Bill Becker is an internationally recognized expert on climate change and the environment.
In this article, he demonstrates how Republicans are pullling the wool over the eyes of the public.
Start with the graphic at the top of the article:
Of the 30 richest nations in the world, the U.S. ranks:
*29th in net income inequality
*29th in wealth inequality
*28th in poverty rate
*29th in life expectancy
Correlate those data with test scores on PISA and TIMSS. Amazing.
Becker writes:
“Question: As Republican leaders have described it, the central promise of tax reform is to put more money in the pockets of middle-class Americans and to provide more money for corporations to create jobs. Can we be confident of that result?
“Background: The answer is no. Earlier this month, CNN broadcast a meeting in which Donald Trump’s economic advisor, Bary Cohn, met with a group of CEOs. The meeting’s moderator asked for a show of hands on how many of the companies in the room would use their savings for capital investment in the economy if Congress reduced their taxes. Only two CEOs raised their hands. “Why aren’t the other hands up?” Cohn asked.
“Past experience provides the answer. Our bigger corporations have demonstrated that when they have extra cash, they don’t use it to create jobs; they use it to increase the value of their stock by raising dividends and buying back shares. CEOs and shareholders benefit, but not most middle- and lower-class households. They usually don’t own stocks. Eighty percent of stocks today are owned by the top 20% of income earners.
“Question: Republicans want to lure trillions of dollars back into the United States by giving a tax break to companies that repatriate the profits they have stashed overseas. By one estimate, the tax break would amount to a half-trillion dollars. Is it realistic to expect that these funds would be used to create jobs and to benefit middle-America?
“Background: Again, experience provides an answer. Congress gave a similar “tax holiday” in 2004 to companies that repatriated their overseas money. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found that CEOs again used their money to repurchase and raise the value of their stock and to pay dividends to shareholders. “Moreover, many firms laid off large numbers of U.S. workers even as they reaped multi-billion-dollar benefits from the tax holiday and passed them on to shareholders,” the Center found.
“What about today? Our big corporations are flush with cash and their earnings are healthy. They already could be investing their profits to create more jobs, if they wanted to. But when more than 300 business executives were polled over the summer, they said they would use repatriated money to pay down their debt, buy back their own stock to drive up its price, and engage in mergers, in that order.”
Oh, and by the way, Senator McCain announced that he would vote for the tax bill. The last possible independent has fallen in line with the party.

Is this the kind of legacy Senator McCain wishes to leave his constituents and to the entire Us of A? Shameful. Sad. Very sad.
LikeLike
Sen McCain’s embrace of this tax plan is sickening, not only because it is a terrible bill. Before he voted against the health repeal bill, he spoke eloquently about the importance of bipartisanship, regular order. There is no bipartisanship here.
He has cancer and is getting the best of care, at taxpayer expense. This tax bill will remove health coverage from millions of people, including many with cancer.
LikeLike
There is not a hint of rationality in US politics today. I just said today, the Maverick has caved, but why?
LikeLike
No one should be surprised. He supported Trump, even after Trump belittled McCain’s military record. McCain is only a “maverick” when it won’t damage him politically.
LikeLike
I sent John McCain a pointed email about what this does not only to his reputation and legacy, but also to his constituents and the nation.
He should reconsider.
LikeLike
You would think that before you die you want to do what is right and not side with truly repellent right wing Republicans. I mean, there are plenty of Republicans who recognize how destructive this tax plan is although they don’t serve in Congress. But my guess is McCain wants to make sure his wife is well taken care of after his death and he’s willing to screw over America to make his kids a little bit richer. He knows his kids will have plenty, but he wants to make sure they will be rich. I can’t think of another reason for him to abandon everything his dad stood for and embrace the most unpatriotic of right wing policies.
LikeLike
DeVos’ speech to Jeb Bush’s lobbying org is a real doozy.
Not one positive example of a single US public school. In fact, this is how ed reform describes every single public school in the country:
“Millions of kids today— right now— are trapped in schools that are failing them. Millions more are stuck in schools that are not meeting their individual needs. And their parents have no options, no choices, no way out.”
https://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/prepared-remarks-us-secretary-education-betsy-devos-foundation-excellence-education-national-summit-education-reform
Your tax dollars at work, folks.
The federal government is OPPOSED to the schools 90% of families currently attend.
Working hard at every day to bash your child’s school simply because it’s public. Shame we all have to pay them for this anti-public school political campaign.
