It is very instructive to scan the long list of organizations that are funded by the Walton Family Foundation. Some will surprise you. Some will not. Here is what we know about this foundation. The Walton Family (beneficiaries of Walmart) is the richest family in America. There are many billionaires in the family. Like Betsy DeVos, they don’t like public education. They don’t like regulation. They love the free market. They don’t like unions. Individual family members have spent millions on political campaigns to support charters and vouchers. The Foundation also supports charters and school choice.
In 2015, the Walton Family Foundation spent $179 million on K-12 education grants. They are in the midst of a pledge to spend $1 billion to open more charters, and they have targeted certain cities for their beneficence (Atlanta, Boston, Camden, Denver, Houston, Indianapolis, Los Angeles, Memphis, New Orleans, New York, Oakland, San Antonio and Washington, D.C.) Their goal is to undermine public education by creating a competitive marketplace of choices. They and DeVos are on the same page.
I suggest you scan the list to see which organizations have their hand out for funding from one of the nation’s most anti-public school, anti-union, rightwing foundations.
Here are a few of their grantees:
Black Alliance for Education Options (BAEO), run by Howard Fuller to spread the gospel of school choice: $2.78 million
Brookings Institution (no doubt, to buy the annual report that grades cities on school choice): $242,000
California Charter Schools Association: $5 million
Center for American Progress (theoretically a “centrist Democratic” think tank): $500,000
Charter Fund, Inc. (never heard of this one): $14 million
Chiefs for Change (Jeb Bush’s group): $500,000
College Board (to push Common Core?): $225,000
Colorado League of Charter Schools: $1,050,000
Editorial Projects in Education (Education Week): $70,000
Education Reform Now: $4.2 million
Education Trust, Inc. (supposed a “left-leaning advocacy group”): $359,000
Education Writers Association: $175,000
Educators for Excellence (anti-union teachers, usually from TFA): $925,000
Families for Excellent Schools (hedge fund managers who lobby for charter schools in New York City and Massachusetts): $6.4 million
Foundation for Excellence in Education (Jeb Bush’s organization): $3 million
High Tech High Graduate School of Education (this one stumped me; how can a high school run a graduate school of education?): $780,000
KIPP Foundation: $6.9 million
Leadership for Education Equity Foundation (this is TFA’s political organization that trains TFA to run for office): $5 million
Massachusetts Charter Public School Association (this funding preceded the referendum where the citizens of Massachusetts voted “no mas” to new charters): $850,000
National Public Radio: $1.1 million
National Urban League: $300,000
Pahara Institute: $832,000
Parent Revolution: $500,000
Relay Graduate School of Education (that pseudo-grad school with no professors, just charter teachers): $1 million
Schools That Can Milwaukee (Tough luck, the Working Families Party just swept the school board): $1.6 million
StudentsFirst Institute: $2.8 million
Teach for America (to supply scabs): $8 million
The New York Times: $350,000
Thomas B. Fordham Institute: $700,000
Urban Institute (supposedly an independent think tank in D.C.): $350,000
To be fair, in another part of the grants report, called Special Projects, the Walton Family Foundation donated $112,404 to the Bentonville Public Schools and $25,000 to the Bentonville Public Schools Foundation, in the town where the Waltons are located. Compare that to the $179 million for charters and choice, and you get the picture of what matters most.
Diane Ravitch's blog 
A simple question. WHY are both of these folks so opposed to our public schools?
It can’t be that they actually believe that private schools are better, can it. Is it just greed and control? I realize I’m from Kansas and we have great public schools but I’m thinking if all of that $$$ were spent on improving public schools, especially building and district leadership, we ALL would be better. What am I missing? Thanx so much for your leadership! ~Dayna
Dayna Richardson Have Fun and Make a Difference Leadership Coach & Consultant, ICF Certified Cell 620 921 5775
LikeLike
The mistake you make is assuming any of these guys have any sense of Civic responsibility. They don’t really care about educating “those kids” – its all about getting access to tax $’s and real estate.
LikeLike
Walmart has already shown it has no sense of decency by the products they sell and the way they treat their employees. Now they’re trying to sell online according to the news. So yes the Waltons have no sense of caring except for the mighty $$$.
Run as fast as you can from any of their schools.
