The organization “In the Public Interest” reports that global equity investors are gearing up for Trump’s infrastructure plan.
Question: if the banks own bridges and tunnels, can they put fees on them and raise fees whenever they want? They don’t invest for sentiment. They expect a return on investment.
“National: The Trump administration is launching its infrastructure plan with a series of high-profile events this week, beginning at the White House today with a call for privatization of the nation’s air traffic control system. On Wednesday, President Trump goes to Cincinnati for an event that “will highlight the locks, dams and other elements of the inland waterways system crucial for moving agricultural products and other goods,” and promote commercial fees. On Thursday, Trump will host mayors and governors at the White House for an infrastructure “listening session.” On Friday Trump will visit the Department of Transportation’s offices “to discuss its efforts to streamline the regulatory approval and permitting process for road and rail projects,” according to former Goldman Sachs president and COO Gary Cohn, Trump’s point man on the initiative.
“Although the outlines of Trump’s plan have yet to be spelled out, at the heart of the proposal is a dramatic cut in federal infrastructure funding, and for shifting the burden onto states, localities and the private sector.
“However, on May 25 the board of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) agreed on a policy resolution reflecting concerns about what the Trump administration has in mind for the framework for this shift. On private financing, AASHTO declared that “while opportunities exist to expand private participation in the provision of infrastructure,” the administration and Congress must “recognize that most transportation projects do not generate a revenue stream and therefore requires federal support in the form of direct funding rather than financing incentives that encourage borrowing or utilizing private capital.” This point goes directly to the issue of whether the administration’s so-called “asset recycling” model is sustainable.
“AASHTO insists that the focus of federal support should continue to be on transportation infrastructure needs, rather than on a turn toward support for energy transmission lines, rural broadband, and other non-transportation needs, as the administration has outlined. AASHTO is also concerned that the new framework might upend current transportation funding and project selection practices and safeguards, and advocates that “the existing federal program structure including highways, transit, and rail be utilized since it would enable investments to flow to every area of the country.”
“AASHTO also called for continued federal support for last year’s FAST Act transportation package (which “has provided near-term funding stability and relief to states”) and that, “at a minimum, the infrastructure package addresses the funding shortfall in the Highway Trust Fund with a long-term and sustainable revenue solution.”
“National: Private equity is gearing up for Trump’s private finance-heavy infrastructure initiative. The Australian funds manager AMP Capital announced on Thursday they’ve hired Brent Tasugi, a former senior vice-president at Oaktree Capital Management, to its New York-based infrastructure equity team. “Tasugi, who will serve as an investment director for AMP, spent nearly three years at Oaktree, joining the firm in August 2014. He was responsible for the origination and execution of North American transportation, logistics and public-private partnerships, working on projects including the Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport in Puerto Rico and Oaktree’s investment in Lonestar Airport Holdings.” [Sub required]. Any expansion of the ‘public-private partnership’ model in U.S. infrastructure in future years would witness the growth of a private speculative market in once fully-public U.S. assets.
Oaktree recently flipped its interest in the privatized Puerto Rican airport, selling its 50% stake to Canada’s Public Sector Pension Investment Board and a Mexican airport operator, Group Aeroportuario del Sureste (ASUR), which already had a 50% stake in the airport. [Sub required]
“National/International: China’s $810 billion sovereign wealth fund is also gearing up to invest in Trump’s infrastructure initiative. China Investment Corporation has officially launched its representative office in New York “to leverage the city’s strategic position as an international finance centre. The team will be responsible for conducting research on the North American economy, financial markets and policies, as well as strengthening cooperation with the fund’s business partners, CIC said in statement.”
For links, go to the website of ITPI

Global Equity Investors — now there’s a contradiction in terms if I ever saw one.
LikeLike
Trump is about to show the United States what it’s like to be a colony again …
LikeLike
A colony of China
LikeLike
China owning at least some of our infrastructure.
