Peter Greene is kind of busy, what with having two-week-old twins in the House, with crying, diapers, and all that entails. But not too busy to read that Checker Finn describes parts of Jeanne Allen’s pro-choice book as “idiocy.”
See, Jeanne agrees with Betsy DeVos that the government should hand out taxpayer dollars to families to use however they want. Checker recognizes that this is a dumb idea. He has noticed the frauds and thieves who want that money.
It is not even a free market approach, when the government subsidizes choices.
Peter quotes Checker:
“This is idiocy. It’s also entirely unrealistic in the ESSA era. It arises from the view—long since dismissed by every respectable economist—that education is a private good and the public has no interest in an educated citizenry. Once you conclude that education is also a public good—one whose results bear powerfully on our prosperity, our safety, our culture, our governance, and our civic life—you have to recognize that voters and taxpayers have a compelling interest in whether kids are learning what they should, at least in schools that call themselves “public.”
Peter agrees.

Hurrah for Chester Finn
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
Zebras don’t change their stripes nor leopards their spots.
I doubt that Finn has really changed his tune either.
LikeLike
Finn is only changing his tune because he loves Charter Schools…..and vouchers will suck the money away from charters. He has to morph to survive. Although I don’t understand since Finn has backed Gov Hogan’s BOOST voucher program in the state of MD. Of the families that received the initial $5 million, 75%(?) were already enrolled in a religious or private school.
LikeLike
Sorry, off-topic for this post, but relevant to some discussions we’ve had lately, especially with our friend Charles. Have you seen this: http://russonreading.blogspot.com/2017/06/military-vouchers-choice-comes-to-our.html
Hilarious!
LikeLike
As I repost Russ’s posts on FB, I lead with “When Russ writes, I read” and it certainly holds true for the post you cite.
A definitive must read!
LikeLike
I am a veteran (US Air Force), and I work at the Pentagon. I found no humor in that posting. The US Constitution explicitly states that the government is formed to “provide for the common defense”.
I discussed this absurdity previously. No one is advocating giving people an “airport voucher”, to land their own planes. I once saw a Texas politician talk about closing down the municipal swimming pool, and having parents “home pool” their kids.
This is an example of “reductio ad absurdum”, Reducing an argument to an absurdity.
LikeLike
Really, Charles? Do you really think he is suggesting the possibility? Casting the choice meme in such terms highlights the absurdity of what has happened in education.
LikeLike
C, The NJ state constitution requires NJ to provide a “thorough and efficient system” of education. Most states have a similar charge (although Washington’s doesn’t allow for charters).
Russ’s post is an example of satire. Many readers will find humor in his tailoring the types of charters.
LikeLike
Finn may not like the idea of Gates’ schools-in-a-box. Perhaps he can foresee his niche being diminished (decimated) by the big boy oligarchs. If Finn has sons, possibly he hoped to hand his self-anointed reform business over to the next generation.
After reading the Deutsch 29 “tenure” hypocrisy post, why anyone gives thought to agreeing or disagreeing with Finn is puzzling.
LikeLike
It is good that Finn acknowledges that education is BOTH a private and a public good. Most pundits don’t seem to appreciate that and few say it out loud.
LikeLike