LikeLike
With all due respect, you should be thinking about tax policy right now, not Betsy Devos.
LikeLike
FLERP!
What happens in NY when residents lose SALT deductions . I am betting the house just sends the bill back to the Senate as is to get it through as quick as possible, SALT is then gone . The conventional wisdom is that angry voters will go after Congressional Republicans . They will in the few districts they can get to them . King and Zeldin are toast but the upstate Republicans in relatively safe Trumpland where incomes and taxes are much lower will stay . That’s why they voted for the bill. So perhaps you flip the house but maybe not.
But then what happens in NY state politics when local school board budgets come up they will be rejected . When local legislative seats come up will the Republicans be blamed or will angry tax payers vote for tax cutting budget hawks, to bring down their taxes. Taxes that have gone up 28 to 34 % depending on incomes . My guess is they go for the budget cutting Republicans . Cuomo has been no friend to public schools nor to Public workers but it could have been worse . This state could flip red in 2018. We have had Republican Governors and a Republican State Senate , but the assembly has been a wall . Does that wall hold in NYC where we had Giuliani and Bloomberg for decades. . If that happens expect to see a massive assault on unions . Public worker bargaining rights could be restricted . Followed by the other drain on budgets prevailing wage laws on public works . Then in the mold of Wisconsin .NY goes Right to Work . crushing the union movement assuring a red state for a long time.
NY could become Wisconsin , Michigan . You think this has not been gamed out in rt wing think tanks .
LikeLike
That’s a lot of analysis I haven’t done, but it looks plausible on its face.
LikeLike
“thinking about tax policy?” Why do we need to think about it?
I am quite certain Chiara already knows the tax reform is a hoax. Just like it was a hoax when Reagan did it. (Bush wasn’t kidding about voodoo economics). Just like it was a hoax when Bush 2 and Cheney did it. And both times Americans saw with their own eyes how much of a hoax it was.
What we need to think about is why Republicans no longer care about facts? What we need to think about is why the entire Republican Congress (although not all Republicans) have decided that arguing for a policy with facts is useless so they will simply use lying propaganda?
When did liberal Americans become so “outraged” by the propaganda that the right spoon feeds them that they can’t see for themselves that what the Republicans in Congress have been doing for the last 10 or more years is DANGEROUS? We live in a country where facts don’t matter. That is what it is like in Russia! You cannot have a democracy without both sides having some recognition of what is true and what is not true.
You cannot have democracy when those in power will do everything and anything to keep that power and if that means undermining all democratic norms then they will do it.
We are veering closer and closer to Nazi Germany.
The tax policy is bad enough. Do you know what is worse? That Democrats spend more time saying “but you know the dems won’t reverse it anyway when they get power” instead of saying “our democracy itself is being imperiled by propaganda and the left is eating it up.” The left complains that if the Dems ever get power they won’t be progressive enough instead of realizing that the danger is that the very opportunity to have power is being destroyed.
Just look at who Putin’s “opponents” in his next “election” will be.
That’s what our country could look like while the left focuses on whether the Democrats will be progressive enough next time they win.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent
I find it amusing that you recognize neo liberalism which more properly should be called illiberal-ism, when it is applied to education and reject those Democratic politicians . But you refuse to recognize it in other areas of the economy.
LikeLike
Joel,
I wish I found it amusing that you believe it is the right wing Democrats who are the real danger to this country and not the Republicans who no longer believe in democracy.
In pre-Nazi Germany, many voters agreed with your perception that all their anger should be directed at democratically elected politicians who weren’t liberal enough while Hitler ran roughshod over democracy. And all those progressives were probably among the first to be rounded up. I guess maybe they were satisfied that it only took the scientific extermination of millions of Jews and other “undesirables” and Germany finally became more progressive!
I’m sure that after it was all over and people learned what the Nazis had done, there were many people saying “well it was all the fault of the other politicians who just weren’t progressive enough”. It’s so much easier than blaming yourself for voting to support a fascist and then spending the years in which he grabbed more power focusing your anger on the “neoconservative” politicians instead.
LikeLike
NY Parent,
You’re right. Republicans love their flag lapel pins, but they no longer care about democracy or the Constitution.
Their oath of loyalty is to the ‘free’ market. Their allegiance is to profits and greed on the behalf of corporations and the 1 percent.
They have no commitment to the social contract, and plan to shred it.
They are as you say – dangerous. Anti-democratic.
