Politico reports that a key position at the U.S. Department of Education will go to one of the nation’s most outspoken opponents of public schools, Jim Blew. Blew has long experience at the charter-loving, union-hating Walton Family Foundation and served as president of Michelle Rhee’s public school-bashing Students First. The position he is slated to assume is the policymaking arm of the department. It is supposed to be a nonpartisan, expert role, judging the efficacy of Department initiatives. It might as well be abolished because we already know that school choice, charters, vouchers, union-bashing, and inexperienced teachers will be the policies of this administration.
“TRUMP TO NOMINATE JIM BLEW FOR ED SPOT: Jim Blew, director of the education advocacy group Student Success California, is Trump’s pick to become the Education Department’s assistant secretary of the Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. POLITICO reported he was the frontrunner in July. The administration announced late Thursday that the president plans to formally nominate him for the role. The announcement touted Blew’s experience as the former president of Students First, a national advocacy organization founded by former D.C. Public Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee. It also said that for more than a decade, he was a key adviser to the Walton family, serving as director of K-12 reform investments for the Walton Family Foundation.”

Projectile VOMIT!
LikeLike
Blew (not to be confused with Baloo) blows up public education.
LikeLike
Or, how to commit an inside job…
LikeLike
If anyone who voted for Trump still thinks his endless cesspool (that was once just a swamp) will ever be drained, then I have an invisible bridge to the moon to sell them, cash only.
LikeLike
Yes. Just when you think it cannot get worse, it does.
LikeLike
Before Trump moved to the White House, Washington was a partial swamp without malaria. Now DC is a totally flooded, malaria-ridden swamp thanks to Trump. He didn’t drain the partial swamp. He opened the gates and let the polluted waters in to drown the government.
LikeLike
That was the plan all along. We have leaders who detest government because that is the only power that protects the powerless from the powerful. We are in deep trouble.
LikeLike
I can add nothing to the above.
God help us all.
LikeLike
This president, and this secretary of Education, both support school choice and vouchers. Why is everyone so upset, that a person whose views are in line with the administration, has been appointed to this position?
LikeLike
Charles,
Why do you keep advising us to stop fighting?
We will fight Trump and DeVos ‘tip the last dog dies.
You would have advised Martin Luther King Jr. to give up.
You would have told Gandhi to quit.
We ain’t quitting.
LikeLike
Like!
LikeLike
I have never told anyone to “stop fighting”. Feel free to protest all you like, you have every right to do so. I will not stand in your way.
I am just trying to understand all of the surprise, that this President and this SecEd, are doing exactly what they set out to do.
I would never have told KIng/Gandhi to give up or quit. The time was right for the civil rights movement, segregation was obsolete.
WW2 signaled the end of empires, France and Britain were granting independence to their colonies, and the time was right for independence of India. Some historians claim that Gandhi may have even impeded and slowed the independence, I have no opinion one way or another.
LikeLike
Charles,
And we will do exactly what we intend to do: fight for students; fight to prevent damage to our public schools and our teachers; fight to prevent DeVos from doing to the nation what she did to Michigan.
Don’t forget that Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million. He was chosen by Putin.
Even had he won the popular vote, those of us who believe in decency, high-quality education, and a better education for ALL would still fight him. He is unfit to be president. His ideas about education were shaped to win the votes of Evangelicals.
One day, he will be gone and maybe the GOP may rediscover its brain, heart, and soul. At the moment, their hapless Tweeter-in -Chief has none.
LikeLike
I am a conservative, who is opposed to the electoral college system. Nevertheless, the popular vote is meaningless, until the constitution is amended.
It sounds like you are “drinking your own bathwater”. People who are opposed to school choice/vouchers, too often believe their own propaganda. I would like to see the NEA/AFT/AFSCME, just “man up”, and admit that they are really fighting for their union jobs, and the leadership is fighting for the union dues.
At least, most of the people who are supportive of school choice, and alternatives to the government-run publicly operated schools, are honest about their goals.
