Barbara Miner is a veteran journalist based in Milwaukee, where she writes often about the stat’s disastrous voucher plan. In 2013, she published a book called “Lessons from the Heartland: A Turbulent Half-Century of Public Education in an Iconic American City.”
In this article in the Los Angeles Times, Miner warns that the public must keep watch on DeVos because her goal is to legitimize vouchers for religious schools across the nation.
She warns:
“DeVos, now confirmed as secretary of Education, is not just another inexperienced member of the president’s Cabinet. She is an ideologue with a singular educational passion — replacing our system of democratically controlled public schools with a universal voucher program that privileges private and religious ones.
“If you care about our public schools and our democracy, you should be worried.”
Miner describes how Milwaukee and Wisconsin were taken in by bait and switch.
“Milwaukee’s program began in 1990, when the state Legislature passed a bill allowing 300 students in seven nonsectarian private schools to receive taxpayer-funded tuition vouchers. It was billed as a small, low-cost experiment to help poor black children, and had a five-year sunset clause.
“That was the bait. The first “switch” came a few weeks later, when the Republican governor eliminated the sunset clause. Ever since, vouchers have been a divisive yet permanent fixture in Wisconsin.
“Conservatives have consistently expanded the program, especially when Republicans controlled the state government. (Vouchers have never been put to a public vote in Wisconsin.) Today, some 33,000 students in 212 schools receive publicly funded vouchers, not just in Milwaukee but throughout Wisconsin. If it were its own school district, the voucher program would be the state’s second largest. The overwhelming majority of the schools are religious.
“Voucher schools are private schools that have applied for a state-funded program that pays tuition for some or all of its student body. Even if every single student at a school receives a publicly funded voucher, as is the case in 22 of Milwaukee’s schools, that school is still defined as private.
“Because they are defined as “private,” voucher schools operate by separate rules, with minimal public oversight or transparency. They can sidestep basic constitutional protections such as freedom of speech. They do not have to provide the same level of second-language or special-education services. They can suspend or expel students without legal due process. They can ignore the state’s requirements for open meetings and records. They can disregard state law prohibiting discrimination against students on grounds of sex, pregnancy, sexual orientation, or marital or parental status.”
Since 1990, the people of Wisconsin have paid more than $2 billion for vouchers, mostly to religious institutions. This has been an expensive experiment.
“Privatizing an essential public function and forcing the public to pay for it, even while removing it from meaningful public oversight, weakens our democracy.”

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
I accept that Trump won the election and he and DeVos are ideologically opposed to public schools. I didn’t vote for them and I don’t agree with them but I accept it.
I also accept that public schools must follow federal law.
But are we obligated to host these folks in our schools? We all know how they feel about public schools- they never miss a chance to bash them
If we had a President and a Secretary of Education who were opposed to charter schools would charter parents and students want them in their schools? What possible value do these people add to my son’s school ?
LikeLike
These people add nothing to your son’s public school or anyone’s public school. They are in the business of subtracting from your son’s public school. Once again, vouchers like charters will focus on the cheapest and easiest to educate. In the case of vouchers many of the parents already have chosen to send their children to a religious school, only now they get a subsidy. This is reckless policy. The state has no right to any quality control, oversight or accountability. The only aspect that is public is the money. It sounds like taxation without representation to me.
LikeLike
The fundamental issue is that this administration and far too many of Republicans in elected office see people as statistics and consumers, not as distinct individuals worthy of dignity, respect, and deference.
LikeLike
I’d just like to discuss this the other way ’round. I’m not here to please ed reformers. This isn’t “what public schools can do to merit the approval of Betsy DeVos”.
She’s supposed to add something of value to schools that exist. If she doesn’t, why would I want my son’s school wasting time with her?
She seems to have this backward. I’m not on the Betsy DeVos anti-public school team. It’s not me and Betsy versus my son’s school.
LikeLike
Chiara
These people operate on the Devalue Added Model (DAM)
So expecting that they will actually ADD value is completely unreasonable — irrational, even.
LikeLike
See the story that kathyirwin1 posted or go here to cheer up a bit
http://www.alternet.org/activism/protesters-block-education-secretary-betsy-devos-entering-dc-middle-school
LikeLike
I read an interview with Senator Toomey of PA on why he supports DeVos. He neglected to mention PA public schools so I went to the state dept of ed to see if there were any
https://twitter.com/PADeptofEd?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
there are a lot of them! Someone should tell the Senator.
LikeLike
So much for accountability. Accountability for public school money, no accountability for voucher money, what a bad joke.
