Steve Nelson, veteran educator and board member of the Network for Public Education, warns that we must protect outrselves against lies and propaganda. Ken Burns’ brilliant series on the Vietnam War shows how we blundered into a horrific war and picked to the burden of defending the French colonial empire.
There are other lies and propaganda that surround us every day. One is the lie that our public schools must be “saved” by privatization. Not true.
He writes:
“The war on public education, like the war in Vietnam, is being prosecuted on the basis of propaganda. In the 1960’s it was the myth of the threat of communism toppling one nation after another like dominos. It wasn’t true and it certainly wasn’t implicit or explicit in the conflict between South and North Vietnam.
“Now, in the 21st century, the war on education is being prosecuted in the name of another set of myths: that public schools are failing – they are not; that school choice gives families more opportunity – it does not; that teachers unions serve only to protect incompetence – a vile, unsupportable lie; and that competition and free markets can deliver everything, including education, with greater quality and efficiency – a heroically grandiose and inaccurate assertion.
“The other striking facet of the wars that bookend my adult life is the way in which the least advantaged among us are used as fodder for the ambitions of those most privileged.
“America’s casualties in Vietnam were disproportionately skewed toward young men of color and relatively poor, rural white men. The draft was ostensibly color blind, but privilege finds it way through the law. As most folks know, deferments for education and other dodges were easily sought and obtained for those with privilege. The cases of George W. Bush and Donald Trump are particularly vivid examples. But if you were poor and black, the choices were jail or service, not Yale or the podiatrist’s office.
“At least in 1967 no one claimed that the Vietnam War was being waged on behalf of the black men and boys who crawled through the jungle. But now, in the 21st century, the war on public education is being waged on the disgusting false propaganda that suggests education reform as a way of improving life for poor folks, particularly girls and boys of color. That is a bald-faced lie too.
“Education reform, particularly in urban charters, is touted as the salvation for communities of color when, in fact, education reform is furthering the decimation of poor communities of color. Education is a $700 billion “market.” As in the 60’s, there is money to be made.”

Diane I am watching Burns’ series, and am enthralled with it, having lived through it (I was pregnant, my husband was drafted and wounded there, but luckily came home in one piece).
But I am waiting to see if Burns brings the focus around, even for a moment, to the politics, the money that was being made, and the huge “stake” than many corporations had in keeping the war going (Ike’s military industrial complex as manifestly real). There are experiences that form our very being and that, though we may be silent about it, we can never forget. I for one will never forget that experience, Nixon’s “secret” and his campaign promise. (The real secret was that he was a living ball of slime.)
On a related matter: Last night, Chris Hayes (MS-NBC) did a piece on the question: “WHY do Republicans still want to pass such a bill in the face of so many people and health institutions who openly and on-record oppose it?” . . . not to mention that they are willfully bypassing long-standing Congressional protocols to do so.
A brief summary of Haye’s narrative: The “clues” that come from several reputable sources suggest this: that a relatively few wealthy donors who fund Republican Congressional campaigns, for instance, the Koch brothers, Sheldon Adelson and fellow casino magnate Steve Wynn (<–spellings may be wrong here), have threatened (in one off-hand remark to a reporter at a Koch meeting in Dallas), to close their “Dallas piggy bank” to anyone who votes against the new bill. The reason? They hate “Obama”care, and want their tax-cut regardless of what it takes to get it.
And that is apparently why, at least in some part, unreasonableness reigns in Congress–the flood of money that is slated to come into Congressional campaigns in the next election (2018). As we all know here, the distortions, red herrings, and double-speaks are thick.
At the general level it seems like, presently, and especially right-now about health care, it’s a showdown between “The People” who are the constituents of Congress, and the few oligarchs among us who think “the government” and “the people” are the enemy. My take on it is, those who think that way in effect want to live in a “little Russia.” That is, they both eschew “globalism” AND live their lives outside of “national” responsibilities, while trying to control USA national politics from that “outside” (corporate boardrooms, gilded hotels, private jets, and yachts).
LikeLike
CBK: It has long puzzled me why billionaires want more money. Want tax cuts. They have more money than they can spend in five lifetimes. Why do they need more? Are they playing out the fantasy that whoever dies with the most toys wins?
LikeLike
I believe it is genetic and that some day a scientist will discover the greed gene (most likely on the X chromosome) which is dominant over all others.
