Susan Ochshorn is an expert on early childhood education. She runs an organization called ECE Policy Works. She has been urging the New York Regents to throw out the Common Core standards for young children and replace them with developmentally appropriate standards. They ignored her advice.
We are violating everything that is known, which is considerable, about how children develop and learn best. We are stealing their childhood, robbing them of play, the primary engine of human development.
We have empirical evidence that kindergarten has become the new first grade, and preschool the new kindergarten. Across the country, and in New York, we have relegated play to an hour a day or less for five-year-olds, and a growing number of four-year-olds. One three-year-old I know recently brought home work sheets from her early childhood program.
Children are being assessed at younger and younger ages. We’re condemning them to the tread mill before they can even lace up their running shoes.
This is decidedly not how young children thrive. They learn through play, exploration, inquiry, and movement. It’s absurd to expect them to sit quietly, to passively receive information and regurgitate it back. We talk endlessly about producing critical thinkers, innovators, but we’re eliminating the kind of teaching and learning that nurtures them.
With New York’s Pre-K through 2nd grade standards, early childhood teachers are under massive pressure to get children to meet the benchmarks. Growing numbers are convinced that they’re committing malpractice, that they’re actually doing harm. Many have used the term child abuse.
In measuring young children by these standards, we deny their uniqueness, ignoring their strengths and vulnerabilities. We deny their human right to a rich, joyful educational experience.
New York policymakers are deluded in thinking that their efforts can close achievement gaps. Nor will they move us closer to eradicating inequity and inequality. Socioeconomic status has been proven to be one of the most significant factors in academic achievement. Of the 4.6 million children living in New York, a staggering 42 percent live in low-income families. Eleven percent of children under the age of six live in extreme poverty, where they’re severely deprived of basic human needs.
Toxic stress is rampant among these children, their cortisol levels soaring. This powerful neurophysiological process, akin to a 24/7 adrenaline rush, affects, among other things, the ability to focus and plan—executive functions that are critical to school readiness and academic performance. By preserving the Common Core—the attempt to rebrand has not changed its essence—we are condemning children to failure at a very early age, and turning them off to school.
Chancellor Betty Rosa and her colleagues on the Board of Regents have been given an opportunity to act in the best interests of the child. And they’ve squandered it.
Their moral compass is terribly out of whack.
It’s not just in New York. It’s everywhere. States can say they dumped the Common Bore, but all they did is give it a different name and the parents believe the lies every single time.
Exactly. And it’s not just little kids. The ripple effects go all the way up through high school. Even so-called “experts” who believe in homework say that kids should do no more than 10 minutes per night per grade, yet my 3rd grader’s homework policy explicitly states that homework can be expected to take 45 minutes per night, not including 20 minutes of reading, 10 minutes of math facts and project work as assigned. And I don’t know how my high schooler breathes, not to mention she’s going to need chiropractic services for her Christmas gift – her backpack weighs almost as much as she does (I thought computer “learning” was supposed to fix that problem?). And in both cases, it’s pure Common Chore content-free “skills” work, even if it’s not called Common Core.
Yes. Over and over and over the public remains passive to the insanity of promoting the same destructive game under new terminology.
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education and commented:
This paragraph rings so true:
We have empirical evidence that kindergarten has become the new first grade, and preschool the new kindergarten. Across the country, and in New York, we have relegated play to an hour a day or less for five-year-olds, and a growing number of four-year-olds. One three-year-old I know recently brought home work sheets from her early childhood program.
The reformists are so hell-bent on testing these kids that the damage they are doing doesn’t matter to them….only making money.
I posted Susan’s article yesterday, but reposting today. I am glad to see our education hero, Diane Ravitch, thought it as important as I did. I am saddened at the NYS Regents not realizing this almost a decade ago. These ideas are nothing new. They are the ideals of teachers who have gone before us and have led the way. Wake up Commissioner Elia, BOR, and administrators all over the country. Learn from the past, so as not to destroy the future.
Parents need to understand the negative consequences of developmentally inappropriate testing, and they need to vehemently oppose harmful testing in young children. There is no academic rationale for early testing; this is political. The Board of Regents should know better and act responsibly. All the high stakes testing in the world will not change outcomes for poor children. Testing is not a program. Schools with supportive, stable, caring adults with developmentally appropriate curricula and wrap around services to support poor families stand the best chance of positively impacting students. Shame on the Regents for yielding to political pressure!
The deformers moral compass is non existence. Money and meanness are their gods. How they sleep at night is beyond me.
That line caught my attention also, Yvonne.
“Their moral compass is terribly out of whack.”
No, it’s not out of whack it’s pointing right to the money source. For that is where their “morals” emanate.
Diane “Under the bus** is becoming a pretty nice place to hang out.