LikeLike
It isn’t about education or children, it is about creating financial markets and establishing a framework for social control. Charters are only part of that. The next wave will be online “personalized” learning that will extract data from ALL students ALL the time to justify investments made via public-private partnerships. More here: https://wrenchinthegears.com/2017/04/04/global-finance-needs-our-schools-to-fail/
LikeLike
Money money money. Charter schools (and privates if vouchers go through) are big business at the tax payers expense. Build (or lease) a cheap building, pay teachers who want out of public schools OR who don’t have the certification to teach there) low wages (privates do this routinely), choose who you are willing to educate (key step), get good test scores and take in federal dollars. So few people seem to realize how many charters are for-profit, very similar to online universities except they get the money directly from the state – not through student loans… how can we educate the public on this sham???
LikeLike
The most troubling of these donations is the funding of public media. As the federal funds for public media dry up due to an oppositional congress, where will we find in-depth reporting without bias due to funding issues. Everyone has bias, but when it enters the funding equation, freedom is restricted as information is suppressed. Do we begin the move from buying a slant to tainting the facts themselves?
LikeLike
Completely agree, Roy. I remember reading that TIME Magazine partly evaluates its reporters by how well their articles match the philosophies of their sponsors. We need some billionaires on our side!
LikeLike
True Public reporting by NPR (reporting in the public interest) dried up long before the latest effort to defund NPR member stations.
NPR has not been a public organization in a very long time.
If people want to support a truly public news organization, they should donate to Democracy Now or the Real News.
NPR chose to go corporate and they should now have to live with that choice.
They can’t have it both ways.
LikeLike
Nothing all that new here .Kevin K. Kumashiro
“When Billionaires Become Educational Experts
“Venture philanthropists” push for the privatization of public education.”
He details the early years of the Business RoundTable ‘s assault on education . But it is important to note why that organization formed and
their first target. Starting in the early seventies
http://www.laborrising.com/2014/03/the-business-roundtable-and-american-labor/
“This committee commissioned the widely publicized study produce by the Wharton School on why Davis-Bacon should be repealed. It has also placed several articles about economics and inflation in the Reader’s Digest, a magazine that goes into homes of one out of every four American families.”
It is clear, therefore, that the Business Roundtable intends to bring its total resources to bear in a multi-faceted attack on Davis-Bacon and, indeed, upon all of the wage protective statutes, in 1979. The combined assets of the Roundtable members, as I have told you, approaches ¾ of a trillion dollars and it seems fair to say that no greater concentration of economic power has ever been placed in the hands of one centralized group in this nation’s political history. It is the ability of the Business Roundtable to bring this enormous power to bear upon the political and legislative processes,”
LikeLike
Thanks for the info. about Reader’s Digest. I’m curious if an e-mail campaign led by Network for Public Education would change the magazine’s receptiveness to an article about Diane Ravitch.
LikeLike
“Most troubling” (actually, down right scary) is the fusion of the Democratic and Republican parties in support of oligarch rule.
Pahara is an Aspen education program. David Koch and Madelyn Albright are on Aspen’s board. Gates funds Aspen’s education programs like the Senior Congressional Education Staff Network, which “creates a safe space” for policy development. Gates also funds Pahara.
CAP played a substantial role in the Clinton campaign. Gates gave CAP $2.2 mil. from 2013-2015. The CAP V.P. of Education Policy was formerly V.P of Education Policy at TFA.
John Podesto, Hillary’s campaign manager, appeared on a dais with Jeb Bush and Chester Finn. Podesto asked campaign donors to support school privatizing candidates.
In March, Marco Rubio introduced legislation that takes control of accreditation standards away from college faculty, replacing the process with measurements based on student outcomes. The data churning will be a boon for tech corporations and Wall Street. The Rubio plan paves the way for the values that business demands, which undermines the foundation of an independent higher education system. In Nov. 2016, CAP outlined its plan for accreditation replacement in Forbes. It was published two weeks after the presidential election. CAP’s narrative of accreditation failure, follows the familiar right wing strategy that falsely portrays a crisis, an echo chamber and a drumbeat of failure rhetoric, followed by political machinations that worsen conditions.
In the wings there’s always a proposal for control, outside of the democratically governed structure and most often it includes privatization. The CAP/Rubio plans are indistinguishable in tone.
