Phil Cullen, an educator in Australia who writes a blog called Treehorn Express, wrote the following about “Kleinism” in Australia.
http://treehornexpress.wordpress.com
KLEINISM IN AUSTRALIA. WILL IT GO AWAY?
A REVIEW
The summer holidays are over ‘down under’, and Australia will commence the new school year under the most peculiar circumstances. We’d like to start a new year of school learning with high levels of confidence in our pupils’ abilities to do as well as they can and with our own usual high level of teacher zest for teaching young people how to go about it. In the long run, we’d like to see Australia at the top of the pole for schooling excellence and our country amongst the leaders of commercial enterprise because of our business expertise in fundamentals and our ability to solve problems, innovate productively and enjoy challenges. Sadly, these fundamental characteristics of a successful schooling system have to be held on hold for some years; replaced by a testing regime invented by a New York curriculum incompetent, teacher-hater, ex-lawyer; once in charge of a school district there.
We aren’t allowed to start the school year down under with high hopes and positive attitudes. We are obliged to maintain the ridiculous; to start as early as possible with heavy preparation and intense practice for our annual standardized blanket testing program called NAPLAN, held each May. Its clone is called NCLB in the US. As educators at the chalk-face, we have no option, no choice, no say. Our system is controlled by testucators, disciples of Kleinism….a fear based system of schooling that was imported in 2008 by Julia Gillard, later our Prime Minister; then federal minister for education. It was one of the biggest mistakes a government representative ever made.
Following the 2007 federal elections, she was charged by her senior colleague Kevin Rudd, new to the job as PM, to reform the Australian education system almost immediately, because his fellow neo-cons were telling him that teachers were making a mess of it and that most Australian children couldn’t spell or calculate. He used serious threatening language in his instructions to the teaching force and to her, to find something better than what we had. The Business Council of Australia and the ‘Four Pillars of Australian Banking’, both organisations of neo-liberal persuasion, roundly approved, despite both politicians being known within their temples of wisdom, as ‘lefties’. It was a peculiar liaison….and became a weird time in our history. Dutifully, she booked her flight to find a place somewhere in the world that had a reputation. Actually, Australia had a reputation itself for being amongst the world’s best at the time, but anti-school fanatics were the preferred mouthpieces of the local press – especially the Murdoch press. No. She didn’t select Finland, South Korea or nearby New Zealand whose schooling achievements were beyond the ordinary. Her first stop was New York. As macabre as the scenario appears, on her first day, she visited Rupert Murdoch, a requirement of all Australian leaders when they travel overseas….. to get their riding instructions. He arranged for her to attend a cocktail party being organized by the Rockefeller Foundation where she was introduced to Joel Klein, a fellow lawyer who, as strange as it seemed to Australians, was in executive charge of a large school district in New York. His system had a reputation. Indeed. It had a really big reputation – not for learning or teaching or anything to do with the realities of schooling, but for threatening learners and teachers and principals and schools to do as they were told and, if they didn’t measure up to his requirements, they were out of a job or the school was closed. He sweet-talked our Julia into the effectiveness of this sort of approach to school leadership and,…..within minutes…..Australia had a new system.
She didn’t request a study of the effects of high stakes testing on schooling, nor check the credentials of the New York operators. She was conned, big time. Rupert and Joel Klein rubbed their hands with glee, because they were in the publishing, programming business, worth billions.
Not long later, Klein openly boasted to the world that his test-based scheme was well established in Australia. He was correct. Although it is based on fear and deceit and child abuse, Australia still has it. The big boys, of the kind that were at the cocktail party, will not allow our government to have any other kind. Their colleagues in the BCA and banking fraternity keep vigilant. That’s clear. Julia felt that she had found the ultimate touchstone of school control, and was able to persuade the Australian banking community to pay the cost of a visit by her ‘pin-up boy’, as she called co-lawyer Klein, to speak to them in their own fortresses in Sydney, Melbourne and Canberra. Despite some ethical uncertainties which she later modified by capturing the ‘approval’ of the principals of all Australian schools with a very swift, cunning and deceitful maneuver. They had to carry the can for professional ethics, once they pronounced their approval of kleinist naplan. Indeed, they dutifully suspended their professional ethics and still do….adopting an attitude that disappoints proud principals of the present and past wondering how this happened to organisations that were once stalwart and proud of their protection of children’s rights. Federal and state education bodies, once citadels of wholesome schooling, succumbed to the use of fear and the abuse of mental health of children for whom they are supposed to be responsible…..and….as Aussies say: “She was in with Flynn”. No blood on her hands.
