Steve Nelson recently retired as headmaster of the Calhoun School, a progressive independent school in Manhattan. He joined the board of the Network for Public Education, to lend his aid to our fight for better public education for all.
Today, he read an article in the New York Times by a charter school teacher, arguing that charter teachers need not be certified. His argument boils down to this: charter teachers do not need certification like public school teachers. Charter teachers are “gtreat” just because they are.
This is Steve Nelson’s response:
“The New York Times is at it again. Today they printed an Op-Ed by Willy Gould, a teacher at Democracy Prep in NYC.
“Willy waxes whiny about having to go through NYS certification, a process he found a great burden. His piece, as you might expect, ultimately argued for charter self-certification. Willy is hardly an innocent victim of bureaucracy. I suspect he is a very willing propagandist, in that his life partner is a director of recruitment for Teach for America.
“Perhaps the NYS certification process is arcane, but charters self-certifying teachers is like having drunk Uncle Fred certify himself as a heart surgeon.
“The “training” provided in most charter schools, most particularly places like Democracy Prep, prepares “teachers” to do unconscionable things to children. They “teach” by call and response. Their disciplinary practices are abusive. I have written about this at length in my book and have documentation directly from a former Democracy Prep teacher, whose heart was broken by their policies and practices.
“Look to Success Academies for another example. I’ve visited and found the pedagogy rote and formulaic. They too use canned gestures and phrases. They too abuse children, as has been well exposed. They are training children, not educating them.
“These charters want to “self-certify” so that they can drill their teachers in these methods, which constitute educational malpractice. They also believe that 2 ½ weeks of training ought to be sufficient, given the rote practices and manuals involved in this kind of teaching. I would be remiss if I failed to note that these young teachers are cheap and easily replaceable, just like all the other cogs in the charter machine: Industrial education with a 21st century technological patina.
“They are hell-bent on the destruction of public education and the creation of an unaccountable patchwork of militaristic training academies, many run for excessive profit.
“I wish the Times would expose this threat to our democratic republic, rather than print propaganda like this.”

Lowering entry requirements for an eligible group of workers is a really time-tested way to bring down wages. There’s also something called a “union premium”. That’s a situation where if there’s a group of unionized workers and a group of non-unionized workers the unionized workers create a “floor” for wages that benefits the whole group.
Charter teachers benefit from an unionized environment because charter schools have to compete with public schools for employees. This will end that. Their wages will drop and there will be less turnover because the charter teachers won’t be able to apply to public schools, thereby making it impossible for them to move between systems.
This is a VERY pro-employer policy. The big winners in this are the charter operators. It won’t benefit existing charter teachers and it won’t benefit students- it’s for the employer. It gets rid of the union premium for wages and it reduces the ability of teachers to leave a charter school and go to a public school. They’ll end up with two tiers, one lower than the other.
So many of ed reforms “empowerment” strategies for teachers are really classic mechanisms to lower wages.
LikeLike
It’s also one more step away from public oversight and regulation of what are publicly-paid employees.
Charter teachers may not consider themselves public employees, but they are. 100% of their compensation comes from the public. The public will have no process and no transparency on whether they’re qualified to receive that pay.
LikeLike
Whoa, there was a lot of horse hockey in that NYTimes article. “As charter schools grow in …popularity”? Wrong! Charter scams are losing popularity by the boatload. And if this teacher from Massachusetts is upset because his credentials didn’t transfer over to New York, wouldn’t the obvious solution be to reform (sorry) the transfer system instead of getting rid of credentials altogether?! Duh! What a thoughtless essay proposing regression.
LikeLike
Horse hockey in the NYT? Say it ain’t so.
LikeLike
I wish Nelson and others would stop using “rote” as a pejorative. It has its place. I’m studying Italian now and I can’t think of a better way to learn the numbers than by rote. What is rote but firmly implanting something in long-term memory through intensive study? What many ed-school brainwashed educators today fail to understand that all the higher-order stuff they extol (including reading comprehension) depends on elemental knowledge firmly embedded in long-term memory. Nelson, Powell-Jobs and other thought-leaders talk as if all that foundation building work can be dispensed with and kids should sashay straight from kindergarten to variety-show production and designing scientific experiments. Kids, especially lower-class kids who don’t have didactic parents, are ill-served by this ignorant doctrine. Such kids could do far worse than to imbibe a feast of essential knowledge –by rote or otherwise –in elementary school. We forget the inescapable order of operations in mental development.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some objectives lend themselves to rote learning certainly. Knowledge is foundational. However, if rote learning is the end goal, students will not be able to make the transition to bigger ideas and higher order thinking. A skillful teacher knows how to get students master material, and use the information beyond the rote level. I doubt many of the four to six week TFA clones are able to do this. Then, some rote learning is more like training rather than real learning that can be applied in a broader sense.
LikeLike
“…I can’t think of a better way to learn the numbers than by rote.”
How about by actually using them (and all other words for that matter), the same way you did when you learned English? Rote is a horrible way to learn a language (and most other things for that matter).
LikeLike
That’s not my experience with studying Spanish, German, French and Greek, times tables, and many other things.
LikeLike
…or memorizing poems. I also use rote memorization to learn the names of my 200 new students each year. When I get class lists, I handwrite each name on a seating chart to focus my attention on each name (most teachers now use automated computerized seating chart programs). Then I quiz myself of kids’ names by walking around the classroom and trying to say each name. As a result I learn kids’ names really fast. Some of my colleagues still don’t know some of their students’ names a month or more into school.
LikeLike
Good GAWD! Maybe these people should certify rescue workers. But wait! There are OSHA requirements.
LikeLike
Just think… it will be so much easier to retain their teaching staff if their teachers are not certified to teach in the public school system. So many young teachers only stay in the charter school industry until they can find a professional job in a public schools.
LikeLike
But if they are certified, their mobility is limited. They are not qualified to teach in public schools. They are captured by the charter industry.
LikeLike
I’ve talked with dozens of former charter teachers now teaching in LAUSD. These are folks who started their careers in charters because there were no jobs in LAUSD, but then jumped over as soon as LAUSD contacted them.
They were/are unanimous in their condemnation of their former schools treatment of them and their students.
“It was Hell.”
“You have no idea how fortunate you are to have a union, and all that comes with that.”
“It was like being in an abusive marriage or relationship. You were controlled at all times, and you were NEVER good enough.”
Indeed, talking to them reminded me of talking to people who, back in the 1970’s and 1980’s, escaped from the Soviet Union, or one of the Soviet satellite states in the Eastern Block.
Charter teachers in non-union charters talk to LAUSD teachers, and also to teachers in unionized charters.
The Alliance for College-Ready Schools teachers have been trying to unionize, but the California Charter School Association raised $2.7 million in dark money to commence the most vicoius union-suppression campaign in history. One teacher said it was “like something out of the 1800’s.”
The Alliance folks like Dan Katzir then claim, “The teachers don’t want a union.” Right, it just took that $2.7 million of dark money to convince them, I suppose.
LikeLike