LikeLike
The really upsetting donations that I immediately notice are the ones to National Public Radio, The New York Times, and the Fordham Institute…organizations that like to pass themselves off to the public as objective.
My son is in fourth grade and studying separation of powers. We found a 5-minute youtube video that mentioned the traditional three branches of government…but then went on to mention a fourth “branch” (the bureaucracy), a fifth “branch” (the media), and a sixth “branch” (the lobbyists and moneyed interests). It finished by noting that there are checks and balances for the first three…but what about the second three?!
LikeLike
But according to National Presstitute Radio, underwriter donations have no effect on their reporting.
And the NPR Ombotsman said so, so it must be true.
LikeLike
Didn’t realize this. What a farce. Do they really believe this?
LikeLike
Here’s one example that.
http://www.npr.org/sections/ombudsman/2015/04/16/397071452/nprs-underwriting-guidelines-part-two
Read the part where the Ombot talks about the (supposed) “firewall”
According to her, NPR doesn’t “pick and choose” it’s sponsors and that it necessarily follows that those sponsors (supposedly) have no effect on reporting or editing.
The funniest part about that whole incident was that at the very same time NPR was running a text version of their story touting the wonders of natural gas, they were running sponsorship “ads” from America’s Natural Gas Alliance on the very same web page that the story appeared on.
The claim that the two were completely separate and unrelated was just a joke. A lie, actually.
LikeLike
In this coutry of supposed freedom, MONEY talks and BS walks. Sad.
LikeLike
Here are the top recepients of Walton grants.
Charter Fund, Inc. $14,170,000.
Teach For America (Two streams) $8,050,000.
Kipp Foundation $6,972,661.
Families For Excellent Schools, Inc. $6,400,000.
Newschools Venture Fund Nsvf $5,216,328.
California Charter Schools Association $5,000,000.
Leadership For Educational Equity Foundation $5,000,000.
Building Excellent Schools, Inc. $4,995,530.
Education Reform Now, Inc. $4,249,337.
Alliance For School Choice, Inc. $3,500,000.
President And Fellows Of Harvard College $3,102,058.
Foundation For Excellence In Education, Inc. $3,000,000.
Hightest funding for special projects
Children’s Scholarship Fund $7,563,500
Camp War Eagle, Inc. $5,940,882
Walmart Associates In Critical Need Fund $4,000,000
Arizona State University Foundation
For A New American University $3,788,280
University Of Arkansas Foundation, Inc. $2,714,805
I think these rearragements show the priorities. Perhaps special projects for Walmart Associates would be lower if the wages were better.
LikeLike
While we’re on the topic of predatory philanthropies, here’s a brief look at Idaho’s Albertson Foundation:
The information was obtained from the 990 Form information for the Albertson Foundation. EIN 82-6012000
Click to access 2015-826012000-0d251b34-F.pdf
$19,413,720.70 in grants were recorded for 2015. Among these are:
Building Hope (charter school fund) $4,000,000.00
Bellwether Education $397,370.50
Bluum (charter school related) $468,230.00
Idaho Education News (think Education Post) $830,000.00
Idaho Business for Education (registered as lobbyist) $215,000.00
Building Hope (charter schools) $90,997.00
Teach for America (Idaho) $1,000.000.00
In addition the foundation gave direct subsidies to several charter schools.
A review of the last pages of the 2015 990 shows depreciation claimed on facilities, exercise equipment, etc.
The picture that emerges is one where the tax code is used to allow nonprofits to drive policy in a manner that benefits associated corporate interests.
LikeLike
We the people are at war with the few who are billionaire oligarchs meddling in our world. This very small minority of the very wealthy have been nibbling away at the U.S. Constitution/democracy/the U.S. Republic, labor unions, and the middle class for decades.
What they are doing is actually illegal but they are clever and have found ways to muzzle the law as defined by the U.S. Constitution that should have stopped them decades ago.
When will we, a majority of the people, wake up and realize this very small minority of individuals with too much money and power will never stop until they achieve their treasonous draconian agendas.
There is only one way to stop them. History shows us what has worked best in the past, and Thomas Jefferson already told us what we have to do to stop tyrants like The Waltons, Bill Gates, the Malignant Narcissist in the White House, Besty Devos, etc.
