loss. It pulls up the ladder of opportunity by making higher education a luxury that few can afford. This bill is a smash and grab by wealthy interests. Any representative that votes for this should have a target on his/her back in the next election.
LikeLike
We should forget parties at this time. This class warfare. It is the !% against everyone else.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Correction: is
LikeLike
oh that the “progressive” party will stop shushing everyone who has the temerity to use those two words: Class Warfare
LikeLike
Thirty one years later, William Burroughs’s “Thanksgiving Prayer” seems as insightful as ever:
LikeLike
OMG, GregB, this is still so, so close to current reality!
It’s sad that we haven’t come any further in so many years, isn’t it?
Time for a drink. I’m having Jack Daniels on the rocks, what are you having?
LikeLike
I just opened a refreshing Lagunitas Pils. Probably won’t be the only one. The hard stuff would probably push me over the precipice right now. Won’t put the link here, but you might also get a kick of Ah Pook the Destroyer, it’s less than 3 minutes on YouTube.
LikeLike
I will be hitting the Four Roses in about an hour and don’t plan to stop until Sunday night.
LikeLike
DUMP is: Making America GRATE not great. What a reprehensible person and totally empty inside. He’s disgusting.
LikeLike
This is not Trump. This is the entire Republican Party. As we will see shortly, the notion of the honorable Republican is a complete myth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not even the great Betsy DeVos? I hear she’s really wonderful because honorable people keep telling me she is. Wait, I forgot, the people who told me she was great have no honor at all. Never mind.
LikeLike
Excellent point, FLERP! I’m trying to think of the last honorable Republican. I’m pretty sure it was Mark Hatfield. Could have been Bob Dole before his presidential run, which made him sell out his core values.
LikeLike
HITTING the nail on the head: passing this tax bill explains exactly why the Republican party stands behind Trump no matter what he does.
LikeLike
One little noticed feature of the Senate tax bill: a tax break for far-right Hillsdale College, a favorite of the DeVos family.
LikeLike
Neo-liberals are ideologues who believe strongly that they are not ideologues, that their beliefs are based in irrefutable economic science. The beginning of wisdom is, as Socrates explained a long, long time ago, is understanding that one doesn’t have all the answers, and neo-liberals can’t make any progress because of their certainty that they are right. Like other cultists, they live in an impenetrable bubble. It’s no use explaining to them, for example, that health-care costs are much, much lower and outcomes much, much higher in countries with single-payer programs. It’s no use pointing them to studies that show that moderate increases in the minimum wage don’t depress employment. They are going to stick to their theory, which has its circular beauty to them, whatever actually occurs in the real world. Add to this the fact that the very wealthy profit from having people in the poorer but professional class believe this crap, and one has a perfect storm, the emergence that we’ve seen in the United States of the New Feudal Order, the decoupling of productivity and wage increases, the decimation of unions, and so on. But here’s the thing about ideologues divorced from reality–they continue to push and push until something breaks. At some point, NO ONE is going to believe the next politician who runs on a throw the bums out, it’s time for real change platform as both Barack Obama and Donald Trump did. We’re far, far beyond “fool me twice” now. That’s why the leaders of the New Feudal Order are ramping up surveillance and civilian crowd control technologies, training, and forces. At some point, this stuff will spill out into the streets. This seems to me inevitable.
LikeLike
If one starts making a list of implementations of new surveillance technologies, ramping up of command and control capabilities, and changes in legal frameworks to enable these, over the past few decades, that list rapidly gets to be long indeed. Even relatively moderate blogs like this one are now routinely monitored and visited by paid trolls.
LikeLike
It is my fervent hope that it doesn’t come to this in the United States, but our financial moguls and politicians seem to me completely heedless. And the members of the upper-middle class, from their comfortable perches, have no clue how much everyone else struggles. If we don’t take a turn toward equity and services for the poor, then there will be no alternative except the growth of the police state, and things will get very, very ugly.
LikeLike
I recently had a conversation with a janitor. He works without insurance for a very low wage. His wage is depressed by the fact that his employer is a subcontractor, working for the schools through a firm who contracts with the schools to provide services.
When I suggested the idea of a single payer, his response was that government messes up everything. When the subject came up about why the heating would not run right, the response was the same, government is the culprit.
This person is the poster child for why good government is needed. He will never understand that part of his wage goes to a corporation that employs him. He will never admit that twenty percent of his health care goes to insurance company profits. His solution? Trump. Donald Trump is his vision of the savior political leader because you can trust him to say what he thinks. Will he ever awaken to understand that his perception of trump is wrong? Will he take to the street as you anticipate above? Or will he join the thousands of those on the left who have simply opted out of the political process because they are not represented by it?
Sometimes it seems to me that the right wing approach to winning political battles is simple. They starve government, then complain that government is the culprit when it does not function properly. They keep this up until when?
LikeLike
At some point, a major crisis will occur and job quality, full-time employment, real wages, and social services will have been cut to the point that very large numbers of people are pushed to a breaking point by some crisis such as a particularly strong cyclical economic downturn. Given the current trajectory, that seems highly likely. How many times throughout history has such a thing happened–the few at the top push and push and push until the system breaks.
