Arne Duncan used to boast about the rising high school graduation rate, but he never talked about one cause of the increase: online credit recovery.
Slate has run a multi-part series on the online credit recovery racket. Imagine a student failing a one-year course, then earning full credit in less than one week. It has its benefits: superintendents get praised for the steady increase in the graduation rate; students get the credits they need to graduate.
But what they don’t get is an education.
This segment begins:
“After she failed English her junior year at Riverbend High School in Spotsylvania, Virginia, 17-year-old Amelia Kreck had to retake the class. It took her two days.
“In the classroom, Amelia had struggled with essay writing. But the online course her school directed her to take as a replacement had no essays. Nor did Amelia have to read any books in their entirety. Unsurprisingly, she says, she never had to think very hard. That’s because she skipped out of most units through a series of “pretests” at the start, which she says contained basic grammar questions as well as some short readings followed by multiple-choice sections.
“Amelia says she enjoyed some of the readings in the online version of the class, created by for-profit education company Edgenuity, including excerpts from Freakonomics and the writings of the theoretical physicist Michio Kaku. She also appreciated the flexibility to work from home—until after midnight on one of the two days it took here to recover her credit. But “there was a big component of the original class that was missing from credit recovery,” she says. “Most of it was on the shallow side.” She finished so quickly, she says, that “I didn’t improve in the areas that needed improvement.”

Duncan needs a real job.
LikeLike
I’ve always wondered why unions and teachers don’t fight harder against this. Why have teachers if students can get credit this way? If students wanted to play the game, they would just skip classes and do the easy online recovery credit. Voilà!
LikeLiked by 1 person
My district ditched online credit recovery two years ago. The teachers who administered the classes pointed out the huge problems with the program and it went away.
LikeLike
A few years ago a vice-principal in one of our low-income schools where graduation rates had been rising was called out for pushing kids into the online credit recovery classes where little supervision led to little education. The other side of the coin, however, is that before R2T/ESSA interventions fussing and complaining about (and attaching funding to) “on time” graduation, these kids could have stayed for a fifth year and truly caught up.
LikeLike
I guess it depends on what Amelia wants to do with her life. There are lots of life options that don’t require deep reading/essay writing, so she might be perfectly happy and well adjusted, and at least this way she will be able to get the piece of paper (diploma) that will allow her to be employed. If she couldn’t pass English and couldn’t get that piece of paper, then she’d really be screwed.
But if Amelia plans to go on to college and/or pursue a career that involves much reading and/or writing then she’s in for a very rude awakening and she’ll realize just how badly she was cheated/cheated herself.
LikeLike
You’re right. Amelia seems to be a bright person and she sees and accepts the flaws of this online scam. Maybe Amelia is brilliant at calculus or playing piano? Maybe Amelia isn’t a proficient writer but loves to read and can parse a sentence/paragraph. NO online course is capable of helping any student with essay writing, but if this is what it took to get her a HS diploma so that she can move on in life (job, college etc), then good for her. She didn’t get an education….she got a certificate that she took a course and lots of kids do this in college to get an “easy A”.
LikeLike
Oh, I can attest to this–I’ve seen it in action far too many times….
LikeLike
My experience with credit recovery is different, it definitely can’t be accomplished in two days and requires a teacher to assist the students when they get stuck. It can’t be done at home. Perhaps the requirements differ state to state.
The students I supervised worked hard over numerous weeks, even months.
Having a child who did not do well in school, especially in certain subjects, alternatives like credit recovery and even GED classes can be a Godsend.
LikeLike
This is what I object to with ed reformers:
Los Angeles already has more charter schools than any district in the nation. In an interview with EdSource, Melvoin downplayed expectations about expanding that number. What was more important, he said, was that the district do more to learn about charter school innovations that it could adopt.
He said his election was about “expansion of best practices” and “not about a proliferation of new charters,” nor about setting a goal of opening “an artificial number of new charters.”
“The reasons I ran for school board and not to run a charter organization was to learn lessons from our charter partners, and to bring that learning to the district,” he said. “This was not a campaign that in any way was run against the union or in favor of charters.”
Rather, the election was “about looking at what works in the district, and replicating that,” he said. “I am much more interested in increasing schools that are serving kids, and much less interested in whether it is a district school, charter school or magnet school.”
In a subsequent interview with EdSource, Kelly Gonez, the other winning candidate, made striking similarly comments to Melvoin’s. “Charter school expansion is not something that I am really interested in doing,” she said. “I want to help support and improve all of our currently existing schools with a primary focus on traditional district schools.”
This simply isn’t true. They do absolutely nothing for public schools. Often they do WORSE than “nothing” – they actively hurt public schools.
It’s okay to promote charters over public schools – it’s an opinion- but I think they have a duty to tell public school parents (84% of the people in that district) this is the “movement” goal when they run for office.
LikeLike
In NYC students are allowed to make up Gym online…
LikeLike
This reality is the result of penalties imposed on schools for low graduation rates. No teachers or administrators believe these online classes are good for the students, but schools are required to reach specific graduation rates or face penalties, so they find ways to meet these graduation rates. This problem only gets worse with the rise of charter schools and vouchers.
“My kid isn’t going to pass at this school? Well, we’ll just send him to the charter around the corner.”
“Oh, sorry ma’am, I think we have an online class that just might move that grade to passing.”
LikeLike
One doesn’t even see where to begin cleaning up this mess.
LikeLike
When I was still teaching high school, classes were offered in summer school to make up for failed classes during the school year. I know because I taught makeup English classes in the summers. The only problem was that summer school wasn’t even the length of one full-time semester so those summer school classes were a third of the time of the classes that were being made up. It was easier to fail during the school year and only work for the few weeks of summer school to pass classes required to graduate.
Why? Pressure from parents that vote and elected representatives who wanted the votes of those parents.
LikeLike
Hi Diane, one of the eight stories (“Just Take It Again”) is about my experiences. Let me know if you’d like to talk. citizens4excellence@gmail.com
LikeLike