Thomas Jefferson said, “The of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/t/thomasjeff109180.html
I know, I know. Someone will comment or send me an e-mail to advise me, to warn me, not to be this outspoken because “they” might send some thug to come for me and muzzle me by tossing me in prison and/or financially bankrupting me, but someone has to say it.
I refuse to be in fear of a knock on my door by the modern American Alt-Right Gestapo that works for these billionaires.
Or there will be the outraged troll from the Alt-Right hate mongers, a member of the deplorable segment of humanity, that will attack me in a comment for not sounding like the stereotype of a so-called turn the other cheek pacifist liberal. I don’t think there are that many liberals that fit that stereotype.
I am not a pacifist liberal. I’m a progressive in the Teddy Roosevelt tradition and TR was not the passive type.
LikeLike
The alt-right and neo-liberals seem to share similar goals. Both have lost sight of the ideals of the Founding Fathers. Living in Idaho AKA Redneckistan, I can tell you that there is a growing number of people who consider themselves conservatives who are just as opposed to what the nonprofits are doing. We are becoming a corporate fascist state. To stop this, we need to return to the Constitution and get the left and the right together. No more labels! No more name calling! Speak truth to power. With that said, one of the better books I read was Ralph Nader’s “Unstoppable”. It pointed out our common ground.
LikeLike
Good luck in getting enough members of the Democratic and Republican parties together.
The neo-con and neo-lib factions (both with roots to the University of Chicago) are already working together toward similar destructive goals, and that togetherness is not good for the rest of humanity.
Instead of growing closer or having some common ground, the two major parties have grown farther apart.
“REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS ARE FURTHER APART THAN EVER – America’s two major parties have evolved in very different ways over the past 24 years, according to a new report from Pew Research.
“On key characteristics – especially race and ethnicity and religious affiliation – the two parties look less alike today than at any point over the last quarter-century,” the report’s authors write.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/republicans-democrats-further-apart_us_57d7f1b6e4b09d7a687f8936
LikeLike
If you read across ed reform the “debates” are really not debates because all of the big decisions have been made. They all say they’re “agnostics”, they all support “data-based decision making” and they all support “choice”.
They all move further towards “choice” as the central theme every year, too. It’s now so focused on choice that they debate whether the new privatized systems should be regulated or not. There’s no longer any real discussion over whether privatization as a singular focus is wise. It’s just a matter of whether to regulate.
If you listen to any of the conventions and roundtables what really sticks out is how little of this is ABOUT existing public schools. Often it will be 80% about charters, 10% about vouchers, and a sort of indirect mention of public schools ONLY in comparison to private or charter schools that adds up to 10%.
It is EXTREMELY skewed, which makes the declarations that they are “agnostic” almost laughable to an outsider.
If 90% of what you’re talking about is charter and private schools you’re not an “agnostic”. You’re making a choice to focus on those schools. It seems so obvious to me as an outsider that I marvel at how they can make the “agnostic” claim with a straight face.
I follow Ohio state law on ed reform and there are whole legislative sessions where public schools are barely mentioned. It’s odd. It’s so contrary to the “facts on the ground” that it just screams “capture” and “echo chamber”.
It’s as a group of people said “we’re interested in public health insurance programs for the elderly” but then excluded any discussion of Medicare and focused solely on Medicare Advantage. They’re not interested in health insurance for the elderly, they’re interested in the privatized program. That’s okay, but it’s sure as hell not “agnostic”.
LikeLike
Check this out, Chiara! A bill co-sponsored by two Ohio Republicans!
http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/education/2017/04/13/bill-would-kill-common-core-state-tests/100415010/
LikeLike
The Walton Family Foundation aren’t the only group who are guilty of an EXTREMELY narrow view that is nearly limited to “choice” schools. Most ed reform orgs are like that.
Often the only time public schools will be mentioned is if there’s some intersect with charter and private schools. The public schools serve as a kind of “control” they use to promote one or another ed reform plan or idea. There doesn’t seem to be any recognition that public schools could have value or worth just as schools, not as some passive “status quo” cog or comparison point in whatever the plans are.
It’s sort of appalling to read as a public school parent, frankly. Public schools are treated as this monolithic bloc that are “failing” or “the status quo” or all the other derogatory terms they use. Read ed reform long enough and your overwhelming sense is this is a group of people who have made up their minds about public schools and the decision they all came to was “inferior”.