LikeLike
Just one quibble:
When the janitor responded to your question about single-payer that “government messes up everything”, I wish you would have replied like this:
Well then aren’t you glad that the Republicans are getting rid of Medicare and telling senior citizens they have to find an insurance company willing to insure them?
I would have liked to hear whether he said “yeah, I can’t wait until the Republicans repeal that government program Medicare”.
LikeLike
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/362829-mccaskill-lobbyists-gave-dems-a-list-of-gop-amendments-to-tax-bill
LikeLike
Reblogged this on BLOGGYWOCKY and commented:
Yes, and this should be a warning to us all.
Not that the Republicans understand this or believe this. The really sad thing is that they have convinced so many people to vote against their own economic self-interests.
LikeLike
Perhaps we should scream, “Taxation without representation!” since none of these people represent the interests of the majority they serve. They only serve their wealthy donors.
LikeLike
Whoops, I forgot the “No!”
LikeLike
Congressional members are well aware that trickle-down economics do not improve the lot of the common man. That has never been the goal, in spite of the posturing, sound bytes, and flat-out lies. Repeatedly, both sides of the aisle ignore the will of their constituents – it no longer is a shell game. And while the deals are made in secret, Congress no longer fears the repercussions of their actions. The goal is to amass as much wealth and power as possible, regardless of the well-being of others. Can’t wait to see the fallout on this when the average American finally begins to feel the trickle-down – except it won’t be the kind they are expecting.
LikeLike
My mom was born in 1925 (passed away in 2000). Lived 75 years. Never graduated high school. Worked since she was 15 y.o. Her last job, she was a glass blower, and underpaid. She asked why Frank with a wife and 2 kids, who was just hired, was earning more than she was. The answer “he’s taking care of his wife and 2 kids.” Her reply “I’m divorced, taking care of 3 kids.” Her employer didn’t care. That’s the way it was.
She told me stories of how her mother and 2 sisters (her father was shot in Newark, NJ when she was 4) lived in the 2 family house of a wealthier family. They had an out house. They used to bathe every 2 weeks in a wooden tub…1 after the other. She said she’d rather be dirty than get in that tub last.
They would take a heated brick to bed to keep them warm.
They received some government food – she’d eat a lard sandwich with yellow food coloring to pretend it was butter. As a treat, they sometimes bought 1 and 2 day old donuts/bread on Sunday. They got clothing that was handed down/used/donated.
Those are some of the highlight I recall. I guess we’re going back to that. Only the wealthy won’t be so kind to the poor and needy. Perhaps we can all “eat cake.”
Vote them out. Vote them out.
These politicians beholden to their masters are screwed either way. Do the bidding of their donors, and get voted out. Or do what is right and lose their funding. Vote them out in 2018 and 2020.
LikeLike
We all know what happened to the last person who said “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche” (“Let them eat cake,” more or less, although Marie Antoinette probably never actually said this).
At any rate, it wasn’t a pleasant ending for Marie and the aristocrats in France.
They didn’t get voted out, they got “revolutioned” out.
LikeLike
Yup. I always say that Versailles is now a museum!
LikeLike
You should read “New Deal or Raw Deal” by Burton Folsom. Some (not all) historians and economists, are starting to realize, that the policies developed by the Roosevelt administration, actually exacerbated and prolonged the Depression of the 1930’s. see
https://www.c-span.org/video/?282898-1/new-deal-raw-deal
Most historians agree, that Hitler and Hirohito, did more to put Americans back to work, than FDR.
LikeLike
So you are saying, Charles, that it was very, very large government programs (armament and defense) that put people back to work. Just to be clear about that.
LikeLike
lol! You nailed him, Bob Shepherd!
LikeLike
Do not put words in my mouth. I am saying that the outbreak of WW2, did put Americans back to work. The policies and programs of FDR, actually exacerbated and prolonged the Great Depression.
It is an empirical fact: The various government programs of the FDR administration were ineffective and harmful. Fortunately, the Supreme Court declared some of the most egregious policies of the national Recovery Act, to be unconstitutional. see A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States (1935) and https://www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/295us495
LikeLike
Charles,
FDR created Social Security.
Do you want to get rid of that too?
LikeLike
Actually the economy improved under FDR and some people think Roosevelt actually saved capitalism. What other president was so popular? Social Security is the most popular program among old and young with wide support as indicated by national polls.
LikeLike
temper temper lol
LikeLike
I am not opposed to Social Security. I have been paying into it, for half a century. The opinions and findings of some (not all) historians and economists, are that some (not all) of the policies of FDR and his crowd, were detrimental to economic recovery, and prolonged the Depression. No point in beating it to death.
LikeLike
FDR created Social Security. The people you admire want to get rid of it. For your sake, I hope it remains. But no guarantees! The GOP will probably cut it to pay for the huge deficit created by the tax bill to benefit corporations. So sorry for you!
LikeLike
LikeLike