She established a special unit called the Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority a sort of third level of government power, a sort of bundestag that now completely controls schooling; and she made sure that it was staffed with expert measurers whose experience in schooling and teaching and learning was severely limited. This incongruous mis-match between knowledge of testing and knowledge of learning between people running the show, has had profound consequences. After all, whoever controls the schooling system, controls the country’s future. The outcomes of constructing testing devices that contain inbuilt pupil dislike and distaste for particular school subjects and for school itself …and doing so in a most rigid manner….has had effects that run counter to the faith that she and ‘pin-up’ Klein had in improvement of PISA and NAPLAN raw scores. They flopped, failed, flunked all neo-con expectations as schools are doing in countries that are overdoing the fear base; and, it must be noted, run counter to the expectations of parents for schoolies to do the right thing. Despites their attitude to childhood, they’d like their kids to do well. Australia, after eight years of kleinism is heading downhill fast.
The last few years in the US and in Australia have clearly demonstrated that no schooling system can progress while its most outstanding features at the chalk-face, each capable of gynormous damage, include
Fear of failing
Deceit
Abuse of mental health.
all deliberately imposed by forces beyond the classroom. Office-based testucators of known kleinish measurement calibre have no idea of what happens in the classroom. They just mass-produce tests, send them to schools, gather the data, pat themselves on the back, blame teachers when things don’t go so well.
But, hold! Now, a breath of fresh air. A hopeful start has been made in the US education circles, our major mentors, in December 2016, by reducing the ponderous effects of centralised control. Releasing states from their fearful obligations is a small step, but it is a step in the right direction. Maybe, one day, control of the learning act will seep down through the numerous know-it-all hierarchies to the real learning centres in all countries where the teaching/learning experts reside, now being wrecked by the corrupting influences of kleinism – fear, deceit and abuse.
Down under, we’re notoriously slow to examine the effects of imports from up over. The big boys there and here do not like it, when educators reveal the truth….that the problem lies within the testing itself. We can’t expect any improvement to learning in our schools in 2017. Both places have a devil-may-care attitude towards children and their schooling; and basic timidity prevents us from sticking up for kids.
___________________________________________________

With a childhood poverty rate of about 17%, Australia will probably not perform in the top tier of countries when standardized test scores are compared. As in America they will also have many top performing students nonetheless. The assumption that standardized testing will improve outcomes for students is erroneous. Rating and ranking does nothing helpful for children. The time and money spent on it would be better spent on helping the poorest students. In fact, time spent preparing for tests narrows the curriculum, and may undermine the self esteem of struggling students. The big winners in testing are the testing companies that fatten their wallets with every contract. I hope Australia emerges from “Kleinism” as soon as possible, and allows teachers to teach. That is what is in the best interest of all students.
LikeLike
If they thought that Kleinism is bad, just wait until they get a load of DeVosism. Now that’s a real load of napalm.
LikeLike
I agree – it seems to me the goal of standardized testing is solely profit, not improved outcomes for
students. (And, to some extent, to deliver a deceptive proxy for genuine concern to ambitious politicians.)
LikeLike
It’s also very useful as a weapon against teachers and public schools, especially those who teach children from poor families.
LikeLiked by 1 person
YES — and this sounds so very, very similar to long years of NCLB and now ESSA: “As educators …we have no option, no choice, no say. Our system is controlled by testucators…”
LikeLike
How about a list of everyone who has wrecked education in America over the past two decades?
I think that would be very educational because many of the folks who rammed nclb,national standards and standardized testing down the throats of the american public with ZERO evidence that it would “improve” schools are STill masqerading as education “experts”.
LikeLike
Make that 3 decades. NCLB came into being over 2 decades ago and I would not want anyone thinking they were off the hook because they acted before 1996. 🙂
LikeLike
Or 97
LikeLike
My bad
NCLB was 2001
So 2 decades works
LikeLike
Another nail in the coffin of reputation USA.
LikeLike
Joel Klein is poison to education. If anyone knows what Joel Klein did to the NYC public schools you would fall off your chair. Joel Klein really is a big time loser. He screwed up NYC public schools working then with the maniac mike bloomberg. Can anyone imagine working for two people any worse than mike midget bloomberg and joel bottle coke glasses Klein?? Let me tell you Joel Klein really is a big time loser because after he screwed us here in NYC Joel Klein then went to work for Rupert Murdoch and tried to create a start up education business whereby all students in the US would get their tablets with their software designed to make people like Joel Klein and Rupert Murdoch richer. However, the company called Amplify failed miserably and Joel Klein had to fold the company and Klein failed again. Ironically today Joel Klein is working in the insurance industry…you can look it up people I cannot make this up.
