Kate Zernike of the New York Times recently visited Detroit to learn about how school choice was working there. It wasn’t. Parents had many choices, but most were bad choices.
Now Zernike shows how Betsy DeVos personally influenced the current chaotic situation of Detroit. Here is her vision: Let the market rule, with minimal or no regulation:
Few disagreed that schools in Detroit were a mess: a chaotic mix of charters and traditional public schools, the worst-performing in the nation.
So city leaders across the political spectrum agreed on a fix, with legislation to provide oversight and set standards on how to open schools and close bad ones.
But the bill died without even getting a final vote. And the person most influential in killing it is now President-elect Donald J. Trump’s nominee to oversee the nation’s public schools, Betsy DeVos.
Her resistance to the legislation last spring is a window into Ms. DeVos’s philosophy and what she might bring to the fierce and often partisan debate about public education across the country, and in particular, the roles of choice and charter schools.
The bill’s proposals are common in many states and accepted by many supporters of school choice, like a provision to stop failing charter operators from creating new schools. But Ms. DeVos argued that this kind of oversight would create too much bureaucracy and limit choice. A believer in a freer market than even some free market economists would endorse, Ms. DeVos pushed back on any regulation as too much regulation. Charter schools should be allowed to operate as they wish; parents would judge with their feet.
Detroit Public Schools, she argued, should simply be shut down and the system turned over to charters, or the tax dollars given to parents in the form of vouchers to attend private schools.
“She is committed to an ideological stance that is solely about the free market, at the expense of practicality and the basic needs of students in the most destabilized environment in the country,” said Tonya Allen, the president of the Skillman Foundation, a nonprofit that works with Detroit children, and a co-chairwoman of the coalition that produced the report that became the basis for the legislation last spring.
“If she was showing herself present in places and learning from the practitioners, that’s a fine combination,” Ms. Allen said. “But Betsy never showed up in Detroit. She was very eager to impose experimentation on students that she has not spent time with and children that she does not have consequence for.”
The DeVos plan is simple: Get rid of public schools. Give every child a voucher and let parents choose to use them wherever they wish. If vouchers are not possible, open as many charter schools as possible, whether for-profit or not, and allow parents to choose at will, with no regulation or oversight.
She is the Darth Vader of school reform. She is Public Enemy #1 of public education.

SUchiha a condemnation! And if you know anything about the Skillman Foundation, then you know that it is pro-charter. The difference is that the Skillman Foundation wants to protect the charter brand and it knows that Devos doesn’t care about quality. Just cares about the market.
LikeLike
Haha. I love how the NYTimes is only even remotely critical of Ed reform stuff when it isn’t their particular kind of Democrat/fake lefty/neoliberal kind of Ed reform, even though the results of the DeVos brand destroys the same things just as thoroughly.
The NYTimes is reform-y top to bottom and up and down. Lets not let that stink get covered up.
Lots of hypocracy on this DeVos thing going around.
She sucks. But so do all the Democrat Reform folks just as much.
LikeLike
DeVos’s brand of reform is not the same ilk as the Democratic Reform. Let’s agree not to bash all charters but to be able to see the link between privatization and providing tax loopholes for the wealthy.
LikeLike
Really? DeVos and the Obama education vision/legacy result in the same destruction of organized teachers and public schools. It’s a matter of different rhetoric (DeVos’ being harsher to the pseudo-lefty ear) and different background (DeVos is a disgusting religio-zealot homophobe etc), but the results are the same. Not acknowledging that is dangerous. Our side will fast forget who our real enemies are (all those who seek to bust unions and privatize), and we will fast find ourselves sitting at tables with them again, tying the noose to put around our necks.
Trump’s assention is an affront to civil society on every level and will unleash many a hellscape in our country and the world. That’s a given. But lets not slowly work ourselves into an ahistorical position whereas we think that his brand of school privatizing is a big new thing. It’s not. It’s the same shit. Honestly, it’s without the rhetoric of social justice the dem-focused reformers were all about, which was huge shovels of bullshit of course. Trump and DeVos….well, it is what it is. But lets not get all up-in-arms now when the most insane notions of privatization and union busting have been furthered for the past decade + by neoliberal dems.
And the whole “there are some good charters” thing. I dunno. Whatever to that. Much more interested in public schools as such. I’m certainly willing to toss out the concept of “good” charters if that means finishing off the privatizing impulse focused on education right now. That baby, as far as I’m concerned, can get tossed with the bath water.
LikeLike
Wendy,
You call yourself an “educator” and “educational consultant”. Is there a difference? Can you please define those terms. TIA, Duane
LikeLike
Charters are a disaster! 338 of them along in Florida have failed in the past few years.
LikeLike
If she’s Darth Vader, then Donald Trump is the Emperor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwBWRiWNGGU
LikeLike
Diane -Will you be putting a post up on the latest from Wendy Koop? …lots of misinformation from her and of course, a put down of American schools.
LikeLike
There were two additional items that jumped out at me when I read this article: the way the DeVos’ bullied house members who opposed their legislation by underwriting campaigns of hardliners to oppose them in future elections and the Times’ repeating of DeVos’ bogus argument that residents should have choice in schools because, after all, they have choice in where they shop for food and travel. Tell a parent living in poverty about the choices THEY have when the “shop for food and travel”….
LikeLike
Wgersen,
Good catch in the DeVos article. The way that poor people get better choices in where they shop for food or travel is to have enough money to pay for better food. A higher minimum wage, say, $15 an hour, would be a good start. But DeVos, the Koch brothers and their ilk never want to deal with poverty, just vouchers and charters. Perhaps the poor would like to go to the same school that Betsy sends her children to. No way. As for travel, that’s not usually a top concern of people living on low wages.
LikeLike