Bianca Tanis is a teacher of special education in a K-2 classroom in the Hudson Valley of New York. She is also a member of the board of NYSAPE (New York State Allies for Parents and Educators), the statewide group that has led the Opt Out movement.
In this post, she excoriates New York’s new standards and says the New York State Education Department ignored the voices of early childhood educators. From the perspective of young children, she says, the standards are fundamentally flawed.
She writes, in part:
We should never have to fight for the right of children to play. Nor should we have to fight for them to spend more than 20 minutes at recess. Instruction should never come at the expense of the creative, spontaneous, and joyful exploration of 4- and 5-year olds. But, increasingly, it does. With the unveiling of New York State’s “Next Generation of English Language Arts and Mathematics Standards,” the struggle to maintain these experiences for young learners—already underway—will intensify.
When New York’s Education Department released the draft standards last September, Commissioner MaryEllen Elia claimed they represented substantive change. Yet most revisions consisted of minor tweaks to language and placement. There were very few shifts in content, and the Common Core anchor standards remained mostly intact. The latest iteration walks back any positive content changes, increasing the rigor of the prekindergarten through second-grade grade standards over and above the draft released in September, and moving some first-grade standards to kindergarten.
While many policymakers profess their commitment to play-based learning and meeting the needs of the whole child, their actions say otherwise. This problem is not unique to New York. But in a state with one of the largest parent uprisings against high-stakes reform and the arbitrary imposition of rigor on child-centered practice, Elia’s reaction is disturbing. She and the New York Education Department have missed an opportunity to deliver developmentally appropriate learning standards that align with early childhood’s robust evidence base.
They’ve also systematically denied teachers who work with young children the chance to advocate for their students and reasonable expectations for development as well as practice that engages them in the critical early years of learning.
Although some teachers working with children in prekindergarten through second grade took part in the review, their voices were marginalized. Not a single early educator was a member of the Standards Review Leadership and Planning team. None were facilitators, or on any of the advisory panels that made the final revisions.
Those who took part in the original standards revision work in August of 2016 were so dissatisfied with the process that they ultimately requested the formation of an early learning task force. These outspoken educators were barred from serving on the 32-member committee, of which only a quarter were early educators.
It’s easy to understand why they were largely excluded from this process. In a room full of teachers working with prekindergartners to second-graders, you would be hard-pressed to find consensus around the idea that all kindergartners should “read with purpose and understanding”—an expectation that Governor Andrew Cuomo’s Common Core Task Force report cited as concerning to early childhood experts.
Ten out of 14 members of the PreK-2 review committee issued a letter of dissent, expressing concern that the number of skills included in the revised standards would make it difficult to find time for play-based and child-led learning.

Thie criticisms here are absolute truth. And don’t let the powers that be kid you that all these standards are met through a play based curriculum, especially in Pre-K. No the play is totally orchestrated with teachers who are supposed to pounce on children with questions and observation notes. There is precious little room for children to breathe, play freely and lead the play. It gets worse as you go up the grades. Kindergartens with no centers and desks and playtime once a week “because we have so much work to do.” In manny schools the youngest children have no to very short recess time. I’m concerned that this regime is also going to be put upon our three year olds if they enter the Pre-K system.
LikeLike
Why the hell are schools even “following” an inappropriate and harmful curriculum falsely named standards?
4 yr old wildly raising her hand, jumping out of her seat. “Oh, I know, I know, I know, the answer!!. . . Because the GAGA Good German adminmals and teachers are afraid of losing their jobs. They ‘HAVE’ to do it.”
YEP, the rationale of a 4 yr old holds true for the adults, the adults that are supposed to protect the child’s interests and being. In loco parentis anyone?
It’s saddening and sickening to see so many supposed educators be so lily-livered, lacking any courage to do what is right and just by the children.
From a still living French philosopher, a far greater thinker than me:
“Should we therefore forgo our self-interest? Of course not. But it [self-interest] must be subordinate to justice, not the other way around. . . . To take advantage of a child’s naivete. . . in order to extract from them something [test scores, personal information] that is contrary to their interests, or intentions, without their knowledge [or consent of parents] or through coercion [state mandated testing], is always and everywhere unjust even if in some places and under certain circumstances it is not illegal. . . . Justice is superior to and more valuable than well-being or efficiency; it cannot be sacrificed to them, not even for the happiness of the greatest number [quoting Rawls]. To what could justice legitimately be sacrificed, since without justice there would be no legitimacy or illegitimacy? And in the name of what, since without justice even humanity, happiness and love could have no absolute value?. . . Without justice, values would be nothing more than (self) interests or motives; they would cease to be values or would become values without worth.”—Comte-Sponville [my additions]
LikeLike
I and other EC teachers tried to fight hack, in my own school at at workshops. People know all this is wrong but they feel they have to follow orders so to speak. I stayed with n the classroom as long as I could but finally felt I had to retire last July after 43 years of teaching early childhood. I taught kids nderhatyen when naptime was part of the day. That’s gone. The DOE folks tried to get us to shorten the Pte-K naps. But that was crazy. Some of these children were very young, some did not sleep well at home and they had a busy day playing and interacting. They are tired after lunch and 50-60 minutes were needed buy many in Pre-K. Of course the time was shortened as th year went on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some of us are doing what we know is best for our students – play centers, music/movement/interactive hands-on learning for 5-6 year olds. I have noticed that many young, new teachers come into classrooms not knowing any better. They are being indoctrinated in their teacher training to teach young children without any time for play in the classroom – and without music and movement. Education programs are the places where change can occur. It is their RESPONSIBILITY. But new teachers will not begin their careers using what are known and tested to be best practices (play-based learning) unless administartiors are saying it. Play should be mandatory and administrators need to EXPRESS THIS to all their pre-K and K teachers.