It’s way past time for a re-engagement with the core values of American democracy.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent
Although I might agree with you on your assertion that we are as close to authoritarianism as we have ever been . Your prescription for fighting it is a losing proposition . When Chris Mathews has to ask where is the Democratic opposition to this bill . I have to laugh . Mathews whose head almost exploded in the Sanders Town Hall during the Primaries . Mathews who gave the most softball interview to Clinton in my memory on a major network (Fox is an infomercial) .
Mathews is not alone . Bruce Bartlet a Reagan supply side architect a Bush 1 Treasury official asked the same question two weeks ago Steven Rosenfeld at Alternet said it two weeks ago . .
What they all see is that on the most crucial issue to face the American people in decades the party is AWOL . A civil war has been declared and the shape of what the country will look like for decades is on the table and the party is AWOL .
“The conventional wisdom is that Republicans are simply paying off their wealthy donors. Obviously this is true, but is only part of the story. The main reason is that a huge tax cut cements Republican policy into place even if Democrats regain control of Congress and the White House.
In fact, I think many Republicans know and expect that they may lose control of Congress in 2018 and the White House in 2020. Their tax cut will ensure that the era of Democratic control will be brief and unpopular.”
Why does Bartlet conclude that because he knows that Democrats will never do what needs to be done never role back the damage . Clinton doing more damage than Reagan , Obama’s hope and change was a
get out of Jail free card for the plutocrats on Wall Street.
“Republican deficit hawks, who are now AWOL, will suddenly reappear the moment Trump signs the tax cut. The media will be filled with reports from leading authorities about how the deficit endangers the country in a variety of ways, arguing that action must be taken immediately.
But taxes will be off the table because of the tax pledge. Therefore, all deficit reduction must come from spending cuts. And of course, defense cuts will be off the table. Therefore, the bulk of cuts will have to come from so-called entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare because that’s all that will be left.”
What has to be done now. The argument that has to be made is populist argument, For decades, more and more of the wealth of this country has been diverted to an oligarchy and the burden for paying for the needs of this country has been transferred to the working class ,the bottom 99% to use the cliche . Of course the Republican argument will be to say that the wealthy already pay a vast portion of the bill . That is true . But it is also a smaller and smaller percentage of the wealth they control. That bill is being picked up by the American worker who is allowing it to be put on a debit account called the National Debt to be paid for by their children and the above mentioned cuts to the programs they paid for.
Make no mistake that wealth was given to oligarchs by Government . Given in policy that allowed them to accumulate that wealth . Given in patent protection for Bill Gates ,Steve Jobs , Merck and Pfizer patents that cost the American people 400 billion a year in the cost of drugs alone above and beyond the cost of Generics . Much of the innovation they have been creating actually paid for by the Government either through the Defense budget or NIH . Steve Jobs did not invent the touch screen. . . …. Given in trade agreements that assure a stable international environment for them to exploit cheap labor to produce.Given in the form of tax avoidance that still continues to make Amazon and Bezos wealthy beyond belief while he put brick and mortar stores out of business . Given in the form of tax breaks that encourage the leveraged buyouts that have destroyed the lives of millions of American workers what of all people Newt called vulture capitalism. Given in labor laws that tie the hands of American workers when it comes to demanding a bigger piece of the Pie for the efforts their labor produces . And if those workers or young people became militant given in the form of a police force now armed with military style equipment . As we saw even peaceful demonstration crushed from Seattle to Occupy. All of which were paid for by the people in fines that were leveled against municipalities for the violations of civil rights after these movements have been crushed.
Who in the democratic party except for the usual few voices on the left have made the argument that it is time to make them pay their fair share of the gains . When Charles Schumer shows up on Wall Street leading a 250 ,000 angry NY Metro area residents, Teachers , College Students , Workers public and private , Retirees , poor people all who will be screwed to death for decades . Than I will believe he was serious about fighting this . Wall Street Chuck is full of shit . He has no intention of biting the hand that feeds the party. Mathews told me so , I would have expected it from Taibbi . Do not believe for a second that Indivisible was anything but a front for the party .
The absence of visible protest speaks volumes . Singing modified Christmas Carols on Park Avenue and Main Street in Huntington is not protest. Not when bricks should be going through the windows of the NY Stock exchange.
LikeLike
Joel,
You confuse me. There are no Democrats supporting the Republican Tax Plan. Why are you ranting about the Democrats?
