Gary Rubinstein has been tracking the progress—and the hubris—of the Tennessee Achievement School District. The ASD was created with millions drawn from Tennessee’s $500 Million Race to the Top Grant, the first in the nation. The basic idea was that the ASD would create a special district for the state’s lowest performing schools, turn them over to charter operators, and within precisely five years, these schools would be “catapulted”into the top 25% of the schools in the state.
The first cohort of six schools were in the bottom 5% of schools in the state.
“Two years into the five-year mission, the superintendent at the time, TFA alum Chris Barbic, declared in an interview that of the original six schools, two were on target to get to the top 25% in five years while one of the six schools, Brick Church Elementary, was on a trajectory to reach the goal after just four years.
“Three years into the five-year mission, the improvements that he had based these projections on did not continue and Barbic was saying that they underestimated how difficult this would be, even admitting that the ‘immigrant poverty’ he worked with as a charter school founder in Houston is very different than the ‘generational poverty’ he works with in Tennessee.
“Four years into the five-year mission, Barbic resigned from the ASD, citing among other things, his health as he had recently had a heart attack. He soon got hired by the John Arnold foundation to work on education issues for them.”
In the fifth year, the state testing system was messed up by technical glitches, so there were no scores. So the ASD got six years to work its magic.
Now the scores are out, Gary analyzed the results, and one thing is clear: the ASD was an abysmal failure.
Of the original 6 ASD schools, one is in the bottom 7%, the rest are still in the bottom 5% with two of them in the bottom 1%.
This is what is called a total and complete failure. It was not “for the kids.” It was for the ego-gratification of arrogant deformers.
Gary writes:
“There are actually other states considering starting their own ASDs, I just read that Mississippi is working on it. Georgia, North Carolina and Nevada already have them in the works. There was one in Michigan which folded and there is still the original one in New Orleans which continues to post awful test results.”
Most of the ASD schools were in Memphis. Jeannie Kaplan reported earlier today that author David Osborne was in Denver touting Memphis as a reform Success. Six out of six of the state’s lowest performing schools are still the state’s lowest performing schools. If this is success, what does failure look like?
The definition of a reformer today: Never look at evidence, never admit failure, never learn anything new, just keep pushing privatization, lower standards for teachers, and high-stakes testing. Fail, fail, fail, and do it again.

If we want to raise up the kids at the bottom, we need to heed E.D. Hirsch’s wisdom: the reason wealthier kids do better is because they hear more rich vocab and knowledge at home. The Hart-Risley study bears this out: professionals’ kids hear 30 MILLION more words than welfare kids by the age of 4. And the words they hear are richer. This fund of general knowledge and vocabulary their “starter capital” which enables them to comprehend texts and what the teacher says, and which accrues interest with each passing month. Most poor kids do not get much starter capital, so they start behind and get ever further behind as the years go on. The best thing elementary schools can do for poor kids is try to replicate the linguistically-rich environment of professionals’ homes.
LikeLike
I admire Hirsch and I agree that all children need access to a strong vocabulary. But poor kids need far more than a strong vocabulary and curriculum. First, they need not to be poor. Then, they need health, food security, Home Security and the material advantages that Rick kids take for granted.
LikeLike
Thank you, Diane. Well said.
LikeLike
Agreed. And they need less lead and other neurotoxins in their environment. Less toxic stress.
Knowledge about these pernicious influences on brain development can be found on the Internet.
LikeLike
Agreed, but only curriculum is in educators’ control (well, maybe not so much any more). Teachers who endorse the anti-knowledge orthodoxy are unwittingly hurting poor kids.
LikeLike
“Teachers who endorse the anti-knowledge orthodoxy.”
“The wimps in the State Department.”
“The Fake News mainstream media.”
“The anti-American war protesters.”
This kind of rhetoric has been and always will be popular. That doesn’t make it legitimate.
LikeLike
It IS kind of amusing how ed reform states are touted and then disappear.
Indiana is the new Tennessee 🙂
Is it an experiment if one never actually revisits the results UNLESS the results prove the theory? I’m no scientist but I don’t think so.
I’d like to see a real comparison between states that adopted the whole roster of ed reforms and states that didn’t. They better hurry up and do it since it’s close to being dogma and they won’t have a “control” state to use as a comparison.