If you listen to DeVos and her heart-warming anecdotes about schools you’ll notice a glaring exception. There are no public school students and parents. Nothing good ever happens in a public school. If you’ve been a public school parent a long time this isn’t just unfair it’s also so obviously untrue that it discredits everything else she says.
LikeLike
That’s because unless you crack open these public schools somehow, you don’t get access to the tax dollars that are going to pay teacher salaries and you can’t “re-purpose” their real estate. These Ed Reform groups are interested only in diverting tax dollars and public assets to the pockets of their donors and their friends. The only way they can do that is to take public school teachers and their unions out of the picture. It has nothing to do with how good or bad the schools are- the calculus is “A dollar that is going to a public school teacher is a dollar that should be resting comfortably in my wallet.” The rest is just smokescreen.
LikeLike
EdTrust is funded by Bloomberg, Arnold and Gates so not sure how that translates to “left leaning.”
LikeLike
I wouldn’t call Edtrust left-leaning but the media does. They are huge advocates for testing and led the campaign to keep annual testing in ESSA because minority kids need scores.
LikeLike
It’s the same thing with the Center for American Progress, funded by Gates. CAP advocates a position on college accreditation similar in tone to Rubio’s proposed legislation. But, all of the media go to CAP for the obligatory alternative view to the right wing position.
Citing a change up, its rare to find an education article in Ohio newspapers, without a quote by Chad Aldis of Fordham. An alternative view, isn’t even cited.
LikeLike
Linda,
CAP is also funded by Walton.
LikeLike
As long as CAP and John Podesto run the Democratic Party, Dem. politicians will be running for office with their arms tied behind their backs.
LikeLike
The NY Times? How can a foundation donate to a corporation?
LikeLike
Oligarch foundations do anything they want to do.
LikeLike
High Tech High runs a graduate teaching program. I’m guessing they get free teachers out of the deal, plus a whole crop of teachers trained in their “method.” This has always seemed fishy to me, but I haven’t had the time to look into it. In CA, High Tech High is one of a few few charter schools that has the classification of State Benefit Charter, meaning they can set up shop in any district anywhere without district approval. They go straight through the charter-friendly State Board of Education. Supposedly they get this special status because they offer some sort of magical “statewide benefit.” I have no idea how that status is justified or how such a status came to be, but HIgh Tech High gets a lot of privileges in our state. I’m sure Bill Gates’ influence had something to do with it.
LikeLike
Yes. Also Gates money laundered for that school through Knowledgeworks.org.
LikeLike
Interesting. I hadn’t heard of Knowledgeworks.org I see they are promoting “radical personalization” and something called “Early College High School.” Now I am curious. Thanks for the comment.
LikeLike
One of the cities designated to be preyed upon by the Waltons is Boston. Our current superintendent, Tommy Chang, is a Broad supernintendo. We do not have an elected school board, but one appointed by the mayor. The budget for next year will decimate 49 schools with reductions in funding of more than $11 million. Boston schools rank 53rd in the state for student spending, despite having 89% of kids in poverty, some 40% English language learners, and many kids with complex special needs. Also, the Boston Teachers Union is in its 15 month of working without a contract, with negotiations going nowhere fast.
http://bostonpoliticaleducation.blogspot.com/2017/02/bps-budget-cuts-in-fiscal-year-2018.html
The state DESE seems to be gunning for us with an assist from Commissioner Mitchell Chester. Chester, once the head of PARCC, is now one of the Chiefs for Change. This would seem to be a conflict of interest, but when dark money is looking for a way to circumvent the voters will against charters, no one in the politically appointed educational hierarchy raises a peep. (Deeply Democratic Massachusetts has a Republican governor who, as a businessman, doesn’t give two toots about our standing as an excellent urban system.) Professor Maurice Cunningham traces that dark money in this post:
http://blogs.wgbh.org/masspoliticsprofs/2017/4/11/dark-money-sharks-devour-mass-education-policy/
LikeLike
The Massachusetts Department of Higher Education has a Board member who is a Pahara Fellow. He identifies it in his bio. at the site.
LikeLike
Which one? We’ve got reformers up the whazoo.
Guessing you mean Turncoat Paul Toner, former president of the Massachusetts Teacher Association (thankfully now headed up by the social justice warrior Barbara Madeloni).