LikeLiked by 1 person
the lack of accountability for suddenly dictated educational funding is exactly what spurred NCLB into a frenzy and then hyped up an ever more deregulated R2T; it has been interesting to watch noise grow about “fed ed” even while control over fed ed money has broken down into chaos
LikeLike
she offers absolutely nothing to kids and parents in public schools;
“DeVos says she’s bothered most by accusations that she doesn’t support traditional public schools and doesn’t really care about the students in them.
“Nothing could be further from the truth. All the work I’ve done has been to help kids for whom the schools they’re assigned don’t work, but with the hope that the schools that they would leave actually have an opportunity to get better as well and should challenge themselves to be better.’
does ed reform consider this a problem? That they add no value at all to existing public schools?
I’m not an opponent of my son’s school. DeVos is. I’m not.
What’s the plan here? The US Department of Education plan to come into public schools and scold us on how we should all be in a private school ?
Do us a favor. Stay in DC. No one needs this advice.
LikeLike
Might Georgia’s recently defeated and Governor-supported Accountability School District have been the opening gambit of a similar bait and switch trick?
LikeLike
OPPORTUNITY School District–sorry.
LikeLike
With the charter school industry that’s favored by U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos bleeding vital funds from the public’s schools, the thoughtful person will ask: “Why are hedge fund people the main backers of the private charter school industry? After all, hedge funds are not known for a selfless interest in educating children.”
Well, the answer, of course, is MONEY.
For example, look at DeVos’ home state of Michigan: There are 1.5 million children attending public elementary and secondary schools and the state annually spends about $11,000 per student which adds up to pot of about $17 billion that private charter school operators have their eyes on. If these private operators succeed in getting what DeVos wants to give them — the power to run all the schools — these private profiteers could make almost $6 billion in profit just by firing veteran teachers and replacing them with low-paid inexperienced teachers, which is what the real objective of so-called “Value-Added” evaluations of veteran teachers is all about.
But wait! There’s more!
In fact, there are many more ways that big profits are being made every day right now by the private charter school industry. Here are just some:
The Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Education has issued a warning that charter schools posed a risk to the Department of Education’s own goals. The report says: “Charter schools and their management organizations pose a potential risk to federal funds even as they threaten to fall short of meeting the goals” because of the financial fraud, the skimming of tax money into private pockets that is the reason why hedge funds are the main backers of charter schools.
The Washington State Supreme Court, the New York State Supreme Courts, and the National Labor Relations Board have ruled that charter schools are not public schools because they aren’t accountable to the public since they aren’t governed by publicly-elected boards and aren’t subdivisions of public government entities, in spite of the fact that some state laws enabling charter schools say they are government subdivisions. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A “PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL” because no charter school fulfills the basic public accountability requirement of being responsible to and directed by a school board that is elected by We the People. Charter schools are clearly private schools, owned and operated by private entities. Nevertheless, they get public tax money.
Even the staunchly pro-charter school Los Angeles Times (which acknowledges that its “reporting” on charter schools is paid for by a billionaire charter school advocate) complained in an editorial that “the only serious scrutiny that charter operators typically get is when they are issued their right to operate, and then five years later when they apply for renewal.” Without needed oversight of what charter schools are actually doing with the public’s tax dollars, hundreds of millions of tax money that is supposed to be spent on educating the public’s children is being siphoned away into private pockets.
Charter schools should (1) be required by law to be governed by school boards elected by the voters so that they are accountable to the public; (2) a charter school entity must legally be a subdivision of a publicly-elected governmental body; (3) charter schools should be required to file the same detailed public-domain audited annual financial reports under penalty of perjury that genuine public schools file; and, (4) anything a charter school buys with the public’s money should be the public’s property.
NO PUBLIC TAX MONEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GO TO CHARTER SCHOOLS THAT FAIL TO MEET THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE PUBLIC.
LikeLike
Well stated.
The economic argument against charter schools and vouchers is what the public should hear. It’s not well understood, and it will resonate better than the draining funds argument. Charter school and voucher money gets spent year after year with the public owning nothing. Imagine if police cars, fire stations, libraries, parks, or big-ticket items like F15 fighter planes were funded with the same hedge-fund rent-seeking behavior!
The public hates the idea of tax dollars being wasted. Oddly, its visceral reaction against waste is almost worse than against corruption. (My theory is that we’ve gotten inured to corruption.) The two are often intertwined and result from the same ill-conceived plan. Nevertheless, we should climb every mountain top and yell waste, waste, waste!
As for those reactionary supporters of DeVos, I’d remind them of their earlier belief that “throwing money at schools” won’t solve anything. But throwing it away will solve something?
