Archives for the month of: February, 2017

Barbara Miner is a veteran journalist based in Milwaukee, where she writes often about the stat’s disastrous voucher plan. In 2013, she published a book called “Lessons from the Heartland: A Turbulent Half-Century of Public Education in an Iconic American City.”

In this article in the Los Angeles Times, Miner warns that the public must keep watch on DeVos because her goal is to legitimize vouchers for religious schools across the nation.

She warns:

“DeVos, now confirmed as secretary of Education, is not just another inexperienced member of the president’s Cabinet. She is an ideologue with a singular educational passion — replacing our system of democratically controlled public schools with a universal voucher program that privileges private and religious ones.

“If you care about our public schools and our democracy, you should be worried.”

Miner describes how Milwaukee and Wisconsin were taken in by bait and switch.

“Milwaukee’s program began in 1990, when the state Legislature passed a bill allowing 300 students in seven nonsectarian private schools to receive taxpayer-funded tuition vouchers. It was billed as a small, low-cost experiment to help poor black children, and had a five-year sunset clause.

“That was the bait. The first “switch” came a few weeks later, when the Republican governor eliminated the sunset clause. Ever since, vouchers have been a divisive yet permanent fixture in Wisconsin.

“Conservatives have consistently expanded the program, especially when Republicans controlled the state government. (Vouchers have never been put to a public vote in Wisconsin.) Today, some 33,000 students in 212 schools receive publicly funded vouchers, not just in Milwaukee but throughout Wisconsin. If it were its own school district, the voucher program would be the state’s second largest. The overwhelming majority of the schools are religious.

“Voucher schools are private schools that have applied for a state-funded program that pays tuition for some or all of its student body. Even if every single student at a school receives a publicly funded voucher, as is the case in 22 of Milwaukee’s schools, that school is still defined as private.

“Because they are defined as “private,” voucher schools operate by separate rules, with minimal public oversight or transparency. They can sidestep basic constitutional protections such as freedom of speech. They do not have to provide the same level of second-language or special-education services. They can suspend or expel students without legal due process. They can ignore the state’s requirements for open meetings and records. They can disregard state law prohibiting discrimination against students on grounds of sex, pregnancy, sexual orientation, or marital or parental status.”

Since 1990, the people of Wisconsin have paid more than $2 billion for vouchers, mostly to religious institutions. This has been an expensive experiment.

“Privatizing an essential public function and forcing the public to pay for it, even while removing it from meaningful public oversight, weakens our democracy.”

Just got this.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/rosie-o-donnell-morphs-steve-bannon-new-profile-picture-article-1.2969051

Now don’t suggest she can walk into the White House and sit in on the next meeting of the National Security Coucil.

Trump has made a series of statements about crime and violence in America that are demonstrably false, starting with his reference to “American carnage” in his inaugural speech. Stirring up fear about crime is a tactic to pour resources into policing and into “get tough” policies that make Americans fearful and afraid to venture out at night, if they believe our national fabulist.

Just for the record–and I know it is an anecdote–I have lived in New York City since 1960. I have never felt safer than I do today. I walk my dog at night, usually between 11 pm and 1 am–and I have never seen a crime or felt afraid.

But don’t take it from me. Here are the data about Trump’s campaign to spread fear. Despite what Trump claimed, the murder rate is the lowest it has been in 47 years, despite a slight uptick in the past year.

Is he laying the groundwork to declare martial law? Does he plan to divert money from education and healthcare to law enforcement?

One of the hallmarks of authoritarians is that they promote fear. They scapegoat. They want control so they can restore order. Trump generates chaos, then expects us to believe he can dial it back. He can’t and he won’t. Chaos serves his purposes.

Peter Greene writes about the filing of another lawsuit in California whose purpose is to defund teachers’ unions.

http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-new-friedrichs-anti-union-case.html

Last time around, it was the Friedrichs’ case, which lost on appeal, went to the U.S. Supreme Court, and ended in a 4-4 tie because Justice Scalia died.

The Yohn case is a rehash of Freidrichs with new plaintiffs and the expectation that Trump’s justice might decide the Court in favor of Yohn.

Greene writes:

“The argument is unvarnished baloney:

[According to counsel for the plaintiffs:] The Supreme Court has recognized the grave First Amendment problems that arise when a state coerces political speech. In 2014, Justice Alito observed in Harris v. Quinn, that, “Agency-fee provisions unquestionably impose a heavy burden on the First Amendment interests of objecting employees.” As he explained, it is a “bedrock principle that, except perhaps in the rarest of circumstances, no person in this country may be compelled to subsidize speech by a third party that he or she does not wish to support.”

Greene says:

“Cool! May I please have a refund on all the taxes I paid to support pointless wars and the actions of various government agencies with which I disagree?

“The goal here is simple– give the union less money. It’s a popular idea– in fact, some legislators are trying to legislate the same thing in PA right now.

“The goal here is to establish a whole class of free riders– teachers who don’t support their local union, but still benefit from the collective bargaining process (where it still exists) as well as the representation that the union is legally required to provide these folks should they ever get in trouble. It’s like having the government require you to drive your neighbor to work every day, but forbidding you to ever ask him to chip in for gas–oh, and if he needs to be taken way out of the way for an appointment, you have to drive him there, too. Oh– and all the way there, you have to listen to how you’re oppressing him by giving him a ride.”

Plaintiff Yohn wants the benefits of collective bargaining, but doesn’t want to pay the union that negotiates for his benefits. If he wins, there will be many more like him, free-riding.

You can be sure that this suit will be well-funded. Certain elites won’t rest until the union movement is gone, a relic of the past.

Trump can’t help himself.

Senator McCain criticized the raid in Yemen and said it was not a success.

