The U.S. government spends $1 million a month to protect Betsy DeVos. Her brother has a private army. We may safely assume that she will never be threatened with bodily harm.
Steven Singer feels certain that she has never had any contact with rape victims. Maybe she met a few in an official capacity, but he meets them with frequency in his classroom. They are just kids. They are afraid.
He is furious that she wants the word of the victim to have equal weight with the word of the accused. There is a problem. Rape has no witnesses, as a rule.
DeVos thinks that accused should have to face the accuser.
She and her deputy Candace Jackson feel that men accused of rape have gotten a raw deal.
He writes:
False accusations do happen, but they are much less frequent than sexual violence. Only between two and ten percent of rape allegations are untrue, according to the National Sexual Violence Resource Center.
Moreover, the same report found that 63 percent of sexual assaults are never even reported to police. Survivors of this heinous crime rarely come forward because of shame, fear and embarrassment.
That’s something I saw first-hand from my students.
They weren’t bragging about an experience they’d lived through. They wanted more than anything to forget it, to ignore what had happened, to get on with their lives. But they just couldn’t. They felt so betrayed, so vulnerable, so guilty, so frightened.
DeVos’ new policy will do nothing to change that. If anything, it will only embolden would-be attackers to attempt more assault – a crime that already affects nearly a quarter of college women.
According to a National Institute of Justice report, 20 percent of young women will become the victim of a “completed or attempted sexual assault” while in college. And more than 6 percent of men will also be assaulted.
We shouldn’t be making it harder for people who have been brutalized to seek justice. The accused should have due process, but that’s what an investigation is. In the rare instance of false allegations, those unduly impugned should be exonerated.
Despite what she says, DeVos’ recent actions have nothing to do with that. Before passing down her decision, she met with “Men’s Rights” groups like the National Coalition for Men – organizations that I can honestly say, as a red blooded American male, certainly don’t speak for me.
This is politics, not any concern for justice. It’s no accident that DeVos serves at the pleasure of a President who was caught on a hot microphone bragging about engaging in sexual assault. It’s no accident that his base includes white supremacists. It’s no accident that his party continually stomps on women’s rights.
There is a culture of binge drinking and sexual assault on many campuses. Read John Hechinger’s True Gentlemen if you doubt it. It is a factual account of fraternity life today.
Betsy DeVos should read it. So should Candace Jackson.

DITZ!
LikeLike
“Talivangelists”
Talivangelists think
That women are to serve
So really wouldn’t blink
If women weren’t heard
LikeLike
These numbers sound accurate to me. They tally well with what I have learned, over the course of a long life, from the women I’ve become close enough to for them to share with me their stories. I long ago stopped being shocked, though I have never stopped being dismayed, when a female friend tells me of the horror she experienced but did not report.
In one of her books (The Beauty Myth?), Naomi Wolfe tells of a study that was done with undergraduate “men.” They were asked something like, “If you could have sex with a beautiful but unwilling young woman, and no one would ever know about it, would you?” A third of them said yes, though the first part of sentence IS A DEFINITION OF RAPE. My sense is that things are changing, slowly, for the better–that the young men I am meeting these days are more aware. I hope that that is so.
The press bashes the Internet all the time–doing so makes for sensational stories–but one wonderful thing that’s happening these days is that when someone is on a thread and says something sickeningly racist or sexist or homophobic or ageist, people pile on and bury the oaf. Social sanction is an extraordinarily strong force, and the most important kind of learning is unlearning.
LikeLike
One of the readers on this blog wrote that her college-student daughter said she knew only five other women who had not been victims of rape on campus
LikeLike
Aie yie yie. Good day. Only five people in the neighborhood contracted colon cancer.
LikeLike
DeVos and her “civil rights” person are not the whole story. Steve Miller gained fame for his defense of the Duke Lacrosse players in a long, complicated case at the intersection of race and rape.
HOW STEPHEN MILLER RODE WHITE RAGE FROM DUKE’S CAMPUS TO TRUMP’S WEST WING
At the young age of 31, Stephen Miller has his own office in the West Wing and the President’s ear. He also has held a shocking worldview since he was a teenager. From his writings on the 2006 Duke lacrosse-team rape scandal, which gave the then–college junior national media exposure, to an alleged association with a white-nationalist advocate, William D. Cohan dives deep into Miller’s tumultuous past. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/05/stephen-miller-duke-donald-trump
LikeLike
What about this law that Republicans are pushing? Isn’t there anything that is sacred anymore? Life for the disabled is hard enough to just survive. Now comes this thoughtless law in which disabled people must prove that their civil rights have been violated before a business has to make their place accessible.
…………..
Republicans are trying to push a change in favor of those businesses, putting the onus on their would-be customers [the disabled] to force them to comply with the law.
