BASIS Schools hit the top of all the high school ratings because its curriculum is so rigorous that many students drop out. That leaves only the creme de la creme in the school, and the folks who rank high schools go giddy at the BASIS results. Look at those scores! Look how many AP exams they passed! Why this should be the model for all schools, say its admirers.
Behind all that rigor and grit and weeding-out of average students is a sophisticated business operation.
BASIS is a very successful business. BASIS is big business. And all this profit wouldn’t be possible without the generosity of taxpayers!
Yoohyun Jung writes for Arizona Public Media:
“As the movement to create independent and innovative public schools spread across the country, Olga Block, an immigrant from the Czech Republic, wanted a more rigorous education for her daughter.
“Block decided to start her own school with the help of her American husband, Michael, a Stanford-educated economist. She would combine best of both worlds: the hands-on, slower-paced American learning environment and the rigorous European study habits Olga Block was used to back home.
“BASIS was essentially built on a mother’s love for her daughter,” said Bezanson, the BASIS.ed CEO.
“The Blocks, who remain managers at BASIS.ed, declined to be interviewed.
“The school opened in fall 1998, renting space at a synagogue in midtown Tucson. It was called Building Academic Success in School, or BASIS.
“Today, the BASIS network runs 24 charter schools in Arizona, Texas and Washington, D.C., and seven private schools in California, New York, Virginia, and Shenzhen and Guangzhou, China. It has plans to open more schools in the U.S. and overseas in the near future.
“As BASIS grew, so did its corporate structure. In 2009, Olga and Michael Block established a private limited liability company, BASIS.ed, to handle school operations. To manage the assets and equities of various private management arms that run the charter, private and international schools, the founders also established BASIS Educational Ventures.
“Such complex corporate structures, also common to other large charter networks, limit risk and maximize profit, said Gary Miron, an expert in charter school finance at Western Michigan University and fellow for the National Education Policy Center.
“It’s just amazing that they are public schools,” he said, “but they are really private in so many ways.”
“Before BASIS’ multi-tiered corporate structure emerged, IRS disclosure forms showed that in 2008, Olga Block earned $197,507 as the chief executive officer of BASIS, which then had two schools and just over 1,100 students. Michael Block earned $156,362 in various roles.
“That same year, the superintendent of the Tucson Unified School District, which served more than 56,000 students in more than 80 schools and programs, made just over $200,000.
“Tax filings from 2007 and 2008 also show that the founders paid family for work they did for BASIS: Olga Block’s two daughters and her sister, who lives in the Czech Republic, were paid for public relations material design and accounting. Michael’s son, Robert, was paid for technology services in other years.
“The founders’ relatives still occupy high-level management positions in various arms of the network. At least three of Olga and Michael Block’s children are on the BASIS payroll…
“Once BASIS transitioned to private management in 2009, few details about its schools’ finances remained public. Filings instead show millions in lump sums for management fees and leased employees, including teachers, all addressed to Michael Block, who until 2015 was a BASIS charter board member.
“For the 2014 tax year, the most recent tax filing publicly available, the nonprofit housing the network’s charter schools paid BASIS.ed $15.6 million in management fees and an additional $44.3 million for salaries and benefits. In exchange for the fees, BASIS.ed says it handles tasks such as hiring administrators and teachers and buying school supplies.”
It is these connections with “related parties” that raise ethical issues for many charter chains.
Demographics is an issue for BASIS:
“Because BASIS charter schools are public, they must serve every student picked from a lottery. But parents say students with disabilities or limited English skills often are pushed out later because they can’t get specialized services. Others are deterred from even applying.
“Data from the National Center for Education Statistics for the 2014-15 school year – the most recent available – shows only six English-language learners were enrolled at BASIS’ Arizona charter schools. But company spokesman Phil Handler says state data says differently: There were 28 – about 0.3 percent of all students enrolled in those schools, compared with the national average of 9.4 percent.
“A spokesman for the national statistics center said the data reflects how states administer English-language learner program funds and not necessarily the exact number of students enrolled.
