Carol Burris analyzes Betsy DeVos’ narrative about vouchers in this post.
What she describes goes far beyond the whims of a billionaire zealot. She describes the step-by-step plans of rightwingers who have long planned to undermine the very idea of public education as a civic responsibility.
DeVos said when she spoke at Brookings a few weeks ago that she in “not a numbers person.” She is also “not a facts person.”
First, she slimed those who defend public education from privatizers as “flat earthers.” Very likely, her family foundation has supported “flat earthers,” as they have supported creationism, quack science, and anti-gay organizations.
Then, she went on to attribute the origin of the modern voucher movement to African American Democrat, Polly Williams of Milwaukee. She forgot to mention that Polly Williams came to realize that she had been used by conservative rich people, and she renounced her support for vouchers. Not a small detail.
The great lie of the voucher movement is that it is built on the spurious claim that vouchers will “save” poor black and brown children. Faced with that claim, fraudulent though it is, liberals collapse and go along with the rightwing plan. But it never ends with the neediest children. That is only the beginning.
“And that, of course, was what Williams came to understand. Vouchers for the poor were the gateway; they were never the goal. That same pattern of starting small and going big repeats itself over and over. Educational savings accounts, tax credit scholarships and the like begin with student groups that evoke public sympathy — students with disabilities, low-income kids, the children of parents in the armed forces — but the goal is vouchers for all.
“DeVos and her allies are playing the long game. Each legislative season, the selected groups expand and the caps are raised. It happened in Indiana, where DeVos spoke to the American Federation for Children, and it is happening in other voucher states, as well.
“There is no better example than Arizona. Vouchers, disguised as the Empowerment Scholarship Account program (ESAs), began 2011. The program was designed for special-needs students. Then it expanded — foster-care students, children of military families, students on reservations, or students living in districts with schools rated a “D” or an “F” were eligible, as well.”
Now we know that vouchers don’t “save poor kids from failing schools.” In recent years, evaluations of vouchers in Louisiana, Indiana, and D.C. show that poor kids who use vouchers actually lose ground.
DeVos doesn’t care about evidence or facts or numbers. She is a choice zealot, and she will exploit her role in the government to push her lifelong passion to take public education away from the communities and families who support them. She doesn’t understand why people like their public schools. She never will.

I don’t think that DeVos is as ignorant on facts and numbers as you think. She understands why public education is so important. She understands that it is public education that poses a threat to keeping the masses in the positions where they continue to provide her families’ empire with its steady stream of cash cows.
LikeLike
“And that, of course, was what Williams came to understand. Vouchers for the poor were the gateway; they were never the goal. That same pattern of starting small and going big repeats itself over and over. Educational savings accounts, tax credit scholarships and the like begin with student groups that evoke public sympathy — students with disabilities, low-income kids, the children of parents in the armed forces — but the goal is vouchers for all.”
So why isn’t that claim discredited in ed reform? It’s now obviously untrue. The moment vouchers go in they immediately start lobbying to expand them. This has happened in state after state.
Why is this claim still taken seriously? It’s as if these arguments they present have no relationship at all to what actually happens, which would be understandable for a certain period, but not for YEARS.
It’s like the claim they “support” public schools. If these people are supporters of public schools I would hate to see what enemies of public schools do. Shouldn’t your policies OCCASIONALLY benefit children in public schools if you claim to be a supporter? Even once in a while?
LikeLike
I find the hypocrisy on test scores absolutely breath-taking. FOR YEARS this “movement” has weighed and measured and stacked and ranked public schools on test scores.
Now test scores don’t matter in the case of private schools.
THEY imposed this measure on the public schools they seek to eradicate yet they will not apply it to the private schools they prefer and promote! Test scores were THEIR measure. We were told for 20 years that this was the freaking Holy Grail of “success” and now they drop test scores because the numbers don’t look good for private schools.
People who work in public schools should be outraged. This measure they said was crucial? Nah. Forget about that.
LikeLike
Chiara,
That is a central tenet of the big Hoax:
Use test scores to belittle public schools, fire educators, and close them
But test scores don’t matter for charters and vouchers
LikeLike
They’ve moved the goalposts on costs, too. When ed reform started in Ohio the public were told that not only would vouchers and charters do it better than public schools, they would do it CHEAPER.