Trump responded with multiple tweets lashing out at McCain.

Donald Trump, who never served in the military, goes after Senate veterans – CNN
https://apple.news/AyCEYj8cgR3eI8M4P6hRMdQ

Trump got five deferments during the war in Vietnam while McCain spent years in a POW camp.

President Chaos is exhausting all of us.

Would Twitter please take away his account for abusive behavior?

Trump just tweeted:

SEE YOU IN COURT.

The security of our nation is at stake

A federal appeals court ruled unanimously to block Trump’s immigration ban, upholding the decision of the federal judge who blocked the ban a few days ago.

If the decision is appealed by the Justice Department, it is unlikely to prevail. At present, the court is divided, 4-4, liberal-conservative. And there is a good chance that the US Supreme Court would rule unanimously against a ban so clearly based on religion. The justices know the Constitution.

The American system of government is based on separation of powers and checks and balances to prevent authoritarian rule. Our democracy scored a victory today.

This post was written by a retired teacher of history who taught in Pennsylvania.

He reminds us about the clown car as an apt metaphor for what is happening now.


Not sure if you remember going to the Ringling Brother’s Circus attraction (too bad they are folding their tents). There was one scene where a small car, later a VW comes to center ring and stops. Out come a couple of clowns and then many more clowns come out of the car. It was always a hilarious thing to youngsters.

Well, the scene is still pretty much the same. As more appointees appear to be part of the current administration, more seem like clowns, but not regular clowns more like Pennywise the clown in Stephen King’s “It.” These are not the normal kinds of appointees with some semblance of experience in the area of appointment, but no experience even near the field.

So each appointee goes before a committee and is asked a bunch of embarrassing questions by Democrats and softball questions by Republicans. All of them have passed so far, even one whose qualifications are zero for her new job. It takes a tie breaker by the Vice President to get her approved.

All of these appointees will be approved. Even those with obvious conflicts of interest will sail through. Interesting that many opposed to the President and his administration are touting the high road in condemnation of what they are doing. It does not seem to be working at all.

Those who supported the new administration are not those who respect the high road or even the moderate road. They are happy with the fact that a brash pt. personality and con man could beat down the elite, college going, establishment (including the media).

Giving factual information to condemn what this administration is doing has no effect on the President’s supporters. Hirer is one example. My wife’s cousin, who is a Californian and a virulent supporter of the new administration, has said that there was violence and tumult at the Women’s March in Washington DC. In actuality, there were no arrests made at the march. Responding to him with a fact like that does not affect him at all. We are all saying and quoting fake news.

So, how does one combat the flying monkeys and the Pennywise clowns? There are groups of people who are calling themselves, “Indivisibles.” They are now around the country. They are thoughtful folks with a purpose. They are realistic and determined. They are not “holier than thou,” folks. They will speak out and work at a local level to take back our country. I am impressed with their determination and skill.

We will take back our country. Period.

Everyone knows by now that Senator Mitch McConnell invoked a rarely used Rule 19 to silence Senator Elizabeth Warren as she was reading a letter that Coretta Scott King wrote years ago against Jeff Sessions. Warren was an immediate media sensation to the Democratic base. Women identified with her as she was told to shut up and sit down for being a naughty girl. Civil rights groups were outraged that the reading of a letter by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was cause for punishment.

But Salon points out that McConnell was throwing red meat to his base by telling an uppity left wing woman to shut up.

The Trumpistas hate Warren. They would like to punch her in the mouth. She is far and away the most outspoken, smartest, toughest woman in politics at the national level. She is articulate and fearless. She must be silenced, and McConnell won one for his base.

All of this reflects George Lakoff’s analysis of right-left thinking. The left is compassionate, empathetic, rational, and thinks that facts will win elections.

The right, says Lakoff, sees the world as a morality play, in which strict fathers make the rules and enforce them. Girls should not be outspoken. They should be polite and deferential. The strict father gives a warning. If the naughty girl persists in speaking up, she must be told to sit down and not allowed to speak again. Or leave the room.

Who won?

Of course, you can extend this line of thought to the field of education, which has a predominantly female work force. The legislate are mostly male. They make the rules. They believe they know what schools should do and how they should run, because they went to school. They think of the profession as a bunch of women who should stick to their classrooms and stay out of the serious business of decision making about policy. That’s for the men.

Alexandra Petri is a gifted humorist who writes for the Washington Post. She has a talent for seizing the zeitgeist and turning it into belly laughs.

In this post, she explains that the Trump administration is right about everything, in their alternative universe.

It begins like this, but you must read the whole thing. It is pitch perfect.

“We are being too uncharitable to the Trump administration.
We have probably made Sean Spicer cry, and that is not what anyone set out to do.


“There is a much simpler explanation for the list of Secret Media Terrorism Coverups and the Bowling Green Massacre and the “alternative facts” than this idea that somehow, the Trump administration is making up facts or misleading the American people. Nonsense. They are doing the best they can with the facts they have. They simply have come here from an alternative universe.

“
It is not their fault that their facts appear to be quite different from what is happening in the universe where most people live. They did not ask to come here. Something went wrong with the timeline, is all. Somebody stepped on a butterfly, and here we are.


“When we look at their recently provided list of times when the media failed to cover Horrible Acts Of Terrorism, what we see is a long series of misspellings in which, often, zero people died. When they look at it, do they see millions of lives cut short, enough to justify a massive travel ban? It is unclear. What is clear is that they exist in a universe where no one reported adequately on the Paris attacks, whereas we live in a universe where all 130 victims were profiled. This discrepancy is nobody’s fault. There, the media really did cover up dozens of very serious attacks in which I, personally, was killed.

”

Please read on, so you can share Alexandra’s deep reasoning.