“The average enrollment for students with disabilities was less than 2 percent across 15 BASIS charter schools for which data were available. That same year, 13 percent of all public school students in the U.S. received special education services.”
The academic demands are too hard for many students:
“The BASIS philosophy is that any child willing to work hard can succeed at a higher level.
“3rd graders can think critically, 6th graders can learn Physics, and High School students can read Critical Theory and Philosophy,” the network’s curriculum overview says.
“That philosophy sells, as evidenced by its steady enrollment growth. Politicians, educators and others have pointed to BASIS as a model for public education. And BASIS’ academic results are above average.
“To graduate, BASIS high school students must take at least eight college-level Advanced Placement courses and six AP exams. In 2016, BASIS students graduated with an average of 11.5 AP exams, according to the management company’s website, compared with a national average of about 1.8 among students who take AP exams. BASIS students also pass AP exams at much higher rates – about 84 percent, compared with the U.S. average of less than 58 percent.
“Students in kindergarten through fifth grades must earn 60 percent or higher in their final grades for every subject to move on to the next grade. Starting in sixth grade, students must pass comprehensive school exams for all subjects, despite widely accepted research that holding students back has no proven benefit.
“With the way the BASIS curriculum is set up, it makes no sense for a kid to move on to the next grade without having mastered the content of the previous one, Bezanson said. A student simply could not move on to precalculus without having passed algebra 2.
“That’s inhumane, setting the kid up for failure or setting up the school to be a joke,” he said.
“Parents and educators have said BASIS pushes out underperformers that way, saying the fear of a child being held back can serve as a strong motivation for parents to transfer a child out.”
With such a remarkable record, it is important to follow the money.

““Parents and educators have said BASIS pushes out underperformers that way, saying the fear of a child being held back can serve as a strong motivation for parents to transfer a child out.”
…………..
This definitely is a corporate level school that provides poverty level kids a way to succeed in life. After all, wasn’t this supposed to be the reason for legitimizing all the proliferation of ‘anything but low performing public schools” goes?
Many public schools are in disrepair because of lack of funding. Class sizes are often increasing making learning more difficult. Too often the arts, library, nurses, social workers, etc. have been cut. Why waste taxpayer money on ‘for profit’ business run schools?
Does any politician really believe this can be ethically justified?
LikeLike
Another method of pushing kids voluntarily. Call a parent in every day about issues. Since she or he can’t afford to miss work, best to remove child.
LikeLike
Posted at Oped: https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/How-BASIS-Turned-Its-Chart-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Charter-Schools_Corporate_Diane-Ravitch_Schools-171008-278.html#comment675907
Here are the comments that I posted. NOTE… AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS, ALL THE COMMENTS BELOW HVE EMBEDDED LINKS TO THE ARTICLES AND POSTS.
COMMENT Submitted by Susan Lee Schwartzon Sunday, Oct 8, 2017 at 1:17:54 PM
What is important to me, is that our people learn what is happening as the privatization goes on I would recommend that everyone who wants to keep afoot of the daily assault on our PUBLIC EDUCTION INSTITUION, not merely our ‘schools,’ get the daily feed from the DIANE RAVITCH BLOG.
Or get the NPE Newsletters – Network For Public Education where you can find out WHAT YOU CAN DO TO ENSURE AMERICA’S FUTURE CITIZENS are educated, and know how to LEARN, and have the skills and know how to do work!
Here is some good reading to familiarize you with the PLOT & THE PLOY to demolish education in America , and with it the road to income equality and our democracy.
FORMER UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE’, DIANE RAVITCH wrote:
How Not to Fix Our Public Schools
Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools.
The Trump Devos Demolition of American Education
*Detroit: The Broken Promise of School Privatization
At her site are articles that analyze what is afoot, things that ‘fake news’ won’t tell you, like this one , an interesting article on the public’s perception of the quality of our public schools appeared in The Atlantic on July 15, where Joanne Yatvin, now retired, was a teacher, principal, and superintendent, as well as a literacy specialist. (The Myth of “Our Failing Schools” and How to Destroy It) offers a real look at what LEARNING LOOKS LIKE AND WHAT IT DOES NOT!