What’s a state that didn’t slavishly follow these people? Virginia? I have nothing to use because the comparable states to Ohio are probably Michigan and/or Pennsylvania and they both idiotically followed Ohio.
LikeLike
There is no state to use as a control. They were all required by federal mandates and bribes to adopt the same bad policies.
LikeLike
“There are actually other states considering starting their own ASDs, I just read that Mississippi is working on it. Georgia, North Carolina and Nevada already have them in the works. There was one in Michigan which folded”
This is the problem. Okay, Ohio wanted to experiment with online schools. Dumb decision but they make a lot of dumb decisions and this is just one more.
Is there some reason Michigan and Pennsylvania had to follow? It isn’t “results”- the results in Ohio are abysmal and they’ve know that for a decade.
If the experiment succeeds they expand it and if it fails they expand it. That’s not an experiment.
Ohio ed reformers are right now pushing to expand charters to rural areas. The charters they have in urban areas don’t outperform urban publics even though urban charters pull 50% of their students from better-performing districts.
Why would anyone expand this?
LikeLike
Avarice. Stupidity. Indifference.
Ohio has ECOT.
LikeLike
Did you see this?
“Its massive education funding efforts have helped spread small high schools, charter schools, and efforts to overhaul teacher evaluations. Now, the Gates Foundation is going in a new direction.
In a speech Thursday, Bill Gates said the foundation is about to launch a new, locally driven effort to help existing public schools improve.
The idea is to fund “networks” that help public schools improve by scrutinizing student achievement data and getting schools to share their best ideas, he said. Of the $1.7 billion the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will spend on U.S. education over the next five years, more than 60 percent will go to these networks — dwarfing the amount to be spent on charter schools, about 15 percent”
I just hope school districts are getting smarter. This money isn’t “free”- if they know what they’re trading for it then that’s one thing but thinking it’s “free” is just naive. The grants cover the upfront costs. They’ll cover the continuing costs.
They should also get ACTUAL local consent before embarking on another round of experiments and holding a star-studded tv event on “reinventing schools” doesn’t count.
https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/us/2017/10/19/gates-foundation-to-move-away-from-teacher-evals-shifting-attention-to-networks-of-public-schools/
LikeLike
More money matters — when if comes to funding schools. It’s not the whole solution, of course, but it sure-as-heck is part of it. For proof of this, just look to New Jersey’s schools, as evidenced by the decades-long impact upon them arising from the landmark Abbott court decision. Decades ago, this ruling mandated the raising of funding for schools in New Jersey’s poorer communities, and the N.J. legislature, for the most part, delivered.
Jan Ressenger:
Posted on October 20, 2017 by janresseger
At a debriefing of the film, BACKPACK FULL OF CASH, which was recently screened in our community, the most probing questions arose about David Kirp’s depiction of the schools in Union City, New Jersey.
How could a poor city afford the universal preschool, small classes and personalized attention the film portrayed?
How could Union City afford to turn around its schools this way?
For Ohioans who watched the film, it seemed a miracle.
David Kirp is a professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley. His fine book, Improbable Scholars, explains part of the answer:
“Money cannot cure all the ailments of public education…. But the fact that New Jersey spends more than $16,000 per student, third in the nation, partly explains why a state in which nearly half the students are minorities and a disproportionate share are immigrants has the country’s highest graduation rate and ranks among the top five on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the country’s report card. The additional money also helps to account for how New Jersey halved the achievement gap between black, Latino, and white students between 1999 and 2007, something no other state has come close to accomplishing.” (p. 85)
So how does New Jersey have enough money to fund its schools adequately even in its poorest communities? The Education Law Center, which has litigated the school funding case of Abbott v. Burke, describes the history of the case: “In 1981, the Education Law Center filed a complaint in Superior Court on behalf of 20 children attending public schools in the cities of Camden, East Orange, Irvington, and Jersey City. The lawsuit challenged New Jersey’s system of financing public education under the Public School Education Act of 1975…
The case eventually made it’s way to the N.J. Supreme Court, which, in 1985, issued the first Abbott decision (Abbott I) transferring the case to an administrative law judge for an initial hearing. In 1990, in Abbott II, the N.J. Supreme Court upheld the administrative law judge’s ruling, finding the State’s school funding law unconstitutional as applied to children in 28 ‘poorer urban’ school districts. That number was later expanded to 31…
*The Court’s ruling directed the Legislature to amend or enact a new law to ‘assure’ funding for the urban districts:
1) at the foundation level ‘substantially equivalent’ to that in the successful suburban districts; and
2) ‘adequate’ to provide for the supplemental programs necessary to address the extreme disadvantages of urban schoolchildren. The Court ordered this new funding mechanism be in place for the following school year, 1991-92.”
