Jeanne Kaplan served for two terms as an elected board member in Denver.
Since she retired from the board, she has watched with a combination of disgust and rage as the district statisticians spin the data to make it appear that students are making dramatic progress
In the last board election, Dark money poured in to buy all seven seats on the school board for friends of corporate reform. Education Reform Now and Stand for Children brought in large sums to secure control.
This is the way the game is played: make a big deal out of growth and try not to talk about current performance.
She writes:
“If you have an important school board election coming up in less than a month and you want to protect your incumbent candidates and your “reform” agenda, and
“If community meeting after community meeting implores you, the District, NOT to close any more schools but rather put real time and resources into the schools with very high concentrations of students living in poverty and not speaking English as their first language and these schools are located in Board Districts where the seats are being contested, and
“Even if you have been warned repeatedly from both sides of the philosophical education debate that so much emphasis on GROWTH over STATUS is misleading, and
“If all of these decisions are determined by high stakes test scores where proficiencies are terrible (39% in reading and 30% in math) and achievement gaps enormous (the highest in the state and among the highest in the nation),
“WHAT WOULD YOU DO? Answer: Change how you calculate school success and rankings, and then put all your public relations minions to work to tout the importance of growth and to downplay the importance of grade level competency.”

And if moving the goalposts doesn’t work they’ll change the goal- from “excellence” to “choice” – they’re already well on their way.
The “choice” movement provides choice. You can’t deny that. It’s literally impossible for them to fail if choice is the measure.
DeVos actually brags about this in speeches- how “liberal” ed reformers move closer and closer to her ideology every year. The GOP base love it. They were right all along! Government schools ARE bad!
LikeLike
Yes, and (most) Democrats have been enablers of the so-called reform agenda, and now fond themselves in bed with Trump and De Vos, despite their crocodile tears.
LikeLike
Because politicians in general ALL love to keep the money flowing into their own pockets.
LikeLike
It’s not lying 🤥 it’s just “marketing” — it’s how Big Biz works in America and the bigger it gets the bigger the lies, er, ad campaigns …
LikeLike
Once again they have co-opted the language: who doesn’t want to see growth? And who knew all of this could be so complicated to explain? In Denver’s case there are so many people working in various departments with public relations at their core, it is truly difficult to fight the machine. But we must continue. Our kids are too important to turn over to them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But nobody really knows how anything is working by disaggregating test scores because there is no way to measure learning. The only legitimate judge is the teacher.
LikeLike
With growth as the latest proxy to measure “education”, we will soon have students that show tremendous growth yet declining scores.
LikeLike
Denver. A couple of years ago dps recognized schools with high growth. 41% dropped in proficiency.
LikeLike
DPS is a true leader when it comes to using BS statistics to show how great their reforms are.
LikeLike
Hello Diane, This is what is happening in Indianapolis and Indiana as a whole. “New” schools (three years and younger) and so-called innovation network schools (privatized schools within the Indianapolis Public Schools system) are being graded by “growth” only while established schools are graded on 50% performance and 50% growth. The result is massively inflated grades for the new schools. Twenty-seven percent of charters fall into that category, but only 1% of public schools. This should be a scandal–but we are having some trouble getting it covered by the press. Chalkbeat Indiana did a piece on it. Here is Steve Hinnefeld’s most recent post from the School Matters blog: https://inschoolmatters.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/more-on-growth-only-grading-of-schools/#more-7114
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is literally a double standard. Here is the Chalkbeat piece: https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/in/2017/10/06/how-indianas-a-f-rules-created-a-two-tiered-system-that-benefits-innovation-schools/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Does this relate to the new testing? In our states, standards for some courses are so inappropriate that no one scores as proficient. Looking at scores on a calculus test does not shed any light on proficiency in Algebra I. Administrators turn to growth scores to keep from looking like abject failures.
In truth, all this testing tells us nothing. If we could argue about what standards are appropriate for what children for long enough to come to some collective conclusion, we might devise some way to get a hint with some testing. We know we cannot measure.
Sounds to me we need to hire and keep competent teachers. It is cheap and places the authority right next to the student, always the best plan.
LikeLike
From what I have gleaned with Denver, after originally learning how to get Big Money for NCLB stipulations, over time the goalposts had to move in order to keep the money coming in: this or that new “problem” is always identified in Denver as soon as old funding fades and new funding can be created and chased.
LikeLike
It is a game, with children as the losers and corporate reformers as the winner$.
LikeLiked by 1 person