LikeLike
Oops, y chromosone
LikeLike
But given people like Laurene Jobs and Betsy DeVos, maybe it is not sex linked
LikeLike
Diane writes: “Are they playing out the fantasy that whoever dies with the most toys wins?”
I have some speculations, but I’d like to see some interviewer ask that question of folks like Koch or Adelson. My guess is that, deep down, it’s existential–it doesn’t make rational sense, of course; but my guess is that they think “somehow” their wealth will keep them from actually dying?
But more proximately, I doubt that interviewer would get a straight answer; and we can assume from watching them that they are hardly the most self-reflective people who walk on this earth. The antidotes, however, I am quite sure, are these: a better understanding of how things really work for all concerned, and that, coupled with a strong dose of humility?
LikeLike
CBK,
I just finished reading Nancy MacLean’s “Democracy in Chains,” and it is a chilling read. Why do the Koch brothers and the DeVos family want more and more and more?
They are the “makers” and the rest of us are the “takers.” They deserve to be astonishingly rich. We don’t. That’s an oversimplification. Read the book.
LikeLike
dianeravitch Yes–and the author talks about “Democracy in Chains” on http://www.BookTV.org, if some cannot read the book.
LikeLike
Addendum to my prior note (which may end up below this one): There is the structural weakness, however, where capitalism and democracy are concerned, at least with the military-industrial complex, and by extension, the oligarchs among us.
That is, here’s the simple and circular movement of money:
FROM: Political need, i.e., war (sometimes legitimate?).
TO: Military-industrial complex (supplies, and depends on government sales)
TO: The stock market (depends on “success” of and constant supply of money
from corporations/military-industrial complex).
TO: Individual stock-holders (same as above).
TO: CHANGE FROM LEGITIMATE TO ILLEGITIMATE NEED
TO: Continued success of the military-industrial complex (to keep war going).
(for instance) buying uniforms, toilet paper, rifles, tanks, bombs etc.
TO: Economic stimulus and military presence (and prisons, for instance) in
particular Congressional districts. Vote for war.
TO: (Reluctantly) paying for funerals of those young people who die in war or
the medical expenses of those who are injured. (No profit there.)
What “reformers” are trying to do, in effect, is put “education” in that structure so that it continues to work, not for the children, but for them and the gods of the economy.
LikeLike
dianeravitch
This might help solve your puzzle. Nothing happens by nature or accident in economics.
When you change the rules of the game outcomes change.
The answer now becomes because they can without expending much cost or energy.
LikeLike
Joel, thanks for that link. Well worth a read.
LikeLike
Diane,
I’m thinking it doesn’t really matter why billionaires always want more, it was ever thus. More a matter of ordinary human behavior which, like other behavior harmful to the public welfare, needs to be addressed in the law.
There was a great opinion article in the NYT Sunday Review by Ganesh Sitaraman called “Our Constitution Wasn’t Built for This”– “this” being a society with economic inequality. “From the ancient Greeks to the American founders, statesmen and political philosophers were obsessed with the problem of economic inequality. Unequal societies were subject to constant strife — even revolution. The rich would tyrannize the poor, and the poor would revolt against the rich.”
The Romans, the English and other democracies built deterrence into the law by what Sitaraman calls “class-warfare constitutions,” including measures like plebe/lower-class representation to balance the influence of the aristocratic/ wealthy… But ours did not.
Sitaraman goes into various reasons– incl: they debated it, but there wasn’t enough time to agree on the details! Also ‘American exceptionalism’, part of which was that early sense that our vast western frontier provided enough room for things to settle out equitably… Isenberg’s “White Trash” details how Franklin & other early actors pictured the seemingly-endless frontier as the perfect breeding-ground for an infinite number of families eking out a middling-range primarily-agrarian living, gradually subsuming indentured servants & slaves).
LikeLike
After a relatively short period of accepting reality, the official Vietnam war propaganda is almost back to full strength, coming not just from right-wing Hawks, but from the likes of Barack Obama, who certainly understands what he is doing/saying.
https://www.commondreams.org/views/2017/09/21/reclaiming-truth-about-vietnam
Some myths die hard — and some, like the Phoenix, do die, but keep rising from the ashes.
LikeLike
I’d certainly consider the Obomber as a right wing Hawk.
LikeLike
You are probably right.
It should not be surprising at all.