Dr. Jean Feldman is a wise, experienced, very well-known teacher/teacher trainer who advocates for play, movement, music and every creative, fun way you can think of to teach young children. When policy-making for young learners, SHE should be advising. We need MANY, MANY more voices like hers to be heard. Below is her profoundly important Kindergarten Bill of Rights.
http://drjeanandfriends.blogspot.com/2017/05/we-believe-in-play.html
INDERGARTEN BILL OF RIGHTS
Kindergarten Bill of Rights
Kindergarten children have the right to the pursuit of happiness.
Kindergarten children have the right to wooden blocks and a housekeeping center.
Kindergarten children have the right to play dough and puzzles.
Kindergarten children have the right to hold hands with their friends and play games.
Kindergarten children have the right to free play outside.
Kindergarten children have the right to sing and dance and be silly.
Kindergarten children have the right to explore with paint, crayons, markers, glue, scissors, and to make a mess!!!
Kindergarten children have the right to have books read to them…many, many books.
Kindergarten children have the right to go on field trips.
Kindergarten children have a right to a quiet time every day so their brains can process information.
Kindergarten children have the right to think school is the most wonderful place in their world.
Kindergarten children have the right to think that they are capable and worthy.
Kindergarten children have the right to hopes and dreams.
Kindergarten children have the right to smiles and hugs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent post! Thanks for the great explanation and the “Bill of Rights! Do you mind if I share?
LikeLike
I don’t mind a bit if you share the kindergarten Bill of Rights. It came from Dr. Jean Feldman. It should be required reading in early childhood education programs!
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Ten out of 14 members of the PreK-2 review committee issued a letter of dissent, expressing concern that the number of skills included in the revised standards would make it difficult to find time for play-based and child-led learning.”
This seems to be a recurring problem with ed reform. They seem to be incapable of saying “no”.
I sympathize with teachers in our school district. Every single year the state adds a mandate and they never drop any. It’s almost a guarantee they won’t do anything well.
The newest thing is “the workplace”. We’re now preparing 3rd graders for “the workplace”. I was in a 3rd grade classroom for a week as part of a “community volunteer” program last month and every single minute is crammed full. It was comical, almost. Down to the minute. This idea they’re all sitting around twiddling their thumbs and waiting for something to do seems misguided. That’s not all! They have to somehow cram in “financial literacy” next year. Do they ever just say “no- we’re not using your idea or pet project”?
LikeLike
Pushing down the curriculum will be counter productive for most students because extended periods sedentary academics will result in a diminishing return. What they are propose is contrary to the nature of the young child. They learn through exploration and play. I also hope this plan does not include lots of cyber learning. Nobody knows for sure the impact on the developing brain.
LikeLike
This posting and the comments bring to mind an old phrase: “mission creep.”
To be applied, of course, to public schools that take all comers. For charters, e.g., they regard taking on the same responsibilities and students as public schools as a kind of “mission creep” that burdens them with regulations and requirements and financial burdens that interfere with hitting their numerical goals like test score goals and $tudent $ucce$$.
But it’s all good when public schools are compared with them and can’t cram every single new fangled item into the time allotted.
A classic rheephorm twofer: boost your own bottom line and undermine the “competition.”
😎
LikeLike
Any ideas about how to fight back? Perhaps we need to organize a statewide early childhood group with local chapters. Early childhood teachers talk about how frustrated they are but we seem to have no “power” to change the developmentally inappropriate mandates.
LikeLike
Why do these basic principles of child development and their manifestations in our schools need to be belabored and defended over and over again? I understand that most school “reformers” don’t respect the evidence generated by their intellectual betters, but that doesn’t invalidate that evidence.
Some friends of mine in North Carolina sent their four-year-old to a private preschool and immediately noticed their child’s pathological reaction to the institution: bed-wetting, anxiety, crying jags, and oppositional behavior. They visited the school to find their child in a rigid, “no excuses” environment that stressed, incredibly, test preparation for children younger than five years old.
If you are reading this blog and think these are good ideas, would you care to make your argument and defend it with credible, independently obtained research? Everything I’ve read about children this age (I have, save for a six-month period in the early 1990s, always worked with adolescents) tells me they need lots of time for independent and cooperative imaginative play in the interest of building a variety of life skills like working with others, having compassion, solving problems, and focusing.
