Mike Klonsky describes Governor Rauner’s rationale for vetoing aid to Chicago public schools.
“Gov. Rauner has vetoed SB1, the school funding bill, thereby continuing to deprive the state’s neediest districts of millions of dollars and threatening the opening of schools in the fall.
“Rauner claims that the bill takes money away from wealthier white districts in order to “bail out” needier, mainly black and Latino districts like Chicago. He also claims, the bill, “includes a bailout of Chicago’s broken teacher pension system.”
“Both claims are false, says the BGA.
“In fact, under the new funding formula no school district gets less state money, but many low-income districts get more. With low-income students accounting for 80.2% of its enrollment, CPS is among the latter group.
“The biggest problem with the bill as I see it, is that it fails to identify new sources of revenue, ie. a graduated income tax, making the wealthiest pay their fair share. But nevertheless, the bill, which passed both houses in Springfield needs to be signed, and fast.
“Rauner’s been using the big-lie technique to play off white students against students of color, urban schools against downstate and suburban schools and everyone against teachers, their unions, and retirees.
“But let’s say, for the sake of argument, that his “bail out” claims are correct. What’s wrong with bailing out public schools or other public institutions in distress? If IL paid its fair share of education dollars, a bail out wouldn’t be necessary. IL continues to rank near the bottom when it comes to school funding.
“The state, by constitutional mandate, has the primary responsibility for funding its public schools but has never come close to covering even 50% of the cost. In recent years, the state’s contribution has dipped below 30%, forcing local school districts to raise their property tax levy or cut programs.”
Another example of a state that has decided to starve its public school and evade its state constitutional responsibility.

How will Arne profit off this?
LikeLike
A lot! A lot!
LikeLike
Sickening! Making $$$$$$ off kids’ backs. And this IS “S–tcago” politics, folks. No shame whatsoever.
LikeLike
There is another glitch to this madness. The state legislature now has to vote to accept the line item veto or vote to over ride the veto. If the legislature fails to do either one, the school districts in the entire state gets nothing. Nada.
LikeLike
Did anyone expect any different outcome? If so I’ve got some great ocean front white sand beach property. . . .!
LikeLike
EdNext Poll: Support for Charter Schools Plummets – this page cannot be displayed. Can you please repost?
Thank you.
LikeLike
I took it down because it is embargoed until August 15. I will repost then.
LikeLike
I agree they shouldn’t hold school money hostage but why should the rest of the state bail out Chicago’s pension mess? I’m in TRS, the pension the rest of the teachers in the state are in, and our pension is a mess on it’s own but we all banded together and make our own deals with the state. Chicago was above all that and make their own deals with the city, why should the state bail them own now that they are in a mess? It would be like social security suddenly bailing all the teachers out because their pension funds were under funded…does everyone else want to pay for that?
LikeLike
Why should I, a CPS teacher, pay for your pension and mine? I do, so it is reasonable that Chicago receive an equivalent share of the pension money. We have 20% of the states students and get 15% of the funding. I admit we have budget issues, but I do not have control over the mess. Chicago spends ~$360 per student on admin while NY and LA spend less than $100 per. Instead of whining about my right to a well earned pension, lobby to reduce corruption by the state and city. And review how your administrators game TRS for higher pensions that are excessive, such as Lincolnways retired superintendent who gets $300,000 annually. I pay for that as well.
LikeLike