LikeLike
Charles,
In every state where there are vouchers, only 2-3 % apply. Not so popular after all.
LikeLike
Washington DC, is not a state. There are many more applicants than there are opportunity scholarships available.
I agree, that the popularity of school choice/vouchers vary from locale to locale. In Indiana, which has universal choice, the participation is about 3%.
Both supporters of school choice and opponents, should take heart from the results in Indiana. 97% of the families in the Hoosier state, are delighted with their local public school (else they are unable to find a non-public school that meets their needs). This reveals that the wide majority of public schools in Indiana, are satisfactory (or better)!
LikeLike
And if given the chance to vote, the people of InDiana would cancel the voucher program. By 97-3%.
LikeLike
Do you have any polling data, or other information, that suggests this? All of the surveys, that I have read, indicate that Hoosiers are delighted with the choice program.
https://www.edchoice.org/media/indiana-parent-survey-finds-hoosier-private-school-school-choice-parents-overwhelmingly-satisfied-nations-largest-voucher-program/
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/370833/surprise-indiana-parental-choice-increases-parental-satisfaction-jason-bedrick
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED560668
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305222282_Why_Parents_Choose_A_Survey_of_Private_School_and_School_Choice_Parents_in_Indiana
and on and on.
LikeLike
Yes, 3% are delighted.
The other 90% of public school parents might prefer to have better funded schools and abolish the voucher program ESP since research shows that kids don’t learn more in Indians voucher schools and mostly learn less.
LikeLike
Q And if given the chance to vote, the people of InDiana(sic) would cancel the voucher program. By 97-3%. END Q
Indiana does not have a referendum process (except for constitutional amendments) see
https://ballotpedia.org/Indiana_2016_ballot_measures
Do you have any polling data, that reflects your hypothesis? The school choice program in Indiana, has the highest per-capita participation in the nation.
Why would a state, with the highest school choice participation, vote to cancel the program which is so wildly popular? It seems antithetical to me.
Personally, I dislike referenda. They are a form of “mob rule”. Under referenda, 51% of the people can control the government. 51% of the people can legally urinate in the corn flakes of the other 49%.
LikeLike
Q Yes, 3% are delighted.
The other 90% of public school parents might prefer to have better funded schools and abolish the voucher program ESP since research shows that kids don’t learn more in Indians voucher schools and mostly learn less.
END Q
Again, present your data. Do you really think that if Indiana had a referendum, that the 90% would vote to cancel the most popular voucher program in the entire USA?
LikeLike
Why is it we never see someone who Is nominated for a national education position that has actually been standing in front of a classroom for a few years before moving up the administrative ladder? This is disheartening to say the least.
LikeLike
“War is too important to be left to the Generals”- Georges Clemenceau, statesman.
Education is too important to be left to the professional educators and edu-crats.
The education policies of this nation, are so important, that our nation needs outsiders, and people who not contaminated and indoctrinated by the public-school mentality.
LikeLike
I understand your philosophy, Charles. Medicine is too important to be left to doctors. Flying an airplane is too important to be left to pilots. Next time you have surgery, invite a friend with no medical training to do it. Next time you take a flopight, insist that the luggage handler fly the plane.
LikeLike
Your analogies are false and pejorative. We do not permit our Defense Department, to be run by the generals. We insist (properly) on civilian control. Our State department, which represents our nation to foreign governments, is not run by diplomats. (I am a former State Dept employee).
Hospitals are not always administered by doctors. Engineering firms are not always directed by engineers. Airlines are not always run by pilots.
Education policy is critical to our nation. I would even say, that it is a matter of national security, because our economy is dependent on the graduates of our nation’s schools.
We need to have our education policy directed by individuals, who are not contaminated by the one-size-fits-all government-run public school system. We need policy direction inputs from private industry, the military, engineering organizations, etc.
Fortunately, both Republican and Democratic administrations, have seen the importance of bringing individuals from outside the education establishment, into the education policy apparatus.
see
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/01/betsy-devoss-predecessors/515139/
LikeLike