LikeLike
in Cincinnati our charter and magnet schools are public schools so the way I look at it vouchers and school choice aren’t about stepping away from public education …but you have to admit our public schools are not working as they should especially when universities have to create remedial courses to deal with this concern….how do you reconcile the issue that Elizabeth Warren wrote a book and advocated for school choice and vouchers and recently said that DeVos’ support of school choice disqualifies her same as Corey Booker
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444738/cory-booker-betsy-devos-statement-hypocritical-school-choice-teachers-union-education
http://thefederalist.com/2015/01/14/elizabeth-warrens-achilles-heel-her-support-for-school-choice/
LikeLike
On the face of it I can’t explain Warren’s earlier position, although Diane Ravitch has changed her opinion drastically since the Bush era. Diane even had the advantage of an educational background whereas Warren would have been examining it form an economic viewpoint. I am a bit concerned by your sources of information, though. I believe I need to see the information from less partisan sources as well.
Chiara, you should chime in on this public charter school claim in Ohio. Although there are a few that are actually under the control of public school districts, the vast majority are obviously private whether they own it or not. Receiving public money without accountability
(among other things) does not make an enterprise public.
College is seen as possible for far more students than it used to be. Even so, I believe i remember reading an article about students recommended for remedial courses who do not take them and enter the regular classes instead apparently fair better. I also remember from my own college days that those “remedial” courses used to just be regular basic courses. We could test out of them but it was not seen as a failure to be placed in them. To a certain extent it is a difference in the way the courses are viewed. I imagine that community colleges will get more students who may need some extra support initially and may very well offer courses that are more basic than a four year institution. I thought that was one of their missions: to support weaker students who needed time to beef up their skills before transferring to a four year institution.
LikeLike
Pamporter,
1. Jersey Jazzman/Mark Weber, doctoral candidate at Rutgers, researched the numbers of students who enrolled in community college several years after graduating high school and noted the hiatus could be a factor in the number of students who must take remedial courses.
2. Why do so many well-to-do foreigners send their youngsters to US colleges if they will be surrounded by peers from our public schools?
LikeLike
GOOD FOR THE PROTESTERS!
Betsy DeVos Tries To Enter Public School, Gets Blocked By Protesters
“Shame!” one demonstrator yelled.
02/10/2017 12:10 pm ET | Updated 45 minutes ago
Huffington Post
The woman in charge of all U.S. public schools was blocked from entering one by protesters on Friday morning.
Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos attempted to enter Jefferson Middle School in Washington, D.C., but protesters barred her way up the school steps.
In video obtained by ABC 7, DeVos can be seen immediately turning back from the school and walking to her vehicle.
“Giving your money to senators and buying your way into the position ― you should be so proud of yourself!” a man can be heard shouting at her.
He was likely referring to the fact that DeVos has made significant financial contributions to the campaigns of GOP senators who confirmed her and their affiliated super PACs.
“Go back!” he continued as DeVos got back into the vehicle. “Shame! Shame! Shame! Shame!”
The same protester can then be seen blocking a vehicle as it tries to leave the parking lot. Video by Fox 5 news later shows him being detained by police.
The protest was organized by the Washington Teachers’ Union, according to WJLA.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/betsy-devos-blocked-protesters_us_589de192e4b03df370d5b4aa?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
LikeLike
yes and yes I am glad I scrolled all the way to your post before I referred Chiara to the same story .
LikeLike
Every aspect of our lives is regulated. Federal, state, county, municipal regulations govern what we eat, how we drive, which bathrooms we can use! If children attend charter/private/parochial schools, they will be strictly regulated by the government. It is naïve to assume otherwise.
LikeLike
I’m hard pressed to find a more bogus “gubmint controls our lives” argument than this. C’mon Chas, you can do better.
LikeLike
I have lived in a communist dictatorship, and an Islamic Kingdom. these political systems control every aspect of your life. I never said that the government (here). I did say that every aspect of our lives is regulated.
Regulations cover food, medicines, business, telecommunications, housing, education, etc.
LikeLike
And those “regulations” are needed to prevent the unscrupulous from preying upon and feeding on the weak and unsuspecting.
LikeLike
I am NOT saying that regulations and government are bad, nor unnecessary. Quite the opposite. Schools are regulated, food is regulated, etc.
” But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary.”
James Madison, Federalist #51
LikeLiked by 1 person
A link to latest on the voucher experience in Milwaukee: http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2017/02/09/murphys-law-taking-aim-at-voucher-schools/?utm_source=Urban+Milwaukee&utm_campaign=2a33667ede-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fa7240869f-2a33667ede-51388889
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Network Schools – Wayne Gersen and commented:
This post explains how vouchers undercut the democratic heart of our county’s public schools.
LikeLike