Gee, what could possibly go wrong? (/s)
LikeLike
So we’ve already outsourced most of our manufacturing, now we are going to sell our infrastructure as well? So if we go to war with China, they will own our airports and make all the parts for our planes? How does that work? I’m beginning to think that a post industrial economy looks and awful lot like a third world one. We grow crops but someone else owns the means of production and distribution. I am obviously not a student of economics, but it would seem to me that if you sell everything that makes you more than a hunter gatherer society…pretty soon you are.
LikeLike
There are some things that are sacred and should NOT be privatized. Look at privatized jails. DUH…$$$$$ talks and BS walks.
LikeLike
This could be the worst thing Trump does as he sells assets like the air traffic control system to private interests. We need infrastructure spending with public dollars on public projects.
LikeLike
Far worse is, turning America’s kids over to the “human capital pipelines” of oligarchs, incarcerating people because they are poor, a judicial system failing to lock up one banker for the 2008 fraud, jailing Black working people because they changed bubbles on the rich, White man’s tests, in order to save their incomes, forcing people into bankruptcy because of medical costs, denying workers the rewards for their productivity gains over the past 35 years, robbing people of Social Security and pensions, fostering a corrupt taxation system….
LikeLike
and a lot more
LikeLike
Diane Thanks for this information. Obama also believed in the public-private partnership. It’s the crown of a well-developed and developing socio-capitalist-based democracy. His problem was not HIS problem at all because he knew such a partnership COULD work; except that he believed in such a democracy that everyone bought into; and not a full socialist or communist model (God forbid–some in the world did that, . . . didn’t work).
The real problem is the inability of “business minds,” Wall Streeters, oligarchs (like the Koch’s), and stupid religious zealots (like Betsy DeVos) to REALLY share power–because they understand and embrace the meaning of such a partnership–and their inability to keep from turning the whole place into a kleptocracy and/or a re-tribalization on the model of a narrow and quasi-Christian tribe.
“Russia” in its present form is what happens when the oligarchs first milk democracy for all it’s worth, then used their wealth coupled with their own moral degeneracy to fight for power among themselves (kill or make slaves of competitors) and with those who understand and want a real democracy (kill journalists or anyone who complains). In the end, they kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. Voila: Russia today; and their end is the world, or they’ll die getting it and taking the rest of us with them.
BTW, if anyone here knows anything about the informal logical fallacies, you will see a framework for all that Russia, and now the defunct Republican party, are deeply involved in.
LikeLike
Will the sell-off be bi-partisan? Will there be token political objection from the other side, evidenced by the fact that the politicians won’t do much to rally people, in their districts, to stand up for the common good, say Congressmen like Cory Booker and, Sherrod Brown (who let his fellow Democrat running for Portman’s seat, hang out to dry)?
LikeLike
What could possibly go wrong? Corporate America has done such a great job in deregulated environments, to wit savings and loan institutions, telecom, energy markets, and finance, that I watch this with absolute confidence that there is nothing on the horizon but winning!
LikeLike
ENRON.
What could go wrong.
The word “partner” as in private-public partnerships is usually a ruse for taking from many to get profits for a few.
The competition for profits will end with private control and either one winner or a division of the spoils among three or four “providers.”
LikeLike
I understand, Laura, I was being facetious. I remember Enron (and WorldCom, and the Savings and Loan debacle, and so on, ad nauseum) well….
LikeLike
More taxes and fees for you and me, tax cuts and free public dollars for those who have the most. What happens to the little people who actually have to work for a living and are therefore stuck paying those tolls every day is “not their problem.”
LikeLike
Ray: “Little people”?
LikeLike
I don’t think he will.
It looks to me like a RttT-type “incentive” plan where states will have to do all the heavy lifting on funding. They’ll be wary of signing on because it will be more expensive than promised.
The truth is, Trump doesn’t get a whole lot done. He may be the most over-rated businessperson in the history of the world.
He’s full of hot air and boasts, but he’s not producing much of anything.
LikeLike
Fantastic I can see it now easy pass scanners mounted to street polls so that you can be billed when you go over a patched pot hole..
