Peter Greene writes about the filing of another lawsuit in California whose purpose is to defund teachers’ unions.

http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-new-friedrichs-anti-union-case.html

Last time around, it was the Friedrichs’ case, which lost on appeal, went to the U.S. Supreme Court, and ended in a 4-4 tie because Justice Scalia died.

The Yohn case is a rehash of Freidrichs with new plaintiffs and the expectation that Trump’s justice might decide the Court in favor of Yohn.

Greene writes:

“The argument is unvarnished baloney:

[According to counsel for the plaintiffs:] The Supreme Court has recognized the grave First Amendment problems that arise when a state coerces political speech. In 2014, Justice Alito observed in Harris v. Quinn, that, “Agency-fee provisions unquestionably impose a heavy burden on the First Amendment interests of objecting employees.” As he explained, it is a “bedrock principle that, except perhaps in the rarest of circumstances, no person in this country may be compelled to subsidize speech by a third party that he or she does not wish to support.”

Greene says:

“Cool! May I please have a refund on all the taxes I paid to support pointless wars and the actions of various government agencies with which I disagree?

“The goal here is simple– give the union less money. It’s a popular idea– in fact, some legislators are trying to legislate the same thing in PA right now.

“The goal here is to establish a whole class of free riders– teachers who don’t support their local union, but still benefit from the collective bargaining process (where it still exists) as well as the representation that the union is legally required to provide these folks should they ever get in trouble. It’s like having the government require you to drive your neighbor to work every day, but forbidding you to ever ask him to chip in for gas–oh, and if he needs to be taken way out of the way for an appointment, you have to drive him there, too. Oh– and all the way there, you have to listen to how you’re oppressing him by giving him a ride.”

Plaintiff Yohn wants the benefits of collective bargaining, but doesn’t want to pay the union that negotiates for his benefits. If he wins, there will be many more like him, free-riding.

You can be sure that this suit will be well-funded. Certain elites won’t rest until the union movement is gone, a relic of the past.