Abbott v. Burke has been challenged repeatedly and continues to be challenged—most recently in Abbott XX and Abbott XXI, but the New Jersey Supreme Court has upheld the extra funding for New Jersey’s Abbott districts. One of the provisions of the remedy in this case is the guarantee of enriched preschool in all of New Jersey’s Abbott school districts.
In Improbable Scholars, Kirp describes how the school district in Union City invested its Abbott remedy dollars:
“Every dollar went to improve instruction. Class sizes shrank, teachers receive training in everything from ESL to project-driven learning, specialists were hired to work one-on-one with teachers, and all the schools were wired with a computer for every three students.” (pp. 85-86)
“In the first phases of the Abbott. v. Burke litigation, the New Jersey Supreme Court focused exclusively on K-12. Later on, however, the justices were persuaded by mountains of evidence that good preschool was essential if children living in the state’s poorest communities, who started kindergarten well behind their better-off peers, were going to have a truly equal chance of success.
Thanks to the Court’s 1998 ruling, every three-and four-year-old who lives in an ‘Abbott district’ is entitled to attend a high-quality prekindergarten.” (p. 108)
LikeLike
New Jersey has Phil Murphy running for governor. As part of his platform he states,”Phil believes that our public schools are a critical part of what makes this state great.” I hope he really means authentic public education because there is a lot of work needed to undo the nefarious Christie policies.
LikeLike
The question is always whether politicians include charter schools as public schools. If you have followed this blog, you know they are not public schools, they are private contractors.
LikeLike
One way to make the environment better for black kids…..drive a bunch of the poorest ones out of the community. In St. Louis, Mayor Slay is quietly recognized as a heroic figure for having the schools illegally taken over by the state, stopping any efforts to overturn the disenfranchisement, and dramatically changing St. Louis into a place which now has more white people than black, and has the local paper talking about building a tube machine to zip people from St. Louis to Kansas City to attract Amazon to move in. Tests prove that it has—–uhhh—-tests do not prove much of anything, other than there are now 11,000 children too embarrassing to say much about in the charter schools.
LikeLike
One of the goals of the charter industry is gentrification, which drives up property values.
LikeLike
Diane, I want to thank you for your blog. You need to know that each day when I awake, if I have the time, I sit with my cup of coffee and my laptop, and the first thing I do is look for your posts.
You and those who comment have become a regular part of my day. I also share items I find of interest to those who are NOT educators from the east coast all the way to Hawai’i.
You and those who comment have provided excellent information for my friends. Some were charter fans (because of marketing ploys from the charter industry) and now they understand the POWER of PUBLIC EDUCATION and how awful charters and vouchers are.
You need to know how much your blog has meant to those non educators, which whom I share some of your posts. THANK YOU so much, Diane. Always, ALL good things to YOU and NPE.
And thank you for this post. OMG, the deformers are crazy, crazy, crazy.
LikeLike
Thank you, Yvonne.
LikeLike
I think you left off quite a few crazies.
Deform is crazy thrice
But three will not suffice
Deform is crazy plenty
At minimum, it’s twenty
LikeLike
It’s crazy like a fox
Which keeps us in a box
And makes us pay a fee
When’er we want to pee
LikeLike
Yes, the ASD is a total failure. It was doomed to be from its start. And now, the Nashville school system is refusing to share its students’ information with the ASD, even though it’s required by law. After all, the ASD has to be able to recruit students (since no one would want to go there on their own), right? As a former teacher and a Nashville parent, I am grateful for the Nashville school board’s decision to stand up to the state and say No! We won’t share our students’ data with the ASD! Only now, the school district is being sued. Here’s the story: http://www.newschannel5.com/news/tennessee-sues-metro-nashville-public-schools
LikeLike
To greedy, power-hungry corporate reformers out to privatize public schools … CHOICE Trumps a total and complete failure.
Trumps is the right term since Trump has been a total and complete failure all of his life except as a serial liar, bully, a troll, a con-man, fraud, and a molester of women.
LikeLike