Mercedes Schneider heard about the book promotion tour of one David Osborne. Osborne is late to the party. He has written a book claiming that New Orleans is the shiny new model for school reform. Way back during the Clinton administration, Osborne achieved a modicum of fame for his book Reinventing Government, which proposed that government agencies should compete with private businesses. The competition, he argued, would produce public benefits and make government more efficient. Vice President Al Gore invited Osborne to work with him to introduce his ideas into the federal government. I’m not sure where that project went, but charter schools certainly fit the paradigm. The Clinton administration got behind the idea and set the pattern of federal support for the experiment.
Well, we have had charter schools for 25 years. They are no longer an experiment. They are not a bright, shiny innovation. Indeed, it is difficult to think of any innovation produced by charter schools, other than getting rid of unionized teachers. It is odd to see an author pop up with an idea that has been tried for 25 years and claim that he is on to something fresh.
Even stranger is that Osborne points to New Orleans as the epitome of reform, the cutting edge that offers hope to schools everywhere. Where has he been hiding these past few years?
Schneider notes that the all-charter Recovery School District that Osborne admires has yet to crack an ACT score of 17, which is very low indeed. Osborne doesn’t mention this. He seems to have stopped learning anything about New Orleans about five years ago.
As Schneider shows in another post, The Myth of the New Orleans Miracle has collapsed.
“For a full decade following Hurricane Katrina (2005-2015), those pushing state takeover and the resulting conversion of all state-run New Orleans schools into charters have been quick to promote the marvels of their miracle.
“Twelve years later, in 2017, not so much, unless cornered for a sound byte.
“Market-based school choicers have increasingly less to work with regarding the NOLA Charter Miracle sales pitch. Consider the 2016-17 district performance scores. Those New Orleans state-takeover (now) charter schools are no longer separated from the Orleans Parish School Board (OPSB), so now those “failing schools” that the state supposedly miracle-whipped are now part of a single district (let’s call it NOLA), with one single district performance score resulting in one single district letter grade– and that single performance score and resulting letter grade really took a dive in 2016-17, from 85 B (sort of) to 70.9 C.”
If you look at her tables, based on stated sources, the Recovery School District in Baton Rouge is graded F.
Does David Osborne know this?
He seems remarkably uninformed.
Kind of like a journalist claiming that using leeches to bleed patients is an important discovery.

Why do you continue to post and implicate the Clintons in ed reform (all truth) and then defend HRC when her reputation for ed reform is attacked by your readers? When ever certain politicians are mentioned here, it causes a firestorm and you clearly have stated this bothers you? I’m trying to understand the logic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many years ago HRC was a proponent of education reform. So was Diane Ravitch.
HRC was also a Senator in NYC and she wasn’t trying to push ed reform. She also has made clear — in a way that neither Bernie Sanders nor Elizabeth Warren does — that she understands the issues that the ed reformers count on lazy Dems and progressives not to look closely at. She doesn’t get her talking points from the TFA intern in her office. She actually studies and reads up on an issue.
I’d rather have Hillary Clinton paying attention than lazy progressives who let their TFA interns tell them about education policy and even when they oppose Massachusetts ballot question #2 say things like
““Many charters schools are producing extraordinary results for our students and we should celebrate the hard work of those teachers and spread what’s working to other schools,’’ she said. But, after hearing from both sides, “I am very concerned about what THIS SPECIFIC PROPOSAL means ….. Education is about creating opportunity for all our children, not about leaving many behind.”
I prefer my politicians not to repeat the education reformer talking points and demonstrate something — anything! — that shows that they question the “extraordinary results” that Sen. Warren is so impressed with and makes sure we all understand can happen if only we have those “good public charters” that Bernie also supports.
But then again, that’s because i don’t start with the assumption that Hillary is a corrupt and evil Democrat looking only to enrich herself by selling out our foreign policy and as many children as she can.
You are free to disagree. But then again, if you weren’t being hypocritical, you’d have to question why Bernie Sanders would endorse the DFER candidate against the pro-public school candidate for Virginia governor and then refuse to endorse the pro-public school candidate in the general election. You’d have to question why Bernie Sanders would praise Andrew Cuomo and sit next to him as he pretends to support “free college” and sell out all the public school parents in NYC who are disgusted with Cuomo’s attempt to undermine our system.
The Progressive Policy Institute is a pro-charter front filled with lots of white people who get paid to promote their line and will do anything to keep their high paying job shilling for charters. I don’t see Hillary Clinton on their board. And attempts to smear her by association are as nasty as attempt to smear Bernie or Barack Obama as terrorists by association.
