Stephen Dyer, a fellow with Innovation Ohio and former legislator, explains how the charter funding system in Ohio takes money away from students who are not in charters.
“It’s really easy to sit back and make esoteric arguments about how Ohio’s charter school funding system hurts kids who are not in charter schools. And there’s a recognition from leaders in the Ohio General Assembly that the funding system — which diverts state funding meant for a district to a charter — is a shell game that leave school districts with far less state revenue than the state says they need to effectively educate their students. This, in turn, forces school districts to use sometimes large segments of their locally raised revenue to make up the difference.
“But what does that mean for a kid attending a local public school district?
“As an example, I’m going to use a student in Columbus City Schools. Let’s assume he or she started first grade in the 2005-2006 school year, which would make this student a senior this year (by the way, I was first elected to the Ohio House in 2006. Wow, does this make me feel old!)
“Anyway, I looked at how much state funding this student lost each year of their career because charter schools receive so much more per pupil state funding than Columbus City Schools would have received for the same kids. (Looking at state funding reports here and doing addition and subtraction based on number of students in Columbus before and after charter students leave, as well as how much state funding comes to Columbus before and after charter students leave.)
“Yes, I know charters can’t raise local revenue. However, the legislature has chosen to not put its money where its school choice mouth is and create a separate fund to make charter schools whole. Instead, they make up a chunk of the local funding disparity by removing extra state funding from the local school district’s bottom line, forcing local property taxpayers to do their work for them.”
Check out his graphs and data.
So, for every student who began their Columbus City Schools career in 2005-2006, they have received $10,548 fewer in state revenue, with another $1,142 set to be lost this, their senior year (charter enrollment is so volatile, this figure could change substantially during the year). To give you a sense of scale, that amount equals about the amount of state funding these Columbus students received their first three years of school — in many ways the most important years.

I think charter supporters in Ohio cannot admit that charters are taking local funding by this backdoor method because it violates state law.
Ohio law states that a “taxing entity”, like a public school district, MUST HAVE a local elected board. Charters get around this by taking a larger share of state funding than the legislature provides, thereby sharing in local funding.
This money has to come from somewhere. It is coming from one of two places- they are EITHER taking local funding or they are taking state funding. Two thousand dollars per student doesn’t magically appear. It comes from a share they take from each student remaining in a public school. There’s no where else it CAN come from.
LikeLike
Republican ed reformers in the Ohio state legislature admit this- they admit it because it can’t be denied. Yet they do nothing.
They’re fine with the fact that charter schools are taking their additional state funding from each and every student who remains in a public school. This is okay with them- ripping off public school families. They’ve know this for YEARS yet they do NOTHING, so it must be okay with them.
LikeLike
Maybe public schools should publish how much money they have lost due to privatization on the school and/or district’s website, and maybe even in the local newspaper. Perhaps the visibility of the loss would would spur some activism in communities being decimated by charter/ voucher proliferation.
LikeLike
Every time you hear a national ed reformer cheerleading for privatization, think about Ohio. They sold privatization to Ohio with the same promises they use to sell it all over the country and it’s an absolute disaster.
If it happened here it can happen in your state. These rainbows and unicorns they’re selling are not what ed reform looks like on the ground.
LikeLike
It would help to understand the mechanism: how does Ohio’s state govt make it possible to steal local funding from tradl pubschs to prop up charter schools?
“Most districts have a very small share of charter students.
Once we leave urban communities, very few students attend charters. In fact, a majority of Ohio districts—364 out of 608—have less than 3 percent of their resident students attending charters.” (Fordham Inst)
Ohio ave per-pupil expenditure is $9k. x 13 for K12 = $117k. So if the ave Ohio pubsch student loses about $10.5k during K12 to support charters, he loses 9% funding. According to the cite, in over half of Ohio districts, charter enrollment is just 3%. So Ohio taxpayers in over half of the state are paying 3x the ave per-pupil expenditure for charter students– their choice is to either let their tradl publics decline, or raise extra local taxes to maintain quality.
If there’s something wrong w/my numbers, advise. But it seems Ohio is extracting 300% of what should be reqd to support charter schools– which means local taxpayers are either extraordinarily generous in their support of sch schoice, willing to pay a fat premium for it– or are being buffaloed. If it’s the latter, how is this accomplished structurally?
LikeLike
The deformers are so arrogant, they care NOT one wit who they crush. Right, students first…ridiculous. And I am a giant. Right…not.
LikeLike
President Trump’s proposal to cut 13.5% (around $9 billion) funding in education, especially hurts students with special needs and students from working-class families. Cory Turner, a senior editor at NPR Ed, explains that reduction in education spending in an effort to increase funding for school choice results in termination of other important services (1). According to Turner, about $3 billion would be cut from funding for programs that enhance students’ learning experiences, such as smaller classroom size, after-school activities, and teacher training. Anya Kamenetz’s reporting (2) reveals that caregivers of children with special needs particularly struggle to find adequate services in private schools — even when presented with voucher plans created to meet these very needs. Parents are finding that many private schools are unable (or unwilling) to provide services for students with special needs. When children’s basic needs are not being met, the “choice” of school seems immaterial. Ultimately, students with medical needs would face more challenges in schools under the new education budget plan.
References:
(1) Turner, C. (2017, May 23). Trump budget reduces education spending, raises funding for school choice. National Public Radio. Podcast retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2017/05/23/529730681/trump-budget-reduces-education-spending-raises-funding-for-school-choice
(2) Kamenetz, A. (2017, May 2017). For families with special needs, vouchers bring choices, not guarantees. National Public Radio. Podcast retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2017/05/17/527938057/for-families-with-special-needs-vouchers-bring-choices-not-guarantees
LikeLike