COMMENT Submitted by Susan Lee Schwartzon Sunday, Oct 8, 2017 at 1:17:54 PM Submitted on Sunday, Oct 8, 2017 at 1:31:28 PM
AT The Network for Public Education: Our View on Charter Schools is a good place to go for the TRUTH…REAL NEWS about the war on public education, and you should know that FACEBOOK banned ads from this site, which was created by Diane Ravitch and top educators to inform the public in the face of all the falsehoods.
The NPE tried to post an ad critical of school choice during “school choice week” which we we rebranded: ‘School Privatization Week’.and was permanently banned by Facebook.”During School Choice Week, we rebranded the week, ‘School Privatization Week’. We were careful to make sure that the logo we created, which played off the Choice Week logo, was quite dissimilar and therefore could not be confused with the choice logo, or be in violation of copyright.
We made it a Facebook ad. It was accepted and all was fine. Then, after a few days, Facebook refused our buys and blocked us from boosting any of our posts. We are still blocked from boosting or buying nine months later.
“Carol Burris called the number. It was disconnected. she spent a day trying to reach a human being. It was impossible. Network for Public Education is in the Facebook doghouse and we have no idea why.
“Yet Russians can place awful ads that try to sway our elections.”An interesting series of questions:Why does Facebook block posts and ads that are critical of School Choice?
Maybe here is he answer: Campbel Brown was hired by Facebook earlier this year to be a liaison with news media and to help avoid “fake news.” Whatever it is she is doing, she plays an important role at Facebook.who is a friend of Betsy DeVos. She wrote a post at her website “The 74” defending DeVos when she was nominated by Trump. She was on the board of DeVos’ pro-voucher, pro-choice, pro-charter, anti-public school American Federation for Children. DeVos gave money to Campbell Brown’s anti-tenure, anti-union website “The 74.” Brown’s husband Dan Senor is active in Republican politics.”
LikeLike
When running a business, a businessperson’s job is to limit financial or other risks, or eliminate risks when they can. So in education it makes perfect sense, under that principle, to deter or reject students who are “high risk.”
When running a democracy, a leader’s job is to do what is best for “the people.” All of them. Under that principle (of/for/by the people), fiscal responsibility is important and accounted for, but are folded in UNDER that “For All” principle.
In our history as a capitalist democracy, businesses have thrived precisely because of the freedoms and principles of living that are afforded by that “of/for/by all” democracy. It’s a matter of logic, then, that when business and its capitalist principles try to extinguish that “all” principle, and replace it with “risk management” principles, they are, in fact, attacking the basis for their own thriving.
And so we have the operating metaphor of the “Snake Eating Its Own Tale.”
Also, in DeVos, the Zuckerbergs and others, we are seeing clear examples:
Being wealthy is not equivalent to being intelligent or excellent, or even knowing WTF you are doing.
LikeLike
CBK, please explain this principle to Charles.
LikeLike
dianeravitch writes: “CBK, please explain this principle to Charles.”
I love your sense of humor. But I’ll use this response to add an afterthought to my earlier note?
That is, in our present situation, the FOLDING UNDER that occurs when business principles are rightly FOLDED UNDER democratic principles–so that democracy can exist and go forward in its vibrancy, is becoming reversed.
So that, presently, democratic principles are becoming folded under capitalist principles.
Bye-bye! democratic principles.
The political order shows itself to be more solidly foundational than its business and financial principles because: while business principles can work well within a democratic political and cultural environment, and though tensions always abound,** democratic principles are nowhere to be found under the present business model (only if that model morphed to become humane).
Concretely, businesses (rightly, I would say) still fire or retire people who cannot do their jobs (or wrongly bump them up?). Whereas, in a democratic political culture, it’s mainly about being FOR THE PEOPLE, and not necessarily about what they can do for the business. It’s citizenry and our well-being, cradle to grave, so to speak that’s the overriding issue.