LikeLike
nycpsp, I’m no historian, so correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m not sure the parallels you’re making to Germany just before Hitler make sense. Germany only had about 15 yrs of democracy between its 100 yrs as a unified nation [an empire with Kaisers] and Hitler. It would seem much easier w/that history to toss the baby out w/the bathwater. Maybe for them, democracy was a failed experiment in progressivism, no great loss?
Not saying we could not be swayed toward authoritarianism if the bottom keeps dropping out from under middle/wkg classes, inequality grows, faith in representative govt dwindles. Wherever we’re headed seems more gradual & insidious…
LikeLike
The reason for Hitler’s rise had nothing to do with Germany being a democracy for only a few years. After World War I, the allies that defeated Germany did nothing to rebuild Germany’s economy and industries. Germany was an economic ruin and inflation was going into orbit around the moon while unemployment was horrible.
On top of all this, as in most nations, the economic factors of the time play a significant role in determining how a society will behave. Germany was economically devastated after a draining defeat in World War I. In addition, due to the Versailles treaty, Germany was forced to pay incredibly sizeable reparations to France and Great Britain.
http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/classes/33d/projects/1920s/Econ20s.htm
And into this mess walked the Nazis and their leader “tell a lie enough times and it becomes the truth” Hitler who created a scapegoat in the Jews and promised to make Germany great again if the people put them in power.
Do you see the parallels with Trump yet?
LikeLike
Lloyd in a way you’re making my point. I was taking exception with “In pre-Nazi Germany, many voters agreed with your perception that all their anger should be directed at democratically elected politicians who weren’t liberal enough while Hitler ran roughshod over democracy. And all those progressives were probably among the first to be rounded up.”… and “I’m sure that after it was all over and people learned what the Nazis had done, there were many people saying “well it was all the fault of the other politicians who just weren’t progressive enough.”
My understanding of why Germany welcomed a dictator and winked [eventually plugged ears & la-lala’d] at atrocities is along the lines of the economic realities you outlined, added to the knowledge of hands tied behind back by them-against-the-world sanctions imposed by surrounding nations — I am intuiting only that parties/ voting/ parliament for them were fleeting & irrelevant consideration in their brief democratic experience, & nycpsp only using this to paint Bernie thumb-suckers & Hillary-haters as paving the way for dictatorship.
To me this is a disingenuous argument which– like most introductions of Hitler into 21stC polemics– jumps the shark into a realm that mirrors rwnj arguments. Although on the surface it appears to say get out there & use your vote against dangerous extremists [supporting democracy], at the same time it ignores the reality understood by virtually all liberals that a vote for the D party does nothing to turn around either the economy or the undermining of democracy brought about by 40 yrs of R/D dereg legislation.
Yes even 250 yrs of democracy does not immunize us against the attraction to authoritarianism that lurks when an increasing portion of pop feels helpless to improve their circumstances & casts about in hateful polarization seeking scapegoats. The answer is not to join in the armageddon polemics. I like ‘democracy”s suggestion that it’s past time for a re-engagement with the core values of democracy, & Joel’s suggestion that, to me, means D party must take bull by horns & co-opt the populist position away from R’s, & not as a bait&switch as they do.
LikeLike
Luckily, you don’t need to believe that we are on the precipice of Naziism to conclude that the Republicans’ tax bills are terrible for America.
LikeLike
Whatever form of authoritarianism that might soon arrive and usher in a miserable dystopian era for most of the people, it will not be called Nazism. It will go by another name. The privatizers of everything public for profit will call themselves the People’s Progressive Movement or God’s Great Trumpian Kingdom or something else that sounds good while inside that house of cards is a pile of stinking cancerous hate filled rot.
If Trump and/or Pence survives Mueller’s investigation, expect the desk and chair in the Oval Office where the president sits to be replaced by one made of solid gold.
LikeLike
Lloyd,
I agree with you that it won’t be called Nazism. But I believe it will as anti-democratic as Germany’s fascism with handy scapegoats provided while the elites get richer and any objection is stilled under threat.
bethree5,
We need BERNIE and I will be happy as he gains influence in the party! We need progressives who support Bernie and understand what the real fight is.
We do not need people on the left who are just as willing to scapegoat as the people on the right are. We don’t need people on the left who are as willing as those in nazi germany to repeat whatever propaganda is thrown at them.
Flaws are not the same as corruption.
And progressives don’t have any patience at all.