LikeLike
“The Wall Street Journal reported that one education reformer troubled by her comments [about charter schools] was was Eli Broad. Broad is currently on the move to make all Los Angeles public schools charters. And it is stated that he threatened to withdraw campaign funding if Hillary Clinton didn’t retract her claim—which she did.
“Clinton has also supported what she quantifies as high quality charter schools highlighted in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). Many realized that ESSA was just an extension No Child Left Behind. Many believe it is a giveaway to charter schools.”
https://nancyebailey.com/2016/07/19/hillary-clinton-and-charter-school-myths/ (emphasis added)
LikeLike
More on Hillary’s education position: https://www.redefinedonline.org/2016/07/hillary-clinton-charter-schools/
LikeLike
dienne77,
Thanks for providing the documentation that Hillary Clinton’s words upset her biggest funders.
Good thing that she “pivoted” to repeating Elizabeth Warren’s talking points, right?
I’d like to hear Elizabeth Warren pivot to repeating Hillary Clinton’s statement about charters that supposedly got Eli Broad so mad. (So why did she say it at all if you think she is owned by him?)
LikeLike
^^and PS — you didn’t address the fact that Bernie Sanders fought for the pro-DFER Democrat and wouldn’t endorse the pro-public school one.
But Bernie did give Andrew Cuomo some much needed nice progressive credibility by standing next to him and praising him for caring so much about education.
Your double standard in which Hillary is evil but other politicians can undermine public education by endorsing DFER candidates are not is getting tiresome.
Maybe Hillary was convinced by Liz Warren and Bernie Sanders that p;progressive should support “good public charters” just like they are. Did you ever think of that?
LikeLike
Yes, her comments upset her biggest donors – which is why she retracted them.
P.S. I’ve told you many times before I’m not going to play your whataboutism game.
LikeLike
NYC PSP and Dienne,
I think we should let go the arguments about Hillary. It is a waste of time.
Focus on how we save our government from the parasites now eating away at its vitals.
LikeLike
Hillary didn’t RETRACT them at all.
She just adopted the “progressive” platform on public education that Bernie Sanders and Liz Warren had.
You may recall that Hillary pivoted on MANY things in order to be more like Bernie Sanders. Pivoting on education so that she sounded more like Bernie Sanders is just like her pivot on every other issue.
It takes a lot of chutzpah to accuse Hillary of pivoting to make Eli Broad happy. Was he happy about the fact that her entire platform was a mirror of Bernie Sanders progressive one? So why are you so angry at her for embracing the so-called “progressive” view on charters.
It isn’t just Broad’s view. It is Bernie’s view. And Hillary embraced Bernie’s platform. Including charters.
Maybe if Hillary’s entire platform had been Broad’s you’d have a point but it was not. It was Bernie’s.
It is absurd for you to claim she embraced a progressive agenda on economics because it was Bernie but the reason she mirrored Bernie’s position on charters is because of Broad.
LikeLike
Sorry…..Nation at Risk was written for Reagan, but it was the Clinton family that opened up the Pandora’s Box of ed reform in Arkansas and continued it into the White House. If she comes clean, apologizes and puts her grandchild into public school then I will concede that she has changed her views on public education. Until then, I have to say that HRC and Bill were the leaders in ed reform…and I will stand by that until I see different. We can’t deny what is obviously the truth.
LikeLike
Lisa,
No, she doesn’t have to put her grandchildren into public schools. That’s their parents’ decision, and if they pay for it themselves, it is their right. The great error of corporate reform is expecting the government to pay for private schools, thus draining money away from public schools.
LikeLike
DR…you are deflecting and distracting. You are correct that it is Chelsea’s decision to put her child into public school, but I don’t see that happening. Hillary and Bill made a mess of public education (for their own profit) and they know it…..their daughter knows it. If you don’t want something for your own children, why would you want it for the other people’s children? What’s good for the goose is NOT good for the gander.
LikeLike
Lisa M,
Do you live in NYC? If not, I suggest you stop insulting NYC public schools as being “a mess”. Given that Chelsea lives in Manhattan, she is no doubt zoned for a school that is better than the public school I attended in the 70s before Hillary and Bill single handedly destroyed them all, as you claim.
I have heard Hillary Clinton talking about public schools in a way that no progressive has done. I wish there were progressives as knowledgeable. Your extreme need to blame Hillary for everything gets tiresome. I wish I could find a progressive to vote for who isn’t mouthing the same tired old “public charters can be good” rhetoric.
I’m sick of people going back 30 years in their Hillary derangement syndrome. 10 years ago Bernie Sanders was pro-gun and fighting gun regulations. He changed. So did Hillary.