LikeLike
Last year my grandson attended full day kindergarten in a public school in Texas. The only time children got to play outside was fifteen minutes of recess. By the spring the teachers were frustrated because the children zoned out from the constant barrage of academics. Based on last year’s experience, they implemented a longer school day with three twenty minute periods of recess. The students are more attentive and productive, and the teachers can keep their sanity on the new schedule.
LikeLiked by 1 person
YEP, Makes sense. Make the day longer for the kids. Ay ay ay!
What depraved bastard thinks of these things?
LikeLike
Six years ago, we were trying to decide whether to send our daughter to school or to hold her out for another year. At that time, first grade was being pushed into kindergarten.
One part of our decision to send her to school was the prohibitive cost of day care. Most of our friends could afford to keep their children out a year. We felt we could not.
This illustrates that pushing children in the lower grades penalizes the parents who cannot afford to hold them out, and penalizes the children who encounter ideas they are not ready to understand.
Why do we need to accelerate learning at all? Says Elliot: …there will be time for a million Indecisions and revisions which a minute will reverse…
LikeLike
In NY kindergarten is now “mandated.” In you hold your child back a year, they cannot go into kindergarten anymore, but must go right into first grade. We have babies in this city coming into school because we don’t have an age cutoff as many other cities have. Children can enter school if they were born within the entire year up until Dec. 31!
LikeLike
Has nap time for preK & K gone the way of the dinosaur?
LikeLike
I think Andy Cuomo needs naptime — or at least a time out.
I find it hard to believe that the people of NY voted for that guy TWICE.
His spiteful behavior is like that of a little child.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Isn’t he known as “Little Andy C.”?
LikeLike
Sorry for all the typos. I was in the early childhood classroom for 34 years (43 if I count my teenage years working with children.)
LikeLike
“Moving some first-grade standards to kindergarten.”
As Krazy TA says, this is mission creep. It began witht the Common Core and the false assumption that if you set a target for learning such as “readiness for college and career” by grade 12, then specify college and career entrance requirements as a “target,” you can “backmap” –identify the pre-requisite skills and concepts that needed to be mastered at each grade level before grade 12.
This is a stupid idea. It is a technique for achieving efficiency in factories and in military training. It is a variant of the “Program Evaluation and Review Technique”(PERT) pushed by Robert McNamara for getting complex projects for the military done on time.
McNamara did some complex statistical studies during WW II. He was known as a “whiz kid.” In the postwar years he helped revitalize the Ford Motor Company. He served briefly as President of Ford Motor Company before he become Secretary of Defense…and infamous for measuring progress in the Vietnam War by “body counts.” Read about PERT and mission creep here.
https://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/37783ba9-f970-453c-8de0-03c9d63904cc/VEGO-IS-THE-CONDUCT-OF-WAR-A-BUSINESS–JFQ59.aspx
Variants of the PERT technique have some utility for training but not for education, and least of all educating children who learn with others and through play.
LikeLike
The backmapping drives me mad! If you backmap to ages 4 and 5 you get to PLAY which none of the idiots understand. If they did, they would know that all the pre-literacy, pre-math, problem-solving skills, etc. etc. ARE learned through play and socialization in preschool and kindergarten. But, of course, there is no money to be made from play. We don’t need to purchase boxed curricula and tests for play-based learning. So it’s not actually ignorance, it’s the dollar signs in their eyes.
LikeLike
The Mywayman’s still riding, I see.
Did anyone really expect Cuomo to listen to the parents who have opted their kids out?
Or to others (eg teachers like Sheri Lederman) who have directly challenged his authority?
If anything, these people have driven him to double down on dumb.
LikeLike
Not that I would suggest they do anything differently.
Cuomo is incorrigible.
LikeLike
Perhaps the varied Early Childhood organizations should grow their backbones and speak out against PreK being part of and in many cases controlled by the public schools. Perhaps some brave community programs could stop accepting PreK contracts if the local school district dictates a curriculim that is harmful to children, Perhaps the State could require that districts only contract with Early Childhood programs that are either NAEYC Accredited or are 4 Star Quality Stars programs and the programs would determine the curriculum..Perhaps school districts that want to participate in UPK should be required to hire Administrators who are trained in Early Childhood Education. I know, perhaps the Easter Bunny is real. It’s still nice to dream. In the meantime perhaps a place to start would be by fighting the extension of PreK to threes.
LikeLike
Johanna…AGREE! Those making decisions have NO CLUE. It’s all about $$$$$$$ not our young.
LikeLike
I tried to organize an “Indivisible” style action network to focus on NYSED and Albany, but to no avail.
I think the time is ripe for such a coordinated effort across the state to write letters, make phone calls, demand town halls with reps, and show up at Board of Regents meetings to get the Education message out there loud and clear. We want equitable funding, developmentally appropriate standards and curricula, less testing, sane evaluation systems, and protection for teachers who advocate for their students and communities. We need weekly action alerts to help guide us in our coordinated communications.
I know BATs are active in NY, but to date, I haven’t seen this type of specifically Albany-focused effort yet. If it’s occurring, please tell us how we can all get in on the action…
LikeLike