Obama had 2 years. Two. With which he had a Senate that filibustered everything. He did some bad things (especially in education) and he tried to do some good things. Do you know what voters did when he did some progressive things? They voted in the most right wing Congress in history and a Senate willing to use the filibuster in ways that no one ever imagined because that unspoken pact that you don’t intentionally cause harm to other Americans had been completely upended. The Republicans no longer cared what harm they caused in their thirst for power.
“Although on the surface it appears to say get out there & use your vote against dangerous extremists [supporting democracy], at the same time it ignores the reality understood by virtually all liberals that a vote for the D party does nothing to turn around either the economy or the undermining of democracy brought about by 40 yrs of R/D dereg legislation.”
Wrong. The undermining of democracy is NOT the fault of the democrats. The Republicans have mounted a disenfranchisement program the likes of which we haven’t seen since reconstruction. The Democrats WANT people to vote. The Democrats are not secretly meeting to figure out how they can keep Republicans from voting.
A vote for the Democratic Party — which has always been the home to progressives and moderates and some conservatives – is a vote for the Democratic Party. The same party of LBJ. The same party of Obama. Jimmy Carter was the first Democrat in office to present himself as a more pro-business less progressive Democrat. Why do you think Ted Kennedy ran a primary challenge against him?
But Carter changed. Democrats try to work within the system and perhaps that is slow going. But there are progressive Democrats who are working to enact a progressive agenda and it doesn’t help to hear their entire party getting smeared from the left.
Be critical, just like Bernie is. But STOP DEMONIZING THE DEMOCRATS. That’s how the far right took over this country.
LikeLike
Bernie would have more influence on the Democratic Party if he joined it.
LikeLike
dianeravitch
I’ll keep it short . If Democrats were calling for a tax increase on corporations and the wealthy . Republicans would be threatening to shut down the government next week and to refuse to increase the debt ceiling.
Here is the Medicare cuts built into the budget bill . That enables the tax bill.
“I talked to one Long Island oncologist who said he and his staff held an emergency meeting earlier this week and decided they would no longer see one-third of their 16,000 Medicare patients. “It’s a choice between seeing these patients and staying in business,” Jeff Vacirca, chief executive of North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates, told me. ”
Here is Steven Rosenfeld
https://www.alternet.org/economy/why-arent-dems-congress-raising-more-hell-oppose-worst-gop-tax-bill-eve
LikeLike
Joel,
Your posts reflect exactly what I said. It’s all the DEMS fault. Why aren’t they shutting down government??
Maybe it is because shutting down government has consequences that harm people?
Is Bernie Sanders calling for shutting down the government? Is Elizabeth Warren? Do they also secretly support the plan?
This is how fascism starts. With the left helping the right round up everyone who opposes them.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent
The path we have been on since Nixon has had tremendous consequences for the American people . As LBJ said
“I can just see him waking up in the morning making that victory signal of his and deciding which program to kill…. ” ” He will take that great lady and make her so ugly that the American people will not want to look at her any more. ”
We are pretty much on our way to going back to the 20s not the 60s and you are talking about people being hurt if the government is shut down . People are going to die if this tax plan goes through . People on ACA as terrible as it is . People on Medicaid as the program gets scaled back . People on Medicare as the piece I posted about the north shore oncology group making plans to cut 1/3 of their Medicare patients .
As the budget deficit balloons other programs will be cut from food stamps to vital medical research . But it is not just the budget . It is cut backs to regulations that literally endanger the lives of American workers, consumers and public in general from pollution of the air they breath and the water they drink.
“Oh we can not shut down the Government people will get hurt”
The Democratic party has been complicit in allowing this to happen for far too long .
Tell me when Chuck Schumer comes out on the Senate floor and promises to not only reverse this but reverse every tax cut since Reagan . Otherwise it is just a dog and pony show.
LikeLike
We got Nixon because Hubert Humphrey wasn’t good enough for the progressives. He was as corrupt as Hillary and painted as such.
I missed the rally that Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren were organizing. When will it be held?
BERNIE is just as complicit. Or maybe he isn’t complicit at all. Maybe they are ALL fighting against the fascism and you are helping the fascists by fighting against them.
And it’s sad that you don’t even see it yourself.
Where is the rally that Bernie is organizing? Where are ANY progressive leaders calling for what you say they should be calling for?
They are all complicit, says Joel as he does the right wing’s dirty work for them to get the public to believe their enemy is the Democrats and not the Republicans.
