Arthur Camins writes in Huffington Post what should be a rallying cry for parents, educators, and citizens:
“Keep the government’s hands off our public schools!”
With his selection of Betsy DeVos to be Secretary of Education, Donald Trump has made it clear. He wants to take away your public school. Tell him, “Keep the government’s hands off our public schools!…”
Many need improvement, but it is democratically governed public schools that have made America great- not private schools and not charter schools. We all know that we can love what is imperfect. We need to strengthen the marriage between public schools and equity, not a divorce….
Democratically controlled schools for all are the norm. Trump and his supporters seek a taxpayer-funded private option to undermine and even replace the existing public school system. Make no mistake. Profit and exclusivity will trump quality and inclusiveness. Privatization means working class children get less and the wealthy keep getting more…
In short, in the name of liberty and freedom, the modern conservative movement represents an exaltation of selfishness. …A striking example is the growing campaign to shift federal and state funding from public schools to charter schools and private schools through vouchers. Sadly, the former has been supported by many Democrats, while the latter has been the long-held dream of “competition solves everything” Republicans and those seeking to tear down our historic church-state barriers.
For over a century, taxpayer-funded public schools that were governed by locally elected school boards lived side-by-side with privately funded and governed non-sectarian and religiously-affiliated schools. The vast majority of parents chose the former for their children. The prevailing, but often contested, assumption was that parents had a right to send their children to private schools, but at their expense.
We are at a crossroads. Integration, diversity, and democracy are under attack as unifying national priorities here in the US and around the world. The ethos of “be out for yourself” is gaining ascendancy over “I am my brothers’ and sisters’ keeper” as inequity and terrorism erode hope and security. In that context, entrepreneurs seek to undermine confidence and exacerbate parent anxiety about the quality and safety of public schools, and exploit a potentially vast education market. Persistent underfunding aids this cynical agenda….
We have a lot to do to improve education in the US. Inequity is persistent and too many schools fall far short on citizenship development. However, public opinion surveys consistently show that parents express greater satisfaction with and confidence in their children’s schools and teachers than with the schools they do not experience first hand.
Our great challenge ahead for education as with other critical features of community wellbeing is to find the language and solutions to mobilize people across their perceived disparate needs to find common cause.

As a teacher that has taught at a charter school without adequate funding for 15 years, (we have no library or gym or cafeteria per se and this is not through mis-management but rules which have not over the years included us in building bonds), we seek to stream line the bureaucracy of a large school district. With 360 students of great diversity between grades 7 and 12, many whom speak Spanish as a first language, and many special services students due to the shear number that put their names into our lottery system, we simply strive for 20 students per class on average, so that every student might be known. And we require them to do mentorships in high school in an area of interest. I don’t know why, when we are publicly funded and have a lottery open to all students (some have traveled an hour to attend our school), one would point a point a finger at us as being part of a problem. I just don’t get it.
LikeLike
Why not join the public school system? Why divide the funding? Stronger together.
LikeLike
I don’t critique individual parents for choosing a charter school or teachers for teaching in them. That is a person choice. However, what makes sense in a particular situation does not make for sound education policy for all. I am pointing a finger at policy makers for ignoring the needs of all children in order to theoretically provide opportunities for the few. There is no evidence that “choice” has potential as a systemic solution.
LikeLike
CROSS PSOTED AT http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Don-t-Let-The-Government-T-in-General_News-Donald-Trump-Lies_Government-Bullying_Money-Trumps-Love_Public-Airwaves–Private-Profit-161212-315.html
LikeLike
see Bill Phillis at OHio E&A today; this is one especially good line… “If charter operators spent less money on campaign contributions, marketing, outrageous building rental agreements and inordinately high salaries, they could probably afford membership in an advocacy organization.” but read the whole thing.
LikeLike
All public school teachers n principals have to build deep and quality partnerships with parents who do and do not have a college education. The parents of public school children are the greatest asset public education and our country have for a living democracy. Poor communities need advocates for good schools, health services, job training and job development. Each state, county, city and local school system has to make a holistic examination of its community and develop a countywide and state support system for individual schools. Schools are very diverse as are the communities they serve. One approach will not serve the needs of all schools. Concerted and collaborative approaches by school n local government leaders will be a key factor in the preservation n success of our inclusive public school system.
LikeLike
A beautiful sentiment, and I agree. I would love to see more NGO’s partnering with schools/parents.
LikeLike