Governor Sam Brownback of Kansas nearly bankrupted the State with his theory that cutting taxes would cause a huge economic boom. Taxes were cut but there was no boom. Meanwhile, the schools of Kansas were underfunded.
The state Supreme Court ordered the legislature to fix school funding. The legislature tinkered. Back and forth. Yesterday the Kansas Supreme Court ordered the legislature again to meet their constitutional obligation to fund the schools.
“The ruling also ordered a fairer distribution of state funding, to ensure that students in poor districts have the same educational opportunities as their peers in wealthier communities.
“The majority of justices supported giving the Legislature until June, but no more time than that, for a final fix on state funding of schools.
“That will give lawmakers, who will reconvene in January, a full regular session to try to come up with a school-finance law that meets court requirements, negating the need for a special session.
“The court is ordering that a new funding law be crafted before April 30 so there’s time for the justices to review it before the annual budget and the schools’ money runs out.
“Once legislation is enacted, the State will have to satisfactorily demonstrate to this court by June 30, 2018, that its proposed remedy brings the state’s education financing system into compliance with Article 6 of the Kansas Constitution regarding the violations identified, i.e., both adequacy and equity,” the court ruling said.
“After that date we will not allow ourselves to be placed in the position of being complicit actors in the continuing deprivation of a constitutionally adequate and equitable education owed to hundreds of thousands of Kansas school children.”
“Three of the seven justices – Lee Johnson, Eric Rosen and Dan Biles – wrote or joined in dissents saying they want the Legislature to have to move faster.
“I would direct the State to tell us no later than the end of this year precisely how the legislature intends to fix its years-long breach of the Kansas Constitution,” Johnson wrote.
“The case, called Gannon v. Kansas, has been going on since November of 2010.
“On Monday, the court specifically held that a school-finance law the Legislature passed earlier this year is unconstitutional.”
Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/news/local/education/article176605486.html#storylink=cpy

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
Thanks my Guru! You keep us fully informed. You are a wonder woman!
LikeLike
Thankful to have readers everywhere to inform all of us
Fortunately state courts continue, most of them, to care about justice and equity.
With Gorsuch on the Supreme Court, I fear much will be lost by those who are weakest
LikeLike
I gather that even Republican members of the Kansas Legislature have had their fill of Governor Brownback’s dismally failed policies. Brownback is of a type that includes, of course, Scott Walker of Wisconsin, Rick Scott of Florida, and so on, ad nauseum.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“ad nauseaum” feels so right in this context
LikeLike
Thanks, Ciedie–needless to say I thought it an appropriate locution under the circumstances….
LikeLiked by 1 person
At least the justices are going to hold the state accountable unlike New York. Cuomo has ignored the court, and there are no consequences.
LikeLike
There is no right to a publicly-financed education. And there is no right to having equitable funding for existing public schools. See Rodriguez v. San Antonio School District (1973)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1972/71-1332
LikeLike
What? Kansas is finally waking up? Too bad it didn’t happen sooner before the state fell off the cliff
LikeLike
I hope they don’t “fix the formula” as they did in ILL-Annoy. This done by taking money from special education, eliminating approx. 25 programs, factoring in money that isn’t there (we still have a flat tax in ILL-Annoy, & there is no new revenue) & then adding “tax scholarships” for private schools (a euphemism for vouchers) in order for it to pass.
I’m guessing that the Kansas G.A. will be looking at the ILL-Annoy “model.”
As in other cases, I would love to be proven wrong.
LikeLike