LikeLike
nycpsp “We got Nixon because Hubert Humphrey wasn’t good enough for the progressives”? Sounds flippant to me as one who remembers the election tho at 19 too young to vote. 68% of the voting age pop was registered to vote & 61% did (typical for those yrs; has declined a few points since then). Humphrey lost the popular vote by only 512k.
Hardly a parallel to Hillary Clinton. Humphrey had more than one primary contender more progressive than he, but the more popular of the two was assassinated. And “progressive” was not the issue, the VNWar was, which HHH sat right up next to LBJ & ran for 5 yrs. “He was as corrupt as Hillary and painted as such”? I don’t know what you mean unless a ref to the war, & that’s pretty much every major officeholder ’62-’74.
LikeLike
Why do you think Humphrey lost to Nixon?
““progressive” was not the issue, the VNWar was, which HHH sat right up next to LBJ & ran for 5 yrs.”
Exactly. That’s what young people who might have tipped the election to HHH heard. “HHH sat right up next to LBJ & ran for 5 yrs”.
So good he got defeated and Nixon won, correct?
There will always be some flaw that can be magnified with that right propaganda to tell you why the democrat is terrible. Directed right at their own supporters. Didn’t you see it done to Humphrey, to Kerry, to Gore, to Dukakis? It wasn’t the Republican voters those attacks were directed to — those attacks were for more liberal voters to convince them their terrible candidate was so bad it wasn’t worth voting for them.
No matter who the next candidate is, we will see it done to them. But it only works when the liberals and media play along as they did with those candidates. They did not with Bill Clinton. Probably because at the time after 12 years of Republican rule they were willing to put aside their differences. Remember all the talk of his affairs? But what did not happen was the liberals taking up the attack and repeating non-stop how evil Clinton was to cheat on his wife. So it died down. The same thing happened with Obama and Jeremiah Wright. The dems — none of them — played alone with the manufactured outrage. Nor did they when the right tried to make Obama’s “cling to their guns and religion” speech the big issue. The left refused to play along with the right.
We have to refuse to play along with the right. Look what happened with Al Franken. He is getting smeared before we know if it is deserved, by the same “manufactured outrage” that the right uses so well. Manufactured outrage about Hillary’s e-mails, about Benghazi, about Al Franken, about Obama and Jeremiah Wright, about Al Gore boasting that he invented the internet.
It’s already happening to Elizabeth Warren and Pochahontas. Will the left help the right wing by printing “thoughtful” articles in which they examine Warren’s supposed claim of Native American ancestry as if it was a corruption scandal, and conclude “well she was a big liar and obviously did it to get ahead but vote for this liar anyway because she’s better than the alternative?” If they do, it just helps the right wing win by pretending theses attacks are anything but propaganda that turn nothings into scandals. While the right laugh and say “well if you condone Warren’s lies, why aren’t you condoning Trump’s, no difference”.
LikeLike
Here’s what ed reform offered public school families today at their meeting:
“Bad news, that is, for the teacher union bosses, the defenders of the status quo, the “education-expert” bloggers and muckrakers and many of our friends on the Democratic side of the aisle in Congress. Allow me to borrow a line from the great American author Mark Twain: The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated!”
Nothing. Not one positive idea for an existing public school, not one offer of support, not one public school congratulated or even mentioned.
90% of US kids. Nothing. If your kid has the misfortune to attend an unfashionable public school, you can forget about any help from these politicians. You’ll still get the privilege of paying them, though.
LikeLike
No one at the US Department of Education can find a single positive story from the tens of thousands of public schools in 50 states.
Wow. That’s just purely ideological and politically motivated nonsense. I can find a solid public school IN THIS COUNTY yet the Best and Brightest can’t turn one up.
Baloney. If this is what passes for “expertise” THEY need a better education.
LikeLike
Millions of children attend Illinois public schools. However. Betsy DeVos completely and utterly ignores those children in her speech and focuses exclusively on the private school voucher section of what was a PUBLIC education funding bill.
The public school families in that state may as well not exist. They were an afterthought- basic funding of their schools was the price that had to be (reluctantly) paid to get vouchers. That’s how ed reform viewed that bill.
This is how completely wacked out and off the rails this “movement” is- they don’t even know you-all exist. Eyes on the prize, man, and the prize is their ideological agenda. Your kids? Your schools? Your communities? Collateral damage.