Funny thing both the NYC subway system and the Nations Railroads were all privately owned at one time . From the IRT, to the BMT, to the Pen Central rail road ,they all went bankrupt and are now publicly owned . .5.7 million rides a day just by the NYCTA. A few million more with the commuter rails that service the NYC metro area.
So not only will there be a problem with usual dog and pony show in the US congress. We can expect Schumer and the progressives to fight hard against it, knowing that the votes will be there to force it through anyway. But we can expect the construction trades to be split on what is potentially the destruction of union construction in America. Private developers will be under no obligation to pay Davis Bacon prevailing wages. Non union contractors who already skirt the law will drive wages down in a free fall . However the larger projects will still need union labor for a short time . There will be Labor leaders who support this because the short term gain from infrastructure spending will put their members to work, thus insuring their own position. It will be Armageddon for Unionized construction ten to twenty years down the road. That will likely be the problem for someone else after they are gone.
Another article on the infrastructure plan
LikeLike
Capitalism has come full circle; we’re back to feudalism.
LikeLike
Mickey: There are some “higher” examples. CBS’s 60 Minutes did a segment awhile back, and then followed up on it last night–of the Chobani yogurt guy who understands the import of his employees on the success of his business.
“Hamdi Ulukaya built the best-selling yogurt brand in the U.S. after coming here 23 years ago. Today, 70% of Chobani employees are American born, 30% are immigrants and refugees.”
https://www.google.com/search?q=60+minutes+june+4+2017&oq=60+min&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j0l5.4613j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
LikeLike
DISGUSTING! This country is for sale. We don’t live in the land of the free and the Brave. We live in the land USED by monied interests…SICK!
LikeLike
The League of Women Voters of Washington and the US have a strong position on privatization as a result of the study about four years ago. You should be able to view it online.
LikeLike
Pat
Can you send a link?
LikeLike
http://lwv.org/content/privatization-position
LikeLike
So Trump’s motto really is “make America China’s [again]?” When will the fools who voted for this orange turd realized he done them in? $1,000,000 daily to “protect” Betsy DeVoid. So much could be done with that cash.
LikeLike
But what year in China? 1920 when China was fractured into fiefdoms by powerful, wealthy, autocratic warlords battling it out to see who would end up ruling all of China. The average lifespan in China then was 35 and 95-percent of the people lived in extreme poverty.
LikeLike
Every private bridge and tunnel is a potential EpiPen. The troll may charge a high toll.
LikeLike
If you want to see what ACTUALLY happens when this takes place, talk to anyone in Chicago. The City sold its on street parking for a cash infusion to its budget a few years ago. The parking prices for on street parking SOARED. I am telling this second hand, as my daughter lives there, but if I remember correctly, the parking increases were 100 to 600%. And there is no political pressure to apply as the parking is now under private control until the contract expires years from now.
LikeLike
(I am a telecommunications engineer. I worked in trans-oceanic air route traffic control). The Trump proposal to privatize our air-traffic control system, is right on. The current system is antiquated, and unable to cope with the projected demand in air traffic. Many systems rely on vacuum-tube technology, and the parts are obsolete and difficult to obtain. The airlines (mostly) are supportive of getting the Federal Aviation Administration to turn over air-traffic control to the private sector.
LikeLike
“Many systems rely on vacuum-tube technology, and the parts are obsolete and difficult to obtain.”
If that is the case then wouldn’t the vaunted free market produce someone who would produce those lacking items and charge “what the market will bear”? In this case perhaps extortion prices (see epipen for example)?
LikeLike
Since when is the federal government interested in the free market? The Army buys $12,000 hammers and wastes money on all types of foolishness. The Federal Aviation Administration sometimes has to go to foreign sources to get supplies and parts, that are not available in the USA anymore.
If Air Traffic Control, is turned over to the private sector, the systems can be modernized, and older systems can be phased out.
The proposal involves setting up a non-profit organization. I think it is similar to what happened when the old US Post office, was handed over to the “Postal Service”.