So that the idea of take and use The People’s tax money for private businesses, but WITHOUT The People’s (government) oversight, regulation, or intention to truly educate under democratic principles (and not propagandize), speaks clearly of not only a high-level of fraudulence, but in the long run, it’s self-destructive.
It’s wanting to have one’s cake and eat it too. And now, according to a Joy Reid interview this morning, there is a movement to rewrite the Constitution on the form of “conservative” principles. <<–in quotes for a raft of reasons. Of course, they say it’s a “return to freedom.”
LikeLike
See my response to you, in the larger reply… I hate it to run along the side forever!
LikeLike
In fact, BASIS assumes the least amount of risk. The easiest attainable goal is to take the brightest and get them to achieve. It doesn’t take a masterful teacher to do that! I wonder if anyone has studied how BASIS students do in college?
LikeLike
retired teacher Yes–that’s exactly what they are doing–true “entrepreneurs.” That term is well-suited for those who legitimately do business in a democratic environment and who don’t try to take over the present democratic political culture en total, and who try to “enfold” it under capitalist principles.
For those who do, however, the term “entrepreneur” morphs to mean “Enter the Manures.”
LikeLike
Many public school districts offer selective admission public magnet schools. There is nothing unique about the BASIS model. What is unique about BASIS is that the company has been very successful at socializing the investment risk and privatizing the profit. We know that there may be conflicts of interests, and confirmed examples of nepotism. As long as federal and state governments continue to offer public funds to expand privatization, there will be a long line of profiteers trying to cash in on the opportunity to access free public money. As long as there is little oversight and accountability, the public will continue to be in the dark about where the money goes. While BASIS makes a generous profit, other charter chains will continue to be rife with fraud and waste.
LikeLike
Basis has overtly refused to honor children’s IEPs, stating in one case with which I am directly familiar: “We don’t make accommodations for our scholars.” This was for a very bright child with Aspeberger’s who didn’t “fit” their program. They attempted to retain him for the third time in 6th grade before his mother pulled him out. It was a low income family with a mother dedicated to obtaining a challenging education for her obviously very bright son, but didn’t know her rights. I’ve heard very similar reports from across the country about this failure to provide services or even accommodations.
LikeLike
“The BASIS philosophy is that any child willing to work hard can succeed at a higher level.”
That philosophy is one that rewards the children willing to work hard but punishes children that don’t. Isn’t that why most if not all public schools offer Honors and AP Courses – for children who qualify and/or work harder?
The public schools that offer Honors and AP courses do not punish the children that do not choose to do the work to get into those classes by throwing them out of school.
Learning is a choice too, but poverty takes away that choice in every country where children live in poverty, and the United States has more children living in poverty than all of the developed countries.
A study out of Stanford made that clear and even with more children living in poverty, the U.S. does a better job educating children that live in poverty than even Canada, Finland and Korea.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2013/january/test-scores-ranking-011513.html
LikeLike
To Catherine and Lloyd and anyone who wants to hear Ralph Nader nail the corporate State of America… Any systems engineer would tell you that Capitalism needs regulation as badly as any engine needs a throttle to avoid self-destruction. It is the job of a Corporation to grow, and the job of Government to prune it for health, considering the whole garden. Our Government is not there for us.
Susan
Here’s Ralph…….
How Big Corporations Game Our Democracy Into Their Plutocracy | OpEdNews https://www.opednews.com/articles/How-Big-Corporations-Game-by-Ralph-Nader-Corporations_Democracy_Democracy-Decay_Money-171006-611.html
“Corporations are about a stage 3 Cancer on the planet.”
“A major chapter in American history — rarely taught in our schools — is how ever larger corporations have moved to game, neutralize and undermine the people’s continual efforts to protect our touted democratic society. It is a fascinating story of the relentless exercise of power conceived or seized by corporations, with the strategic guidance of corporate lawyers.”