LikeLike
The problem is not the Republicans the problem is the Democrats who never will reverse this. Notice how much the Republicans can get done with 52 votes . Time to vomit again
LikeLike
Yes, it’s always good to blame the Democrats for everything. Believe me, the right wing will be saying exactly what you posted that next time there is an election and one of those Democrats like Russ Feingold are up for election. “Hey, if you don’t like the situation and you are suffering, blame the Democrats. Feingold is a Democrat. Vote against him.” And voters will. After all, they already know it is all the Democrats’ fault.
LikeLike
Are there Democrats who are not exactly what and who they should be? Absolutely.
But the Republican party has gone off the rails. Completely.
I’m with you.
LikeLike
TRUMP rode in to Washington on a promise of MAGA fueled by populism. It was a good story, but he’s just the latest incarnation of Carl Icahn. But TRUMP lacks the talent to raid a corporation, so he chose to raid the US Treasury. But even that is a stretch, giving TRUMP way more credit than he deserves as far as any semblance of intelligence is concerned. Some say he’s playing four dimensional chess. The man probably cannot play checkers.
But his lackeys and his millionaire/billionaire cabinet has the talent to raid the place. There is no better training ground for legal robbery than Wall Street and Goldman Sachs is the Ivy League firm to train at. The robbers robber they are.
I truly believe two things drove TRUMP to run for president, ego and spite. He was so angry at Obama’s roast of him at the Corespondents Dinner in 2011, that he ran out of spite. When you look at a lot of things he says and does, if you look at it through this prism, it makes sense. TRUMP does not build, his only desire is to tear down anything Obama built.
LikeLike
Seth Meyers is the one who did the damage of Trump at the White Correspondents Dinner. He’s still at it, this time with the inclusion of Matt Lauer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WnizmrnJlk
LikeLike
Judging from the GOP tax scheme: the GOP just absolutely hates poor people and the working class. The GOP has been against Social Security for 80 years, some of the more extreme right wingers contend that SS is unconstitutional and sadly some of those people are being appointed to the courts by Trump. This vicious anti-human GOP tax plan gives them cover to slash and burn SS, Medicare, Medicaid and the ACA. CHIPS has already been sabotaged and defunded. This is all on the GOP, I do not blame the Democrats for the failures, pathology and sociopathy of the GOP. The GOP is the WORST, this party is a menace and existential threat to ordinary Americans and especially the poor. This is all above and beyond anything the Democrats do or do not do. The present GOP is in a class all by itself, it’s morphed into a hideous genetic hybrid of a slathering yowling vampire-hyena. The GOP gave us the Great Depression and it appears they are determined to do it again.
LikeLike
Yes, it is utterly insane! What is not to like about Social Security? What is not to like about Medicare? The Republicans know there is nothing not to like so they push the great lie that it will be bankrupt anyway (so why not help it to get there sooner is what they “forget” to add). They are in complete and total thrall to Koch and company’s idea that all government is evil and all government programs are evil. Except the military which is needed to round up all critics and keep the rich safe in their guarded homes.
LikeLike
^^and meanwhile the angry, angry left will continue to say “but it’s all the Democrats fault because they weren’t able to mind control the Republicans do allow them to have progressive policies so let’s focus on the evil Dems instead of how absolutely scary, corrupt and Putin-like our national government has become.
LikeLike
“The meeting’s moderator asked for a show of hands on how many of the companies in the room would use their savings for capital investment in the economy if Congress reduced their taxes. Only two CEOs raised their hands. ”
How many CEOs were at the meeting?
LikeLike
Hoax. Fraud. Outright lie. All of them.
Krugman today:
“Mnuchin said his department had a study showing great effects on growth; that was a lie. Donald Trump says the bill is ‘not good for me’; that’s a lie. Senator John Cornyn said, ‘This is not a bill that is designed primarily to benefit the wealthy and the large businesses’; that was a lie. Senator Bob Corker said he wouldn’t support a plan ‘adding one penny to the deficit’; that was a lie…this whole process involves a level of bad faith we haven’t seen in U.S. politics since the days when defenders of slavery physically assaulted their political foes on the Senate floor… The rot pervades the whole Republican Party…”
LikeLike
YES … “Hoax. Fraud. Outright lie. All of them.”
THE GOP is SICK! They are GREEDY COWARDS.
LikeLike
Every journalist who continues to call this radical upward redistribution of wealth “tax reform” is just as blind/opportunistic/dishonest (take your pick) as those who continue to call school privatization and student monetization “education reform.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually prefer the term to “tax bill” or “tax plan” because it communicates how radical the change is. Every administration has a tax plan, and every Congress drafts tax bills. But tax reform is a rare thing with multigenerational effects. But I take your point that most people probably associate “reform” with positive change.
