Christine Langhoff teaches in Massachusetts and is a member of the Network for Public Education.
She writes:
Massachusetts public education is being run by a cabal of reformsters, many of them affiliated with a local thinkster tank, The Pioneer Institute. Jim Peyser, state Secretary of Education, is a former director of The NewSchools Venture Fund, having run the Pioneer Institute from 1993-2000. Gov. Weld named him as undersecretary of education in 1995, shortly after the introduction of charters to the state, for which Peyser was – and is – an advocate. In charge of higher education is perennial gadfly Chris Gabrieli, failed gubernatorial candidate, who has developed no fewer than three reformy edu-businesses. (Time on Learning – extended day and year no extra pay; TransformEd – measuring grit and feelings; and Empower Schools, which seeks to destroy union contracts and impose a “third way” in urban districts – so far 3 and counting). So, to use the local dialect, all of them are wicked reformy.
Things have not been going so well for Chester. He signed on as chairman of PARCC, but that boat sank under the weight of the Common Core. This past November, when he thought the charter cap would be lifted and privatization could proceed apace, that too went down to an ignominious 2-1 defeat, in the process awakening parents and taxpayers to the charter scam. He has lately signed on to be a Chief for Change. Reformsters, unlike teachers, don’t need tenure because they have sinecures.
I think this latest peevish salvo stems from Chester’s frustration at being unable to simply sign executive orders and command the world as he would have it. Recently, after testimony from Lisa Guisbond of Citizens for Public Schools, he was forced to revise a punitive policy for students opting out:
“On the related issue of state testing, I thought you should know that some teachers are being given these instructions for handling students whose parents have chosen to opt them out:
‘When a student opts out they will remain in the classroom, listen as the test directions are being read and given the test. If after 15 minutes the student doesn’t write anything down, then, and only then, may the teacher remove the test.’
A 4th grade teacher shared her reaction:
‘This is public shaming, will cause emotional harm, and is a travesty to the precious relationship between teachers and students. Remember we cannot say anything except the scripted words on the test document or we are threatened with job termination, legal and or criminal action.’
So we have a fourth grader embarrassed and crying and a teacher who could lose his or her job for consoling the child. The teacher must ignore this child in need and say nothing.
I trust that these instructions are in error, and that your humane instructions from last year, Commissioner Chester, that students should not be pressured or punished for opting out, remain in place. I urge you to communicate this to the field.”
Delay and Revise MA ESSA Plan to Help, Not Harm, Struggling Schools
At the April 18 board meeting, one of the topics under discussion was the use of the scores from this year’s round of testing. Chester proposed to have 2017 scores included in the average for determining school levels. That was nearly unanimously rejected by the Board due to the use of several variants of tests in the past three years. Previously, it had been agreed that schools would be “held harmless” during the transition to a new test.
A recess was called, during which time Secretary Peyser expressed his belief that if the 2017 scores were not included, teachers would deliberately have students tank the exams so that they could increase scores in future years. In other words,he believes teachers across the state would INTENTIONALLY have thousands of children do poorly on tests in order to create a low baseline. NB: At the time of the discussion, we were already halfway through the testing period.
These people have no respect for the work teachers do. They do not believe we have any integrity. They do not treat us as professionals. It is indeed shameful.

“So we have a fourth grader embarrassed and crying and a teacher who could lose his or her job for consoling the child. The teacher must ignore this child in need and say nothing.“
It sounds like the children and the teachers are in a no-win scenario.
For trying to console a crying child opting out of a state mandated test, the teacher might lose his or her job.
And if a teacher were to ignore a crying child who was the victim of neglect or physical or emotional abuse, or simply say nothing, that same teacher “might lose his or her job.”
I guess that it is not abuse if it’s a state or federal mandate. Or is it?
LikeLike
It’s still abuse!
LikeLike
This really is unconsionable behavior from public officials. They do not have any desire to treat students and their teachers and parents as worthy of anything other deliberate and methodical punishment.