“Start with their birth certificate — the state charters that bring these corporate entities into existence, with limited liability for their investors. In the early 1800s, the Massachusetts legislature chartered many of the textile manufacturing companies. These charters could be renewed on good behavior, because lawmakers then viewed charters as privileges contingent on meeting the broad interests of society.
“Fast forward to now. The charter can be granted online in a matter of hours; there are no renewal periods and the job is often given over to a state commission. Over the decades, corporate lobbyists have had either the legislatures or the courts grant them more privileges, immunities and concentration of power in management, rendering shareholders — their owners — increasingly powerless. The same corporate fixers work for corporations and their subsidiaries abroad to help them avoid US laws, taxes and escape disclosures.
” Remarkably, the artificial creation called the “corporation” has now achieved almost all of the rights of real people under our “We the People” Constitution that never mentions the words “corporation” or “company.”
“Corporations cannot vote, at least not yet; only people can. That was seen as a major lever of democratic power over corporations. So what has happened? Commercial money to politicians started weakening the influence of voters because the politicians became increasingly dependent on the corporate interests that bankrolled their campaigns. The politicians use their ever-increasing corporate cash to saturate voters with deceptive political ads, and intimidate any competitors who have far less money, but may be far better representative of the public good.
“To further shatter the principle of voter sovereignty, corporations have rewarded those politicians who construct restrictive political party rules, gerrymander electoral districts and obstruct third party candidate ballot access. By concentrating political power in fewer and fewer hands, corporate influence becomes more deeply entrenched in our democratic society. Politicians quickly learn that political favors will attract more corporate campaign cash and other goodies.
“Institutions that are supposed to represent democratic values, such as Congress and state legislatures are meticulously gamed with the daily presence of corporate lawyers and lobbyists to shape the granular performance of these bodies and make sure little is done to defend civic values. These pitchmen are in the daily know about the inner workings of legislative bodies long before the general public. They often know who is going to be nominated for judicial and executive branch positions that interpret and administer the law and whether the nominee will do the bidding of the corporate bosses.
Then there is the press. Thomas Jefferson put great responsibility on the newspapers of his day to safeguard our democracy from excessive commercial power and their runaway political toadies. Certainly, our history has some great examples of the press fulfilling Jefferson’s wish. For the most part, however, any media that is heavily reliant on advertisements will clip its own wings or decide to go with light-hearted entertainment or fluff, rather than dig in the pits of corruption and wrongdoing.
What of the educational institutions that purport to convey facts, the lessons of history and not be beholden to special interests? The corporate state — the autocratic joining of business and government — exerts its influence all the way down to the state and local levels, not just in Washington. It works through boards of education and trustees of colleges and universities, drawing heavily from the business world and its professional servants in such disciplines as law, accounting and engineering.
“Moreover, the most influential alumni, in terms of donations, endowments and engagements, come from the business community. They know the kind of alma mater they want to preserve. The law and business schools are of particular interest, if only because they are the recruiting grounds for their companies and firms.
Their subversion even extends to the sacrosanct notion of academic freedom — that these institutions must be independent centers of knowledge. For example, Monsanto, General Motors, Exxon and Eli Lilly are only a few of the companies that have pushed corporate, commercial science over academic, independent science through lucrative consultantships and partnerships with professors.
“The unfortunate reality is that the wealthy and powerful are driven to spend the necessary time and energy to accomplish their raison d’etre, which are profits and the relentless pursuit of self-interest. Citizens, on the other hand, have so much else on their minds, just to get through the day and raise their families.
“The path forward is to learn from history how citizens, when driven by injustice, organized, raised the banners of change and concentrated on the ways and means to victory. These initiatives require civic self-respect and an understanding that the status quo is demeaning and intolerable.