LikeLike
A small request that I wish I could communicate to the entire news media. No more stories about Matt Lauer or Roy Moore or Al Franken until the Republicans are done ramming this through and the President has signed it. At least allow the people to watch it happen without distractions.
LikeLike
Yes.
LikeLike
The distractors have been playing the media like a well-tuned harp lately, haven’t they. I yelled at my TV all last week as MSNBC & CNN convened panel after panel on the fine points of sexual harrassment/ abuse, literally fiddling [er plucking, I guess] while House & Senate were burning Rome– this week Donnie lobbed in a quick grenade, re-tweeting outrageous fake anti-Muslim videos– then freaking Flynn story breaks at the 11th hr, thanks Mueller. Last night I watched Rachel Maddow’s entire explanation of the Flynn-story history & import, so well-done even my non- political-junky husband watched w/me. As Senate wound down to their vote. Why o why Rachel, Wolf, Ali? Why no full-blown pt by pt pick-apart of the import of every blasted piece of this dastardly legislation every day for the last month?
LikeLike
The Senate has every Republican lined up for a “yes” vote except these three: Susan Collins, Jeff Flake, and Bob Corker. Only one of them needs to vote “yes” for the bill to pass. I will eat my hat if Mitch McConnell can’t pull that off.
LikeLike
Susan Collins is ONLY allowed to vote against something when it is guaranteed to pass.
Has she confirmed that she will vote no yet? When she does, it means that one of the other votes is 100% yes.
She is almost worse than the others.
She is a coward who knows that what she supports is truly evil. She convinces herself that as long as she can occasionally oppose something when it doesn’t matter, her conscience is clean.
So Collins can tell herself “I’m voting to get this awful person out of committee even though this person has no business being approved because if I don’t those scary right wingers will run a primary opponent against me. But I’m good because I’ll vote against him when it’s a done deal and the right won’t be mad at me.
SHE is the one who needs to go.
LikeLike
Grrr, I so agree. And Murkowski is far worse than chopped-liver Collins, she has lost my respect forever. Meanwhile both my D senators & even my R congressman have been solidly against this bill since the start, so noplace to sit but on the sidelines politely clapping for execrable debt-hawks hoping they’re so rabid they’ll stand by their hateful ideology (no such luck).
LikeLike
Sorry for the stream of comments from me. But what Paul Krugman wrote a couple weeks ago bears repeating. It probably should have been repeated a lot more and loudly by the Democratic leadership, too. (How much time have we been discussing Al Franken and Roy Moore over the last two weeks?)
LikeLike
Always glad to read your insightful comments. I have been piping up a lot myself, this tax reform bill has had me tied up in knots for weeks. It’s a case in point for the helplessness I feel re: the representative govt that doesn’t represent. Polls showing overall 25% approval which I think might mean even half of Trump voters seethrough it.
EXCELLENT clip from Krugman, & EXACTLY the stuff I was not hearing day after day on MS TV media… except for CSPAN Wash Jnl which covered all this & more for at least an hr daily over last 10 days. Lots of conservative old f*rts watch that show, maybe they helped nudge approval rating down a bit.
LikeLike
“… most people probably associate “reform” with positive change.”
As they reasonably might, given that most definitions of the word include the word “improvement,” which is also why people trying to screw over the poor (“Welfare Reform”), students, teachers and taxpayers (“Education Reform”), and everybody but the very rich (“Tax Reform”) mask their efforts by using the word.
LikeLike
I also meant to add that, if you control the language, you control the terms of debate, and if you control the terms of debate, you win.
LikeLike
Your comments about not using the word “reform” are astute and should be repeated to the media at every opportunity.
The right has been extraordinarily good at re-shaping language to cover up how nasty their policies are.
One of the few times that the progressives did this is when they made supporting abortion rights into “pro-choice”. It took the right a while before they realized that they should be saying pro-life instead of anti-abortion and then they went hog wild with words like “reform” to mask what they actually want.
LikeLike
Both versions of the new GOP tax plan have an excellent potential to grow the US. economy fast and by leaps and bounds.
LikeLike
The problem is, the growth would be for the 1% and cause the lower, lower middle, middle, and upper middle classes to become far more homogenized into a much more impoverished class with few to no real safety nets, all as a result of transferring wealth to the 1%, who are already uber-rich.
You can say the politicians are doing this, but ultimately, the American people have done this to themselves.
LikeLike