LikeLike
By definition, when salesmen know the product they are selling is worthless, they don’t “have respect for” the suckers who buy their products. To the salesmen, teachers are nothing more than residual after sale -effect. A Microsoft Canada manager quipped in Entrepreneur magazine, “Teachers have got to shift or get off of the pot”.The founder of New Schools Venture Fund identified NSVF’s marching orders in Philanthropy Roundtable, “to develop diverse charter school organizations to produce different brands on a large scale”. Gates, who financed NSVF, understands his scheme is cost-cutting, which is embodied in his schools-in-a-box investment. The product’s founder predicted a 20% return to investors. Presumably Gates wants quality schools for his kids so he chooses schools for them, that reject his schemes. Harvard Prof. Fryer, who got a 1mil. Gates grant said, it’s “testing everyday” for the 2nd tier in the prescribed two-tier education plan. If respect was anywhere in the equation, Gates-funded organizations wouldn’t refer to schools as “human capital pipelines.”
That’s why the opponents of Peyser/Chester must prevail. A win for Peyser./Chester, gives America to the colonialists and it makes meaningless all of the sacrifices that have been made for the nation over the past 250 years..
LikeLike
Roland “Two-Tier” Fryer was, until quite recently, a member of the MA state board of education. His resignation was announced last week.
LikeLike
Glad to hear it. Was Fryer replaced with a person who understands public education has driven the economic growth of the nation, while those from Wall Street have undermined both GDP and democracy?
LikeLike
Linda – No replacement has been announced so far, but with the pro-charter governor we’ve got, I don’t think your unicorn will appear.
LikeLike
Once reformsters infiltrate a state they will treat teachers and non-compliant students like enemy combatants. The teachers, students and parents stand between them and access to all that public money, and that is their goal.
LikeLike
The funders of PBS’ School Inc., a propaganda film for privatization, are Rose Marie and Jack Anderson Foundation, Prometheus Foundation, and Gleason Family Foundation.
They are the usual right wing ideologues, that are described at Muckity and Sourcewatch. The fourth funder, Steve Hardy (and wife, Lana)
made his money licensing portfolio analytic software to…pension plan sponsors… He sold the company and now, he is on the Board of Nevada Policy Research Institute. In what is a huge irony, given the lack of democratic input in the sell-off of America’s most important common good, the NPRI site brags about its commitment to democracy. How do they manage not to gag?
LikeLike
OMG, more than sick. Why are the deformers so TOTALLY MEAN and OUT of TOUCH? Is it because of their money, power, and perks? Answer: Must be.
LikeLike
Thanks for posting, Diane.
In Boston, we’re battling the state board and the mayor – we have not had an elected school committee since 1992. Teachers have now been working without a contract for 15 months and the last proposal undercut COLA’s for the (mostly female) BTU in comparison to other (mostly male) city unions.
The mayor’s budget for the upcoming school year includes cuts to 48 schools, nearly $11.5 million. The city is in the best financial shape in a long time, so it isn’t an austerity that is due to a lack of funds. It’s a deliberate choice to underfund our schools.
Two Boston parents, Kristin Johnson and Bob Damon, have done this excellent analysis of the horrific impact budget reductions will have on our city’s kids with the greatest needs:
http://bostonpoliticaleducation.blogspot.com/2017/04/who-is-impacted-by-bpsbudget-cuts.html
” Among the schools facing budget reductions due to declines in enrollment this year, 66% have a higher concentration of Economically Disadvantaged Students (ED); 72% have higher numbers of High Needs students (HN); 60% have higher amounts of Students With Disabilities (SWD); 42% have higher amounts of English Language Learners (ELL); 46% have higher numbers of First Language Not English (FLNE); 54% had a higher than average number of black students; and 26% have more Latino students. Every indicator of students within the achievement gap was overall higher within the group of schools facing budget reductions.
As we mentioned in our last budget post, there is a troubling number of level 3, 4 and 5 schools receiving budget reductions. Not surprisingly, our research revealed that schools that are facing budget cuts -and- have a high DESE level also have significantly higher concentrations of Economically Disadvantaged, Students with Disabilities, African Americans and High Needs students. View the entire data set here.”
LikeLike