The requisite to such an awakening is the awareness that our two precious pillars of democracy — freedom of contract and freedom to use the courts — are being destroyed or seriously undermined by corporate influence. The contract servitude of fine-print contracts, signed or clicked on, is the basis of so many of the abuses and rip-offs that Americans are subjected to with such regularity. Add this modern peonage to the corporate campaign to obstruct the people’s full day in court and right of trial by jury guaranteed by our Constitution. The plutocrats have succeeded in gravely doing just that. Tight court budgets, the frequency of jury trials and the number of filed wrongful injury lawsuits keep going down to case levels well under five percent of what the needs for justice require.
“Some fundamental questions are: Will we as citizens use our Constitutional authority to reclaim and redirect the power we’ve too broadly delegated to elected officials? Will we hold these officials accountable through a reformed campaign finance system that serves the people over the plutocrats? Will we realize that a better society starts with just a few people in each electoral district and never requires more than one percent of the voters, organized and reflecting public opinion, to make the corporations our servants, not our masters?”
LikeLike
Susan Lee Schwartz Yes, thanks. I was disappointed by Diane’s recent revelations about Rachel Maddow and her sidestepping public education. The best that can be said of that is to say that she is staying in the fight by choosing her battles. Otherwise, she’d be gone. If that’s the case, then the best WE can hope for is a moment of clarity and the personal risk that goes along with speaking truth to power. Sigh . . . .
LikeLike
“The BASIS philosophy is that any child willing to work hard can succeed at a higher level.”
No, it shows that kids who are wiling and able to be obedient get rewarded by their slave masters. There are plenty of ways to work hard, it’s just that BASIS only recognizes “academics” as working hard (and only a thin slice of that). A kid who dedicated a year to nearly exclusively learning about ancient Egypt applied that knowledge in multiple fields and expressed that knowledge in multiple ways would not, by BASIS standards be “working hard” even though s/he was pursuing a passion with dedicated passion – something that serves much better in later life than making sure one’s required 3 hours of homework a night is done regardless of whatever else one needs or wants to do. “Working hard” in BASIS lingo simply means coming as close as humanly possible to working like a computer, and why do we need humans to do that, considering we have computers to do it?
LikeLike
I had 2 kids, and 4 grandkids and I taught for 40 years, 12 of them as a sub in Rockland county and I met thousands of kids, and got to know many as they went from k to 12.
I know what children want. So does any parent. They need motivation to do hard work!
The one thing that I know about teaching that succeeds is from what I know about the psychology of children…they learn when they are engaged, so, at the top of MY lesson plans was the MOTIVATION.
In the nineties, I competed with Sesame Street and Electric company to make learning interesting in my primary grade classroom. Thank goodness there are no screens to compete with me for their minds!
In my last tenure, I was tasked to ensure that every 13 year old kid IN MY CARE FOR TEN MONTHS, would leave knowing how writing is accomplished, and how to read– really grasp text, and enjoy reading. I filled the room, with books that seventh graders would find interesting, and we compared text to movies, and analyzed characters and plots, and wrote stories… and talked and, and talked and we listened to each other. It was fun for me, and for them.
For years my kids were at the top of every city exam. They loved learning with me, and I was, 4 times, nominated for WHO’S WHO AMONG AMERICA’S TEACHERS, by graduating high school seniors who said that I was the most memorable teacher.
What they remembered, and what my former students who find me on Facebook and Liked in, tell me, is that I made learning FUN!
I am not saying that I felt that I had to entertain them!
I made them work hard, and took no excuses for not meeting my clear criteria, but Harvard and the LRDC (Univ. of Pittsburgh who ran the Pew research on the standards( identified the REWARDS FOR WORKING — because it was the second PRINCIPLE OF LEARNING (ON WHICH THE RESEARCH WAS BASED.)
… research that disappeared despite the millions spent to ensure that it was AUTHENTIC.
It is hard to reach some kids, I admit. There were problems children, who needed special services to help them overcome real issues, but the SERVICES were there in NYC Public schools.
But, great teachers, talented human beings who ‘GET ‘ children, and who know how to ‘teach’ –> or RATHER HOW TO ENABLE AND FACILITATE LEARNING — have been hobbled or eliminated They are replaced with trained service employees, who regurgitate the mandates from the top-down corporate entities who have purchased the schools systems, and created a marketplace for their ‘stuff’.