H.R. 620 would completely change the way in which a business is required to comply with the ADA. Instead of requiring that a business comply proactively, the bill would place the burden on the individual who is being denied access. This bill proposes that after an individual with a disability is denied access she must first notify the business owner, with exacting specificity, that her civil rights were violated, and then wait for six months to see if the business will make “substantial progress” toward access, before going to a court to order compliance.
Business owners can spend years out of compliance and face no penalty even after they receive notice, so long as the owners claim “substantial progress.” By allowing a business an endless amount of time to become compliant with the ADA’s reasonable requirements,
H.R. 620 removes any incentive for a business to proactively ensure that people with disabilities have access. Instead, the bill encourages businesses to just wait until an individual’s civil rights are violated before making any changes.
LikeLike
She as well as the rest of #45 cabinet are entitled, golden spoon in the mouth, POS, AH’s wall to wall; they haven’t got a clue and never will.
LikeLike
Though I have little respect for corporate Democrats (I am now a registered Independent after decades as a Democrat), I must ask this: why are so many Republican politicians so cruel and heartless? Why do they stand up for the oppressors and the rapists and the privatizers whose only principle is profits?
LikeLike
To answer your two questions with one answer: Because they monetarily benefit from doing so.
LikeLike
Son Zorba told me years ago, when he was in high school, “I could never be a Republican, Mom. They’re so mean.”
True then, true now.
LikeLike
Dale Watson wrote a song along this line called “Mamas Don’t Your Cowboys Grow Up to be Babies.”
LikeLike
LOL!
LikeLike
A moving op-ed, today, from actor Amber Tamblyn:
LikeLike
Yet she supports Hillary Clinton who famously smeared and shamed every one of her husband’s accusers. Never been quite sure how Hillary retained her “feminist” titles after that.
LikeLike
She smeared the accusers? I don’t remember that. It seems we have now gotten beyond the “boys will be boys” attitude that prevailed in the days of John F. Kennedy. No Vegas hotel penthouse parties with the Rat Pack and for sitting presidents these days. That’s progress. On another front, not so much. During the whole Lewinsky thing, I felt bad for young Chelsea. One can pursue justice without further violating the innocent collateral victims to whom everyone else–journalists and pundits, for example–has duties of respect and care.
LikeLike
And how many of us were lucky enough to fight our way out of a situation?
LikeLike
In a young life complicated by very few relationships with young women when I was that age, I still managed to get to know two people who had narrowly escaped forced sex. These are two of an extremely small pool who just happened to feel comfortable enough with me to share their harrowing tales. I am not even including in that sample those women who had at one time or another felt threatened or had been followed.
LikeLike
Obama’s rules on campus sexual harrassment/ assault were a good start, but they probably need improvement. That doesn’t mean the gov should back off the ‘preponderance of evidence’ rule, which is the normal std for OCR investigations. WaPo has a good article on that:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-devoss-position-on-campus-sexual-assault-is-flawed/2017/09/13/3e2b34a0-97d2-11e7-82e4-f1076f6d6152_story.html?utm_term=.faa2027cf1f4
which concludes, “Let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Our goal should be to make our educational institutions places where students are equally treated and safe to learn. The guidance provided by the Dear Colleague Letter could be improved. Even more important is assisting schools in complying with the letter — both by affording victims of sexual assault adequate protection and by making certain that students accused of assaults have fair and equal procedural rights. The Education Department should assume its responsibility to counsel schools on achieving fair processes, not abandon the project of purging our campuses of the scourge of sexual violence.”
Another WaPo article demonstrates that gov rules probably need expansion on guidance/ recommended procedures:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/campus-sexual-assault-policies-are-unfair-to-the-accused-this-case-shows-how/2017/08/16/2ab6781e-7de0-11e7-a669-b400c5c7e1cc_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.85cef6a25391
This article examines perhaps the only case where the details of the campus investigation are available– because the accused [who was ‘convicted’ and expelled] sued Amherst & won a settlement. (A friend of the accuser who knew the rape claim was false had provided the accused w/accuser’s texts making that clear– admin didn’t allow them into evidence.) In comment threads at both articles, a few readers cite similar examples from their son’s or college friend’s experience.
The Amherst case reveals an insufficient investigation of the claim, & I don’t see much in the 2011 Dear Colleague letter to prevent that. It illustrates the difficulty here: campus committees are not lawyers/ police investigators. We can say, that’s OK because the remedy is not jail, it’s just expulsion. But the 2011 rules say it’s OK for the college to report results to “anyone”. VA & NYS passed laws in 2015 requiring colleges to note misconduct violations on the transcripts of students found to have committed sexual assaults [my emphasis].
LikeLike