“Paul F. Toner is the Executive Director of Teach Plus Massachusetts, a non-profit engaging, elevating and empowering teachers in the areas of education policy and practice in Massachusetts and across the nation. He is also president of Cambridge Strategic Partnerships, LLC providing education consulting services in Massachusetts and nationally. Toner is an experienced senior executive in education policy, association governance, labor and government relations.
Toner is the former president of the 113,000-member Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA), a position he held from 2010 to 2014. Toner, a middle school social studies teacher and lawyer was elected MTA president after serving four years as vice president. From 1991 to 2001, taught at the Harrington School in Cambridge, MA. In 2001, Toner was elected president of the Cambridge Teachers Association. As leader of the CTA and MTA, he was a strong advocate for students and members while working with the administration to improve labor-management relations and focus on improving student achievement.
Toner served on many NEA committees at the national level. He is a member of the Teachers 21 Board of Directors, an appointed member of the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education and the Education Commission of the States. He was a member of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Board of Directors and Group Insurance Commission. He served on numerous education committees and task forces. He was a participant in Governor Deval Patrick’s Readiness Project and served on Governor Charles Baker’s Education Transition Committee. He is also a Pahara-Aspen Teacher Leader Fellow.”
Jim Peyser, Secretary of Ed:
“As Secretary of Education, Jim Peyser directs the Executive Office of Education which is responsible for early education, K-12, and higher education in Massachusetts. Secretary Peyser sits on each of the boards governing the Commonwealth’s education agencies – Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, and Department of Higher Education as well as the University of Massachusetts system. He is Governor Baker’s top advisor on education and helps shape the Commonwealth’s education reform agenda.
Prior to his appointment as Secretary, he served as the Managing Director at NewSchools Venture Fund, a non-profit grant-making firm that seeks to transform public education in high-need urban communities by supporting innovative education entrepreneurs. From 1999 through 2006, Secretary Peyser served as Chairman of the Massachusetts Board of Education. Prior to joining NewSchools, he was Education Advisor to Governors Bill Weld, Jane Swift and Mitt Romney, where he helped shape state policy regarding standards and assessments, school accountability, and charter schools. In 1995, he served as Under Secretary of Education and Special Assistant to the Governor Weld for Charter Schools.
He previously spent seven years as Executive Director of the Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research, where he helped to launch the Massachusetts Charter School Resource Center, which supported the development of the state’s first charter schools. Before joining Pioneer Secretary Peyser held various positions at Teradyne, Inc. in Boston, an electronic test equipment manufacturer.
Secretary Peyser holds a Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy from The Fletcher School (Tufts University) and a Bachelor of Arts from Colgate University.”
Chris Gabrieli, Chair and education gadfly, running 3, count ’em 3! edu-businesses
“Chris Gabrieli was appointed to the Board of Higher Education by Governor Baker in March 2015. He is the co-founder of three non-profit education innovation and reform initiatives and a lecturer at Harvard’s Graduate School of Education.
As the co-founder of Massachusetts 2020/the National Center on Time & Learning, Gabrieli has been at the forefront of the movement to expand learning time for disadvantaged students. He is the Chairman of the Springfield Empowerment Zone Partnership, a groundbreaking partnership between the state and district aimed at accelerating success for middle school students. He is a Partner Emeritus at Bessemer Venture Partners where he helped entrepreneurs build biotechnology companies.
Gabrieli has served in several higher education board roles at Harvard, Boston University’s School of Public Health and Clark University.”
http://www.mass.edu/bhe/board.asp
LikeLike
My sympathies. It’s Toner who is Pahara. It’s a black eye for the NEA.
They should send a letter to the Mass. Board Chair, denouncing Pahara’s agenda, as a counter to the impression that Toner’s affiliation with Gates’ funded Aspen programs represents the view of the public sector, which includes teachers.
That’s assuming the NEA is not in bed with the the richest 0.1% reformers. If they are, the BATS need to certify as a union to oppose labor turncoats.
LikeLike
voters’ will
LikeLike
Is Stand for Children backed by Walton as well?
LikeLike
Stand for Children has received Walton funding. In the 2015 jackpot, the Louisiana branch of Stand was a winner of Walton $$$.
LikeLike