Watching yesterdays’s non-stop attacks by the right wing media and the right wing trolls on Elizabeth Warren that drag out the “scandal” that she lied about her background to get ahead reminds me of how easy it is to turn a popular woman into an evil liar. Those trolls will be on your Facebook feed next election pretending to be progressives and telling you what a lying corrupt person Sen. Warren is. I just hope people don’t get fooled again.
LikeLike
If any NYC readers know of a good chiropractor, I think NYCPSP could use one.
LikeLike
Keep up your good work accusing Mayor de Blasio of being just as corrupt as Hillary Clinton. Your spidey sense is absolutely perfect in identifying the “evil” democrats you are so desperate to defeat. And so many times your spidey sense made you absolutely certain that you had identified another “collaborator” who was just as evil as you told us that Hillary was — the evil Mayor Bill de Blasio.
How can I argue with your spidey sense?
LikeLike
And perhaps you need a good ENT doctor, because your nose seems out of joint.
LikeLike
They’re enthusiastically promoting Indianapolis as a national model now. They have no earthly idea if it works, but it meets the criteria for ed reform which is “privatized”
The big ‘innovation” is they rebranded charter schools as “innovation” schools because charter schools were “controversial” which means people in Indianapolis were objecting to privatizing the whole system.
Solution? Call it something else.
In ’15 they were all promoting Cleveland. Then the Cleveland results came in low so they dropped it and replaced Cleveland with Indianapolis. They just disappear ed reform failures. They’re omitted. Detroit has completely disappeared and it was big news in ed reform in ’14. It’s just gone.
LikeLike
Firing thousands unionized workers, as happened in New Orleans after Katrina, is the wet dream of so-called reformers; to them, it’s “the civil rights movement of our time,” since it liberates oppressed management and the investor class, enabling them to extract what they believe is rightfully theirs.
LikeLike
Exactly
LikeLike
Michael: wet dream after Katrina. Nicely word played. Awe here.
LikeLike
Booksellers should move Osborne’s book to the fiction department, which is where it belongs.
LikeLike
Osborne actually says all schools should be privatized.
I appreciate his honesty- glad they’re finally dropping the “we’re agnostics!” nonsense.
They want 100% privatized systems. They seek to eradicate existing public schools, so if your kid is IN an existing public school ask yourself what it means to have a huge group of policymakers and politicians opposed to the existence of public schools.
Is it any wonder public schools are getting killed? NONE of these people support them and these people absolutely dominate in DC.
We have no advocates. 90% of US students have no one in power who support the schools they currently attend. They’ve abandoned 90% of families because they’re smitten with folks like Osborne who promise all kinds of gains with NO investment.
LikeLike
when ed reformers succeed in privatizing schools and it isn’t what they promised, will they be held to account?
i don’t think so. Osborne has made a career out of privatizing and he seems to be doing very well, personally.
If we lose public schools and the ed reform privatized systems don’t live up to the marketing and hype just be aware we will never ever get public schools back.
This decision is irreversible. Once they privatize a 600 billion dollar sector they’ll die before they’ll allow ownership to revert back to the public
LikeLike
It amazes me that Osborne uses US health care as an example of a successful private system
US health care is a disaster – expensive, wildly inequitable and with poor public health outcomes.
They want schools to look like healthcare? Why would anyone want that?
LikeLike
Anyone? Well, the insurers are profiting handsomely off U.S. healthcare. Why wouldn’t people want to profit off education?
LikeLike
US healthcare is the PERFECT example for the people who love charters.
They want to give private health insurance the right to cherry pick the patients they want to insure. Who needs regulations when a patient who gets sick and gets dropped by his insurance company has the entire free market to find another insurance company to choose?
Choice works so well in private insurance — at least to enrich corrupt and unethical insurance companies — why shouldn’t it work in education so that corrupt and unethical charters can benefit?
And the kids who get pushed out — especially those with special needs — can find some school that welcomes losing lots of money by educating them. Why, it will be just as easy as finding a decent insurance company that wants to lose lots of money by insuring the patient with the expensive illness dropped by the other insurance company.
After all, choice should work both ways in a free market, according to the free market proponents.
The school gets to choose you, too, just like the health insurance company does.
LikeLike
We have an extreme example of the elevation of “individualism” in our country. We have lost sight of investing in the common good, which is the democratic model of public education and all our government social safety nets. Any market based system will result in uneven access and uneven results. The system automatically creates a few winners and lots of losers. Just look at what happened in Chile! Our political system is driven by billionaires and corporations. Our current crop of shameful politicians has no problem leaving many of our people on the outside looking in. They are only interested in lifting the “worthy” boats, the already wealthy.
LikeLike