I dunno, it’s awfully crowded down here. Some fine company though.
dienne77 Yes “fine company.” And kids can play under there without being bothered by testing, and by zealots with totalitarian ambitions.
it is getting crowded under the bus.
If the oligarchs aren’t stopped, eventually more than 90-percent of the people will be under that rolling bus and the 9 percent that works for the 1-percent will be driving the bus.
Lloyd Lofthouse: Notes From Under the Bus:
What we need is a new Solon. That is, we need a person with totalitarian ambitions, but for the right reasons, and one who is willing to give up power at the appropriate time.
Trusting someone with totalitarian ambitions that they would step down at the “right time” would be a very risky gamble for the rest of us.
Who decides what the “right time” is?
Lloyd Lofthouse We’ll have to ask Solon. Uhhhh, well, he lived before Jesus and Socrates. Oh, well. But he DID step down when the time was right. Sigh . . . .
One man in more than 2,000 years. Sounds like a long shot to me.
Lloyd Lofthouse You only need on good person to prove the possibility. Actually, history is littered with them. Some people really don’t care about money and power, except in very practical matters or when your own freedoms are at stake. But really–do you have another suggestion?
My suggestion would also be a longshot because it would depend on a majority of the people voting with knowledge and logic, so the deplorable that voted Trump it couldn’t win another election. In fact, I’d like to see the GOP lose both Houses of Congress in 2018, but that is up to the voters. Like I said, the odds are against my idea too.
They don’t have a moral compass, and ignorance is not an excuse.
I would be interested to read more about the cortisol level she mentions. Have there been studies of poverty and its relation to chemical makeup of the body?
“It is well known that individuals from more advantaged social classes enjoy better mental and physical health than do individuals within lower classes. Various mechanisms have been evoked to explain the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and health. One mechanism that has received particular attention in recent years is stress.
It has been shown that individuals lower in SES report greater exposure to stressful life events and a greater impact of these events on their life than individuals higher in SES. In order to measure whether the development of the relationship between SES and mental health is sustained by exposure to high levels of glucocorticoids, we measured morning salivary cortisol levels as well as cognitive function (memory, attention, and language) in 307 children (from 6 to 16 years of age) from low versus high SES in the Montreal area in Canada. The results revealed that low SES children from 6 to 10 years old present significantly higher salivary cortisol levels when compared to children from high SES.
This difference disappears at the time of school transition, and no SES differences are observed in salivary cortisol levels during high school.
However, children from low and high SES do not differ with regard to memory or to attentional and linguistic functions.
Also, mothers of low SES children reported higher feelings of depression and more unhealthy behaviors, while mothers of high SES children reported higher stress related to work or family transitions.
Altogether, these results show that low SES in young children is related to increased cortisol secretion, although the impact of SES on cortisol secretion is absent after transition to high school. These data are interpreted within the context of the equalization process of class patterning. Four social explanatory factors are suggested to explain the disappearance of SES differences in basal cortisol levels after school transition, taking into account the influence of family environment on the child’s secretion of stress hormones.”
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/development-and-psychopathology/article/can-poverty-get-under-your-skin-basal-cortisol-levels-and-cognitive-function-in-children-from-low-and-high-socioeconomic-status/44990AC6E1E448F8414FD171FE25CA5D
And higher Cortisol levels go hand in hand with PTSD, an illness that is caused by stress. Combat vets aren’t the only victims of stress that come down with PTSD.
“Cortisol, a stress hormone, is a key player in the subtle hormonal changes that have come to be associated with PTSD, and Dr. Rachel Yehuda, a neuroscientist and the director of the traumatic stress studies division at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, has played a major role in advancing our scientific understanding of the role of cortisol in PTSD.”
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-aftermath-trauma/201606/cortisol-and-ptsd-part-1
This helps explain what a Stanford study discovered.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2013/january/test-scores-ranking-011513.html
Conclusion: teachers that work with low SES children are working with children that come to them with higher ratios of PTSD do to the stress caused by poverty.
What are the symptoms of PTSD?
Symptoms of PTSD may disrupt your life and make it hard to continue with your daily activities. You may find it hard just to get through the day.
There are four types of PTSD symptoms: …
#3. Negative changes in beliefs and feelings
The way you think about yourself and others changes because of the trauma. This symptom has many aspects, including the following:
Feeling keyed up (also called hyperarousal)
You may be jittery, or always alert and on the lookout for danger. You might suddenly become angry or irritable. This is known as hyperarousal. For example:
https://www.ptsd.va.gov/public/ptsd-overview/basics/symptoms_of_ptsd.asp
Thanks Lloyd. I call that service.
This is spot on! Thank you for fighting for our youngest most precious citizens! Why can’t we just allow them to have a safe, healthy learning environment where their educators can nurture and engage them in play and developmentally appropriately practices. These simple foundations will give them more success than funneling them through a conveyor belt of curriculum developed by those whom don’t know the true meanings and necessity of childhood!