LikeLike
Klein now works for an insurance company called Oscar, owned by Jared Kushner’s brother Jonah. You can’t make this stuff up.
LikeLike
Sounds like a great little book. Where are they now? I know that Rod Paige and some associates set up a consulting shop called Chartwell Education Group. Right now he is in Mississippi trying to help Jackson State University bail out of financial problems. While there he has opined that DeVos is a “high quality person.”
http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2016/dec/02/rod-paige-jsu-must-improve-image-devos-high-qualit/
LikeLike
Ironically, when I took my education courses in the 1970s, it was the Australian education system which was looked up to as a model for us to emulate – A system which was the exact opposite of what they have now.
LikeLike
We had the “Aussie Program”, here in NYC, during the ’90s. It was an ELA program that was being used in Australia which was deemed to be “better” than ours.
The guy who they sent to our school was a really nice guy. We’d have lunch together and even hung out after hours, quaffing down a few. We had more than a few great discussions.
He was also very knowledgable and, thankfully, open minded. He wasn’t expecting to be dropped into a school who’s student population was labeled severely emotionally disturbed. As a result, we collaborated and came up with an effective program that incorporated facets of both the Aussie program and that which I’d developed (special ed was given a lot of latitude in those days). The result was a creative and effective system for a very difficult group of students.
What was interesting is that he was there during a time when we were set to vote on a new teacher contract, here in NYC. “Joe” was warning us in no uncertain terms about the problems we’d face if we voted the contract in, citing how it contained provisions in it similar to those that had been ratified in Australia about 4 years earlier. Provisions that took away significant autonomy on the part of the classroom teacher. He actually told me that he’d joined the Aussie program in order to get away from the classroom, despite the fact that this new job took him away from his family for so much time during the year. He used to love teaching but now it was becoming much more administrative and script oriented. Not “teaching” so much as “directing” the students according to the dictates of outside forces.
We ended up voting the contract in and, thinking back on that time, I can now see where it laid the groundwork for what we see today. I can clearly remember the shift, going to curriculum fairs and PDs where the presenters began to and continued to use the phrase, “…and the BEST thing is that YOU, the teacher, don’t have to do ANYTHING! It’s all written out for you. Pacing. Calls and responses. Everything you need!”. When we’d ask, “What if we WANT to do something?”, the reply would either be a confused look or a smiling, “There’s a differentiation section in each lesson and unit plan”.
Not surprising that Joel would end up Down Under. Germs have a way of spreading. What a shame.
LikeLike
Sadly I write to verify that every word that Phil Cullen wrote, as utterly absurd as it sounds is true. the logic of the process fails every possible measure of common sense, evidence or whatever other political nonsense Australia’s politicians roll out. As an Australian who was once proud of our education system, and has work with educators in more than 50 countries, I am embarrassed by their stupidity. …and of all those who have followed and done nothing to rectify the situation.
Two lawyers and a monopolistic publisher single-handedly took one of the world’s best education system back 20 years…and to this day it has never been acknowledged, let alone remedied. You could not make this stuff up.
I reflected on the state of Australia’s system in a recent post in Educating Modern Learners, a weekly newsletter I publish with Will Richardson focused on countering such insidious influences…
My first contact with PISA was however, rather amusing, if not nearly very embarrassing.
“In the early 2000’s after speaking at a conference in Frankfurt shortly after the very first PISA report had been released, I was seated next to several EU Education Ministers for dinner, when one turned to me and asked, “And what do you think of PISA?”The first answer that came to mind was “Well it hasn’t fallen down so that’s a good thing,” but as luck would have it, I paused before blurting that out, and fortunately responded instead to the question that followed asking if I was proud of how well Australia ranked.”
Yes, there was a time Pre-Klein/Gillard when Australia had an education system to be proud of. (not that I actually care for PISA much anyway). One that granted its teachers genuine professional autonomy, much in the same way as countries like Finland, and to some extent New Zealand do. One that built a reputation for learning from the best of the best research, from wherever it was in the world. In Reading we were world leaders, having learned much from people like Donald Graves and Frank Smith; around technology the same, having had the good fortune to have had close encounters with Seymour Papert and others.