It was central to the ed reform argument. We “threw money” at public schools and private and charter schools were run like businesses, so it would be much more efficient.
Total lie. Running 3 school systems costs more. All they’re doing is replicating services and administration that already existed.
LikeLike
How can anyone believe that you can provide the same level of service when separate facilities are less efficient than when all the services are in a single school district? The goal of vouchers is to turn school budgets into ATMs for schools of dubious quality. The real goal is to turn public funds and education over to private entities. The public schools are just the host for these parasitic ventures.
LikeLike
I watched those public school teachers and parents pleading with ed reform to consider their students and schools as “more then a score” and they were dismissed by the Clip Board Crowd as not looking at “data”.
Vouchers come into view as a possibility for more privatization and data goes out the window and schools and students are now “more than a score”? We’re back to talking about the whole child and how schools aren’t just contract service providers?
Wow. Hypocrisy much? Ed reform now AGREES with public school supporters but ONLY re: private schools?
This is nonsense. It’s gibberish. None of it is consistent or hangs together. The ONLY way ed reform makes any sense is as a privatization agenda. It sure isn’t about data.
LikeLike
I’m confused myself. Two years ago every ed reformer in Ohio was pushing the Common Core tests as the gold standard for a good school. Our dopey state legislature bought the whole program, hook line and sinker and imposed it on every public school in the state with virtually no debate.
Now I’m told test scores don’t matter for voucher schools and it’s all about parental satisfaction and “choice”. They didn’t give a fig about “parental satisfaction” when they were imposing the Common Core on every public school in the country. In fact, public school parents were ordered to sit down and shut up, smeared as “whiners” and “privileged”.
I just want to know the rules because public schools can’t seem to win this game.
LikeLike
“I just want to know the rules because public schools can’t seem to win this game.”
That public schools can’t win the game is the only rule of the game.
LikeLike
DeVos is answering questions with 3 word slogans today. Her answers would get a big fat F if my 8th grader turned them in. No argument, no support for the argument, just one syllable assertions of her “beliefs”
I ask you, WHERE is the RIGOR and WORK ETHIC?
That these people have the nerve to scold young people on how slack they all is just amazing. HUBRIS. It’s the coin of the realm.
LikeLike
How ridiculous is our current representation in the federal government that the ONLY people who are listened to regarding the 90% of children in public schools are charter school advocates:
“In the “skinny budget” that the White House released this month, President Trump offered $168 million in new funds for charter schools. As public charter school operators, we appreciate the proposed investment in new schools like ours.
But we cannot support the president’s budget as proposed, and we are determined to do everything in our power to work with Congress and the administration to protect the programs that are essential to the broader needs of our students, families and communities.”
90% of parents and students have no voice in DC. The only way to petition DeVos and get a hearing is if you’re a member of the club. It’s as if public school parents and students don’t exist, which would be SOMEWHAT understandable among anti-public school ideologues in the Trump Administration except for that fact that it’s NINETY PERCENT.
LikeLike
When ed reform put the Common Core tests in Ohio, I read up because my son takes the tests. I looked at the sample questions online and read thru the reams of stuff on “rigor” and supporting an argument.
Here’s the Ed Reform CEO “answering” a question:
JoyVerified account @Joy_Resmovits 2h2 hours ago
More
I asked if she believes that disparate impact in discipline rates is a problem. DeVos answered: I believe in helping all students.
DeVos would fail the 7th grade Common Core English test.
This is about “rigor” and “hard work” FOR KIDS, but not for adults. Adults skate. They offer garbage like this and they get an A +
LikeLike
Great post, and I too immediately recognized the irony and hypocrisy of an evangelical Calvinist like Betsy DeVos ridiculing those of us who oppose her mission, so to speak (i.e. pun intended), as “flat-earthers.”
Just another day in the post-truth era, I suppose….
LikeLike
“That same pattern of starting small and going big repeats itself over and over. ”
Good description. This is why any compromise is a victory for the reformers, and hence it should be rigidly rejected from day one.
They win the politics, we win open confrontations and battles. We need to choose the weapons that suit us. They choose, we lose.
LikeLike
Weingarten, for example, chooses politics https://dianeravitch.net/2017/05/31/randi-endorses-charter-schools-in-op-ed-piece-with-jonah-edelman/
LikeLike