LikeLike
If this wasn’t so sad it would be funny. After spending millions and millions on dollars on these report cards, GOP lawmakers want to ditch them:
“Brenner is a non-voting member of the state board of education along with Senate Education Committee chair Peggy Lehner of Kettering. Lehner says she feels improvements could be made, but she says the letter grades aren’t the real problem with the report cards.
“If you look deep down at them, you’re going to find that there’s an increase in poverty in those school districts. And it’s being reflected in some of those scores.”
It’s all they ever do- they change the measuring system. This one is 2 years old. They’re changing it again.
http://statenews.org/post/lawmakers-mulling-possible-change-state-school-report-cards
LikeLike
“. . . they change the measuring system. . .”
No, there is no “measuring system” to change. There are subjective analysis schemes that they portray as “Objective measuring systems” but that is a false portrayal.
We must stop repeating their lies and falsehoods! The edudeformers and privateers control the dialogue when we fumble the language right back to them by repeating their lies.
LikeLike
The fact that they keep changing the way they claim to be measuring is actually an indication that their methods are vacuous.
Physicists don’t regularly change the fundamental way they represent physical qualities like weight and speed.
They might come up with new instruments to do the measuring, but the measurements themselves are still in the same fundamental units (eg, pounds, miles per hour, etc)
LikeLiked by 1 person
An authoritarian regime, and that’s so-called education reform, is always arbitrarily revising its demands, so that people are always out of compliance and subject to discipline and sanction. Kafka captured it perfectly in “The Trial.”
As every fascist interrogator who has ever lived knows, “Everybody is guilty of something,” and it’s just a matter of time until they find out what it is…
LikeLiked by 1 person
SDP & MFiorello, yes, but… There’s also the inherent problem in “measuring” education. Measurement is a term that is appropriate to weight & speed, not so much to mental growth, learning, & similar concepts. Brain science is in its infancy, which makes the idea of measuring education laughable. And I suspect that as we come closer to measuring changes in the brain via neuroscience, imaging, etc., the sought-for confirmation of parallel ed-achievement/ results will dance away just as fast. Kind of like the way all our understanding of evolution & physics have brought us around to a ‘big-bang theory’ echoing the Bible– w/ increasing physical evidence of an endlessly expanding & contracting universe, & us still no the wiser as to how life started 😀😀.
Asking the wrong questions…
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s extremely hard and painful to watch Ken Burns’s series on the Vietnam War (plus the wars in Cambodia and Laos). This country was torn asunder by these horrific wars of choice that should have never happened. Millions died in those 3 Asian countries as a result of our arrogance, pride and hubris. We dropped more bombs on those 3 countries than we did during WWII and they had done nothing to our country. The truly tragic part is that we learned nothing from the tragedy of Vietnam. We remain as arrogant and prideful as ever, ready to attack, invade and occupy some third world country at the drop of a hat. These wars were fought, ostensibly, to stop the spread of communism/socialism/Marxism-Leninism, etc.
LikeLike
Joe
A not so glowing review of the Film .
“Whatever the reason, the stories keep alive the idea that the war could have been won if home front support had not wavered—and that wars like it can be won in the future if We the People stay loyal to the mission.”
http://www.alternet.org/burns-wrong-lessons
LikeLike
I’m not a big fan of Ken Burns – though the arrival footage was wonderful, his series on jazz was Tory history as told by Wynton Marsalis – and haven’t yet seen this Vietnam series, but one news site I read reported that the film mentions the US “responding” to North Vietnamese “aggression” in the Gulf of Tonkin.
I haven’t seen the film, but if that’s true, then we’re off into PropagandaWorld, since in effect there was no Tonkin Gulf incident; it was a fabrication intended to give a pretext for increased US involvement in Southeast Asia, on par with Colin Powell’s aluminum tube fantasies at the UN in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
LikeLike
Staying loyal to omission?
Wasn’t that Johnson and McNamara’s strategy for winning the war?
LikeLike
Lively comment thread at that article. I think “we” learned a lot from VN: shrinking pie of automation/ globalism perfect oppty to bring back pre-Depression free-for-all capitalist grab for the big pieces; offer the hungry-for-jobs the oppty to bargain their lives as volunteer fodder to the maw of endless war-industry; use the corp-bought-out media to replace DRather-style VN-era reporting w/sappy troop-hero deflection. They know better now to avoid universal draft, opens too many eyes too fast.
LikeLike
Cross posted the article itself at https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Why-Are-Betsy-DeVos-and-Bi-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Betsy-Devos_Billionaires_Choice_Education-170923-60.html
LikeLike