Wait and see.
LikeLike
Sorry, ain’t got time to “wait and see”. The system could be modernized and older systems phased out within the existing structure. I don’t trust any private entity to do anything other than maximize profits. And what happens when they fail, and they will??
LikeLike
$1,200 hammer!
Now we know that Charles is an avid, loyal follower of the hate filled, Alt Right media machine that focuses on lies, misinformation and conspiracy theories.
The myth of the $600 hammer (it seems that whatever Alt-Right media source Charles follows has doubled the amount of that myth.) Alt-Right sites do that all the time, double, triple or even multi by hundreds of times these types of myths.
“Ever since the Defense Department procurement scandals of the 1980s, the $600 hammer has been held up as an icon of Pentagon incompetence. Immortalized in the “Hammer Awards” that Vice President Al Gore’s program to reinvent government gives out to waste-cutters, this absurdly overpriced piece of hardware has come to symbolize all that’s wrong with the government’s financial management.”
One problem: “There never was a $600 hammer,” said Steven Kelman, public policy professor at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and a former administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy. It was, he said, “an accounting artifact.” (there’s more on this issue at this site)
http://www.govexec.com/federal-news/1998/12/the-myth-of-the-600-hammer/5271/
LikeLike
And Medicare is tun more efficiently than most private insurers.
Also, re USPS, they are being required to recognize retiree liabilities that private companies can keep off their balance sheets. They also have to maintain delivery to every address. Finally, I don’t think the price of postage is at all unreasonable.
LikeLike
Lets look at the “Postal Service”. The prices skyrocketed, and the service got worse. The poster child for NOT privatizing!
LikeLike
I do not know all of the specifics of the proposal. I do know that the proposal involves turning over air-traffic control to a non-profit, like the US Postal service.
I say give the proposal a chance.
LikeLike
Bottom line Chas: How many people have died because of an error from the air traffic control system?
Zero!
So what is the urgent need to privatize that system? I’ve yet to see any government service that was privatized cost less and be more efficient than what the government provided. Prisons? Nope! Parking systems in big cities?? Nope!! Traffic Control cameras and collection system??? Nope!!!
Shall I continue? Nope!
LikeLike
“I say give the proposal a chance.”
Hear that phrase from the Trumpistas all the time.
How about going out back and giving Russian Roulette a try?
Same difference!
LikeLike
Remember Trump said to black voters:
“What do you have to lose?”
Other than the right to vote, healthcare, social programs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, the corporate raiders and Trumpist fraudsters and serial liars all say “give it a chance” and then a decade or two decades later when that program turns out to be a total fraud, a failure, and flop, they say, we haven’t given it enough time yet. We NEED more money to make it work. Give us another decade, another twenty years, another fifty and more money, more money, more money – the record is stuck and repeats without end.
LikeLiked by 1 person
(Notice how none of the commenters are telecommunications engineers, and none have worked in air-traffic control)
The proposal to shift air-traffic control from the FAA to a non-profit corporation is basically sound. The model has been used by Canada for many years. It works in Canada, and in fact Nav Canada recently had a rate reduction.
I am glad that there has not been a fatal crash of a large airplane, in the USA for over 8 years. But, the FAA system has all of the inherent problems of any government operation. Often, equipment is obsolete before it is installed. This is because of the long delays in obtaining funding approval for purchases.
The major airlines in the USA have been pushing for this for decades. And it a rare time, when corporations, the US Government, and the labor unions are all on the same side of the issue.
The non-profit corporation would operate without government subsidy, and charge fees to the airlines. The main opposition to the program is coming from operators of small jets, and smaller airlines, who fear that the board will be dominated by the major carriers.
No one on the left objects to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. A similar non-profit can work for civil aviation.
see
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/448353/privatizing-air-traffic-control-trump-proposal-good-idea
(BTW- See the movie “Pushing Tin”, an excellent insight into the work of an air traffic controller)
LikeLike