All gone with the trite political whim of ignorant politicians lobbied by vested interests. Sound familiar?
As I said, you just can’t make these sorts of stories up.
LikeLike
We got more than an overdose of Klein and Bloomberg, here in New York City. Then it went national with Arne Duncan. Next up could be DeVos.
These are ultra wealthy amateurs who have appointed themselves as experts. Education for the common good is secondary to their agenda, at best.
Want a great education? Go to private school. Otherwise it’s going to be a crap shoot.
LikeLike
PRESS RELEASE: (my emphases)
News from the NEPC: Public Education, Democracy, and the Role of the Federal Government: A Declaration of Principles
Education deans nationwide release Declaration of Principles calling on Congress and the Trump Administration to advance democratic values in America’s public schools.
Public Education, Democracy, and the Role of the Federal Government: A Declaration of Principles
Key Takeaway: Education deans nationwide release Declaration of Principles calling on Congress and the Trump Administration to advance democratic values in America’s public schools.
Find Documents:
Press Release: http://nepc.info/node/8436
Declaration of Principles: http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/deans-declaration-of-principles
Contact:
Dean Kevin Kumashiro: (415) 422-2108, kkumashiro@usfca.edu
Dean Kathy Schultz: (303) 492-6937, katherine.schultz@colorado.edu
William J. Mathis: (802) 383-0058, wmathis@sover.net
More NEPC Resources on Democracy and Education
More NEPC Resources on Equity and Social Justice
More NEPC Resources on Teacher Education, Quality, and Professional Development
More NEPC Resources on Diversity: Race, Ethnicity, Class, Culture, and/or Gender
BOULDER, CO (January 13, 2017) – As the nation watches this month’s transition to a new administration and a new Congress, a growing alliance of deans of colleges and schools of education across the country is urging a fundamental reconsideration of the problems and possibilities that surround America’s public schools.
In a Declaration of Principles released today, 175 deans sounded the alarm: “Our children suffer when we deny that educational inequities exist and when we refuse to invest sufficient time, resources, and effort toward holistic and systemic solutions. The U.S. educational system is plagued with oversimplified policies and reform initiatives that were developed and imposed without support of a compelling body of rigorous research, or even with a track record of failure.” The deans called upon federal leaders to forge a new path forward by:**
Upholding the role of public schools as a central institution in the strengthening of our democracy;
Protecting the human and civil rights of all children and youth, especially those from historically marginalized communities;
Developing and implementing policies, laws, and reform initiatives by building on a democratic vision for public education and on sound educational research; and
Supporting and partnering with colleges and schools of education to advance these goals.
Signing the statement are current and former deans of colleges and schools of education from across the United States, as well as chairs of education departments in institutions with no separate school of education.
The statement was authored by Education Deans for Justice and Equity (EDJE) and prepared in partnership with the National Education Policy Center. EDJE was formed in 2016 as an alliance of deans to address inequities and injustices in education while promoting its democratic premises through policy, research, and practice.
The entire Declaration of Principles by Education Deans for Justice and Equity on Public Education, Democracy, and the Role of the Federal Government, as well as an online form for additional education deans to sign on, can be found on the NEPC website at http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/deans-declaration-of-principles.
The National Education Policy Center (NEPC), housed at the University of Colorado Boulder School of Education, produces and disseminates high-quality, peer-reviewed research to inform education policy discussions. Visit us at: http://nepc.colorado.edu
LikeLike
Catherine, you beat me to the punch!
LikeLike
Diane –so sorry. I was so delighted to read it, I couldn’t wait to share it. I felt a great weight go off my shoulders when I read that piece. If you have that link already, I’ll refrain from posting from it. Thanks.
LikeLike
Catherine,
No criticism. I had the embargoed copy but sometimes I get overwhelmed. So much is happening.
Thanks for the reminder!
LikeLike
It’s definitely a strong comment by distinguished minds. It gladdens my heart as well.
The reformers have targeted our colleges (not just the teachers programs) as being “sub par” and in need of repair in addition to the public schools. I’d imagine their response to this document will be along those lines.
Discredit voices of dissent. Sound familiar…?
LikeLike
gitapik: Right out of the playbook–discredit your enemies; and them appropriate and blame using terms that are falsely applied but which were once rightly ascribed to themselves. Another of those terms is Hitler–a term they have appropriated for themselves to apply to others–again,their use of the term is false, whereas as originally applied to Trump it is an extremely close analogy in the particular, and spot-on in the general.
LikeLike