The corporations have won!
https://www.opednews.com/articles/How-Big-Corporations-Game-by-Ralph-Nader-Corporations_Democracy_Democracy-Decay_Money-171006-611.html
LikeLike
As much as I find is utterly reprehensible that certain medium size cities have given the BASIS Charter school the franchise to be the “gifted and talented” school, at least they are relatively honest about what they do.
If you can’t make the grade, you are out. No one at BASIS is saying “we have the solution for failing public schools and just follow our practices and every at-risk child in a failing school can be a high achieving scholar”.
BASIS makes no bones about it — they aren’t interested in offering at-risk kids the solution to their failing school. They want to be the Bronx Science of Tucson except they will start with perhaps 100 students (randomly selected – as long as having your child pass 3 APs in middle school doesn’t scare you away) and brag about how well the 30 or 40 who are still there by senior year do. Or perhaps it is only 20. It really doesn’t matter because only the deserving ones remain.
At least we don’t have the disgusting spectacle of the BASIS founder selling a book cleaning to have found the secret to failing schools! At least the BASIS founder isn’t pretending to be in education for any reason other than to make a profit and teach any child who is profitable to teach.
BASIS has made a small foothold in NYC by teaching students whose parents can afford their tuition. But in NYC they have a real recruitment problem because if a student is high achieving, there are a myriad of free public schools that specialize in teaching high achieving students. In small cities in Arizona, BASIS not only was free, but they had little competition. In NYC, they have a lot of competition and there are generally openings for anyone who can pay the tuition. Despite their claims to having stellar academics, when compared to public schools doing the same thing, BASIS has trouble competing.
LikeLike
I worked for one of the BASIS private schools for a year as an administrator. The BASIS “curriculum,” their proprietary “secret sauce,” is nothing but a list of course requirements. The content covered in said courses is dictated by the College Board A.P. program and other standardized tests. Teachers are rewarded for “teaching to the test” through bonuses given. For example, A.P. teachers receive a monetary reward for each student in his or her class who receives a passing score on the A.P. test. Most of the instruction that I saw was college-lecture style. The only assessment or monitoring of student learning is tests such as the PISA, A.P., PSAT, and SAT. The school buildings themselves are designed for the expected student attrition such a program inevitably leads to. When our school opened, with students in 4th-11th grade, it was crammed to capacity. We were told our building capacity was 800. To maximize profits, Michael and Olga Block pushed admissions to over-enroll for year two (although I left for another job at the end of that first academic year, I was part of the recruitment process for the following year.). Although there was an admissions “process,” interviews (which I conducted) and an application, nearly all students who applied in the lower grades were accepted. In fact, the admissions director never even asked me for my interview notes. The goal was to fill to capacity.
The school only accepted a small number of students into the high school program that first year, 15-20 in grades 10 and 11. Since we knew the school would be judged based on college admissions and A.P. scores, the admissions requirements for the upper grades were more stringent. Yet if you looked at the enrollment in the lower grades (around 150 kids in grades 4-8), there was no way the building could accommodate all of the lower grades making it through to graduation. We were past max building capacity, even with the tiny upper school classes. This is what I mean by the attrition being “built-in”. We expected that the majority of middle school kids would leave before 9th grade. They had to, there was just nowhere to put them.
BASIS is all about marketing. I remember being somewhat embarrassed when meeting with a parent about an issue and the parent remarked , “you know, I didn’t mind when the director of admissions asked me and several other parents to post favorable reviews on Yelp, I know you’re a new school looking to build your reputation.” Yup, BASIS solicits parents and students to write favorable reviews. It’s all marketing and no content. The students who succeed at BASIS would succeed anywhere. Yet rather than celebrating these remarkable kids, BASIS takes credit for their talent and hard-work. There is nothing unique about BASIS or its academic program. The school takes hard-working kids and teachers and turns their success and talent into dollars for the Blocks and their investors.
LikeLike